The Arrow (1997)
1/10
Yet more fiction from deluded Canadians.
28 January 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Almost nothing about this story agrees with the facts.

The most pertinent of those are public knowledge and the cabinet minutes are posted at

http://www.international.gc.ca/ department/history-histoire/dcer/ details-en.asp?intRefid=8169

Diefenbaker's government was told the cost of the aircraft would be nearly $10 million each,"The R.C.A.F. now had nine all-weather squadrons and the present programme called for their re-equipment with the CF-105, requiring a production order of 169 in number. These, together with aircraft recovered from the development and pre-production order for 37, would provide sufficient aircraft for nine squadrons. The total cost would be $2 billion spread from 1959-60 to 1963-64." (This compared to $2 million for a Voodoo or $3.75 million for a Delta Dart.)

The military recommended cancelling the program,"Finally, the cost of the CF-105 programme as a whole was now of such a magnitude that the Chiefs of Staff felt that, to meet the modest requirement of manned aircraft presently considered advisable, it would be more economical to procure a fully developed interceptor of comparable performance in the U.S." Note that the government was told the Arrow was "comparable" to other aircraft and not that it could fly higher, faster, or further than anything else.

The film is a little piece of political propaganda and deserves a negative score for being less than useless but the choices are limited to positive values. It actually deserves something closer to -7 out of 10.
0 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed