Review of S. Darko

S. Darko (2009)
3/10
Bad bad movie makers . . .
15 June 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I've watched DD once when it first came out. I don't remember anything about it so this review is coming from someone who has a relatively fresh aspect on this.

This movie is bad. Really bad. No plot, no excitement. I had a few jumps in the beginning when the dead girl appeared here and there, but that's about it. The best part of this movie was the skin shown due to some unknown pajamas addiction the main actress had. I understand that sequels are ten times better after watching the original or prequel but, shouldn't they still make some kind of sense? A sequel or follow-up is not going to be good just because the original was awesome. All good movies, sequels or not, have a few things in common . . . a) they make sense b) the characters win your heart or interest c) they make sense d) there's a freaking plot somewhere buried in the movie! Throughout the entire movie I was waiting for a flashback or miracle or ANYTHING to appear that would make sense of this compost pile of a movie. Bad, bad movie and bad, bad movie makers. If my fingers weren't too busy clawing out my eyes, I'd give you a thumbs down.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed