Change Your Image
welfareasia
Reviews
Civil War (2024)
Dirty and stupid senseless story
"Senseless Savagery: A Misguided Misadventure"
"Senseless Savagery" presents itself as a cinematic spectacle but falls tragically short, delivering a storyline rife with gratuitous violence and a message that is both muddled and morally bankrupt. The film glorifies aggression and bloodshed without any semblance of justification, leaving viewers questioning its purpose and impact on society.
From start to finish, "Senseless Savagery" bombards the audience with scenes of mindless brutality, devoid of any meaningful narrative or character development. The violence is not only excessive but also devoid of any context, serving only to shock and desensitize rather than provoke thought or evoke emotion.
What's most troubling about "Senseless Savagery" is its underlying message, which suggests that violence is an acceptable means of resolving conflict or achieving one's goals. By portraying aggression as glamorous and heroic, the film perpetuates dangerous stereotypes and reinforces harmful attitudes towards violence in society.
In a time when real-world violence is all too prevalent, "Senseless Savagery" misses a crucial opportunity to challenge the status quo and promote empathy, understanding, and peaceful resolution. Instead, it serves as a cautionary tale of the dangers of sensationalism and the consequences of promoting senseless violence without reason or consequence.
Ultimately, "Senseless Savagery" is a misguided attempt at entertainment that not only fails to entertain but also fails to deliver any meaningful message or insight. It serves as a stark reminder of the responsibility that filmmakers have in shaping cultural norms and values, and the importance of using the medium of film to promote positive change rather than perpetuate harmful stereotypes.
Thanksgiving (2023)
Typical Action Horror film
The movie delivers intense action with impressive special effects, but its storyline falls within the ordinary. The climax, while decent, doesn't reach remarkable heights. If you're a fan of extreme violence and eye-catching visuals, it's worth a watch for the spectacle, but don't expect a narrative that breaks new ground.
While the movie successfully captivates with its engaging screenplay, the predictability of the ending leaves little room for surprise. Despite this, the journey through the storyline keeps you hooked, offering an entertaining experience.
That's why I rate above average. Six out of ten.
Don't Go (2018)
Boring plot
"Prepare yourself for an unparalleled cinematic ordeal. The movie in question, if it can be generously labeled as such, unfolds at an agonizing pace, drowning the audience in an ocean of mind-numbing dialogue. With every passing minute, the film becomes a marathon of verbal monotony, leaving one yearning for the sweet embrace of silence.
The screenplay, or lack thereof, seems to revel in its refusal to adhere to basic storytelling principles. Characters engage in lengthy conversations that meander aimlessly, devoid of any discernible purpose. One could argue that the scriptwriter mistook verbosity for depth, as the incessant dialogue fails to contribute meaningfully to the plot, assuming there is one hidden beneath the verbal labyrinth.
The narrative, if we can generously use that term, is an elusive phantom, a mirage that vanishes upon closer inspection. The audience is left adrift in a sea of disconnected scenes, struggling to discern a coherent story arc. It's as if the filmmakers abandoned any pretense of crafting a compelling plot, opting instead for a disjointed collection of events that defy logical progression.
The characters, mere vessels for the ceaseless verbal onslaught, lack depth or relatability. Viewers are forced to endure exchanges that serve no purpose other than to prolong the agonizing runtime. It's a cinematic experiment gone awry, where character development is sacrificed at the altar of tedious dialogue.
The cinematography, while technically proficient, fails to salvage the sinking ship of this cinematic endeavor. Scenes linger interminably, capturing the mundane minutiae of characters engaged in mundane conversations. The visual composition, rather than enhancing the viewing experience, becomes a cruel accomplice in subjecting the audience to the drudgery unfolding on screen.
The soundtrack, if one can call it that, is a forgettable symphony of mediocrity. It neither complements nor elevates the viewing experience; instead, it serves as a background hum to the verbal onslaught, fading into the background as the audience grapples with the tedium unfolding before them.
As the credits mercifully roll, one is left to ponder the purpose of this cinematic endeavor. Was it an attempt to redefine storytelling, an avant-garde exploration that missed the mark entirely? Or perhaps a misguided experiment in pushing the boundaries of audience endurance? Whatever the intention, the result is an arduous journey through a cinematic wasteland, leaving viewers questioning the value of their time and the elusive one star out of ten feels almost too generous.
In conclusion, this movie is a testament to the perils of prioritizing talk over substance, of forsaking a coherent narrative for the illusion of intellectual depth. It stands as a cautionary tale for filmmakers tempted to venture into the abyss of verbosity without a lifeline of engaging storytelling. Save yourself the agony and choose a cinematic experience that respects your time and intellect."