Iron Brothers (2018)
4/10
Why on earth did you need to do that?
12 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I'm writing this to the writer, director and funders. we are 2 comments in so I'm sure you will see this. Film making is quite simple. Protagonist, antagonist, storyline, crisis, resolution. Right from the start, well, 25 unnecceasy minutes in, brother A is hot headed and murders a man. Brother B kills an unarmed Indian. On what planet did you think you audience was going to care for the Iron Brothers? There is zero potential for empathy or identifying with these 2 reprehensible characters. Unless this film is about the law, the Indians, and the victims families getting retribution, what did you think the audience was going to do? It's not even 30 minutes in and I simply don't care about them. Zero empathy for them. Yawn.

I think a few people have seen this film, but 2 comments suggests that very few of them cared to make it to the end.

Which is a shame because if you created a different plot device I could have stayed to the end and Maybe this was a good film. Maybe it is. But I have no interest in finding out
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed