I can see how this story is interesting, but I just don't think it was interestingly told. I found it wanted to say much and used up a lot of space and time but in the end it gave me no solid clues why I should think they were guilty or not. I thought it just did a lot of talk over nothing instead of focusing on the story and the details. I also found it a bit one-sided as we were able to almost only see or hear Erla's story.
What I also wanted out of this is to kind of delve into what might have happened to the missing persons, the theories surrounding that and a bit more talk about the 'victims' so that we can maybe make our own theories about what might have happened to them.
I don't know. To me it's really bland - stylistically, the way the story was unraveled, the main character of this story (or who the focus was on)...
Just not my cup of tea. :)
What I also wanted out of this is to kind of delve into what might have happened to the missing persons, the theories surrounding that and a bit more talk about the 'victims' so that we can maybe make our own theories about what might have happened to them.
I don't know. To me it's really bland - stylistically, the way the story was unraveled, the main character of this story (or who the focus was on)...
Just not my cup of tea. :)