In the annals of US serial killer history, there have been numerous more prolific, depraved or callous perpetrators than John Wayne Gacy.
Ted Bundy, Gary Ridgway, Albert Fish and Richard Ramirez are names that spring to mind.
But I somehow found Gacy's story to be the most sickening. This monster had absolutely no redeeming qualities whatsoever and didn't appear to be the product of his upbringing or environment. He was a hateful and sadistic sexual deviant by design.
His heartlessness and utter contempt for human life was seriously difficult to comprehend. He was completely hellbent on indulging in his perverted tendencies and disposed of human bodies like they were bags of waste.
Listening to the arrogant, conceited and self-indulgent pig's recordings really got on my nerves. Not even the slightest hint of regret or remorse in him. Quite the opposite in fact, he was actually proud of his hideous life's work and revelled in his infamy, celebrity status, the attention he attracted from Police and the pain and suffering he caused his victims and their families.
When he said that because he had paid for the sexual services of many of his victims he was entitled to do whatever he liked to them, like something you buy from a shop, it became crystal clear that these deaths were not merely the outcome of sexual misadventure.
His insanity plea was a blatant ploy to save his own neck. I believe that most people have some form of mental illness, emotional weakness or inner demons to face, but only the most extreme cases can be used in defence of multiple murders. The question is whether those disorders, however severe, prevent a person from exercising self-control.
Gacy's debauched series of crimes were clearly the actions of an extremely cold-hearted and calculating individual, with a carefully premeditated strategy. I don't feel that he was ever impulsive or out of control - he made a succession of conscious decisions, based on sinister fantasies that he went on to realise time and time again. He was a control freak who got off on owning and degrading his victims.
He might be the most repulsive human being I've ever come across. A lethal injection was a wholly inadequate and relatively painless end, in stark contrast to his casualties. The rotter deserved to suffer total misery and solitude for the rest of his sorry existence. He got off pretty damn lightly in my opinion.
This documentary was not easy to digest and made me feel somewhat uneasy. God knows what the poor souls who had to unearth all the corpses from Gacy's crawlspace went through.
I also felt that compared with the superbly-made Netflix series 'Conversations with a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes' it was a little repetitive, lacked explanation and coherence in places, contained some very strange and irrelevant imagery between segments and didn't fully examine important aspects of Gacy's crimes.
That was partly down to the insignificance with which law enforcement treated many of the disappearances, due to the status and vagrant nature of the victims. There were plenty of opportunities to put Gacy behind bars for a long, long time way before his eventual arrest.
There was such a strong homophobia embedded into US society at this point in time that sex crimes committed against males were not taken seriously. The stigma of homosexuality was so negative that many of Gacy's victims were outcasts who had been disowned by their families and living on the fringes of society, which he preyed upon and took advantage of.
It was as if the lives of these young men didn't really matter to anybody.
I think that was what I disliked most about this documentary - the fact that it was a continuation of Gacy's twisted, nightmarish legacy and perpetuating his wicked life for future generations to experience, but with a tragic lack of information on the majority of his victims.
He really should be erased from existence rather than documented or sensationalised. Since notoriety was something that he craved it would be the most appropriate course of action.
Ted Bundy, Gary Ridgway, Albert Fish and Richard Ramirez are names that spring to mind.
But I somehow found Gacy's story to be the most sickening. This monster had absolutely no redeeming qualities whatsoever and didn't appear to be the product of his upbringing or environment. He was a hateful and sadistic sexual deviant by design.
His heartlessness and utter contempt for human life was seriously difficult to comprehend. He was completely hellbent on indulging in his perverted tendencies and disposed of human bodies like they were bags of waste.
Listening to the arrogant, conceited and self-indulgent pig's recordings really got on my nerves. Not even the slightest hint of regret or remorse in him. Quite the opposite in fact, he was actually proud of his hideous life's work and revelled in his infamy, celebrity status, the attention he attracted from Police and the pain and suffering he caused his victims and their families.
When he said that because he had paid for the sexual services of many of his victims he was entitled to do whatever he liked to them, like something you buy from a shop, it became crystal clear that these deaths were not merely the outcome of sexual misadventure.
His insanity plea was a blatant ploy to save his own neck. I believe that most people have some form of mental illness, emotional weakness or inner demons to face, but only the most extreme cases can be used in defence of multiple murders. The question is whether those disorders, however severe, prevent a person from exercising self-control.
Gacy's debauched series of crimes were clearly the actions of an extremely cold-hearted and calculating individual, with a carefully premeditated strategy. I don't feel that he was ever impulsive or out of control - he made a succession of conscious decisions, based on sinister fantasies that he went on to realise time and time again. He was a control freak who got off on owning and degrading his victims.
He might be the most repulsive human being I've ever come across. A lethal injection was a wholly inadequate and relatively painless end, in stark contrast to his casualties. The rotter deserved to suffer total misery and solitude for the rest of his sorry existence. He got off pretty damn lightly in my opinion.
This documentary was not easy to digest and made me feel somewhat uneasy. God knows what the poor souls who had to unearth all the corpses from Gacy's crawlspace went through.
I also felt that compared with the superbly-made Netflix series 'Conversations with a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes' it was a little repetitive, lacked explanation and coherence in places, contained some very strange and irrelevant imagery between segments and didn't fully examine important aspects of Gacy's crimes.
That was partly down to the insignificance with which law enforcement treated many of the disappearances, due to the status and vagrant nature of the victims. There were plenty of opportunities to put Gacy behind bars for a long, long time way before his eventual arrest.
There was such a strong homophobia embedded into US society at this point in time that sex crimes committed against males were not taken seriously. The stigma of homosexuality was so negative that many of Gacy's victims were outcasts who had been disowned by their families and living on the fringes of society, which he preyed upon and took advantage of.
It was as if the lives of these young men didn't really matter to anybody.
I think that was what I disliked most about this documentary - the fact that it was a continuation of Gacy's twisted, nightmarish legacy and perpetuating his wicked life for future generations to experience, but with a tragic lack of information on the majority of his victims.
He really should be erased from existence rather than documented or sensationalised. Since notoriety was something that he craved it would be the most appropriate course of action.