290 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Too confusing to be fun
30 April 2024
ERASMUS, it seems, refers to a program for students who are citizens of the EU to study in other countries and more. The official summary says it "is the EU's programme to support education, training, youth and sport in Europe. It has an estimated budget of 26.2 billion euros."

So, following a prologue depicting the murder of a British Erasmus student, this found footage movie documents the experiences of an international group of EU Erasmus students in Barcelona who go out together to party, booze and hook up, but end up facing mortal danger.

Barcelona seems to be a hot spot for found footage movies, since I know of several which are set there: REC (2007), REC 2 (2009) APARTMENT 143 (2011) and HOOKED UP (2013). All of these are much better and especially more fun than this movie.

There are two major problems:

First, the characters are very 2-dimensional, and most them are neither very likable nor memorable, despite the fact that the cast is unusually good-looking.

Second, during the action scenes it is hard to tell what is going on as many scenes are too dark, and combined with our detachment from the characters, this turns the hectic proceedings into a very uninvolving one, if not a complete mess. Because of that, the double twist at the end, which I presume was meant to surprise the audience, can at best elicit a shoulder shrug.

It is too bad because the movie had some things going for it: unlike most other found footage movies, which tend to reward sitting through a movie in slow burn mode with a few minutes of frantic action at the end, the pace picks up relatively early and doesn't let up. This is something I do appreciate.

Also, there is a lesson that in matters of love, mortal danger has tremendous power to clarify where one stands, but it gets wasted on characters about whom we don't care that much.

Altogether, this is a disappointing effort because it had the potential to be a top notch found footage horror film.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Bad script and no atmosphere
29 April 2024
It took over 40 years for a sequel to appear for DARK NIGHT OF THE SCARECROW (1981), which tells the story of a mentally handicapped man who is unjustly killed while hiding inside a scarecrow, and whose spirit takes supernatural revenge on his murderers.

The original was very straightforward in telling the story, but handled everything in a solid manner: it had a decent plot, the acting and cinematography were executed well, and it was very atmospheric.

The central concept of the movie was that the possessed scarecrow did not actually kill anyone (at least not actively, shall we say), but served as a harbinger of death for those who saw it. They would subsequently fall victim to events which conspired to prove deadly, an idea that was earlier realized, for example, in THE OMEN (1975) and later most conspicuously in FINAL DESTINATION (2000).

I think this concept made the supernatural threat even more menacing because it was not "localized" in a scarecrow but could appear anywhere. It was an effective horror device.

The sequel was written by J. D. Feigelson, who also wrote the original, but inexplicably changes the central concept to turn the scarecrow into a killing entity, thereby rendering the movie not only essentially indistinguishable from a million other slasher movies, but also making it sillier. Ray Bradbury is listed as a story consultant, though he died almost 10 years before this film was made.

There is no atmosphere to speak of, the plot is not only contrived but confusing, and the acting holds no water to the original. The dialogue is also weaker. I actually noticed this only due to contrast when I heard the only decent piece of dialogue toward the end, when the main villain ambushes the protagonist, a lady who moved to the area with her young son.

All in all, this forgettable horror movie is an unworthy sequel to the original.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Fabric (2018)
6/10
Good Effects, confusing story
27 April 2024
THE FABRIC begins by showing a man in a futuristic prison cells the walls of which are full of scribbled mysterious formulas. He is trying to figure something out, and in short order it becomes clear that he is attempting to use some heretofore unknown laws of physics to essentially teleport himself out of his cell. Eventually he succeeds, and in the course of subsequent events, he begins to remember his past as a famous physicist.

Being a physicist myself, this sort of story naturally appeals to me. The effects and the atmosphere in this movie are really well-done; unfortunately, even though we learn more about the character and others he encounters in the course of the short, there is still a lot in the plot left open, so that after the open ending, one is left unsatisfied.

Also, the characters he encounters are drawn in a very cliche manner. The villainess, in particular, is so over the top in her expressions that I was literally reminded of cartoon villains.

It really felt like this story was missing some parts, and if it had those together with better fleshed-out characters, this could have been an excellent short film.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Deja Vu (2006)
7/10
Nice Ideas, perfect execution, gigantic plot holes
27 April 2024
An ATF agent investigates a terror attack that killed more than 500 people and then joins an FBI team which has a access to a novel surveillance technology to help them find the culprit.

DEJA VU takes its title from a psychological phenomenon in which a person feels as though they had previously experienced a situation they are currently experiencing. Without spoiling the plot, let's just say that this movie takes the idea behind it in a literal direction.

There are a lot of really nice ideas for story elements, especially on the dramatic side. The writers clearly thought about how to make the proceedings interesting, and little touches which reveal attention to detail are everywhere.

I also enjoyed the philosophical questions this movie raises. For example, even if we could go into a past, could we actually change anything?

The direction by Tony Scott was essentially flawless, hitting all the right notes at various stages in the development of the plot and the actors did a good job. The special effects can hold their ground even today.

This movie could have been among the very best in its genre, but unfortunately, several large plot holes and gaps in logic bring it down. Not enough so that if you turn off your brain, you won't have an enjoyable movie experience, mind you. But in my case, doing this is difficult, especially if a movie raises philosophical questions.

That the movie has such glaring plot holes is all the more baffling and disappointing given that, as mentioned, the writers clearly paid a lot of attention to other aspects of the script.

Many of the plot holes relate to the central conceit of the movie which I cannot reveal without spoiling it, but there are some that are independent of it. For example, in one scene late in the movie, the protagonist is in a hurry to get somewhere, but right after he mentions how little time he has to get there, he decides to stop somewhere to basically freshen up.

Anyway, I am still rating this overall as a good movie because in all other aspects the movie is strong, and because I am an ideas guy (i.e. Someone who sees genuinely value in ideas just for their own sake, and feels profound satisfaction at being exposed to new ones) and that aspect of the movie appealed to me especially.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
73 Minutes (2021)
7/10
A good high concept Mystery Thriller
24 April 2024
73 MINUTES is the amount of time available to an ambulance chasing lawyer to get a case file to a mysterious caller who threatens to call her daughter and her mother if she does not do so.

This film has a good plot and builds a fair amount of suspense, so that the fact that most of the movie plays inside her car, as she talks to various people over the phone or videophone, does not make it boring. However, there are similar movies which manage to ratchet the tension up even higher (see list below).

I really like how it uses technology which would not have been possible until fairly recently as essential plot elements. I also liked the fact that movie did not end in a cliched manner.

This is good entertainment for slightly over 80 minutes and recommended for anyone who enjoys these types of movies. Other movies with similar plot elements which I found more suspenseful/thrilling:

PHONE BOOTH (2002) RETRIBUTION (2015) (it was remade as RETRIBUTION (2023)) THE GUILTY (2018) (it was remade as THE GUILTY (2021)) SIXTY MINUTES (2024) BURIED (2010).
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hacksaw (2020)
1/10
Just saw a hack work
24 April 2024
HACKSAW is a found footage film which tells the story of a couple who while on a road trip have the misfortune of encountering a mass killer/urban legend.

I am a hardcore horror fan, but even I must admit this movie is really, really bad:

-a confusing and pointless intro that mixes gore with opening credits

-a generic and razor-thin plot that has been done a million times, with nothing original except the useless filler to achieve a runtime of just over an hour

-characters who are BOTH totally unrealistic AND supremely annoying

-a dialogue that is absolutely atrocious. A fav example:

"It will"

"Not"

"It will"

"Not"

"Will"

"Not"

"Will"

"Not"

"Will"

"Not"

...

"Aaaah, Stop it"

-a hamfisted attempt at exposition by means of insertion shots of some lame ass show that has "try hard" written all over it

-heavies who laugh evilly and pointlessly like sesame street villains

-scenes filmed in darkness so we can't tell what is going on

-practical gore effects in such close ups that you can't tell what is what

-logical gaps like a shirt that is all torn and spilling intestines suddenly being neat and undamaged a few minutes later

-mortally wounded extras that just won't the f die

-a supernatural twist so dumb you would think a six-year old thought of it

-the usual horror tropes, except executed execrably

The only positive aspect is the naturalistic acting by the beautiful Cortney Palm, but her cameo in the beginning of the film has no relevance to the rest of the movie and is essentially wasted.

Avoid.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ultravioleta (2014)
7/10
Well-shot atmospheric Horror Short
22 April 2024
ULTRAVIOLETA tells the story of an art restoration specialist who prepares a painting for public view which has been obscured by a layer of wax stamped with occult signs, and which had originally been applied in order to contain the evil within the painting. Little does she know what awaits her once she finishes her project...

This is a very professionally executed supernatural horror short that could easily be part of the first act of a full-length feature film. The director, Paco Plaza, is well known for his REC (2008) found footage horror franchise, and here he shows that he is a master at building atmosphere.

The ending is kinda expected, and the final twist is from a logical point of view a little bit of a downer, but getting to that point could have been hardly filmed any better.

This is a nice 10--minute diversion for fans of atmospheric horror.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Anthrax (2017)
9/10
Gripping found footage political conspiracy thriller
22 April 2024
Of the small handful of found footage political conspiracy thrillers I have seen (see list below), all of which are above average, ANTHRAX stands heads and shoulders above the rest in terms of suspense.

A group of five friends who, while in the Israeli military, had signed up for an experimental vaccine trial realize that it seems to have serious long-term effects. Their attempts to find out what exactly happened are stonewalled and eventually they end up in mortal danger.

The film begins with a 3-minute prologue that is its weakest part: it rushes through shots of the first of the friends who gets sick and dies, and because it recounts the events so quickly, it disorients the viewer.

The story then properly begins when the remaining four reminisce about him at his funeral, and soon after, another one of the group falls ill.

The acting is extremely naturalistic, the story is really good and the execution as a found footage thriller is almost flawless.

Many found footage films succumb to what I call the "slow-burn syndrome", where efforts to gather clues to a mystery come at such an exceedingly slow pace that they risks losing the audience due to boredom. But not this movie: the pace is brisk, and the twists are well-placed, so it keeps audience attention throughout.

The film is based on the Omer-2 Anthrax vaccine trial, in which over 700 Israeli military personnel were subjected to a treatment which caused long-term side effects for many of the participants.

The Israeli government initially denied the victims' claims, but after the findings of an investigative commission were ordered by Israel's high court to be made public, it was eventually (nearly 20 years later) decided to give compensation to some of the victims. While the secret vaccine trial was presented to the participants as an effort to bolster national security, the findings of the commission were that the participants were selected merely based on "convenience".

This movie contains an important lesson about the dangers of blind obedience of and trust in government, and specifically the military. I consider it now the gold standard for found footage political conspiracy thrillers. Some other good ones are:

1. THE CONSPIRACY (2012)

2. WEKUFE (2016)

3. FRAME SWITCH (2016)
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Slightly underrated Adventure Horror Found Footage
20 April 2024
Out of the over 260 Found Footage films I have seen, only a handful combine exotic locales with a setting rich in history (see list at the end). There definitely needs to be more, for when a found footage movie manages to take advantage of the setting, the result can be an amazing vicarious experience. Unfortunately, it does not happen too often, and here the result is mixed.

DAY OF THE MUMMY is a found footage horror adventure movie in which a team of archaeologists are looking for the tomb of a cursed pharaoh, and the protagonist in addition is secretly given the task by the wealthy financier of the expedition, played by Danny Glover, to find a valuable gemstone.

The movie feels very much like a live-action video game, with the gimmick of a camera being clandestinely installed in the protagonist's eyeglasses and the financier boss periodically adding commentary to the happenings on screen through a hidden ear piece. I take it that the protagonist, an Indiana Jones type, is meant to be drawn as a complex character, not entirely good and not entirely bad, but he ends up feeling like a video game character, too.

Although the film has some atmosphere, the happenings on screen are always at arm's length and therefore fail to involve the audience. There are also some major requirements of suspension of disbelief (e.g. A signal going through even while deep inside a cave: the group reaching a chamber full of lit candles and never even asking who lit them and when, and so on). The ending was less than satisfying.

Still, there was enough to at least keep me entertained. So, while it is not a good found footage movie, I think the IMDB rating (2.6 as of this writing) is too harsh. The film may well have an audience in those who, like me, enjoy found footage movies with an adventure component and exotic setting.

There is one other ancient Egypt-themed FF movie I know of, made even the same year as this, THE PYRAMID (2014), which is a couple of notches better (see my review). Some other comparable movies I liked are

1. JERUZALEM (2015)

2. AS ABOVE, SO BELOW (2014)

3. FINAL PRAYER (2013)
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Surprise (I) (2019)
6/10
High Concept found footage comedy
11 April 2024
A man buys a video camera to film the surprise party he is throwing for his girlfriend. Unbeknownst to him, the camera is defective and cannot be stopped from recording. In the course of the party, the camera is witness to surprising secrets from virtually every guest in the party, many of whom would rather keep their secrets under wraps and therefore try to destroy the footage and/or camera in a discreet manner when they realize that they have been filmed.

SURPRISE has a really neat concept, but while there were some genuinely funny moments, I ended up not finding it as a funny as I wanted to. I am not sure why, because the dialogue was pretty good, the actors decent and the situations in which the camera was put imaginative. It may be that the comedic timing was not always on point, and some of the secrets were a little too contrived for my taste.

Nevertheless, fans of high concept, found footage, or unusual comedic cinema may wish to give this a watch. Another comedy which is conceptually a bit similar but much funnier is CAMERA SHY (2012).
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
If Shyamalan and Miike had collaborated on footage horror
8 April 2024
A RECORD OF SWEET MURDER is a found footage horror film which tells the story of a journalist duo who are invited into an abandoned apartment in order to do an exclusive interview with an apparently mentally disturbed serial murderer who had escaped from psychiatric custody . Once there, he tells them that God told him to kill 27 people to bring back a dead childhood friend, that his count is 25, and and that he wants them to record his final two killings of a loving couple which will soon appear.

The film is very unusual for the found footage genre and takes a number of unexpected twists and turns while maintaining a good tension based on the audience not knowing whether the murderer is insane or whether there is genuinely some supernatural stuff going on, very much in the spirit of M. Night Shyamalan's KNOCK AT THE CABIN (2023).

Some of the twists and turns are more successful than others, but even the less successful ones can be enjoyed as a sort of dark satire, especially since some of the characters are reminiscent of the weird characters in Takashi Miike's satirical horror movies (I was especially reminded of the antagonists in ICHI THE KILLER (2001)).

One aspect I wonder about is whether the fact that some of the characters are Korean and others are Japanese is meant as an oblique commentary on the dark history between the two countries. In 1910, Japan annexed Korea as a colony and severely subjugated and oppressed the local population, something for which Japan has not properly apologized to this day.

Be that as it may, I like movies with highly original stories, I found it entertaining, and it ended in a way I did not predict, so overall I rate this as a good movie.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Uninvited (2008)
1/10
Why do some filmmakers try to deceive the audience instead of making better films?
1 March 2024
THE UNINVITED is a movie with an intriguing premise that is handled in such an amateurish and unsatisfying way that by the time the end credits roll, one is left with confusion and displeasure. I originally gave this a score of 3, but then I noticed that there are a bunch of fishy things going on with it:

1. It appears the IMDB score is being gamed: there are, as of this writing, 385 perfect scores of 10/10 out of about 1.1k scores, making it by far the most frequent score. There is no way anybody but unethical filmmakers or paid shills would give this stinker a perfect score.

2. the Wikipedia page of this movie gives only comments from a single critic whose review, though containing criticism, is overall quite positive. What seems strange to me is that the critic praises the movie exactly for the aspects at which the movie particularly sucks. Also, the wiki seems as though written by a person who is biased in favor of the movie.

3. The title is identical to several other movies, including one much better known which was released in January 2009. IMDb gives the release date of this movie as 2008 (no exact date), but Amazon and Google play give it as 2010.

As I was watching the opening, I was taken aback by how amateurish this film seemed, but because I confused this with the 2009 movie, I decided to hang in there.

Though admittedly the premise of a woman suffering a strange phobia being terrorized by some kind of supernatural entity or Satanic cult is good, the movie manages to completely botch the execution. Apart from the amateurish direction, the movie is simply incoherent. I have watched thousands of movies, and I rarely feel like I wasted my time watching one, but on this I did.

I will make sure to strictly avoid any further movies from this director.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
18 second film mainly for those interested in the history of cinema
1 February 2024
The Execution of Mary, Queen of Scots is an 18 second short film depicting exactly what its title says. There is no real story, and beside what the title tells us, we have no further context. Also, the actual swinging of the axe is curiously slow.

Still, this is the first known film to use a special effect, namely a cut where the person of Mary is replaced by a mannequin, and it also may be the first film to use trained actors.

The actual special effect, while visible, is not that bad. If the legend is to be believed, some audience members even thought that the film depicted an actual beheading.

18 seconds is not much to see one of the pioneering works in cinema history.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Found Footage (I) (2011)
5/10
Seriously disturbing, but what was the point?
23 January 2024
FOUND FOOTAGE begins with a notice telling us that this is footage in the possession of a police within the context of a crime investigation. Then the movie proper begins.

Darius steals a camera from a store with the intent, stated shortly after, of documenting his daily life. It turns out he is a small-time drug dealer and stalker/serial killer and over the next hour and few minutes, we see a first-person perspective of his murder spree.

One one level, this is a well-executed found footage movie: it has an interesting premise, it is very gritty and realistic, and the actors involved do a good job.

The film directly puts us in the shoes of a profoundly evil person, and thereby generates a lot of unease. THE POUGHKEEPSIE TAPES (2007) did something very similar, but did not have as much violence. It is a testament to the latter movie that it could still be highly disturbing despite most violence taking place off-screen.

Not so in FOUND FOOTAGE: the serial killer fixates on attractive young women, having mapped out their daily routes-what he calls the "grand design" of their lives-and when it comes time to do the deed, which he does with a knife, the film forces the audience to witness the graphic murder almost as if it was doing it. Although those sequences are short, they are very disturbing.

In serial killer movies, part of the point of the film is to convey something about the kind of person the psychopath is. The best found footage serial killer movies, such as MAN BITES DOG (1992), THE MAGICIAN (2010)(another Aussie take on the subject), RANDOM ACTS OF VIOLENCE (2012), CREEP(2014), and CREEP 2(2017) present us with fully fleshed-out characters, where we can gain some insight and learn something about extremes of the human condition.

I felt that Darius was incompletely fleshed out. What we learn about him is that he is a nihilist, something of a coward, as when he is confronted by a much larger neighbor, and that he reduces people to their grand designs. Also, that for someone who reduces people to abstract concepts, he is pretty good at pretending to have warm human emotions when it is required.

Okay, that is a good start, but by the end of the film I was still in the dark about who he really was. If nothing matters, why go through the bother of killing people?

There is a hint that his murders are motivated by feelings of sexual inadequacy (which would explain the knife) but it is never really explored.

The other problem is the lack of a real story. To be sure, there are events late in the movie which happen because they were set up earlier, but the film has almost something like an episodic feel to it, without much of a story arc. Actually, this ties into the character issue, since the best stories also reveal the characters.

So, after the movie abruptly ended, I still felt left hanging, having gone through a little over an hour of the unpleasant experience of putting myself in his shoes with little payoff. For some, the vicarious experience itself is the payoff, and if that describes you, by any means, see it. Just don't expect to learn much from it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Starfish (2018)
4/10
This film pulls a bait and switch on Sci-fi and horror fans
23 January 2024
STARFISH tells the story of a young woman who arrives in town for her best friend's funeral, and who breaks into her friend's house shortly thereafter to grieve and ponder.

On that same day, apocalyptic events, ushered in by the appearance of murderous monsters, begin which portend the end of humanity. Her friend has left her an envelope containing a mixtape with instructions to find another six which, when put together, produce a signal which can still save the world. She then goes on a journey to find the mixtapes and play them in order to complete the signal.

Okay, so this sounds like the set-up for a slightly unusual sci-fi/mystery/horror movie, but it turns out this story is merely a metaphor for deep personal loss and guilt and treated like an afterthought.

What this movie is evidently really about is how a person uses music to guide her in the process of grieving the death of a dearly loved one, one where the grief is additionally topped with an overwhelming sense of guilt.

There is an audience for languidly paced emotion-driven movies where the logic of the mind defers to the logic of the heart, and I think that audience will really appreciate this movie.

The trouble is, that is not how this movie is marketed or comes across, and as a result many people who are not part of the target audience watch this movie and get disappointed. Indeed, the few monster/horror scenes add little to nothing to the movie and could have been left out. It amounts in my view to a bait and switch.

Technically, the movie is well-made, with nice visuals and plenty of music, courtesy of the writer/director. Sometimes it is bold in its approach in that it experiments with art-house techniques, such as an in-movie anime which culminates in the protagonist drowning, and another scene which breaks the fourth wall. But for an audience which is led to expect a movie that is supposed to make sense at the level at which it is ostensibly presented, it fails.

The very conceit of having someone who is already in possession of the mysterious signal to break it up, go out and hide its pieces around town for no given reason, on the off-chance that her friend might find them, sounds ridiculous on its face.

The best movies, considered as works of art, often feature multiple layers of interpretation. If this story was going to incorporate the apocalyptic monster scenario, then why not really go for it and make it one of the layers at which this movie functions, in addition to the deeply intimate, emotional one?

At the perfunctory level at which the sci-fi/horror story is told, this element tends to subtract from the story, in my view. If these monsters and the end of the world are supposed to be a metaphor for the protagonist's inner world, then presenting all that in such a literal manner, as this movie does, make her come off as self-centered and almost narcissistic.

On another note, I found the long stretches where nothing happens except that we see a gloomy, grieving woman, really irritating, and it instructive to compare this to another film I saw recently which received massive amounts of flak for being extremely slow-paced.

The horror movie HONEYDEW(2018) has practically nothing do with this film, except that it also features lengthy sequences where "nothing" happens. Yet to me, it was not only intellectually clear that these sequences served a purpose-they were meant to dial up the creep factor and unease-but they also achieved that emotionally. I am positive the movie would have felt less creepy and disturbing without those sequences. That is in part why I consider it a good movie, unlike apparently the majority of reviewers.

In contrast, while in STARFISH I can intellectually grasp that the lengthy sequences where "nothing" happens are meant to serve a purpose-to "feel" the character's pain and grief-they did absolutely nothing for me emotionally, except to bore me. I believe in part that is because the movie offers us too little on the relationship between the friends to care, and if this is right, then it represents a failure of the movie on its own terms.

STARFISH ends in a rather mystifying manner, not the least baffling aspect of which is that, apparently, "Forgive+Forget" completes the opening of the doors for the monsters to enter our world and consummate the apocalypse. But then, little else in this movie makes sense at a logical level.

Only watch this if you are part of the target audience.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fantastic Philosophical Sci-Fi Movie (plus explanation of ending)
22 January 2024
INFINITY CHAMBER raises a question that is quite uncomfortable: what if some day in the future, an authoritarian government obtains the technology to penetrate your thoughts and dreams, to get into the deepest crevices of your mind while blurring the boundary between dream and reality?

At present, the most an authoritarian government can do, short of taking your life, is to take your physical freedom and to torture you. "Truth Serums" and such are extremely limited in their effectiveness and not very reliable in extracting secrets.

But the kind of technology shown in this film is at a whole different level. In some sense, it dehumanizes us, because it reduces us to a kind of predictable robot, albeit made of flesh and blood.

To better understand what I mean, consider how the gap between abilities of the human mind and similar ones generated by AI is being reduced with each passing day. Now, the usual way to reduce it is to make the AI more human-like. But an alternative way to reduce the gap is to transform the human mind from this almost mystical source of creative power and insight unique to our species into something that can be manipulated, explored and exploited like a piece of software. Most often, we overlook this angle.

The story concerns a man in the near future by the name of Frank, who in the opening shot is literally shot in the back, and then wakes up in a sparse room to a computer that calls itself Howard. There is very little information at the beginning, but as the movie progresses, we learn more about Frank, his world and Howard, and we also learn that not everything shown to us is real.

I have read reviews that tagged this as a movie that touches upon themes of surveillance or over-surveillance, but it is about so much more than that.

For a good portion of the latter half of the movie, it is not clear what is real and what it not,but the ending, which is one of the most brilliant of any movie I have ever seen (see SPOILER ALERT below), drives home just how unimaginably awesome such a power would be in the hands of a government: if it really possessed this power, you could never again be sure what is real and what is not, and this would transform the Cartesian concept of a Deus deceptor-a malicious demon that tries to deceive you at each step-from an abstract philosophical problem into a pressing and mortifying concrete one.

This theme has been explored by other movies, most famously the MATRIX (1999) franchise (also THE THIRTEENTH FLOOR (1999) which had the misfortune of being overshadowed by MATRIX, even though it gives a deeper philosophical treatment of the same theme), but not, as far as I know, in such an intimate way which really drives home just how profoundly life-altering such a power in the hands of a government would be.

Although this movie was made on a shoe-string budget, this is not evident at all. The acting, direction, cinematography and production design were all great.

I feel the movie is underrated because it is a little ahead of its time. We do not yet have to worry about such technology in a realistic sense, and because thinking about it seriously is unsettling, few of us now do.

But the day this could become reality draws closer, and at some point in the future we will have no choice but to deal with it. I hope we will be well-prepared.

Now to the explanation

SPOILER ALERT

It might seem that the ending is ambiguous, but if one takes the subtle hints throughout the movie seriously, it is possible to construct an interpretation that fits everything shown without any ambiguity, as best as I can tell:

The only scene that plays out in reality is the opening shot. After that, Frank is on life-support (similar to how his father had been), kept alive by government authorities, who probe his mind to find out where he had hidden his USB drive.

Instead of trying to hide this information in his mind, he has subtly modified his memory of where he hid it by exchanging aspects of his memory (like waffles for pancakes) in order to mislead the authorities.

All the scenes in the infinity chamber are therefore attempts by the authorities to try to obtain that information from Frank's mind. This is hinted at when we first hear Howard speak, for we hear a human voice morphing into Howard's voice, a human voice which represents the government authority behind Howard.

In order to break Frank, the authorities come up with scenarios that provide hope for Frank, only to be dashed. These scenarios include Howard's reset, the power outage, the first escape and the second escape. These scenarios are basically "games" that the authorities play with Frank's mind to discover his secret.

At the conclusion of the second escape, the government authorities finally succeed in getting Frank to reveal his secret. Once he reveals where he put the USB drive, his mind's imaginings take on a new direction because the government now has what it needed from him.

Hints that the last scene in the coffee bar is not real include the curious personalization and synchronization between the male and female newscaster announcements when they say "we praise your(!) safe return and welcome you back to the new world", the same dog as in the dream version, the nearly identical dialogue between him and the barista as in the previous dreams, and obviously Howard in the last shot.

The change from "Gabby" to "Madelyn" signifies that the government finally got what it wanted and no longer needs to play games with Frank, so what is ostensibly portrayed as a happy end in the final scene actually represents the defeat of Frank's anti-authoritarian resistance; the equivalent of his taking the blue pill in the MATRIX. The authoritarian government won.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Honeydew (2020)
7/10
Slow-burning retelling of a familiar story in an unfamiliar way
21 January 2024
A young couple goes to the countryside to research a fungus that infects cereals and which can cause gangrene, convulsions and insanity (based on the real-life ergot fungus). While out camping, a man identifying himself as the property owner shows up and asks them to leave. They do, but find that their car won't start, so they are forced to walk. Eventually, they come upon a house occupied by a sweet and hospitable but loopy old lady who invites them in. As the story progresses from there, the couple finds itself in an increasingly dangerous situation.

This is a slow-burn horror film that makes use of a Texas-Chainsaw-Massacre-type story, but tells it in a different way. Instead of body horror, we get slow-burn creeps and food-related repulsion, and instead of having victims killed in all kinds of outlandish and gory death scenes, we have the arguably even greater horror of humans being eaten piecemeal while still alive.

Most of the critical reviews have cited the slow pace and derivative story as reasons for their assessment, but I would argue that even a familiar story told in an unfamiliar way is a creative innovation. And while the slow burn may turn off at least some horror fans, it is actually quite atmospheric and well-constructed, and will therefore appeal to fans of that type of movie.

There are interesting directorial and cinematographic choices, overall this is well-shot and Barbara Kingsley, who plays the old lady, is a scene-stealer.

Again, this is not for every horror fan, but those who like a paced and atmospheric unfolding of a mystery with effective use of repulsive imagery will probably like it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Black Bags (2023)
7/10
A good small-scale twisty thriller
21 January 2024
BLACK BAGS tells the story of two women whose fates are ostensibly intertwined by a switch-up of their luggage. There are many twists and turns in the story, so saying more would spoil the movie.

Although the switched luggage trope might seem like a meagre source for driving plots, the thrillers I know of which are based on it have turned out to be more or less good movies (or at least movies I liked), such as Roman Polanski's FRANTIC (1988), 8 HEADS IN A DUFFEL BAG (1997) and, though not a thriller but a classic nonetheless, WHAT's UP DOC (1972). BLACK BAGS joins this small group of good movies.

What impresses most in the movie is the acting by the two main characters, which is thoroughly believable and renders them real. Worse acting could have sunk this movie, since the story, though well-constructed, increasingly pulls on our suspension of disbelief. However, the quasi-philosophical questions about motherhood, and its relation to questions of good vs. Evil are raised in an organic way which make up for that, in my view

I also like that the movie deviates from the standard progression common in thrillers; the third act seems almost like a different kind of film, but nevertheless joins with what came before quite well, something which is not easy to pull off.

The direction, cinematography and editing were a little bland. I feel like there were opportunities for more tension and suspense which were missed. However, at no point was I bored and despite the criticism, these aspects of the move were definitely not bad.

The audience for this would consist of people who want to watch twisty indie thrillers with a greater-than-usual emphasis on fleshing out characters. Another such movie which is quite good, though not based on a switched luggage trope, is BULLITT COUNTY (2018).
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Horsehead (2014)
7/10
Underrated Horror Fantasy: an explainer
18 January 2024
Warning: Spoilers
HORSEHEAD is a fantasy movie with horror elements which takes place on two planes of reality, so to speak:

The first is the real world, in which a young woman is visiting her mother and step-father on the occasion of her grandmother's death, whom she hadn't seen since she was a little child. The relationship with her mother is frosty, and there are unspoken issues between them. During her stay, she gets the flu, experiences vivid and disturbing dreams and gets progressively weaker and sicker until the final scene.

The second is the dream world, where in the first dream after her arrival she sees her grandmother looking for a key, and from there she tries to piece together the solution to the mystery using lucid dream techniques. At first, her dreams are very confusing, but as she puts together clues (and the audience is also given clues from scenes in the real world scenes), it becomes gradually clear that she is uncovering a long-held damning family secret.

The movie demands a lot of patience from the viewer in that it does not even begin to become clear what this is all about until past the midpoint. No doubt some people will be turned off by that since by then, they may no longer be interested in putting the puzzle together. In my case, the gorgeous fantastic dream imagery kept me interested enough to pay attention to what is going on, so here is an explainer of how I understand this movie.

In short, as I see it, the movie is a story about the sorrow and pain visited upon three generations of women of a family by the mandates of archaic religious belief. More precisely, I see this as an indictment of the harmful consequences of religious beliefs surrounding "illegitimate children", an inadequate standard expression which already dehumanizes them, in my opinion.

Now to the details:

SPOILER ALERT

The protagonist, Jessica, has had a certain kind of confusing nightmare which features a demon-like feature with a horse-head, all her life, and indeed the movie opens with one. She wakes up to a phone message from her mother to come home because her grandmother just died.

On the train ride, we are exposed to a book she has been studying about a lucid dream technique (a technique for building awareness that one is dreaming and changing events as one wishes) called MILD, which stands for Mnemonic Induction of Dreams (this is a real-life technique, by the way).

We are told that the technique is used to "fight and destroy evil in dreams" that gnaws at people in real life, and that the horse is an "archetype of the mother", or alternatively a "messenger of death".

Once she arrives, we quickly find that her stepfather is much warmer and welcoming to her than her mother. The subsequent events have been broadly summarized above, so let's get to the meaning of the imagery.

Many of her dreams begin with the depiction of clockwork and metronomes, which I interpret as her traveling back in time. Indeed, whenever her grandmother is shown in her dreams, she is a young woman only slightly older than her.

We are also introduced to her grandfather, previously described by the family handyman as an "Old testament kind of person". In her dream, he is similarly young as the grandmother, and depicted as a cruel and sadistic punisher. His booming voice and dark, handsome appearance make it almost appear as if he is the devil himself. The implication that his zealous adherence to religious belief has turned him into a kind of devil is unmistakable.

The one person who does not appear younger in Jessica's dreams is her mother. I interpret this to mean that her mother, or at least a defining aspect of her, has not changed since she was a young person. In time, it becomes clear that this aspect is that she would rather lie or be dishonest than face reality, which is particularly ironic given that she lectures her daughter early on that Jessica needs to face reality. The mother lies to her own father about her pregnancy and tries to escape into the fantasy that she is "the immaculate one" when she is young, and she ends up lying to her daughter about aspects of her pregnancy when she is old.

The grandmother calls the horsehead demon "the Cardinal", which to me makes it plain that it is an allegory for religious guilt. She advises that Jessica should follow the wolf and always run from the cardinal.

What the wolf represents is not spelled out in the movie, but it is an easy guess that it represents the authentic, independent self, untamed, so to say, by the restrains of religious guilt. Coincidentally, I recently saw the unsettling but excellent movie WOLF HOUSE (2018) where the wolf, as I understand it, represents the fascist mindset, so interpretation is still context-dependent. Therefore, even if it is not difficult to guess, I think the filmmakers should have given more hints as to what the wolf represents.

There are two near-incestuous scenes, one in which Jessica is in the bathtub with her own grandmother as a young person, and one in which she begins to make out with her mother upon the latter's initiation. I interpret these to mean that Jessica is so desperate for love from either-love which she never received (the first because she last saw her as a small child, the second because her mother has always been unloving toward her)-that she is even willing to go the incestuous route.

There is a scene in which the horsehead demon slays the wolf, just before Jessica uncovers the family secret, which I interpret as a foreshadowing of the events which she is about to witness, but at a spiritual level: religious guilt won out and robbed the people involved-her mother and her grandmother-of their authenticity.

In the grand reveal, we find that upon the unrelenting pressure and intimidation by her grandfather, Jessica's grandmother performed an abortion on her mother in a church. The twist is that her mother was pregnant with twins: the second twin survives and becomes Jessica.

In the quasi-epilogue, it all comes together: Jessica's grandmother, who was looking for a key early in the movie, was actually looking for some kind of absolution for the religious sin she committed; Jessica's mother was always cold and unloving to her because Jessica was a constant reminder that she had violated religious tenets, something she could have pretended as if it had never had happened if the abortion had been completely successful; and Jessica finally finds peace in knowing that she has a twin, and as such, part of her twin is in her, as symbolized by her heterochromia in the concluding scene.

This is a good fantasy movie with a definite message, but the message gets kind of buried under all the admittedly gorgeous imagery. I personally do not like movies where there are confusing elements just for the sake of causing confusion, and HORSEHEAD is definitely not that kind of movie, but it is sufficiently opaque that a portion of the audience will find it difficult to discern what it is about. Also, the ending should have been a little less open-ended, in my opinion. But those who do not mind a challenging movie with wonderful visuals will likely enjoy it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An Explanation of the Movie: a brilliant self-indictment of the Fascist Mindset
16 January 2024
Warning: Spoilers
THE WOLF HOUSE tells an allegorical fairy tale reminiscent of those of the Brothers Grimm in a unique stop-motion/2D animation style that is as indescribable as it is spell-binding.

The story, though very simple, veers into the surreal fairly quickly, making it hard to discern what the movie is all about. It does not help that the hints strewn throughout are subtle, that the movie freely switches between German and Spanish (though it has English subtitles), and that a knowledge of the historical context is essential to appreciating what the movie is trying to say.

So here is how I would explain it:

In short, my understanding of the movie is that it exposes and indicts the evil of a fascist mindset by letting it speak for itself.

Now to the details.

SPOILER ALERT

Before the movie proper, we see a prologue in the style of a restored older movie which owes much of its inspiration for its bucolic and harmonious atmosphere to Nazi propaganda films.

We are shown an idyllic community in the southern part of Chile, a colony of happy people in traditional clothing working, helping and singing, along with serene scenes of nature, farmland, livestock and pies. The colony even has a motto:"Helping makes Happiness", which, however, uneasily echoes "Arbeit macht Frei" ["Work makes Free(dom)"], the infamous slogan which adorned the entrance to Auschwitz and other Nazi labor and concentration camps.

The narrator identifies himself as the "shepherd" of the community and tells us that the film we are about to see is meant to dispel "horrible rumors", a "dark legend", that have plagued it. This tells us that the movie is trying to convince us of something, and is not necessarily objective.

The movie begins by briefly recounting how a young girl, Maria, lost three pigs, and upon the prospect of punishment, chooses to flee the colony instead. It is at this point that we are properly introduced to the unique artistic style of the animation.

The animation has a disorienting effect in at least two respects: first, a lot of times, 3D objects, including the main characters, are represented at various points by 2D animations on background walls, and second, everything undergoes a continual process of change, flow and transfiguration.

I interpret the first to mean that often, the movie is merely showing us a literally shallow representation of a thing. The failure to grasp the fleshed-out 3-dimensional richness of something is a shortcoming which reflects something about the narrator, since this telling is not meant to be objective but reflects the narrator's point of view.

I interpret the second as a device to impart a dream-like aura to the entire story, since it resembles what often happens in a dream: things or people at one moment may "morph" into other completely different things.

Maria is chased by a wolf but finds an empty house with two pigs, and decides to make it her home. She also decides not to eat the pigs but instead to care for them. While the wolf outside is trying to persuade her to come back to the colony, Maria's new dwelling slowly transforms into her dream home.

Upon her command, the hooves of the pigs transform into human hands and feet. She tells them her name and that she is "a mother, an angel; Maria is care and love". Then she decides to give the pigs clothing, and shortly after that they transform into full-fledged people, albeit with ethnic features and black hair. Later, she gives a choice to be "better, stronger, healthier and more handsome" or to "stay small and ugly", and they transform once more, into the Aryan ideal, with blonde hair and blue eyes, indeed like Maria herself.

Shortly after this last transformation, Ana and Pedro begin to distrust Maria as she realizes that she needs to go out and search for food. They convince her not to go out and before long she finds herself tied to a bed, and realizes that Ana and Pedro are getting ready to eat her.

She implores the Wolf to come and rescue her, which he does, albeit in a very impersonal manner: Ana and Pedro transform into trees, recalling an earlier tale Maria tells about a tree with a hole near it into which animals would happily fall and get eaten.

In a sort of epilogue by the narrator, we find out that Maria finds her way back to the community, helping and presumably living happily ever after, and "taken care of". A cheeky concluding remarks invites the audience, whom the narrator calls "pigs" to join the colony to be "taken care of", against an animation that looks ominously like the entrance to a concentration camp.

In terms of analysis, the prologue is essential for understanding that this is a tale told by a fascist with a fascist value system, self-conception and outlook of life.

The historical context is that there is an actual colony in Chile founded by a German Expat who fled Germany over child molestation charges. His name was Paul Schäfer, whose last name translates from German to "Shepherd".

Without going into too much detail, Schäfer founded the colonia Dignidad ("Dignity Colony") which soon transformed into a cult compound and a haven for escaped Nazis. During the reign of the fascist dictator Pinochet, the colonia was also used as a camp to interrogate, torture and kill political dissidents. Schäfer was eventually convicted both of political and child sexual abuse crimes and spent the last few years of his long life in prison.

So, the movie is the telling of a story in the voice of a through-and-through fascist. From that point of view, a "good" person can only be another fascist, and that is exactly what Maria turns out to be.

The pigs she finds in the house represent uncultured natives which she considers on par with animals. She has a profoundly self-aggrandizing conception of herself: only by her grace of not "eating" them and commanding them to become more human-like do they approach something like humanity.

She attempts to inculcate the persona of loving mother figure into the pigs, while at the same time seeing them as inferior, weak and ugly, so long as they fail to reach the Aryan ideal. These sorts of contradictions reflect the fact that the narrator is biased in favor of turning a blind eye toward them. Lying, or making up a narrative in order to make oneself look better, and specifically more Carina and loving in one's own and other people's eyes, is a key element of fascism.

Though Maria arrives at her situation through an act of disobedience, she is profoundly intolerant of it, as driven home by a story she recites of a puppy which disobeys the admonishment of a loving house not to run to far and gets lost, leaving the house "sad".

This continues this element of a the fascist narrative: any evil carried out, if it is even recognized as such-and a whole lot of evil even isn't-, is something that is absolutely necessary, even if it makes the fascist "sad".

The seemingly unexpected turn where once Ana and Pedro reach the Aryan ideal, they plot to eat Maria illustrates two other aspects of the fascist mindset: envy and paranoia. Because these are so natural to the narrator, of course he is going to expect that once Ana and Pedro becomes something like equals to Maria, they will act to remove her. People who see the exploitation of others for one's benefit as something approaching a duty will naturally expect that others will think likewise.

The wolf is an allegory for the fascist mindset, a hallmark of which is the notion of "eating" others for one's benefit, something illustrated both for Maria when she explicitly considered it upon finding the two pigs, and then Pedro and Ana, once they reached the Aryan Ideal.

For most of the movie, the wolf is presented as an agent of the colony trying to get Maria back, but in the climax, she realizes the wolf was always inside her, though as discussed above, it was already plain for anyone to see if one put the hints together.

So, in the end, the title of the movie refers to nothing other than Maria's abode: she escaped from the fascist colony to make her dream home, but this turned out to be nothing other than a miniature version of the place from which she escaped, a house where she was about to be eaten by the two other wolves she raised.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A philosophical exploration of our cosmic insignificance
12 January 2024
GRAPEFRUIT & HEAT DEATH! Shows us a lecture on the long-term fate of the universe through the eyes of a student attracted to a girl sitting next to him.

There are many bold and thought-provoking comparisons here: human bonds with those that hold the solar system together, the idea that bliss might seem forever but could already be doomed along with everything else and without us knowing it yet, the finiteness of a human lifetime with the seeming infinity of the universe ending in heat death. For those who have pondered the meaning of life, this is a small treasure trove of ideas.

The effects are well-done and all the more impressive considering that they were mostly practical. The idea of fruits standing in for celestial bodies could have gone wrong, but was executed in a manner that fit the overall tone, filtered through the lens of a teenage boy's view of the world.

This is a very creative short film which tackles hefty issues in a humorous manner, although I suspect it takes a certain philosophical temperament to really appreciate it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hall (2020)
6/10
Underrated horror film, but still had the potential to be much better
7 January 2024
HALL tells the story of a debilitating and mysterious illness that befalls the guests at the third floor of a hotel, several of whom end up fighting for their lives in the hallway (hence the title).

The movie focuses on the fates of two women, each of whom attempts to escape from danger in their lives, only to be confronted with a much greater one. It is better no to know what the cause of the disease is, for that will permit one to enjoy the mystery aspect of this film.

One thing I liked about this film is that even before we see the first shot, it conveys an atmosphere of dread which rarely lets up except when it flashes back to quieter moments via non-linear story telling.

The cinematography and make-up effects are quite good, and so is the acting. This could have been a first-rate horror film if it were not for three frustrating aspects:

First, the actions of several of the characters make little sense.

An infected woman crawls desperately towards...well, what she tries to reach is never made clear, but she even leaves a phone behind which she could have used to call for help.

After finding out about the illness, a mother seems oddly unconcerned with immediately finding her daughter whom she just sent ahead to escape with from an abusive husband.

The husband, in turn, implausibly appears in the hotel basement shortly thereafter.

These nonsensical actions are particularly frustrating because the story is, apart from these missteps, original and intelligent.

The second frustrating aspect that brings the movie down is the glacial pace, made more apparent by repetitive scenes of crawling and veeery slow limping. All the characters, even the healthy ones, are curiously low in energy. There are scenes where one wants to shake the main protagonist out of her torpor.

Finally, the film ends on a note that feels incomplete, despite the fact that it has a proper conclusion. It may be that the story did not focus on enough characters, that it does not really explain the motivations of the villain or that the story arc feels like it ends prematurely. Whatever it is, the ending feels unsatisfying.

Despite these flaws, the movie is underrated. I can imagine that the frustrations that viewers may experience from the above aspects contributed to its very low ratings.

If you like moody slow horror mysteries with an unusual story and don't mind baffling character behavior, you may still like what this has to offer.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
We Are Still Here (I) (2015)
5/10
Confusing script and too understated direction bring the movie down
21 December 2023
WE ARE STILL HERE gives us a haunted and possessed house story set in New England winter, and that should have given this movie already a head start, along with a basic plot outline which could have yielded a good horror movie.

Alas, there are too many problems to make this stand out positively.

On the screenplay side, there are number of events that simply don't make sense; characters are killed off for no ostensible reason, the motivations of the human villain are not clear, and the ghosts of the house want the new inhabitants to move out one moment but then stay the other. Also, this kind of story could have used a helping of humor, of which there was not enough.

On the directorial and cinematographic side, the approach used does not fit the unfolding events, in my opinion. It is too understated and more suited for a something like a TV drama, not a horror movie which culminates in an orgy of bloods and guts.

The approach does work in the beginning by adding some realism, but once the horror gets going, holding on to it creates unnecessary disorientation in the viewer because the events seem too bizarre to be compatible with the way they are filmed. It is probably best to mention some concrete examples of what I mean. Movies which did the transition from grounded reality to unmoored quasi-absurdist horror very well are AUDITION (1999), SERBIAN FILM (2010) and MOTHER! (2017).

The effect of the disorientation is that it kills the tension, which is also not helped by the editing. There were several scenes in which better editing could have amplified the tension, and the climax of the movie, which in theory should have been an impressive fireworks of bloody mayhem, ends up fizzling out.

Interestingly, writer-director Ted Geoghegan also wrote SATANIC PANIC (2019), a similar kind of story which under the direction of Chelsea Stardust uses the kind of approach that I think should have been used in this movie.

I would have liked for this movie to be better, but it is a miss.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fear Pharm (2020)
6/10
Horror film based on a punny title
18 December 2023
FEAR PHARM (2020) is ostensibly just another Texas-chainsaw-massacre-themed slasher with a dash of jokes on top of a helping of gore.

Four friends are selected for a VIP corn maze and offered a cash prize if they can traverse it in under two hours. Naturally, they discover along the way that the horror characters they encounter are not "just" trying to scare them.

It turns out that the villains actually have a motivation beyond pure bloodlust which brings the movie's title full circle, and it is always a delight to see that at least some thought went into formulating a movie's concept. The ending scene is a wonderful exercise in black humor.

Though the film is decently shot, some directorial choices bring it down, unfortunately. Chief among these, in my opinion, is the prologue. It is not only unnecessary but actually counterproductive. It shows that the villains really are murderous, and thereby destroys any plausible deniability that could have been sustained in the first act of the film by its light-hearted tone and especially the funny "business meeting" introduction of the family. Had we found out that these guys really mean business only once they started hurting our group, it would have been that much more shocking.

Other unwise choices in my opinion were the repetitive panning shots over the corn maze that cheapened the movie's feel, the curious cut-aways during actual gore scenes (was this because of the MPAA?) and some implausible sequences, such as a character whose arm was just amputated reviewing his acting as if nothing was literally amiss.

Also, while there is a colorful band of villains, only some of them are really fleshed out. I had trouble distinguishing between a couple of them.

I think with a few different choices, a better fleshed-out characterization of each member of this family and a tad more creative gore scenes, this could have been a good horror movie. It just missed the mark.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Second best title in the Franchise
14 December 2023
I saw the original FINAL DESTINATION (2000) in movie theaters and it left an indelible impression on me: more than a slasher movie without a slasher but with a dash of humor, it posed some interesting philosophical questions about life and death, not to mention that it started with the most realistic depiction I had seen up until then of what it must feel like to be inside a doomed plane.

I had not seen any of the sequels until recently, when the opportunity came up to watch them in a binge session, and so I did.

FINAL DESTINATION 2 (2003) starts off with a spectacular multi-car collision scene which is among the most eye-catching in the entire franchise, but then drops off somewhat. There is a twist that the order of deaths is reversed and the protagonist is female this time, but overall it does not reach the original.

FINAL DESTINATION 3(2006) has an amusement park as the setting of its opening disaster, introduces a novel element of photographic clues, and also features a female protagonist.

Though the opening roller coaster disaster is among the weakest in the franchise, I feel the film is overall very slightly better than the second installment.

THE FINAL DESTINATION (2009) is the fourth and weakest of the sequels, and the problems come down to the quality of the CGI, which is noticeably worse than that of any of its predecessors, and the lack of "realism", in the sense that the characters no longer feel like real people. However, overall it is still (barely) an okay horror movie.

So, expecting the usual trend in horror franchises, where later installments almost invariably converge to crap, I got very pleasantly surprised when I saw numero Cinco.

The broad plot outline is the same as before, but little tweaks here and there keep it fresh: unlike in the previous installments, one person survives the initial catastrophe, and the idea latent since the original, that some of the doomed survivors might try to save themselves by killing others, is finally fully explored. The CGI is a major improvement, the no-name actors overall do a good job, and the deaths are as creative ever, being particularly good at amplifying ordinary fears we might already have, such as of acupuncture or laser eye surgery. And then there is a superb twist at the end which ties the entire series together.

It is not necessary to have seen the previous movies, but it adds to the enjoyment because of the references and easter eggs interspersed throughout, and the closing credits recapitulate the most notable death scenes in the franchise, so spoiler alert for those who have not seen the previous movies.

After the original, this is the best movie in the Franchise so far. Evidently, as of late 2023 a sixth film is in pre-production, so it will be interesting to see what it brings to the table and how good it will turn out to be.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed