I'm pretty sure the screenwriters had a difficult time. Mikhail Kalashnikov was undoubtedly a true hero of the Soviet Union (and received the appropriate medal to certify this fact), and the poster child of talented engineers and gun designers all around the world. His merits are beyond dispute. However, one thing he was not: a protagonist in a particularly exciting story. This is something neither him, nor the filmmakers can be blamed for.
Apart from his WW2 front service, Kalashnikov rarely did anything that would look spectacular on the silver screens. For most of his life, he just held a job in which he performed exceptionally well. Good for him, but at the end of the day, apart from the product he worked on, he was just living an engineer's life. The backdrop, which is the Soviet Union, may make his personal story mildly more interesting, but that's pretty much all there is. Everything beyond that would turn the movie into a technical documentary. There is no drama, no tension, nothing. So much that the film doesn't even go beyond 1949, when the AK-47 was introduced to frontline service.
So, spoiler alert, the movie goes like this: Young soldier with a somewhat unhealthy obsession with designing guns gets wounded at the front. Gets sent to the rear to recover. Wants to design a gun. Designs a gun. Receives praise, but gets rejected. Designs another gun. Receives more praise, but still rejected. Gets married. Designs another gun, and gets accepted. AK-47 was born. The end.
Well, it's almost perfectly historically accurate. Well done, nicely made. But there isn't much to watch. If you're a gun nut, you might find amusing to see how he (may have) designed his first guns, or how his competitors fared in the test range where the AK-47 emerged triumphant. Beyond that... it's an OK movie, but nothing particular to see or remember.
Apart from his WW2 front service, Kalashnikov rarely did anything that would look spectacular on the silver screens. For most of his life, he just held a job in which he performed exceptionally well. Good for him, but at the end of the day, apart from the product he worked on, he was just living an engineer's life. The backdrop, which is the Soviet Union, may make his personal story mildly more interesting, but that's pretty much all there is. Everything beyond that would turn the movie into a technical documentary. There is no drama, no tension, nothing. So much that the film doesn't even go beyond 1949, when the AK-47 was introduced to frontline service.
So, spoiler alert, the movie goes like this: Young soldier with a somewhat unhealthy obsession with designing guns gets wounded at the front. Gets sent to the rear to recover. Wants to design a gun. Designs a gun. Receives praise, but gets rejected. Designs another gun. Receives more praise, but still rejected. Gets married. Designs another gun, and gets accepted. AK-47 was born. The end.
Well, it's almost perfectly historically accurate. Well done, nicely made. But there isn't much to watch. If you're a gun nut, you might find amusing to see how he (may have) designed his first guns, or how his competitors fared in the test range where the AK-47 emerged triumphant. Beyond that... it's an OK movie, but nothing particular to see or remember.
Tell Your Friends