Uh?....eh?...what?....
This is my fault. I can't stop a movie after a few minutes. So most of this very bad feeling is 'cause of me.
And this startling clunker. I've seen bad movies. Movies that make you angry. And this rates up there with them.
But you don't do this bad unless you are doing it on purpose for some really strange reason. Mental illness?
All that money down the drain. I know actors have to eat like everyone else. But you didn't have to do this.
How 'bout a revenge movie where you talk your nemesis into financing your really bad movie and it's this one?
I'm forgiving enough to actually admit that Tom Arnold has done some decent acting in the past. But he was bad and probably the best thing in this at the same time.
The two bright spots were some decent cinematography and a good final fight scene. That's where I awarded the 2 points.
But the pain, oh the pain!
An amazingly stupid story where this guy is framed for several murders to cover-up the dealings of the bad guys. He's then tossed in the river alive. (Just shoot him? Oh no!) Then his friend arrives a year later to investigate the situation. Bad scene, bad scene, bad scene. The friend's body was previously discovered. Bad scene, bad scene. Good fight scene.
THEN the friend and the framed friend turn out to be the same guy!
He apparently survived being dumped in the river and then spent the next year preparing himself to come back and avenge...solve....I don't know. But he left Mena Suvari floatin' the wind for a year?
And I have a few more questions.
If the "hero's" body was found, who's body was it? Why did he dig up his own grave if he knew it was empty?
What exactly were the bad guys doing? Drugs? Did they bother to try and explain? 'cause I'm not going' back in there to find out.
Why were all the bad guys doing their bad guy activities in broad daylight with plenty of witnesses around? Was workin' nights overtime?
In what reality was it a good idea to let the "hero/lead" actor anywhere near the set (he's also the writer and in another movie he wrote)? Oh dear Matilda he is bad! Being a bad writer wasn't enough. Absolutely he had pictures of the director with a goat to get that part. In a bad movie with bad acting he outstripped all of the other cast. I'm not a good lookin' man but could easily sell the part better than he did. He looked like a bad, over-the-hill comic.
There are a lot of things in life that I don't understand. George W was elected twice? Obama and Romney (at this moment) are runnin' neck and neck? And someone read this script and said "okay, let's do it" and wrote a check, too?
Now I have to get an industrial strength shredder that will tear through a DVD. (I'm not going to be the one responsible for anybody else ripping 101 minutes out of their life.)
This is my fault. I can't stop a movie after a few minutes. So most of this very bad feeling is 'cause of me.
And this startling clunker. I've seen bad movies. Movies that make you angry. And this rates up there with them.
But you don't do this bad unless you are doing it on purpose for some really strange reason. Mental illness?
All that money down the drain. I know actors have to eat like everyone else. But you didn't have to do this.
How 'bout a revenge movie where you talk your nemesis into financing your really bad movie and it's this one?
I'm forgiving enough to actually admit that Tom Arnold has done some decent acting in the past. But he was bad and probably the best thing in this at the same time.
The two bright spots were some decent cinematography and a good final fight scene. That's where I awarded the 2 points.
But the pain, oh the pain!
An amazingly stupid story where this guy is framed for several murders to cover-up the dealings of the bad guys. He's then tossed in the river alive. (Just shoot him? Oh no!) Then his friend arrives a year later to investigate the situation. Bad scene, bad scene, bad scene. The friend's body was previously discovered. Bad scene, bad scene. Good fight scene.
THEN the friend and the framed friend turn out to be the same guy!
He apparently survived being dumped in the river and then spent the next year preparing himself to come back and avenge...solve....I don't know. But he left Mena Suvari floatin' the wind for a year?
And I have a few more questions.
If the "hero's" body was found, who's body was it? Why did he dig up his own grave if he knew it was empty?
What exactly were the bad guys doing? Drugs? Did they bother to try and explain? 'cause I'm not going' back in there to find out.
Why were all the bad guys doing their bad guy activities in broad daylight with plenty of witnesses around? Was workin' nights overtime?
In what reality was it a good idea to let the "hero/lead" actor anywhere near the set (he's also the writer and in another movie he wrote)? Oh dear Matilda he is bad! Being a bad writer wasn't enough. Absolutely he had pictures of the director with a goat to get that part. In a bad movie with bad acting he outstripped all of the other cast. I'm not a good lookin' man but could easily sell the part better than he did. He looked like a bad, over-the-hill comic.
There are a lot of things in life that I don't understand. George W was elected twice? Obama and Romney (at this moment) are runnin' neck and neck? And someone read this script and said "okay, let's do it" and wrote a check, too?
Now I have to get an industrial strength shredder that will tear through a DVD. (I'm not going to be the one responsible for anybody else ripping 101 minutes out of their life.)