Reviews

5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Man of Steel (2013)
7/10
Simply Too Much
18 June 2013
Warning: Spoilers
As a really good steak can be ruined by smothering with too much sauce, the 'Man of Steel' falls victim to too much smothering by special effects. And sadly, it seems just for the sake of special effects. There is actually a great movie hidden among the two hours and twenty minutes of screen time. But like trying to take-in fabulous scenery along the highway by catching glimpses between the trees, the endless special effects in 'Man of Steel' get in the way of taking-in an inventive and promising Superman remake.

This movie is also smothered by its own weight. It's actually two movies in one, as I definitely felt I was watching a movie AND its sequel during the same sitting. The obviousness of this remake's refreshing departure from previous Superman movies was clear, given the portion of the script devoted to the happenings on Krypton and in the way it used innovation to retell other elements of the Superman saga. From the use of flashbacks for his formative years, to the sage warnings offered by his father, and to the revamping of his relationship with Lois Lane, this is a great movie… worthy of a 9 or a 10… but only if it would've dared to expand on these qualities and stick to the story of Superman. Alas, It didn't dare.

I cringed when Zod made a promise just before his exile from Krypton. I cringed because I hoped not to see his promise come true THIS movie. Save it for the sequel, I said to myself. Let this movie be about Superman. Don't dilute it. Not yet, anyway. But my hopes were not answered as for the second half of 'Man of Steel' we get to see its sequel instead.

And thusly like so many other recent superhero movies, the story was no longer about the hero, but more about the battle. And this is where 'Man of Steel' departed from being a really, really good remake to just another fill-your-senses-with-special-effects just-because-we-have-the-technology-today-and-it-looks-awesome movie. Again, I repeat - there IS a great Superman movie between the special effects, but is so diluted and numbed by them that its attraction is lost… and so is its '9' or '10' rating.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Should've been titled the, "12 Gruesome Deaths of Christmas."
11 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Should've been titled the, "12 Gruesome Deaths of Christmas."

Complete with killer Christmas lights that break from their shackles for the attack, a mysterious fog that makes that creepy noise while stalking its prey, and unlucky Grandma impaled by a giant icicle that missiles from the sky.

A small-town story of biblical proportions, of course character and place names gotta use biblical references. And finally, no good biblical disaster story is worthwhile without an evil nemesis, so toss in a Wal-mart clone and its megalomaniacal owner as the villain. I mean, the disaster has to have a purpose, right?

A sophomoric movie that I admit kept me watching just to see how it ends. The real end though, was me poking myself in the chest for losing two hours of my life.
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Battle Force (2012)
3/10
Saved by OK combat effects
26 August 2012
To be fair, I watched only the first 20 minutes of this movie, so my comments are only based on that. I might have hung around if WWII Sicily's "landscape" wasn't so easily recognizable as that of Southern California. I gave up hope when several shots showed the film's characters walking along railroad tracks on top of modern concrete ties with modern signals in the background.

I get the feeling this movie was a film school project. And if it was, then I guess it's OK for that purpose. If not, at least it was a good opportunity for inexperienced actors to put something in their blank resumes.

The combat special effects were OK... enough has been said by others regarding the realism of the combat itself, but I thought the special effects used for weapons discharge and bullet flight was OK... more realistic than those we used to see 15-20 years ago. That earned this movie its 3rd star.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tin Cup (1996)
8/10
Kevin Costner not being Kevin Costner
17 March 2008
This movie is perhaps my most watched movie that I don't own. Every time it's on TV, it seems to find my TV screen... even if I'm not looking for it. But even after multitudes of viewings, something struck me after watching it again tonight... what a GREAT job Kevin Costner did in this role! And WHY do I say that? Because this is one of his few films where I didn't realize I was watching Kevin Costner! Usually, he plays a role that's too big for him to chew... and you painfully watch him try to make something of it, all the while your conscience says, "I'm watching a Kevin Costner flick... this is painful".

BUT NOT WITH TIN CUP. I actually found myself 2/3 through the movie quizzing myself on who the actor was... I could swear I've seen him somewhere before...

Keven Costner totally loses himself in this role... so much so that he wonderfully loses his identity as Kevin Costner.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Viva Laughlin (2007)
6/10
DIFFERENT Makes it fun and interesting
24 October 2007
Lambast the singing all you want, but that's exactly what makes this show something different to watch. I applaud the execs who had the guts to try something off the mainstream. Everyone knows Las Vegas is hot, and NBC already has that cornered.. so why try to compete with the same format? All of you who complain about the singing are missing the point, totally. I expect that every person (men usually) who say they can't stomach musicals have deep down inside, in that dark closet, a soft spot for song in a movie. Or a TV show in this case.

Yeah, it didn't work in Cop Rock, because WE ALL know what cops are supposed to be like. And singing cops is just plain weird.

But the characters in Viva are meant to be cartoonish- almost larger than life... I mean, how many Nevada casino owners do you know? And who says what they're supposed to be like? Most casino owner stereotypes are built of fiction. So why is it so far fetched that they break out into a number once in a while? It's a refreshing change of pace in a TV show, and for that reason alone, I say it deserves a FAIR shake!
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed