Reviews

26 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A commendable effort with a blunt stage-play ending
22 April 2024
Late night with Devil (2023)

It is a one-of-a-kind analog horror flick with a unique plotline. The fictional story is set on the backdrop of 70s satanic rituals and occult practices. It happens mostly in interiors within the setup of a Television Studio program, although some found footage scenes were included at the beginning for around 8 minutes to lay the premise of the story.

The set was designed pitch-perfect reeling a feel of the 70s late-night talk shows, where the guests are allowed to smoke and both the guest and the host are immaculately dressed. Long collars and bright prints were en vogue. And of course, the makeup - thick eyelashes, nude lips, bronze and blush, a bit of shimmer and glitter, and sun-kissed skin, men sporting long hairs, thick sideburns - all done well. With a modest budget, this amount of attention is commendable, but then its necessary as well.

Even though the acting was great, and the dialogues were well written, I somehow felt that David Dastmalchian was a bit too stiff for a role like this. You need a bit of movement, shades, quivering expressions, shivering mien, and lots of voice work instead of just the weird stare, to establish a character like Jack Delroy. Indeed, David picked up the 70s mannerisms especially the hand gestures and finger movements, but then, he essentially presented the character mostly flat like the character is always under spotlight, every movement of his and every word he says were to be critically analyzed and severely judged by his audiences, and hence maybe, his character is frigid and somewhat starchy, didn't quite look that stressy of his falling show ratings.

The film invested a shoestring VFX budget of mere USD 150K on approximately 300 visual effects. Not all of them worked though. The scene when Lilly became repossessed and bolts of lighting pulled her apart so as to split her head into two, with lights emitting from the gaps - could have been done in a much, much better way. Such VFXs of lightning, splitting heads, etc. Are nowadays a common day effect employed on popular YouTube channels, that too for kids! Its hard to imagine that the same movie where at the beginning you are shown the terrific face of Lilly possessed by Abraxas, with great voice work, but then cut-to the scene where Madeleine's spirit was shown standing right next to Jack, its just so amateurish, it ruined the film for me.

The ending should have been handled in a much better way. It completely lacked the tools to induce excitement and exploit suspense to drive the film into an edge-of-a-seat ride, instead, it diminished itself more and more into a blunt stage-play.

The shoddy effects combined with an unimpressive ending will probably be the reason it won't find big distributors for releasing it across the global consuming audiences like in India. Its a failed effort, albeit qualified but not superbly commendable, it just couldn't make it to the finish line!
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Madame Web (2024)
1/10
An lifeless, lousy and idiotic movie
6 April 2024
For me the decisive moment came early in the movie when a bunch of tribal "spider" people of Peru starts crawling down trees to rescue Constance. The animation (or lack of it), the superbad rubbery costume of the tribes (looked much like coming from some 80s low-budget TV movie), and that well-groomed Spanish looking tribal chief - all of them are total spoilsports.

Secondly, Dakota should do something about her lifeless casual acting or actually the lack of energy which is evident across every single frame. Despite being such a famed actress, she maintained the same facial expressions and monotonous voice throughout the various events in the movie. It might have served other movies but this one is a Marvel movie and she is somehow the titular character!

Thirdly, Tahar Rahim is not at all a good match for the Sims character that he had played. If you have ever gone through the Amazing Spider-Man books, you must have noticed the character looked completely different. It had a super-wrinkled face, crooked mien, grey hair etc. But Tahar looked fresh out of Salon every time he was presented. Plus, he looked so weird in the black spider suit, which seemed to me like a suit made by cutting truck tyres.

I (and I am sure you too) can go on like this but, in actual, there are so many annoying, meaningless scenes which keeps pointing to only one direction - this is a stupid, lackluster movie, not even worth my neighbor's dog's time.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Nun II (2023)
2/10
To blew a Nun with wine takes some serious backing
6 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The director and his entire team did a good job setting up the atmosphere, sets, costumes, hue and tones, and background scores, the characters are well-slotted, having said that, it's a somewhat meager improvement over the first Nun installment.

The scares aren't new and mostly pulled in from previous scary gothic and missionary horror tales.

Its commendable that the writer thought of introducing Eucharist as a weapon of choice this time, but to be honest, you really don't expect to obliterate a demon Nun as powerful as the antagonist, by barrels of wine! I mean come on! I, for once, thought it to be some over-the-top mineral water advertisement, or some Kohler shower ad, or maybe some unsophisticated wannabe wine ad!

They should have thought of some more scares with the demon goat creature, that seemed to have some potential though.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Menu (2022)
2/10
The Jonestown Chef!
4 September 2023
The movie attempts to mock the hollowness underneath upper-class fine dining, and audiences get that but it's the pretentious and hollow story that bothers some.

They twisted the story wrongly at the very end.

Even though the underlying message is great, and the acting is good, there happens to be too many appalling plot holes in this story. I really couldn't grab the reason for the menus, nor the backstory of the characters. It is so pallid that to see others giving it a 5-star rating almost feels more of a mystery to me!

Ralph is a great actor, only a handful of them still remain, but casting him into similar roles, film after film makes it so monotonous, to the extent that one had to blame the story writers and screenplay for not putting adequate effort for bringing more intrigue, more depth, more history to the characters, and above all, a better ending.

You see when she asked for a mundane cheeseburger, she broke the pretentious balloon. But it should not urge the writer to slash the Masterchef along with his creation and the innocent chefs and helpers, because they had absolutely nothing to do with it. They merely followed their chef, and the chef is not a militia! Is that the reward he's offering, or is it Jonestown, you decide what you saw and voted for! Do not let excitement slide you away.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Shoddy Film, Sub-Par Storyline, Series Deserved A Much Better Closure
3 September 2023
There is literally nothing much to talk about this part. It's probably the worst sequel, why? Because of so little action. It didn't seem like the Lamberts or even Winslow were any more afraid of the infamous lipstick demon. It has become that raccoon that gets in every now and then to the extent that now the family has learned to ignore it. This was Patrick Wilson's first directorial and it displays that he tried his best, but Whannell and Teems's storyline was so monotonous, repetitive, and unexciting that only a handful of directors (maybe James Waan, but I still doubt) could have made it work. It's a duff and not at all recommendable. This series deserved a better closure.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Oppenheimer (I) (2023)
4/10
Below expectation, except Robert Downey Jr.'s characterization
3 September 2023
I don't think this movie hits my expectation. The emotional aspects and drama overshadows the intricate details of physics and chemistry that should have been more prominent and masterfully depicted. Watch this movie thoroughly and you'll notice that Mr. Oppenheimer is not contributing much to the bomb creation, not even showing much of a leadership quality during adversities. He's depicted as a creature of emotions. The fact that he's womanising is not clearly depicted. The only character that I am thoroughly impressed with and the only character that have driven this lose movie is Robert Downey Jr.'s character. He's the reason you found "something" within this movie. And what special effects are they talking about? There ain't one! I am getting little weary of Nolan's reputation overshadowing his recent works!
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Old (2021)
5/10
Unique but unentertaining plot with implausible characterization, its faulty!
16 January 2022
Watch this movie if you admire the director M. Night Shyamalan's oeuvre, and more importantly, commend uncommon stories. However, as a cinema viewer, you'll always feel something amiss, some dosage is still left - overall, it would be an uneven, unsatisfying experience. The characters weren't properly believable, the plotting is mundane and the climax is just, schlocky.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Eternals (2021)
2/10
Unexciting, repetitive, underwhelming & easily forgettable!
16 January 2022
You have been bored with such an unexciting storyline, indistinguishable emotions, similar superheroes, akin villains, and above all, almost identical climaxes. You might probably appreciate the efforts to fill up a bald, uneventful plotline with Asian comedic elements, but you have witnessed that as well in some form or the other on-screen. It's nothing new, nothing touchy! The box office is such a gaslight, do not heed.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Don't Look Up (2021)
2/10
Wastage, its like the failed trial just before the successful one, which alas will never release!!
16 January 2022
Terrible atrophy of cinema! Adam McKay took the best of the actors and shriveled their efforts despite showing flashy potential. This movie shall be remembered as an example of a cinematic debacle where the director failed to switch between his desire for an art-form and the actual effort to deliver a packed drama. In the end, this movie remains on the screen, never gets into your skin or touches your heart, never gets you thinking, never haunts your imaginations. It is not a funny movie, and if it tries to be one at any slice of its reel, make sure that it's a wastage.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tales of the Unexpected: Proof of Guilt (1980)
Season 3, Episode 3
8/10
You'll never see it coming!
16 April 2020
Until you reach the last half (about 24 minutes into it), you'll not be able to guess the METHOD.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An example of an epic conclusion
26 April 2019
It is a precious movie with a gratifying ending. This time the revenge is complex and the plot is interblended, almost outsizing any of its previous installments. It witty, amusing, thrilling, nostalgic (prepare to cry), charging and glorious. That's how an epic is concluded.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Amnesiac (2014)
1/10
Frame-by-frame ruining of a promising story
24 April 2019
Amnesiac is a bland psychological mystery thriller about a man who has met with an accident and unable to recollect the incidents. He then began suspecting that the lady claiming his wife may not be his real wife, triggering a series of twisted unfoldings. Although well acted, the movie feels strangely namby-pamby and suffers largely from its direction. The feature-length exceeds its short storyline. Admittedly, the story is the real gain from this mangled picture. It tries too hard to play with your predictive mind and twists them just before you think you got it. But there seems to be a clear lack of effort somewhere. Such crisp stories clamor for a much better presentation. If the director is clear about the genre(s) of the movie, it becomes a much easier task to provide the right amount of treatment to the movie, which, in this case, does not happen, stupefying expectations.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Red Sparrow (2018)
6/10
Coudn't supersede Salt or Atomic Blonde
24 April 2019
Red Sparrow would have been regarded as a great movie if released before Black Widow, Atomic Blonde or Salt. The story of cold-war honey-pots to trap diplomats to extract sensitive information is not a new one. Like most of the sexpionage movies, adequate scenes of grueling brutalities are added to pep up the storyline and create the base of the characterization. What tries to separate it from the lineage of those movies is its skilled star cast and first-rate screenplay. The action scenes are fast and well-choreographed. However, the plot seems to ride too much on the soldiers of its titular character and fails to provide the requisite nail-biting suspense. If compared with the recent films of its genre, the thing that stands out is Jennifer's strong acting skills, otherwise, the rest of the movie suffers from inconsistencies and feels rather vapid.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Thelma (2017)
7/10
Good movie
22 April 2019
Thelma (2017) is a unique, bold, coming-of-age, slow-burn, supernatural thriller which retains its gravitas throughout its runtime and leaves a gnawing impact. The story revolves around a sexually repressed teenager who discovers her latent telekinetic abilities as a bizarre firestarter. The cinematography is laudable. The treatment is lonely and gloomy to a strange degree which makes it more of an indie-supernatural thriller rather than a mainstream movie. It manages to skip jump-scares and depends largely on characterization, acting, and emotional impact. If you have a hankering for quirky supernatural flicks with moody undertones, this is your movie.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Wall (II) (2017)
6/10
Why the stretch!
22 April 2019
The so-called undefeated spirit of US army within the soils of the middle east is ruthlessly shattered in this movie. Soldiers on an overwatch mission are trapped by an unknown Iraqi sniper who is ironically trained by US military as allied infantry.

There is a showdown of dynamics between the surviving Issac, played by Aaron and the sniper Juba, regrettably most of which depends on small talks instead of intelligent action.

The realistic screenplay comes to a saturation point midway through the movie, forcing the director to stretch the affairs to a length enough to deform the overall structure of the story, thus hampering the interest build-up of such tensed survival-suspense story. If you have a short crisp battle-story with very limited actors, a handful of props and a frailing wall then it is bloomer to stretch the plot using only small-talks, tense music, and dust - which is bound to backfire. As if the director's lack of plot is replenished by the audience's patience.

Nevertheless, the climax is totally unexpected and successfully infuses the fear of a practically unassailable attacker taking down the obstinate US army.

Aaron has grown as a genuinely talented actor and does justice to this muzzy penned role. John Cena befits his short-lived character of a decorated staff sergeant and the only companion to Aaron. The opponent here is the Iranian sniper who remains sly, stubborn and unvanquished till the end.

Thus, there's not much of a point in spending 81 minutes to witness such a movie unless you are equipped to hit the skip button till you reach the climax!
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A spendid and significant thriller
22 April 2019
Charley Varrick (1973) is a smart crime thriller. At moments you will fail to ignore the striking similarities between this movie and two of Coen Brother's praiseworthy classics - Blood Simple (1984) and No Country For Old Men (2007).

Based on John H. Reese's crime novel The Looters (1968), the plot follows a bunch of bank robbers lead by Walter Matthau accidentally mugging a bank with mafia money in it causing a flukey overturn of situation. The bemused syndicate then hires a callous hitman, played by Joe Don Baker of Walking Tall (1973) fame, to retrieve the money. This sets off an engaging cat-and-mouse game with a series of twist and turns up until the climax.

The suspense, chase, and twists are well-proportioned and directed with finesse by Don Siegel, the same director who directed action-thriller evergreens like Dirty Harry (1971) and prison escape-drama Escape from Alcatraz (1979). What surprising is Walter Matthau's performance in this serious role. His acting is precise and mature with a visibly unperturbed but cautious mien. This earned him a BAFTA award for Best Actor in 1974. Another thing to watch out is the well-shot climax, a lesson for stunt coordinators till this date.

Overall, it's an underpriced, hall-of-fame worthy gem of a thriller.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hellboy (2019)
6/10
You will enjoy it if you stop comparing it with Del Torro's work!
21 April 2019
Too many sequences packed up in this fast-paced reboot. David Harbour from "Stranger Things" fame takes up the role of Hellboy with Milla Jovovich as the main antagonist. You are certainly going to miss Del Toro's writing and direction, but not Ron Perlman, the original Hellboy. David did a fair job portraying the titular character. You will enjoy the movie if you are OK watching an R-rated, fast-paced, gory action sequences misfiring every aspect of the original Hellboy and sucking in every left-over folklore nightmare creature, loosely connected due to a weak storyline - it's just too much of undetailed and scattered imaginations. Besides, I believe a large part of the negative reviews are due to its obvious comparison with the Del Toro's original work, but then it's a reboot with a different director, writer, and a mint cast. I would give it 6 out of 10 and suggest you enjoy the flick keeping your minds off the original one, for the most part, the movie will give you the desired thrills but when compared seems nothing but a doltish cloggy ride.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Badla (2019)
8/10
A zippy thriller with an amazeballs climax
20 April 2019
Badla is a spiffy, tight and engaging thriller. At its core, there's binding suspense circling a bunch of unreliable characters. The climax is the apex of this movie. The audience will love the storytelling. Backed by a rapt performance from Amitabh Bachchan, this movie is a no-miss. Although it is a remake of the 2017 Spanish film "The Invisible Guest", Badla manages to retain its charisma. You see, thrillers are very special kind of dramas where storytelling and suspense play titular roles. Well placed incidents, dubious characters, and plot-twists may create a lasting impression in the audience's mind. That's why screenplay and editing have to supersede the story to make it notable. Here's where dramatization supplants the base story. In this effort, Badla succeeds to a good extent.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Watchable, hair-raising, recurring story relying heavily on jump scares
20 April 2019
Watchable, hair-raising, recurring story relying heavily on jump scares. It is creepy and formulaic. The scares are predictable but able to induce startle responses. The plot is archetypal of a James Wann horror movie. Thanks to Jame's obsession with this sub-genre, the viewers are now starting to see Nuns in a whole new way. The problem being, viewers grow quick resistance to such sequels or prequels or spin-offs and most importantly studio-executives are not the only audience. I feel a gradual shift in the horror palette - first there were graveyards and churches, then came secluded cabins, pharaohs and mummies, urban legends of all sorts, creature monsters of all shapes and sizes, aliens, supernatural flicks, Japanese and Korean horrors and then came the Spanish horrors. Someone's surely been doing market research on this.

Be ensured that this movie does not meet any gold-standard in the realms of Conjuring universe, but then it's not expected to be. Spin-offs and their installments like this have happened before and nothing sort of new goes on here. You have already been spooked before with similar wights and you are au courant with most of the scenes, color tones, ominous music and above all, the plotline. But then it happens with almost all horror movies! If there is only one horror flick playing at a multiplex and you need to feel the jolt of fear, then it's a no brainer.

Nevertheless, it's enjoyable.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Arizona (2018)
8/10
Damn Good Movie!
19 April 2019
Set up during the early days of real estate housing crisis, this murky comedy will keep you glued to the edge of your sit especially at the second half where the turnings get a bit nippy and things become off-center. McBride plays intemperate berserk who has fallen on a radge killing spree. Rosemarie DeWitt is a fibster realtor who gets trapped in an unsought situation. Together they split the scenes nicely. Director Johnathan has taken apt precautions to skip the possible yawner moments. Of course, you will get to taste the usual McBride foul-mouth pantomimes, but it's not bawdy rather stroppy in nature. I hope such quality movies do more marketing and go for international releases before the rips hit the market. Withal, movies like this deserve better treatments before and after release. They have to be made known.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Shazam! (2019)
7/10
You will enjoy it!
19 April 2019
An unconventional and all spiffed up superhero crammed cleverly in a movie full of marvy that will leave the audiences' with big boffo laughs. Its a jim-dandy of a new breed of superhero character on the way to flaunting a brill new movie franchise. You will witness a fresh story, unexaggerated acting, good editing, and an astute direction - all summed up in a natty and engaging comedy superhero flick. One tiny thought though - throughout the movie, Billy as a kid looks comparatively less kiddish than Shazam! But who cares, you will fall in love with them both. Go Shazam!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Glass (2019)
3/10
Impetuous
14 April 2019
In neurocinematics, often audience's expectations are inadvertently synced with predictability. The exception happens when the audience is well acquainted with the particular director's end game. In case of Glass, Mr. Shyamalan kept up with his oeuvre of twisting the ending of his own story - something common to his style of story-telling. With a successful trilogy in the making, Mr. Shyamalan has somewhere felt encumbered to conclude the plots and characters in the way most of his fanboys won't like, but then this has been his panache. As a director, his abilities are certainly unquestionable but his intentions are not, not after watching this movie. It seemed to me that he had to compulsively deliver a unique bending to the conclusion unmatched to any of his audiences' expectations - just to satisfy his abilities to create and destruct his own creations at his sole will.

Run-of-the-mill movies tends to have bog-standard ending. Remarkable movies show distinctive and sometimes iffy denouements. This movie manages to skip both and ends up dividing and breaking hopes and sentiments. Great stories have a tendency to become tarnished if not written at a go. That's how they end up not being an epic. Gaps in writing stories have often proved fatal because all pieces fit together but in the wrong places!

The conclusion felt like straitjacketing the enormous capabilities of a fitting ending, almost ends up cheating the audience's enthusiasm. In an attempt to embrace realities, the director killed the cinematic qualities required for a movie of such proportion.

The actors have justified the characters as far as humanely possible, but their performance is overshadowed by director's idea of settling the characters. The problem, I see, lies somewhere between the story which have more plot-holes than any recent a-grade movie, the editing which should learn from Shyamalan's earlier movies and the screenplay which is just insipid. An unwonted super-hero story ends up in an unpredicted and gloomy ending. Evidently this is a demotion of the storyline and an attenuation of its characters, who are unfortunately unrestorable. The audience of this movie are either the fanboys or a regular cinema watcher - both somewhere got disturbed by its conclusion - both are the victims of director's choice.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
When Michael Calls (1972 TV Movie)
8/10
"Auntie My Helen ... " shocks me up .. even now
3 February 2018
The Robert Drasnin theme music from Daughter of the mind (1969) is a perfect suited theme song for this psychological thriller. It actually hints the fact that its not a ghost story but a deep rooted thriller within the hood of supernatural ambiance. I still have horrors just remembering the words from other side of the phone - "Auntie my Helen... " I loved Ben Gazzara's persona in the movie. However, its the young Michael Douglas (28 years old) playing a much mature psychologist with tainted emotional setup is almost uncaught up until the climax. Loved the movie and its twists - would have been great if remade with selective cast for the big screen!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Foxcatcher (2014)
8/10
This is a bizarre but real story of men with cauliflower ears ;-)
3 February 2018
Anybody who is not aware of the star cast may make a failed guess about the actor who played John du Pont. It is one of a performance by Steve Carell. Steve have nailed it in so many ways. The makeup was superb. The bizzare dialogue delivery was well acted. Not only Steve's, but Channing and Mark's characters were given thoughtful makeup, for example the Cauliflower Ears common in wrestlers. The expecting though unexpected climax stole the other interesting parts of the story. I am impressed by the director, Bennett Miller. It is one of his best work till date - even better than Moneyball.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1922 (2017)
7/10
Watch it for a once in a lifetime performance by Thomas Jane
3 February 2018
I wish the ending was more in accordance to the original Stephen King novella. I also think that somehow the foretelling by Arlette was not depicted as a foretelling, instead it was shown as a highlight whisperer. Nevertheless, the cast gave a solid performance, esp. Thomas Jane. I believe the movie has a low focus on ghostly horror rather than the repentance, misdeeds and escapades. The pace of the movie is bit inconsistent as well. Wish the screenplay and editing was better to make it a flawless supernatural flick. It was almost there..:)
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed