Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
King Kong (2005)
10/10
Wonderfully rich, beautifully crafted film...
30 December 2005
As I type this it's 2:46 AM, New Year's Eve here in Singapore, and earlier this evening I made the decision that I would go see this film at 11:00 PM.

Of course, being thirty years old I'm quite familiar with the story. As a youngster I saw the black and white version in segments, understood the components of the piece but no deeper comprehension than that. Later, at eleven years of age I saw the 1976 version with Jessica Lange and Jeff Bridges. Even at that young age, having sat through the entire movie I can say it had a definite effect on me through the power of its emotional elements and general film-making dynamics.

The 2005 version had me in a spell-bind. I realize most of the heated commentary over this film for the moment is centered on its spectacular special effects, and for good reason. However, for me, this movie proved to be much more than a stellar display of modern technology's visual wonders; it had a story with characters, and its effect was nothing short of powerful. At times humorous, others frustrating, I patiently and appreciatively watched as Peter Jackson developed the characters, set the stage for increasing dramatic anticipation and succeeded in nearly covering the entire scope of human emotional responses in me.

I've always used rather simple, yet unquestionably determining criteria for assessing the quality of a film. Basically, I ask myself several questions. Do I appreciate the movie's dynamics? Do I give a damn about its characters? Was it (whether uplifting, disturbing, painfully sad, humorous or otherwise) powerful? King Kong answered all those questions affirmatively. It's been a long time since I've seen such a masterfully blended work of modern, breathtaking cinematography and such carefully created, moving drama. As a visual spectacle, the film presented me with allusions to some of the most fascinating tales of wonder and adventure I came to know and love while growing up. As an example of serious, at times heart-warming and others soul-chilling presentation of the magic and pain to be found within the gamut of human emotion, it held me in a most attentive focus.

I won't comment on plot specifics as I feel that would be redundant, given the general public's prior knowledge in that area. I will, though, recommend it strongly if you wish to see a movie that will demand your attention and again, dynamically deliver one of the finest films you're sure to have seen in recent times.

I hope you enjoy it as much as I did.

JD
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Alexander (2004)
1/10
You've got to be kidding me...
29 June 2005
I'm giving this film one star for the reason that it has absolutely no excuse whatsoever for its wretchedness. With a cast like it has, a budget ample enough for three good films, and a legend-centered plot sure to pique the viewer's interest well before the movie is even seen, it delivers a seriously despicable, laughable fiasco.

Of course it's set in ancient Greece. What's interesting is that Alexander sounds straight out of Dublin. And his mother? Why, it's Angelina Jolie, and she's...straight out of Prince Vlad of Tepes' castle in Transylvania. That's right, Vlad of the Dracul. I suppose miss Jolie spent some time watching Gary Oldman deliver his line, "Leesten to Dem! Di tcheeldren ov da nyyaat; vhat sveet muzik dai mike..." or "Alexander, Oi know vat veemen vi-ll do in yore loif..." Yes, it is that bad. So far no good.

As for Alexander's supposedly legendary tactical genius and indomitable character, here instead the viewer gets to watch the boy from Dublin with painfully obvious bleached streaks in his hair and freshly tinted eyebrows look at Jared Leto countless times with a facial expression that's half "Mommy can I have another cookie?" and half irritable bowel syndrome. Leto reciprocates, and captivates movie-goers with a luxurious dark mane of Paul Mitchell's finest work and eyes that make Dakota Fanning look Chinese.

Kilmer is wasted here, as is Hopkins. I didn't give a damn about either of their characters. Watch it yourself to see if you do.

As a boy I was fascinated by Greek mythology, Greek Tragedy and Comedy. I jump at any chance I can get to tack on extra elements of wonder to my understanding of these subjects. At least I learned something new by watching Alexander. His mother was a vampire wanna-be snake temptress and Alexander's horse had more charisma than he did. Yup, Alexander's horse gets my nomination for best actor.

JD
370 out of 656 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A true triumph of a film...
7 June 2005
Wow, now I haven't seen a film like this in a long time. This movie is all things powerful, endearing, thoughtful, joyful, painful rolled into one. I won't go into specific points or details from the movie to reinforce the above comment; rather, I leave it to you to weave your own appreciative spin on just how gripping this work of art is.

Clint Eastwood, Hilary Swank and Morgan Freeman have coordinated in the working of a truly memorable masterpiece with Million Dollar Baby. I've always felt one of the most crucial elements any good film should possess is the capacity to entice the viewer to really give a damn about its characters. Not necessarily love. Nor hate. Just care what happens to them, be they good or bad, or anything in between. Well, this movie made me care. It made me laugh, yearn, cry. Mr. Eastwood, I am now, and always have been your fan. Bravo.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sideways (2004)
3/10
"What the hell?"
4 June 2005
I had high hopes for this film, if for no other reasons than all the praise it received and my curiosity at possibly glimpsing a gem of a movie sans any seriously well-known actors in it. After probably forty-five minutes of viewing, waiting all the while for the brilliance to shine, I realized my subjective truth: "This is it...and it stinks..." Truly, I kept waiting for the magic. Admittedly, the acting itself is not sub-standard. However, I didn't care about the characters. Even after some development, none of the characters evoked any concern on my part for their fates. Also, the movie's ultimate motive remained mysterious to me throughout. It's been called a comedy. It is not. There are some humorous scenes, but these few are largely dwarfed by the pathetic and morose vibe the rest of the production oozes.

Why the hell did this film get so well-received? Watching it reminded me of the feeling I got while watching "The Thin Red Line." Obviously, the genres are entirely dissimilar, but the effect both films seem to have had on the "serious, thoughtful movie appreciation crowd" is nearly the same: hmm, thoughtful movie...unusual...different...aah! Must be a film of exquisite substance! Something only the elite, enlightened "thoughtful movie" movie-goers would understand and dutifully appreciate...

Balderdash.

Still, you're possibly curious. After all, this film is on the top 250 list of all time. Well, see for yourself. I give it three stars just because a one or two star rating seems a bit too scathing. I didn't hate the film; I just didn't didn't give a damn about it.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed