Fever Dream (2021) Poster

(2021)

User Reviews

Review this title
30 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Creepy horror tale
Horror_Flick_Fanatic28 October 2021
It's a decent creepy cautionary horror tale reminding us that unintended consequences often accompany the best intentions. The film is another take on W. W. Jacobs', The Monkey's Paw. Unfortunately the 1980s slashers film has convoluted what younger people consider horror. Horror is equated to slasher horror films. But horror genre is much wider than this and traditionally consisted of cautionary tales about the evils that can result from tempting fate. Usually, these tales had a main idea behind it that could be applied to everyday life.

The film has good cinematography and the actors did a fine job. I personally enjoyed it. We just need to get past the nonsense that horror = blood splatter so that we get more original and creative stories on to film. If you are a mother, then you likely feel the sense of dread watching what happens in the film.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
How did this confuse people?
bogleech-3576030 October 2021
You can tell the negative reviewers were expecting a "horror movie" with "scares." Fever Dream is not a spooky ghost movie. It's a psychological drama with an element of magical realism. The story is very coherent and very clearly explained; it would only be confusing to someone who thinks "supernatural" elements must fit into a well established trope, like a curse or a haunting. The original novella had a more surreal, more disturbing sense of desperation, confusion and sadness that would be difficult to translate to film, and they didn't fully do it justice, but it's still competently made. Bottom line is that the book was better but the bad reviews are still mostly just clueless.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Fever Dream
raven_guest18 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This is a beautifully shot film with talented actors and a stunning backdrop. The problems come with just about everything else. Had the story been told in a linear fashion is would have bored most people to tears. The use of 'flashbacks' etc made it more interesting, but essentially this is a very simple story that is made over complicated.

My biggest problem was with David. He doesn't actually ever do anything wrong, he's just a bit 'off'. He's described as a monster and insulted by his mother constantly, but he genuinely just seems sad and lost. He craves affection and seems to get that from Amanda until he crosses a line I don't think he really understood. Neither of his parents seem interested in him and he's left to his own devices. Was it the splitting of his soul that caused it or the expectation of what splitting his soul would cause? Corolla was expecting him to be different and so he was? The whole 'Greenhouse' storyline just wasn't needed. It seemed tacked on as a reason for weirdness when really you could just have had David have a head injury. It didn't add to the 'poisoning' at all, that in and of itself was enough to be important. It was hard to feel sympathy when after the horse and child got sick that no one roped off the water, put up signs, called for change or any such thing. Other children are affected by it but no one seems to care, they just let their children be affected. It is a relevant issue as we're constantly being faced with our planet's destruction and no one seems particularly bothered. Chemicals are still dumped, pollution still happens and we all just shake our heads and move on. Is this small town a microcosm of the planet at large? And if that is the point, why bother with the 'Greenhouse' parts? They just felt like they distracted from the main themes and message that the film was trying to get across.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Lost in Translation
payasoingenioso15 October 2021
I watched with English audio.

I assume it makes more sense in Spanish. The Spanish title does.

Rescue Distance. It is the "thread" that makes it make sense. It is repeated continuously. And somebody chose Fever Dream instead?!

I have more questions. And very few answers.

Madres made sense. The poetry in this film seems lost in translation.
12 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The threat is in the details
danybur14 October 2021
Summary:

The director Claudia Llosa carries out a complex and disturbing story, quite faithful to the novel by Samanta Schweblin (both are co-writers of the film), a psychological thriller with edges of terror where the threats and the danger that tighten the rope of the "distance of rescue " between a mother and her little daughter could be located in fantastic elements, in the most real of worlds, or in both.

Review

Amanda (María Valverde) arrives at a country house to spend a vacation with her little daughter Nina. There she establishes a relationship with a neighbor, Carola (Dolores Fonzi), mother of a disturbing boy named David. From certain revelations from Carola, Amanda will perceive a growing sense of danger.

Of course, Fever Dream widely transcends this synopsis. It was a challenge to transfer to the cinema the extraordinary homonymous nouvelle of the Argentine Samanta Schweblin, given its complex narrative structure, which the film by Claudia Llosa (co-writer with the novelist) maintains and which makes the film retain a certain literary imprint.

This complexity has to do with several factors, basically with the point of view. The story is narrated and driven by an off-screen dialogue between Amanda and David, in which he precisely guides the former (and the viewer) on a journey through the extensive flash back that constitutes most of the film. It is not known where (either exactly when) this dialogue takes place, but it occurs at a critical moment for Amanda, in which David's voice forces her to search for the keys to understand what happened, to understand how it got there. It should be noted that there was no way to avoid that literary dialogue in off of a double narrator since it is essential for the structure and the sense of the story. The timelines, which come and go, and which at times open like a set of Chinese boxes, are complex but quite clear.

In this story Amanda mentions what she calls "rescue distance" (itle of the film and the novel in Spanish), which she understands as the maximum distance that can exist between a mother and her child so that she can keep him or her safe and which is perceived as an invisible thread that unites them and that reaches its maximum tension when that distance is reached and that can be broken if exceeded. The concept of distance as a limit that operates in a bond and that is a factor of anguish in the film, takes on a disturbing premonitory quality (the novel predates the covid pandemic) since it is inevitable to relate it to that of social distance and with other realities of a threatening environment.

Carola tells Amanda (who is waiting for her husband to arrive to join her vacation) what happened to her son, a disturbing story that, added to the voice-over story, will mark the climate of the entire history. In this way, Llosa carries out a complex and disturbing story about these two mothers and their children, a kind of psychological thriller with edges of terror where the threats and the danger that tighten the rope of the rescue distance between mother and daughter could be located in fantastic elements, in the truest of worlds, or both.

Valverde, Fonzi and the children are very good in their roles and the complex fragmentary narrative structure of the film is excellently assembled. The film exploits very well the beautiful exteriors where it takes place and which are also, in some way, essential protagonists of the story.

I must clarify that my vision of the film was somewhat "contaminated" because I read the book before. I can point out that the adaptation is quite faithful to the novel, although in it the sensation of terror is more suffocating because the story is more urgent. But also, having read it, the disturbing is perceived from before. That is why it is not a bad idea to see this movie again knowing where it is going.
21 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The never beginning story
caroline_chupaa13 October 2021
Starts out mysterious and great. But shuts down and ends before ever beginning. Explanations left short and cut and suddenly the build up we've been expecting ends. It never evolves. And then it's just over.
13 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Confused yet?
kosmasp13 October 2021
Fever dreams ... or crazy reality? And caused by what exactly? I am still rather confused by many things depicted by the movie. That may be enticing or it may be annoying to you. Depending on how much time and will you have to fully take this in and digest it ... well that will determine how much you probably will like it.

You can't just watch this while doing something else. Like having your phone and doing stuff on it while "watching" the movie. I have done this with lesser titles, so I am not judging. Some movies are more than predictable and do not really glue you to the screen. This is different ...
14 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Que tonteria!
Ebert11 February 2023
Argentines use this expression when they want to say that something or a situation is silly. My reaction to this film was this: How silly! From something very real: poisoning and environmental pollution by pesticides, a tangle is built with spirits, witches, transport of souls and many other nonsense. Something told me to stop watching the movie in the first half hour, but curiosity made me continue watching. What a waste of time! Don't make the same mistake I did. If you read this comment before seeing the movie, run away! The idea of mixing a real problem (environmental pollution) with nonsense about spiritism, lost souls and other "tonterias" results in a silly film. Beautiful locations, good performances, an efficient decoupage are of no use if the story being told is nonsense. Run!
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Won't be the same
nogodnomasters25 October 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Amanda (María Valverde) travels to a get away house (filmed in Chile) with her daughter Nina (Guillermina Sorribes Liotta). The house is shared with Carola (Dolores Fonzi) and her son David (Emilio Vodanovich). Amanda talks to David in her head as Carola tells Amanda the strange story of how David got ill from the water and the only way he can survive is the old woman in the Greenhouse. She can save him, but only by spitting his soul with someone else so both bodies can handle the poison. But David would not be the same.

It was an interesting tale as things come full circle. I think an American Louisiana version would be good.

Guide: No swearing. Brief sex. Brief nudity (María Valverde)
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A beatifully told anti-science rant.
shauncore80810 September 2022
For this entire movie, you watch people alternate between losing their minds over nothing, under-reacting to major issues, and rambling about crack-pot theories. But you keep watching because the story is told so well that you find yourself sucked into it.

Then at one instant, you'll realize that the entire thing is essentially just an anti-science rant that's based on a serious lack of understanding of numerous topics. And that's not even a spoiler. Because the actual topic is so moronic and far-fetched that you would never guess it with 1000 tries.

They should have just gone with "It's aliens.". It's just as dumb, but at least it makes sense.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
For anyone who didn't understand this movie
cameliafilip18 October 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I wouldn't call the movie slow paced or boring, as some of the people here say it is.

Any good movie leaves room for interpretation, and this movie isn't short of it.

From how I saw it and how the scenes played out I'd say: Not everything is meant to make sense, it's a "fever dream".

Amanda was suspicious of Carola stealing her kid, but that never happened. She took the kid back to the old clairvoyant to save her from imminent death by making another "migration".

Maybe she wanted to keep her daughter, but the husband came and took her. She then decided to leave her own family and disappear.

David said he didn't share half with someone else, but when Amanda's husband comes back at the end, he acts exactly like Nina would, getting on the back seat where she always stays and holding the teddybear that she always had.

This made me believe David and Nina are sharing their souls/bodies, but Amanda didn't make it in time to the green house and died.

When David is pulled out of the car, he looks as the car gets farther and farther away but he remains still - as if the invisible thread between them gets tighter and tighter. He looks as if he is abandoned by his father.

If David arrived at the green house during the migration, he was moving. The old lady said only the things that are ready to make this switch should move.

It might be possible that Carola was planning all along to steal her child, but I'd have to give it another watch to notice how things unfolded.

She might be wearing heels so she doesn't get contaminated. Carola might have taken Amanda outdoors so much on purpose.

That is also a possibility, but I didn't pay attention to this so much, since it all seemed innocent and light-hearted.

I hope this sheds some light into what this movie is about and why it isn't bad at all, at least in my opinion.
22 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Thread has already snapped ..... b/w Mother Earth & it's Children
vikezy-198227 March 2022
Horses are dying. Birds are dying. Children are poisoned.

The ones who have been damaged say:"thread has already snapped" ..... We are far beyond the tipping point.

Mother's are looking for the answers.

Answer lies in the call from the nature: "Take us back to the green house(Earth)!"

Complex movie ..takes a while to process.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not impressed
gustheaffen14 October 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Yet another environmental poisoning movie that sets up tension that goes no where. It started off okay but left a lot of questions. Why one woman left, what exactly happened with the daughter and the splitting souls. Whatever, another Netflix production down the memory hole.
9 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Waste of time
williamhsjensen15 October 2021
I get it all and what they are trying to make : mysterious and kind of a spooky movie.

"Fever dream" is the name of the movie. The definition of a fever dream : very strange experience or situation, usually a bad one, that seems like a dream rather than like something that would really happen.

And that's what I felt when I saw the movie. Fine with movies with a open and kind of "not knowing what is going on" but come on - this is too weird and I could have made a movie like this while I was asleep ( a bad nightmare )...
9 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good enough
dhanielrachmat27 October 2021
I've never watched a movie with a rate under 6, but I'm making an exception for this. I like the storyline which makes me curious what happens next, even though makes me confused at the same time, but I don't really like the sad ending.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Boring and opportunistic exploitation of eco-terror.
jhmb20037 November 2021
Fever Dream seems to be pieced together from fragments of other films, without it being possible to identify where and when things happen and to whom they happen. The movies seems more like a cold calculation to include all Spanish American nationalities so that no one feels excluded, and in the end they all are. It is a tedious but superficial film, with no merit beyond the occasional beauty of the odd isolated scene. A flawed, tenuous and irrelevant product.
6 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
An Environmentalist's Daydream/Nightmare
david-4953518 October 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This is NOT a psychological thriller. This is NOT a scary story. This is nothing more than a story about how pesticides harm the children and at least one adult in a small, rural community. If that's what you want to see, watch it. If not, skip it.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Zzzzz
Movi3DO15 October 2021
IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-alpha stimulate hypothalamus to release Prostaglandins E2, and we have a fever.

So this movie was supposed to feel atmospheric and like a dream, as the title suggested. It was so dreamy that I almost fell asleep many times. Zzzzz. Granted that I was a bit sleepy going in, I still believed that this movie was Netflix's new dose of melatonin.

So yes, I hate this movie with a sleepy passion. It was supposed to build to something, and then it ended with nothing.

Overall, a waste of time. 2/10.
11 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not a horror movie!
ashleytite19 October 2021
Not so much a bad movie just not a horror movie as advertised. I read about it being some great new horror movie so I found it to be a disappointment!
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Wow that was boring
jcslawyer18 October 2021
I have a pretty high tolerance for "slow burn" or "thinkers," but this was really dull. I watched until the end just so I could get some fulfillment from the last hour and a half of boring-ness. And guess what? It was boring. Thinking about this movie makes me want to sleep. This movie is a fever dream of boredom and "Amanda" over and over from that kid. Watch something else.
7 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Mind blowing
bekiwij3 March 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is one of those movies that you watch, and you do not understand what you're watching but still like it! From the beginning, I was captivated by the story and yes, I was more confused at the end, but I also felt like it was worth watching. After reading several comments and googling "The ending" I realised it's mainly about the pesticide plague happening in Argentina. But it also talks about the bond between a mother and a child and how different mothers deal with motherhood.

Let's begin with the pesticide plague that's happening in Argentina. There is no doubt that it is poisoning everyone in the village, and the reason why children are born deformed or fall sick because of the pesticide poisoning. Rather than doing something about it, the villages choose to do black magic, voodoo, BS, and make peace with the consequences. Now that's out of the way, let's talk about the other other main subject which is about motherhood.

To me, carolla comes across as a narcissist, and that she has always put herself first and failed to own up to her own mistakes. Because of that, she nearly lost her son and destroyed her new friends life. Even at the end, she chose to run away from the consequences, rather than facing up to them . The fact that she believes that her own son does not deserve her love shows she is a narcissist .

Amanda, on the other hand was an anxious empath, who put everyone else's needs before her, which made her the perfect victim . She was the perfect caring, loving mother, wife, friend, neighbour, etc. It is why there 2 very a different women felt this strong attraction towards each other.

Also this movie is talking about, often the things we perceive as threats aren't always threats and places we find safe aren't always safe. Sometimes the real threat or the danger is right in front of eyes and we choose not to look at them because of our own insecurities. If we paid more attention to the details, then we could have prevented those disasters from happening to us.

I guess that's why David kept asking Amanda to focus on the details. Because these tiny little details can be clues for us to save our selves from danger. Anyhoo.. I really like the movie and I might probably watch it again.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
I couldn't wait for this to end!!
frosty-4443118 April 2022
This isn't a horror film, however its one of those films the constantly builds up suspense that leads up to nothing, yet you keep watching it just in case it gets better.

Well it doesn't, and I wouldn't recommend this film.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Warning: Spoilers!!!!!
ashera-571-73053615 October 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Okay.... so I get the pesticide poisoning the water bit. Dies the Greenhiuse signify something? The split souls? Why is Carolla's husband so short with what's her name's husband? Carolla wanted the daughter for herself but she didn't poison them, did she? Why didn't she just warn them in the beginning? I'm so confused....
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
What?
TogosDad16 October 2021
Either this movie is extremely disjointed and meaningless (yes, I understand the environmental pitch here), or I am too jaded to understand the significant impact this brilliant piece of cinematic excellence has made.... No.

This movie is extremely disjointed and meaningless.
5 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Don't expect much
osmiobr20 March 2022
The story is like getting lost in the woods. Many paths appear in front of you that look like it will take you somewhere but in the end, you are just lost. So much talk generating expectation for so little ending. Very frustrating.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed