6/10
better then part 2 but still dull
25 April 2016
So many fans didn't like part 3 but just look what really is going on. It was shot as a very long flick and has been divided in part 2 and 3, so it explains why we go back to Tokyo at the end and why part 3 starts were 2 ended.

For me part 2 was a bit boring and stupid but part 3 is a whole lot different. There's no nudity to see what is rather strange for a Troma flick (if you don't count bodypainting to it), one moment, Claire goes nude but not that there's anything to see like in part 2.

The gore is left out but there are 2 moments worth picking up and let be that the thing that makes it worth seeing. The melting of Toxie and the destroying of the devil. It's pure gore but not like in part & and 2 were we had another kind of gore.

The story is of course dull and a lot of blah blah is going on. Not your typical horror as it isn't really a horror. But for me better then part 2.

Gore 1,5/5 Nudity 0/5 Effects 2/5 Story 2/5 Comedy 1/5
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed