Fancy Pants (1950)
7/10
Good news / bad news
9 December 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The good news is that this is the type of role that Bob Hope usually excelled in playing. It's not exactly his "coward" role, with which he could run away with a picture. But it's close -- in this case a British actor portraying a British servant, playing a British earl...this time a somewhat cowardly braggart. There's nothing wrong with Hope's performance here.

And then there's Lucy, playing an American Western woman looking for a husband. As with Hope, it's a good performance.

And, Bob and Lucy always were good together...and were here.

So what's the problem? Well, many stories need a set up to get going. But the set up for this story lasts about 40 minutes, and that set up is only moderately entertaining. Once the Westerners mistake Hope's character for an earl, things pick up and the film gets relatively entertaining.

It's also a rather lush production with high production values.

The supporting cast here does okay...with the emphasis on "okay". Bruce Cabot wants to be Lucy's love interest, but of course Hope is in the way; Cabot was, in my view, a marginal supporting actor, although he often looked right for his parts. Jack Kirkwood plays Lucy's father; again, he does "okay". Lea Penman does fairly well as Lucy's overbearing mother. Clearly the studio wanted to save money here -- the supporting actors are largely unknown to the American audience.

What I find interesting here is the wide division between reviews here. People either love this film or hate it. I'm more in the middle.

BTW, this is somewhat of a musical. The songs sorta work, but it's pretty clear that Lucy is lip-syncing (to Annette Warren singing).

Chase scenes can be funny...but 3 chase scenes in a row is a bit much.

I'll give this film a weak "7"
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed