'Here' is the brainchild of Braden King, mainly known for prior documentaries and music videos. With 'Here', King decided to create the first American-Armenian joint film venture. Despite the script's low commercial appeal, he managed to conscript the well-known American film actor for his project, Ben Foster, and obtain almost $1.5 million in financing.
According to King, shooting in Armenia was a logistical nightmare, as he had to contend with a myriad of bureaucratic obstacles coupled with the technical limitations of the Armenian film industry. Nonetheless, as King related in a recent interview, working with the Armenian people was a great experience. 'Here' is mainly worthwhile to see the beautiful Armenian landscape, which few Americans are privy to, due to the dearth of Armenian films released in the U.S.
As for King's story, sad to say it's not all that exciting, quite lugubrious and a tad bit self-indulgent. It's about an American internet satellite map cartographer, Will Shepard (Ben Foster), who meets Gadarine Nazarian (Lubna Azabal), a free-spirited Armenian photographer. While Will maps the Armennian countryside, Gadarine. a photographer, walks around taking pictures. They travel around in an SUV and eventually a romance develops. Azabal, however, is not from Armenia at all. She's of Moroccan and Belgium descent, and memorized all the Armenian parts of her dialogue. To me it sounded perfectly authentic but I read a poster from Armenia on the internet, who claimed her accent was "laughable". That leads me to wonder why King failed to cast an Armenian actress in the role, despite Azabal's talents.
Part of the 'Here' script's problem is that it takes about an hour before any meaningful conflict develops between the couple as well as conflict in the external story. There is a mildly interesting section where Will and Gadarine visit the family of an old high school friend of Gardarine's, but like most of the film, goes on for way too long (the best thing about this scene is that we do learn that many Armenians DO like vodka!).
Another interesting but questionably effective scene is when Will and Gadarine are stopped by border guards at a border crossing into the disputed territory of Karabakh. Will is depicted as a character with quite a bit of repressed anger, but shows little common sense, when he picks a fight with the border guards. It's only through Gadarine's intervention that prevents the couple from being arrested or suffering an even worse fate. According to King, the scene was originally written with Gadarine bribing the lead soldier. Armenian authorities insisted that King change the script as they conceded it was realistic to depict police officers being corrupt in Armenia, but not soldiers. King ended up agreeing to make the change, as in the end, he was advised that the turning down of the bribe in this context, was wholly realistic!
The romance between the couple follows the usual program with a scene of initial intimacy (caressing while partly nude in a swimming spot off the beaten track), full score passion inside the car, an eventual argument and final reconciliation. Garadine proves to be a much more interesting character than Will, as she must contend with the disapproval of her family, as they are unhappy with her traveling and spurning Armenian tradition (she's just a little too liberal for such a conservative place as Armenia). Will is much more problematic because he's basically unlikeable. Not only does he end up failing in his mapping project but there's very little interesting about him. King has the idea that if you turn your main character into an angst ridden sad sack, that's enough to pull the audience in. Unfortunately, it is not.
In addition to the main story, King punctuates his narrative with some weird effects done to a collection of still images. Over these images, a narrator opines, with a succession of cryptic poems. When asked about the still images and the poetry, King remarked that it had something to do with the process of film itself. I didn't actually understand what these scenes meant nor could I fathom Mr. King's explanation.
I really wanted 'Here' to move faster. The romance between the principals meandered just like the entire film. The events that occurred were unexceptional and it was almost as if we were watching a slow-paced documentary. I realize that Mr. King was attempting to present some kind of 'slice of life', but Mr. Foster's character, was just too angry, to be engaging. See 'Here' for a glimpse into both the people and landscapes of Armenia. As for the drama, hopefully the film's creator will choose a much less ordinary and compact story, on his next go-round.
According to King, shooting in Armenia was a logistical nightmare, as he had to contend with a myriad of bureaucratic obstacles coupled with the technical limitations of the Armenian film industry. Nonetheless, as King related in a recent interview, working with the Armenian people was a great experience. 'Here' is mainly worthwhile to see the beautiful Armenian landscape, which few Americans are privy to, due to the dearth of Armenian films released in the U.S.
As for King's story, sad to say it's not all that exciting, quite lugubrious and a tad bit self-indulgent. It's about an American internet satellite map cartographer, Will Shepard (Ben Foster), who meets Gadarine Nazarian (Lubna Azabal), a free-spirited Armenian photographer. While Will maps the Armennian countryside, Gadarine. a photographer, walks around taking pictures. They travel around in an SUV and eventually a romance develops. Azabal, however, is not from Armenia at all. She's of Moroccan and Belgium descent, and memorized all the Armenian parts of her dialogue. To me it sounded perfectly authentic but I read a poster from Armenia on the internet, who claimed her accent was "laughable". That leads me to wonder why King failed to cast an Armenian actress in the role, despite Azabal's talents.
Part of the 'Here' script's problem is that it takes about an hour before any meaningful conflict develops between the couple as well as conflict in the external story. There is a mildly interesting section where Will and Gadarine visit the family of an old high school friend of Gardarine's, but like most of the film, goes on for way too long (the best thing about this scene is that we do learn that many Armenians DO like vodka!).
Another interesting but questionably effective scene is when Will and Gadarine are stopped by border guards at a border crossing into the disputed territory of Karabakh. Will is depicted as a character with quite a bit of repressed anger, but shows little common sense, when he picks a fight with the border guards. It's only through Gadarine's intervention that prevents the couple from being arrested or suffering an even worse fate. According to King, the scene was originally written with Gadarine bribing the lead soldier. Armenian authorities insisted that King change the script as they conceded it was realistic to depict police officers being corrupt in Armenia, but not soldiers. King ended up agreeing to make the change, as in the end, he was advised that the turning down of the bribe in this context, was wholly realistic!
The romance between the couple follows the usual program with a scene of initial intimacy (caressing while partly nude in a swimming spot off the beaten track), full score passion inside the car, an eventual argument and final reconciliation. Garadine proves to be a much more interesting character than Will, as she must contend with the disapproval of her family, as they are unhappy with her traveling and spurning Armenian tradition (she's just a little too liberal for such a conservative place as Armenia). Will is much more problematic because he's basically unlikeable. Not only does he end up failing in his mapping project but there's very little interesting about him. King has the idea that if you turn your main character into an angst ridden sad sack, that's enough to pull the audience in. Unfortunately, it is not.
In addition to the main story, King punctuates his narrative with some weird effects done to a collection of still images. Over these images, a narrator opines, with a succession of cryptic poems. When asked about the still images and the poetry, King remarked that it had something to do with the process of film itself. I didn't actually understand what these scenes meant nor could I fathom Mr. King's explanation.
I really wanted 'Here' to move faster. The romance between the principals meandered just like the entire film. The events that occurred were unexceptional and it was almost as if we were watching a slow-paced documentary. I realize that Mr. King was attempting to present some kind of 'slice of life', but Mr. Foster's character, was just too angry, to be engaging. See 'Here' for a glimpse into both the people and landscapes of Armenia. As for the drama, hopefully the film's creator will choose a much less ordinary and compact story, on his next go-round.