I wanted to stop watching around 12mins in. I made the mistake of giving it a chance.
It's essentially a student film that was edited by drunkards and written by a moron. Robin hood movies need stealth, archery and cunning, not farcical nonsense.
FYI nobody would leave a perfectly good sword standing in a river in the 12th century, it would be like leaving a pile of gold behind. Another point to mention is that arrows hurt when they enter your internal organs, particularly the lung. Wounds require treatment and in the 12th century sepsis sets in pretty quickly.
As another reviewer mentioned none of the main characters seem to be of the opinion that checking to see if you've killed the bad guy is important. Apparently removing an arrow and clothing from a body is achievable without realising that he's still breathing.
Worst adaptation ever. Men in tights is more believable.
It's essentially a student film that was edited by drunkards and written by a moron. Robin hood movies need stealth, archery and cunning, not farcical nonsense.
FYI nobody would leave a perfectly good sword standing in a river in the 12th century, it would be like leaving a pile of gold behind. Another point to mention is that arrows hurt when they enter your internal organs, particularly the lung. Wounds require treatment and in the 12th century sepsis sets in pretty quickly.
As another reviewer mentioned none of the main characters seem to be of the opinion that checking to see if you've killed the bad guy is important. Apparently removing an arrow and clothing from a body is achievable without realising that he's still breathing.
Worst adaptation ever. Men in tights is more believable.