Interesting that Thor (page2 of comments) focused solely on the religious aspects of the film. This was only 1/3 of the overall content.
While I welcome his comments and it provokes further thoughts on the basis of Christianity being ancient Egyptian mythology, there is much more to this film than simply the religious section.
Stating that Horus was born on 365 days of the year, as opposed to Zeitgeist's focus on his birth on just 1 of these days of the year does not refute the remainder of the film.
It does not address the assertion that demolition experts are saying that they could not have done a better job of knocking down WTC buildings. Ancient Egyptian 'spells' vs Christian teachings, does not refute many of the remains of the WTC buildings possessing hallmarks of demolition work...
It does not address the evidence provided of 'false-flag' operations in America's involvement in previous major wars. It does not address the evidence found for England's similar operations, and for that matter all other involved countries similar stories.
Yet another example of governments seeing what they want to see for political/financial etc. reasons is raised in documentaries like "Storyline Australia - Truth, Lies and Intelligence" which show that irrespective of the wealth of evidence that the war was without foundation, the war machine was in motion and there were vested interests politically and financially in these conflicts progressing.
As with any internet/film/media works, take this with a grain of salt as everyone else has suggested. Do not take this as the authoritative truth. Use it as a basis for your own research.
A great film, and as it was intended, THOUGHT PROVOKING.
~Bill Hicks was the king~
While I welcome his comments and it provokes further thoughts on the basis of Christianity being ancient Egyptian mythology, there is much more to this film than simply the religious section.
Stating that Horus was born on 365 days of the year, as opposed to Zeitgeist's focus on his birth on just 1 of these days of the year does not refute the remainder of the film.
It does not address the assertion that demolition experts are saying that they could not have done a better job of knocking down WTC buildings. Ancient Egyptian 'spells' vs Christian teachings, does not refute many of the remains of the WTC buildings possessing hallmarks of demolition work...
It does not address the evidence provided of 'false-flag' operations in America's involvement in previous major wars. It does not address the evidence found for England's similar operations, and for that matter all other involved countries similar stories.
Yet another example of governments seeing what they want to see for political/financial etc. reasons is raised in documentaries like "Storyline Australia - Truth, Lies and Intelligence" which show that irrespective of the wealth of evidence that the war was without foundation, the war machine was in motion and there were vested interests politically and financially in these conflicts progressing.
As with any internet/film/media works, take this with a grain of salt as everyone else has suggested. Do not take this as the authoritative truth. Use it as a basis for your own research.
A great film, and as it was intended, THOUGHT PROVOKING.
~Bill Hicks was the king~