1/10
"Sources" Aren't Reliable
2 July 2017
I was impressed for about 5 minutes with the people Greer interviewed for this movie. Top level people with access to "Top Secret" information. But then I started looking them up. None of them were reporting first-hand information. Not a single one. They, like all people who report UFO sightings have inconsistent stories and most of it is hearsay.

Paul Hellyer, ex-minister of defense of Canada, was convinced of UFO's by an ABC documentary.

Col. Philip Corso, Army intelligence, has a long history of making up stories about his career. Not just about aliens, but about everything.

Glenn Dennis was labeled as a "Roswell Mortician." He worked in the town nearby, not the AFB. A nurse from the base told him a rumor some people were talking about regarding aliens.

Brig. Gen. Lovekin, possibly not a real Brig. Gen. told stories he heard from other unnamed people who are apparently "in the know."

Gordon Cooper, Air Force test pilot, some photographers under his command saw something weird, he said he sent the photos to Project Blue Book but nothing ever came of it.

Dr. Robert Jacobs saw a strange image through a camera in 1964 of something 800 miles away. He has aggressively refused to listen to any alternate explanations.

Capt. Robert Sals, AF missile launch officer, some test missiles failed to fire due to an electrical failure but he continues to call it aliens.

The film claims that Carl Sagan was intimidated into not believing in aliens. But Sagan spent his whole career trying to get the government to declassify UFO documentation. He wanted people to see nothing was ever found for themselves.

The move says UFO sightings happen near nuclear facilities but has not info to back this up.

It says the Roswell AFB had the only nuclear arms squadron at the time of the crash. This clearly isn't true. Once example is the 393d Squadron at Whiteman AFB... which dropped the bombs on Japan.

And the film ends on some nonsense about free energy. Which is clearly impossible.

Bad film, bad sources, misleading info. It tries to use people's old credentials to sell false stories.
223 out of 372 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed