"The Stand" Blank Page (TV Episode 2020) Poster

(TV Mini Series)

(2020)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
The Company Gathers
Gislef1 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Maybe they should downplay Hamish Linklater in the "Previously"s. He seems more impressive than most of the regulars. And maybe that's the problem with the casting. Henry Zaga as Nick Andros? Brad William Henke as Tom Cullen? Goldberg seems more like stunt casting, and as others have noted Heard, really doesn't have the acting chops to portray Nadine.

Marsden, Young, and Adepo are just kinda... there. Only Teague, Wolff, and Skarsgard of the regulars is what I would call "good", and that's three regulars out of nine. Kinnear, I don't know.

As others have noted, the focus is less on the plague and more on the post-apocalyptic period. Although we get hefty flashbacks to Nick, Nadine, and Stu meeting Harold and Frannie. And that's of the show's lack of impact, too: the non-linear approach means you're regularly taken out of the story. And you've already got that with Flagg's "dreams", as well as they're filmed. Add on top of that the flashbacking, and the directors not making it clear that they're flashbacking, and you spend more time unravelling the timelines then you do focusing on the story the production staff is trying to tell, based on King's novel.

In fact, the whole thing raises the question of what the production staff is trying to _do_. Once the novelty of the Stand-pandemic compared to the current day pandemic wears off, you're left with... not much. It's pretty much a non-linear retelling of the novel, and thus the 80s miniseries. And if I want to see a visualization of the novel, I'll watch the 80s version. Walston is dead and Fagerbakke would have probably been confused for Patrick from 'Spongebob". But they're still better visualizations of the characters than what we get.

And part of it is just odd visual quirks. Nadine can't get Joe to come out from the under the bed... then in the next scene she's at the school and Joe was with her. Not only is that an odd bit if discontinuity, but what was the _point_ of having Joe hide under the bed? Except to trigger a 30-second flashback of how Nadine and Joe met Larry?

There's nothing bad with the episode: it changes a couple of things, with Heck Drogan coming to Boulder and Flagg speaking through him. But there's nothing good about it, either. It just... plods along.

But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong. What do you think?
14 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
well, it took 3 episodes....
davidm-147 January 2021
I tried hard to reserve judgment on this redo of the classic, oft-published stephen king novel. visions of the 90s miniseries stood out and there can't help but be comparisons. after all, "it" actually got better when remade, didn't it? and stephen king had some input this time.

after watching 3 episodes, i have to conclude i don't like it. yes, there's the constant mentioning in other reviews about the non-linear storytelling style. i have to agree that it really takes you out of the story, and that's really the best part, i always thought.

the casting doesn't work for me either. most especially, the jim carrey cover band playing harold lauder. what happened to the insecure fat guy from the book? frannie, too, should be a lot nicer than she is being portrayed. it's an interesting choice, but....

the end result is a lot like a time travel movie for me. i mean, i'll always watch it, but that doesn't mean i'm going to like it or that it's going to be good.
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
HE'S COMING!!
daleover131 December 2020
"M-o-o-n and that spells OUCH! My name is Tom Cullen and I have a hard time reading social cues."

I love this show and it keeps getting better. Every time they introduce a character I smile and remember the book. Just waiting for the Trash Man!
37 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The best so far
sk700914 January 2021
I'm just happy to have a new version of my favorite King character, Nick Andros. So far I'm really liking the way Henry Zaga portrays him, making the character a bit less soft and more defiant than in the 1994 mini series. I absolutely love that he gave Randall Flagg the finger.

I'm also intrigued by this new version of Tom Cullen. He seems sufficiently sweet and endearing, and his and Nick's first encounter made me smile.
19 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
In the old version, Glen Bateman's house is straight outta poetry with trees, grasses, a small bridge n a flowing river which can be used for keeping the cans cool but..
Fella_shibby1 January 2021
They messed it up in this one. In the old version, the camaraderie between Nick Andros n Tom Cullen reminded me of Of Mice and Men. Hope they expand on that. Amber Heard is not convincing as Nadine. Hope they bring some intensity with the arrival of Trashcan man.

The show is gettin slower as opposed to building tension.
29 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not getting any better
paulwattriley4 January 2021
Frannie Goldsmith is not likeable - well to be honest neither is this show - a foul mouthed mess, its all over the place.
7 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed