Though made for a drive-in audience the movie's not typical of that often tacky fare. A few notes on historical context may help understanding aspects of the film.
Before the big Baby-Boomer Generation, there was the so-called Silent Generation. For obvious reasons, few now have heard of it. For kids coming of age, the period was from about 1950-65, and was called silent because the main ambition of the youngsters was to get married and get a job which were plentiful in that post-WWII era. The popular refrain of the time was "Are we too young to get married". In short, there was little gap between youth and adulthood. One motivating reason was that sex outside of marriage was strictly forbidden. Thus hormonally driven youth were sometimes thrust into early, unhappy marriages. This movie from that era (1959) dramatizes some of the prevailing aspects.
All in all, the movie's best at showing the strains on Steve's and 17-year old Judy's troubled early marriage, especially when she's required to do household drudgery—good touch. In short, being a housewife has a non-romantic downside. Her parents are disapproving of the youthful arrangement as would be expected. But their conniving is fairly subtle. Unfortunately, the movie was produced mainly for teen audiences, so the contrived role of hoodlum Chuck hassling the newly-weds takes up more time than it should, and represents a strictly commercial side. Nonetheless, moments of unexpected quality do pop up, especially in Sands' (Judy) performance dour though it often is. Also, the final shot is more ambiguous than I expected from this type movie. And catch that bang-up look at the intricacies of a movie studio serving as an action climax. For folks interested in modern mores, the film presents some insights, along with a fairly entertaining narrative..
(In passing—Note the semi-Beatnik coffee shop the kids gather at. I say "semi" since something more genuine would have featured jazz, bongo drums, and poetry readings. Whatever the case, the Beatnik fad was short- lived, professing to be a non-conformist movement among the conformist Eisenhower era.)
Before the big Baby-Boomer Generation, there was the so-called Silent Generation. For obvious reasons, few now have heard of it. For kids coming of age, the period was from about 1950-65, and was called silent because the main ambition of the youngsters was to get married and get a job which were plentiful in that post-WWII era. The popular refrain of the time was "Are we too young to get married". In short, there was little gap between youth and adulthood. One motivating reason was that sex outside of marriage was strictly forbidden. Thus hormonally driven youth were sometimes thrust into early, unhappy marriages. This movie from that era (1959) dramatizes some of the prevailing aspects.
All in all, the movie's best at showing the strains on Steve's and 17-year old Judy's troubled early marriage, especially when she's required to do household drudgery—good touch. In short, being a housewife has a non-romantic downside. Her parents are disapproving of the youthful arrangement as would be expected. But their conniving is fairly subtle. Unfortunately, the movie was produced mainly for teen audiences, so the contrived role of hoodlum Chuck hassling the newly-weds takes up more time than it should, and represents a strictly commercial side. Nonetheless, moments of unexpected quality do pop up, especially in Sands' (Judy) performance dour though it often is. Also, the final shot is more ambiguous than I expected from this type movie. And catch that bang-up look at the intricacies of a movie studio serving as an action climax. For folks interested in modern mores, the film presents some insights, along with a fairly entertaining narrative..
(In passing—Note the semi-Beatnik coffee shop the kids gather at. I say "semi" since something more genuine would have featured jazz, bongo drums, and poetry readings. Whatever the case, the Beatnik fad was short- lived, professing to be a non-conformist movement among the conformist Eisenhower era.)