Reviews

14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Salome (1973)
6/10
Unsettling amateur work
9 January 2005
Grainy 8mm black & white short film, without any dialog. (An ambient-type soundtrack has been dubbed in.) Basically a filming of sections of Oscar Wilde's "Salome" but without audible dialog it's a little tough to follow. The cast are quite young and the main actress appears in contemporary garb. Although the film is made quite cheaply, the elements of macabre eroticism that would figure in Clive Barker's later work are evident. Recommend for fans of Clive Barker, this is not a feature-quality production but has it's moments while it lasts.

As a note, the DVD version of this film also contains another weird Barker short ("The Forbidden") with graphic and bizarre content that seems like an early rough draft for "Hellraiser". There is also an extensive Barker interview, as well as a ridiculous promotional into with an Elvira-type topless vampire hostess drooling blood all over other unclad ladies.

For value to Barker fans and the fact that it sticks in one's head, 6/10 Non-Barker fans would likely find it a 3/10
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ultrachrist! (2003)
2/10
Not so good...
22 June 2004
Normally I don't like to bash indie cinema (It's more fun to trash movies that are poorly crafted but cost $$$ to make) but I have to make an exception. I was fooled by the high IMDb rating and reviews on this turkey, which must have

been posted by friends of the creator. Let me say upfront that I'm far from

religious, and appreciate good satire in the vein of Election. This was too dumb to be called satire.

A Jesus with a whiny Brookyln accent shows up nude in NYC (a'la "The Terminator") and crafts a spandex powder blue "superhero costume" to relate to today's youth. Lots of scatology and sex jokes as Jesus turns the

commandments to pro casual sex to win converts. The video and especially

audio are sub-porno quality. "Jesus" fights Richard Nixon (guy in rubber Nixon mask) Jim Morrison and Dracula. An interesting concept badly executed. Look

elsewhere for religious humor not so puerile, I suggest "The Life of Brian".
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Ring (2002)
4/10
Stop that, that's silly!!
9 June 2003
Warning: Spoilers
(Very mild spoilers)

Remember that classic Monty Python skit about the old women stealing babies? Mid-way through, a man in a British army officer uniform breaks in and stops the skit, Complaining that "this was a perfectly good skit about stealing babies and then it got SILLY so next time hat happens I'm going to stop it.

Right? RIGHT!".

Something like that needed to happen in the last 20 minutes on The Ring. What started out as a perfectly good B horror movie got ridiculous. Not the "it's coming out of the TV" part (I apologize to those who genuinely were scared as horror is a very personal thing) or cheesy "sucked dry" corpse, but the sad "answer" at the end that points out about 40 plot holes big enough to dive a

MAC truck through (already listed by many others) What could have been an

unsettling vague ending with a memorably creepy Surrealist B&W video

(reminiscent of NIN "Closer video) to haunt your dreams is spoiled by the

implausible explanation.

The film is undeniably well crafted and the acting is above "B" quality, but many "B" films have been more unsettling simply by witholding the answers and letting the visuals or atmosphere linger without Zombie Stalker horror or

ridiculous coicidences and plot devices. Reference the original "Phantasm",

"Blair Witch Project", "Picnic at Hanging Rock" or "Dead Ringers" for films with similarly implausible subject matter that are extremely effective by what they DON'T include. As stated above, horror is a personal experience and what

scares some may make other (me) laugh in the theatre despite my best efforts. A little subtlety at the denoument could have made this an eerily effective thriller instead of something that falls apart at the end.
8 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Never a dull moment.
6 May 2003
Sometimes this movie provoked awe at it's visual landscapes and other times it caused unintentional laughter at it's kung fu action. But all in all I have to say I was never bored by it and would watch it again. The plot is pure hokum (for those interested the real story of the beast is very fascinating and can be found in many online rescources) as Hawkeye and Tonto use kung fu to start the

enlightenment and free France from evil. There is some stuff about overcoming ignorance and superstition but a giant prehistoric animal is tracked with peyote, so...

BUT, you can made the ridiculous believable when the cast plays along this effectively, and the costumes are as good as I have seen anywhere. Sets like the ruined Templar cathedral, and the palace at Versailles are beautiful and detailed. It's COOL, guys, cool like James Dean if not Miles Davis and

sometimes cool doesn't have to explain itself, you just know it when you see it. 8/10
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Brain Dead on Arrival
5 May 2003
A fan of the first film and the novel that preceded this, I did not expect much from this film as neither the author of the book or director of the film was on board for this "sequel", let alone cast. On a lark, I taped it off HBO so it did not cost any $$ and tried to be understanding and treat it as a "B" movie, hoping for laughs. No such luck. The film is a poorly written attempt at black comedy, like someone wanted ot combine "Election" with "American Psycho" but came up

with what would be an insult to the "Devil in the Flesh" movies it more closely resembles. I apologize for being mean, but it's a bad idea to have a voice-over narrative when your actress has a terrible lisp. (and can't act). Anyone who was involved in this film should take year off to carefully evaluate what they are doing with their careers and why they wanted to be in the entertainment

business.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Long hu feng (1975)
6/10
nonstop action
28 April 2003
A young man who is a social misfit joins a kung-fu academy but still unable to fit in, turns to a life of crime. A former friend who tried to help him must track him down. Unique for it's "nail-throwing" combat scenes. Spot the modern home furnishings and farm machines in this picture shot in medieval China. For the genre it is an entertaining film, with constant kung-fu action the last 40 minutes. Sold as a double feature on DVD with "Mantis vs Falcon Claws" in the Brooklyn Zu series from noble house.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
If you liked this...
23 February 2003
then hopefully you will grow out of it.

It looks like Beavis and his buddy went to film school, found out that the rights to one of the books by "that one dude who wrote that movie where that

chick got cut in half by a chainsaw" (Ps that film realized it was a SATIRE) wasn't purchased yet, read half of it, filmed "the cool parts" and shipped it out in a few weeks. Filming in reverse doesn't make you a genius, kids. Go join Butt-head on the set of "Kill Bill" and disappear forever. Please.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nailed (2001)
6/10
One thing
19 February 2003
One thing alone makes this almost work, and that's the performance of Rachel Blanchard. With minimal lines or character development, she does an

amazing job of making her character almost three dimensional. Without her

ability, this film could have across as a character assassination of "loose"

women and new age dingbats. As it is, this is not a terrible film but it needed more work in my opinion. The back of the disc says Renfo is "stalked" by a

"psychotic" young woman so Keitel (like in his "cleaner" roles in "Pulp Fiction" or that Bridget Fonda thing?) has to intervene to save his son. Apparently the

publicist or media people either never watched it or had no idea how to market it! The box makes it seem like "Swimfan" or something! Instead it's Lifetime V for men too close to their dads, but Blanchard, who should get better work, holds this together enough to make it watchable. 6/10
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Surprisingly special
18 February 2003
This is not a movie that will make one feel warm inside or good about humanity. The motives of the characters, and their actions, are often disturbing. But I found a great deal to appreciate in the effort that the writer and the actors brought to this. Along the lines of "Chuck and Buck" or the "Good Girl" in it's power to stay with you and make you think about people and things you might

not want to! I saw a film today called "Igby Goes Down" with A list stars and a relatively high budget that was extremely pompous and made no effort to

communicate. This small film easily outshines it on every level. I grew up in rural South Dakota and Minnesota and football is that serious a business there, and there are as many disturbing elements and people around this "heartland" as

anywhere else. Extra thanks to Ryan Gosling (who has been good in everything

so far) David Morse and Clea DuVall for their great efforts here.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Vanilla Sky (2001)
6/10
If you saw the original...
16 December 2001
...than this has to be a disappointment. I wish I could see it "for the first time" again because Abre los Ojos was a masterpiece to me. Maybe I was SO deathly bored because I already knew what was going to happen? Also, please Mr Crowe, we know you love rock music but it's not a SUBSTITUTE for emotion. Please turn it dow, the old Monkees and Beach Boys makes this seem like a weak acid flick like Jack Nicholson's "Psyche Out".

Penelope Cruz seemed like a much better actress with subtitles, the reading is so monotone. The Cameron Diaz character was better in the first film because there was less of a "relationship" between her and David and she was less attractive. This makes her more dangerous, the more casual realtionship makes David more of a heel. Crowe, of course, would hesitate to make any main character less than likable, especially Tom Cruise, a fine actor who is miscast as he brings too much audience presupposition to this. The dialoge is TOO MUCH, as Crowe seems to want to add more meaning, more statements to a fine film that simply weigh it down. Unlike most foreign films, you cannot find Abre los Ojos boring or pretentious even if you hated it. Sadly, we can't say that this time around.

** 1/2 as my expectations may be too high compared to the first film, but the soundtrack and banter are too much.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Gladiator (2000)
7/10
Entertaining, but really.....
26 March 2001
After the Academy Awards, I have to temper my displeasure a bit. This was not a bad movie at all. It is quite good compared to, say, Demetrius and the Gladiators. But this has to be the most overrated movie to win Best Picture since Forrest Gump. Even more overrated than Titanic. Take one part Spartacus, one third Braveheart, and one third Caligula and blend. The female character is pure window dressing, the effects are poor but thankfully used sparingly.The period armour and weapons are all wrong. The tacked-on "going home" racial liberation bit at the end is pure hokum. In it's defense, the film does have two very fine performances (rewarded) and some terrific action sequences.

Still, I am sad that we could not have seen the award go to one of the more challenging and visionary films, Crouching Tiger or Traffic. Sometimes popcorn is just popcorn, even with heavy butter. ** 1/2 stars, seven out of ten.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Naked Man (II) (1999)
1/10
DON'T
26 March 2001
This is not funny or ironic. It's not even amusingly absurd. It's awful. I had to fast-forward through the last ten minutes. Blue Velvet is one of my five favorite movies, and I barely finished this. Proof positive that I will try and watch anything with Rachael Leigh Cook at least once. NO STAR
4 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Highly Conservative
26 March 2001
For a film that was advertised as the new 9 1/2 weeks, this is a very chilly film. The basic premise is that sex outside the sanctity of marriage will either kill or haunt you forever. There are some things to hate about this movie (that damned awful piano score) but also things to admire about it. If you feel this is Kubrick's worst movie, try sitting through Barry Lyndon. If Stanley was still alive I'd like to ask him what was up with Alan Cumming's character, was it supposed to be funny or just disturbing? I thought he was going to leap over the desk and kiss Cruise.

Overall, this film was a little suspenseful and NOT SEXY AT ALL. And the ending of the story with Kidman's promise to Cruise almost came off more like a threat. Or a life sentence. Whatever grandpa Stanley says, sex is not THAT scary. Not that I've ever been to his Hellfire club.

Out of four stars, 2 1/2. Interesting.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A powerful and difficult film.
5 February 2001
Warning: Spoilers
This movie has become somewhat obscure, partly due to it's multiple titles (The misleading "Mystery of Kaspar Hauser") and due to Herzog's own focus on his work with Klaus Kinski. However, if you are a fan of Herzog, neither this nor "Stroszek" should be overlooked. This has less to do with the historical Kaspar Hauser (and there are inaccuracies, as with "Aguirre") than a harrowing look into alienation and exploitation.

I will avoid spoiler details, but the scenes with the circus and the churchyard are especially evocative. This is a restrained film, as subtle as anything Herzog has done. If you are expecting grand historical panoramas, look elsewhere. If you want a harrowing view as to how we are all alone even when in the company of others, and a view of how we force our expectations on others, see this film.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed