Faraaz was the grandson of one of the richest person in Bangladesh, who also controlled the media (He owns the newspaper). It felt like the sole purpose of this movie is to depict falsely the bravery of his Faraaz when nobody knows what happened inside as there was no survivors watched what Faraaz did. That being mentioned, they were bad at showing the fiction!!
Acting was bad except the role Nibras (terrorist leader), you can give him some points. Script was written poorly.
Even the last scene where they showed the involvement of army, the scene was completely false. Bangladesh army first used tanks to destroy the wall of the cafe then officers got involved.
In short the director tried to use the money of Faraaz's grandfather, who tried his best to establish his grandson as martyr, both in national newspaper and now in movie.
Acting was bad except the role Nibras (terrorist leader), you can give him some points. Script was written poorly.
Even the last scene where they showed the involvement of army, the scene was completely false. Bangladesh army first used tanks to destroy the wall of the cafe then officers got involved.
In short the director tried to use the money of Faraaz's grandfather, who tried his best to establish his grandson as martyr, both in national newspaper and now in movie.