I'm no film major, aside from my own film I made, but this film is interesting. Time travel and the multiverse is in this year, thanks to Rick and Morty (I think). So this film is good in my opinion, though pretty complex. Perhaps too complex for anyone, the base ideas are good, the characters are likable and flawed in ways... so if you like sci-fi and time travel you might like it.
If you need explanations for everything you might not like it... it seems to have no thread explanations. By that I mean there are a lot of people that who have written that it's poor in effects, and poor in concluding the ideas it gives... they are probably right... but I still like thinking about the movie and enjoying what it is.
In my own film I have myself in it, perhaps that's a good think and the director should be in it. Like if he's leaving things, according to other's, badly done like the effects and writing... perhaps he should be in the film to explain in some way. In my film I actually am killed by having my buttocks crushed, then I have my friend thrown down the stairs... not sure what he could do in the film to make people happy or if it's needed, but it is always fun to see the director in a movie. It sort of breaks the rules of film for some reason... as if none of the other actors/actresses in the film could have written or given direction suggestions at all... kinda of odd... it must be the way it's done usually... self aware to a degree...
Is this film self aware to some odd degree that makes people give it a low score, or like this review is it too self serving? Like he just really likes time travel ideas and well if you all don't like it... keep thinking about it perhaps you'll make a better conclusion. Not sure, it's kind of forward thinking to have my friends portrayed as such good method actor's, perhaps their fatal flaw (the creatives behind it) is that time travel isn't revealed as real and our imaginations can't ever piece together any film about time travel... hopefully you all still like Back to the Future with that notion, but whatever...
If you need explanations for everything you might not like it... it seems to have no thread explanations. By that I mean there are a lot of people that who have written that it's poor in effects, and poor in concluding the ideas it gives... they are probably right... but I still like thinking about the movie and enjoying what it is.
In my own film I have myself in it, perhaps that's a good think and the director should be in it. Like if he's leaving things, according to other's, badly done like the effects and writing... perhaps he should be in the film to explain in some way. In my film I actually am killed by having my buttocks crushed, then I have my friend thrown down the stairs... not sure what he could do in the film to make people happy or if it's needed, but it is always fun to see the director in a movie. It sort of breaks the rules of film for some reason... as if none of the other actors/actresses in the film could have written or given direction suggestions at all... kinda of odd... it must be the way it's done usually... self aware to a degree...
Is this film self aware to some odd degree that makes people give it a low score, or like this review is it too self serving? Like he just really likes time travel ideas and well if you all don't like it... keep thinking about it perhaps you'll make a better conclusion. Not sure, it's kind of forward thinking to have my friends portrayed as such good method actor's, perhaps their fatal flaw (the creatives behind it) is that time travel isn't revealed as real and our imaginations can't ever piece together any film about time travel... hopefully you all still like Back to the Future with that notion, but whatever...