IMDb RATING
7.4/10
300
YOUR RATING
First Amendment attorney Martin Garbus talks about the history and current state of free speech in America.First Amendment attorney Martin Garbus talks about the history and current state of free speech in America.First Amendment attorney Martin Garbus talks about the history and current state of free speech in America.
- Awards
- 2 nominations
Photos
Ken Starr
- Self - Dean, Pepperdine University
- (as Kenneth Starr)
William Bradford Huie
- Self
- (archive footage)
J. Edgar Hoover
- Self
- (archive footage)
Joseph McCarthy
- Self
- (archive footage)
Joseph N. Welch
- Self
- (archive footage)
Alan Colmes
- Self
- (archive footage)
Bill O'Reilly
- Self
- (archive footage)
Storyline
Did you know
- ConnectionsFeatures Mr. Smith Goes to Washington (1939)
Featured review
Well made documentary.
I saw this film a few years back on TV and was amazed how little attention this well made, thoughtful film has gotten.
Even in 2012 there is hardly any reviews on this film, maybe Liz Garbus had a bad distributor? This documentary discusses freedom of speech seen partly through Garbus father, attorney Martin Garbus.
They discuss among many things how the government in the USA have tried their best at silencing awkward opinions in post 9/11 America. But also what is the point of having freedom of speech? Is it needed?
Should racists, anti abortion activists, intelligent design people, etc have the same right? These and many other questions are raised in the film.
And it is not just one side of the political spectrum who get a chance to talk but Garbus interviews people with different political views. It is required viewing by anyone interested in freedom of speech or just interested in seeing a well made documentary.
This film should seen side by side with Fück (2005) directed by Steve Anderson. Noticed the odd spelling of Steve Andersons film? Yes, IMDb doesn't allow four letter words.
Even in 2012 there is hardly any reviews on this film, maybe Liz Garbus had a bad distributor? This documentary discusses freedom of speech seen partly through Garbus father, attorney Martin Garbus.
They discuss among many things how the government in the USA have tried their best at silencing awkward opinions in post 9/11 America. But also what is the point of having freedom of speech? Is it needed?
Should racists, anti abortion activists, intelligent design people, etc have the same right? These and many other questions are raised in the film.
And it is not just one side of the political spectrum who get a chance to talk but Garbus interviews people with different political views. It is required viewing by anyone interested in freedom of speech or just interested in seeing a well made documentary.
This film should seen side by side with Fück (2005) directed by Steve Anderson. Noticed the odd spelling of Steve Andersons film? Yes, IMDb doesn't allow four letter words.
helpful•80
- CurtHerzstark
- Mar 13, 2012
Details
- Runtime1 hour 15 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was Shouting Fire: Stories from the Edge of Free Speech (2009) officially released in Canada in English?
Answer