Candyman (2021) Poster

(2021)

User Reviews

Review this title
969 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
I'd stop at four times, myself...
donaldricco18 December 2021
Well, it has all the components - say his name five times, the hook for a hand, and the bees! And the 'puppet' animation, especially over the end credits is amazing! But the story seemed very muddled, and I'm not even sure I understand what happened at the end. I like the idea of the hive, and of Candyman standing for all the racial injustices suffered in this country, I just found the story itself to be very confusing.

But that puppet stuff - true works of art!
29 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Clearly none of these reviews understood the original
random_gyrl28 August 2021
Scrolling through these reviews, I saw a couple 5 and 6 stars, but mostly 1 and 2, all complaining about the movie focusing on racism rather than horror, and blaming Jordan Peele (even though this is not his solo film). All I have to say is these people have either never seen the original Candyman or failed to understand it. If you think the original didn't have anything to do with race I think you should watch it again. Nia Dacosta did a great job with this film and tying all the legends together, creating a "spiritual sequel" as planned. Candyman has never been cut and dry horror, and while I agree there could have been more chilling moments, this is not as bad of a film as these other reviewers would like you to think. If you walk into a black horror film expecting jason vorhees or michael myers, that's your fault, not Dacosta's.
289 out of 487 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A mess
kuarinofu19 September 2021
'Candyman' 2021 is a mess on every level included in the film.

It's a tonal mess, where the supposedly scary parts are mixed with parody-level dialogue (and delivery), satirized or serious social commentary, flamboyantly gay characters played as they walked right of the set of 80s or 90s comedy show and more. This was kind of anticipated after 'Us' 2019 though.

It becomes clear that there wasn't enough story for a feature film, hence the short run-time by modern standards.

Even with a lacking story and the film constantly pulling away into different themes and tones, there were no characters or character development in the film. There is none, trust me.

Acting-wise it was also very reminiscent of 'Us' 2019 since almost everyone was acting like they were trying to do an impression, a parody. I think the initial idea was to make the African-American cast act like rich white people, probably. If not - they were barely believable. The inclusion of the same-sex couple was also more comical for some reason. Again, maybe intentional.

All the political stuff was extremely overexaggerated to a point I wasn't sure if they were serious. I laughed at most of the police brutality scenes just because they were delivered this way.

To summarize the story, it seems like the Candyman is a passing spirit that protects the hood from white people's police brutality by violently murdering them for being extremely stupid and goofy.

I'm planning to see 1992 original, since this one acts more like a sequel, maybe it's better.

And yeah, there's also a theme of gentrification but the film abandoned it just like most of the other ones.

From a positive standpoint, I did like some of the shots and it was nice to see Tony Todd, even in his CGI state.

It is impossible to perceive this as horror since 90% of the murders are obscured behind the scenery. It is also impossible to view this as a mystery film since there is none. And since there were no characters or character development...it's hard to view this as a film altogether.

At first, I thought this was going to be a style-over-substance film with all the allegories to the world being upside down, even the music felt like it was playing backward, but in the end, it was just a gimmick, because mirrors, yeah, ok.

I'm looking forward to seeing the 1992 film and forgetting about this one as fast as possible. At least it was funny in places.
157 out of 264 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Didn't work for me
Gordon-1122 September 2021
The story didn't really work for me. I found it disturbing, but not thrilling or scary. It was quite slow paced, and lacks suspense.
129 out of 208 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good imagery and score. Inconsistent storytelling.
demented_peruvian28 August 2022
Nia DaCosta/Jordan Peele's "Candyman" sequel ("Candymen" might have been better title) breathes new life into the 30 year franchise by finding a new angle to the story. It keeps the same type of classy direction of Bernard Rose and Bill Condon of the first two films, while tackling themes of gentrification, police britality, and artists' mindless appropriation of violent tragedies. It links to the first film, while incorporating mythogy of the second film.

This movie is best appreciated at night with the lights off, and with headphones or a good sound system. John Guleserian's cinematography is great, the narrative shadow puppets were cool, and Lichens' score is consistently disturbing, while incorporating Glass' score of the original.

The screenplay however is uneven. The conversation of gentrification is intelligent amd balanced. So is the coverage of artists being insensitive and uncaring about the victims of the violence they depict, while focusing instead on their own fame. But the police brutality story is uneven, and some references to recent events ("Say his name") feel tacked on. The events depicted do match real life stories and can elicit empathy and rally against injustice. While Chicago police do disproportionately intervene African-Americans, and fheir is a history of brutality, an all-white modern day large Chicago police squad does not correspond with reality.

I dismiss others' complaints that 'all the victims are white'. No, not all are, and it is similar to the victim make-up of all the other "Candyman" movies: mostly white teen girls and white intellectual snobs, with the non-supernatural violence done by modern-day African-Americans against others, and in flashbacks, by racist whites. I will agree that the kill scenes themselves are inconsistently executed.

The bigger issue is that the story itself feels rewritten by people who did not agree on what was going on, and it falls apart in the last 20 minutes. The journey of Anthony's character makes no sense, nor does that of Billy, his guide into Candyman mythology. His girlfriend Brianna, the wealthy art exhibitor, has a distrubing backstory revelead halfway that is never developed. Mutliple variations of the Candyman are described, but only a couple are shown. If there was a succession and another variant took over 45 years ago, then why do we instead have the original in the previous films? Shouln't it had been the next one? At times they keep the original concept of Candyman as an urban legend of an atrocity that should not be mocked within ita community nor trivialized by outsiders, but then it is switched to a vigilante dishing out justice. The rules as to what happens when the name is called out are quite variable.

The acting is variable. The great Tony Todd is barely in the film. The child actors are good. Most of the snobby supporting cast overacts. Yaya Abdul Mateen II continues his streak of mixing in great acting with forced, overly conscious acting. Teyonah Parris does well with what they give her, and Colman Domingo is fine. Vanessa A. Williams steals the scene in which she is in.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
trailer person needs a raise
jiannovoets4 September 2021
The trailer was like 10 x cooler than the actual movie. Like, i was hyped to go see this for months and now i wish i never wasted my time doing so.

Plot: predictable yet incoherent. Character building: boring. And maybe the worse part is that the movie wasn't scary for a second when it could have needed a lot of that.
402 out of 603 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One Caveat: If you understand what Candyman actually symbolizes then you should appreciate this interpretation.
ijaqvbfj28 August 2021
Understanding that this sequel is its own installment and it interprets what Candyman is will allow you to experience this film differently. If you are expecting a carnage filled experience carried by the brilliant Tony Todd, you will be a little disappointed. But if you reflect on what the Candyman actually symbolizes and what this ghost actually means to the world it inhibits you may appreciate what they brought in this installment. It's not a fun watch. It's creepy and full of imagery that will make you cringe. Solid movie all around.
55 out of 96 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This is being review-bombed
minabasejderha29 August 2021
It's a good film. And I enjoyed it quite a bit. Peele was one of the screenwriters, but he was not directing on this one. Up 'til now, I was basically only familiar with his comedy, but I will be giving Get Out and Us a watch some time soonish.

As for what else I said, this is almost certainly being review-bombed by people with petty disagreements with Peele's politics, as with the politics of the film more broadly. They seem to think the *coughs* 'woke' racial message of this film is something the film added. And that's correct. The 1992 film DID add the woke racial message to Clive Barker's story, which was instead about social class in England. But the 2021 film definitively did not. If you don't remember, watch it again. You must have missed it. Regardless, if you are upset that the film is about a ghost of a man who was lynched and now seeking revenge, you have the 1992 film to blame.

This film maybe does has a more nuanced take on issues of housing discrimination and gentrification (my field of study) than the original, but that's because the actual historical and sociological writing on gentrification advanced in the last 30 years, and the 2021 film (surprisingly) kept up with current research.

Yes, the film is racially conscious. Yes, it has interesting things to say on the matter. But no, it is not anti-white. There is a singular joke at white-people's expence, and it is just that the black characters are much more cautious than the white ones, and they consequently live longer.

What IS the film's political message, then? Well, a couple of scenes, one early on and one toward the end, depict the police as trigger-happy. The latter of the two depicts that they will lie and cover up each other's mistakes, and pressure witnesses into backing them up. This is called the "blue-wall of silence", a well-documented phenomenon that even some ex-police have complained about, saying they were bullied into playing along.

I would not say this is the "point" of the film, but it is a clear perspective that the film has. It is a secondary point to the main characters' stories. You can easily enjoy this movie even if you disagree with it's politics. If it helps, just tell yourself the police in this movie were bad apples.
186 out of 345 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
WOW!
jackaries11 October 2021
That was absolutely awful.

It was handsomely filmed but there was not one single likable character in the whole damn film and, of course, Jordan Peele insists on battering you over the head with the WHITE PEOPLE BAD agenda he trots out in everything he makes.

The original already had something to say about racism and the mistreatment of the poor in society but managed to weave it into an engaging story with a degree of subtlety whilst maintaining its primary focus on crafting a genuinely scary film that is still effective to this day.

Stick with the original.
127 out of 186 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Abysmall... Candyman takes the background seat to political propaganda
sumtim3s00n26 September 2021
Is this really what movies are coming to... We watch movies to be entertainig, uplifted or perhaps even make us contemplate on something. This is nothing of that. It is not horror. It is not entertaining. It is another misguided and fabricated attempt, which Is unfortunate becaues Peele is talented, of propaganda. But last few films of this directors have all been in this direction. The title of the story is misleading and facade. This is plain one sided, fabricated truths, divisive instead of trying to portray a chance of unity. Just endless victimization and no responsibility taken for anything.

Avoid.
202 out of 376 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Sloppy and rushed Editing ruined it for me
Shazam130326 August 2021
I was traumatized by the first two Candyman Movies as a child. Something that has stuck with me through the years. I went in super nervous and expected to be reminded of the trauma I once had. But after the movie was over I felt more like my trauma was healed. I felt relieved. Because of the social commentaries and the focus this movie has, it kind of shy's away from the intense horror and goes more into themes of trauma and social injustice. I went in expecting to be frightened but got more of a drama about the traumas of a black man in America (which I am by the way, so I could connect to a lot of topics). Those topics are frightening if you can really relate to them. So kudos for talking about important things, but the Candyman used to strike way more fear into me. This movie just didn't do and responsible to me are certain decisions that the director and team made... The movie felt rushed and a lot of scenes didn't make sense. You don't know why certain characters choose certain actions and therefor the movie is full of plot holes and unrealistic behavior. The kills are just not frightening because you don't feel for the characters that are killed. They just appear in the movie to be killed. There's nothing personal to these characters and the main plot. There's just not enough time built to invest in them and what happens to them. And the Candyman just didn't seem scary to me. Neither did his look or the way they staged the kills. I really don't want to spoil anything but it's hard to get into the issues without details.

But put it like this...

My Wife, which is usually scared of horror movies and hates me for a week, after I take her to one, left the theater loving the movie and not scared at all. She complimented the movie and the topics and felt sad...not scared.

So yeah! Maybe this comment will help you to set the right expectations.

I hope we get another sequel because this movie gave me tones of ideas where you can take the future of the franchise and I really want them to take the movie into scarier and more intense directions than this.
38 out of 86 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
politically motivated movie
laurmanolescu22 October 2021
Weak storytelling,no heart,no soul. Just another revival for some political induced reasons without asking the real issues in the black communities.an excuse to kill some white people on screen.
49 out of 69 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cringe worthy like a bad Netflix original
epicbrowniez1 September 2021
I love the original film and I will admit I was excited to see this. But the writing was stupid and felt like it was trying to hard to be edgy. And so many of the scenes were just boring or awkward to watch. I didn't think it was too terrible but I am a bit bothered that this is trying to be a remake of the 90s classic.
24 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
If you're white your dead
caponetone1428 October 2021
This movie was slow and wasn't even scary the whole focus of this movie instead of horror is racism. This movie only victims are white people if a white person was on screen you can predict they were gonna die the fact that this attacked one race made me sick to my stomach because if it was the other way around about a movie where a white killer only killed black victims there would be outrage from the black community it's a complete double standard and made me give this a low rating I wish I saved my money.
34 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
If you like the original you'll enjoy this one
wookiedacat27 August 2021
First and foremost, watch the movie yourself so you can give your own opinion. Don't let these wannabe critics persuade you not to watch it. Just go on and watch the movie and take it for what it is, a movie about Candyman. Nothing more nothing less.
30 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Well directed, not too heavy handed
hogwarts1628 August 2021
Although the argument can be made that this new entry in the Candyman series is not as subtle as the first film, it is no less contemplative. What it lacks in nuance, it makes up for with fantastic directing from Nia DaCosta. I can promise you it is leagues better than anything the first 2 sequels dished out.

Some of the visuals are truly haunting, especially the shadow puppetry anytime it comes into play; sit through the end credits is all I'll say. On top of the directing, the cast here is really good, with Coleman Domingo being a particular standout. It interestingly shirks cetrain tropes and cliches. One character in particular I was certain had slasher victim written all over them yet they narrowly avoid a grim fate; you'll know who it is when you see the film.

Best of all the film has it's own identity whilst building on the story and themes of the original. At barely over 90 minutes it is a breezy, albeit abruptly short sit. It may come off of preachy to some, but DaCosta and producer/writer Jordan Peele have made a chilling new entry for the horror classic, in the same vein as Halloween (2018), that will definitely have audiences talking.
110 out of 201 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Candyman Has a Sweet Opening, But The Razor's Cut The Finale Off Roughly
rgkarim27 August 2021
LIKES:

The Creepy Atmosphere: Candyman's latest installment shows a gentrified Chicago hood that holds the modern splendor of modernization, built over the ruins of the past in an attempt to bury the culture that might be less attractive. In these ruins is where the legend starts to rise again and the fact this "curse" spreads into the wealthier districts is the true horror of the movie. Candyman uses a brilliant amount of non-special effects to set the stage, a blend of subtle light changing filters, use of ear splitting violins, and the sound mixing of other elemental pieces that suggest the doom that is about to take place. That atmosphere sort of lying beneath the surface of calm is definitely something that makes this movie have a little more nontraditional bite.

The Acting: Again no award winning roles in the terms of Oscars, but don't knock Candyman's performances until you give them a shot. The lead is done extraordinarily well by Abdul-Mateen II, as he takes on the transformational role of the aspiring artist looking for inspiration. Like many great tales, his journey is not linear, and seeing the changing mindscape and what was demanded of him was awesome to see brought to the levels that were balanced between overdramatic horror we expect and a realistic portrayal of horror. Teyonah Parris gets a nod for her performance in the manner of someone watching the legend unfold from her dynamic. The rational role was quite well and I had just wished for a little more integration. Nathan Stewart-Jarett was okay for me, the comedic relief role that is there to try accomplish reducing the tension at times, while also a potential set up, but he needed more time and development instead of the token role he did. Everyone else did a fine job with the roles handed to them, but as they were not the fully integrated components, can't spend too much time calling out other performances.

The First few acts: Candyman's biggest surprise comes in the form of the story that they actually focused om in this time vs. Just the horror/slasher aspects that other franchises try to accomplish. The importance of the lore is heavily emphasized, and piece by piece starts to build up the characters trapped in the Candyman's tale, all while integrating a few kills into the mix. Elements of traumatic back story, relationships that may be tested by the pressure of the Candyman's tale, and lots of things to address if possible. It was this element that really had me ingrained into the story to see what would emerge when the monster came for them.

The Shadow puppets: I loved the storytelling of the legends through the use of shadow puppets as seen in the Japanese art of storytelling. In addition to being unique, the impressive display of art goes with the theme of artistic display in this movie, and also be kind of creepy at the same time. The end credits will show you more of the origins of Candyman at the end, and I really liked that element instead of another live action tale that they could have done.

The Makeup: Several of the injuries and changes to characters in this movie involve some impressive alterations to anatomy. Sure CGI fills in some of the work, but the makeup and prosthetics for this movie are super impressive in terms of execution. Great blending, diverse textures, and levels of impressive growth are to the point to match levels seen in the Walking Dead. While not the biggest seller for many, I have to give props for the amazing work they did in the characters who appeared on screen.

DISLIKES:

Not Scary: Part of this is going to be due to my desensitization to violence and horror that I've developed from my time as reviewing. Candyman's atmosphere is the creepiest element at times, that sense of being alone and having to deal with the pressures that life and supernatural can throw at us. Yet, the movie sort of adds that Peele twist to the film and begins losing the scare factor for more of that cheaper thrills that he sometimes brings. I'd have liked a little more suspense and execution into the element of Candyman's hunts, but that did not seem to be the focus of this feature.

Political: If the legends are indeed built upon what a character says, I supposed I should not have been surprised. However, Candyman's modernization holds a lot of political undertones and agendas that you will either appreciate or be annoyed with. While not the worst thing to happen in a movie, there are times when that focus gets a little stale for me and starts to throw off the horror element for me. When you see who the victims are, who gets passed by, and especially the ending, it suddenly starts to show a different face that kind of threw off the story for me. And when the kills start to become cheap bouts that happen in the background... it only further shaves off the thrills you were hoping to see.

The Story Element in the third act: My buddy and I both agree that the first acts engage and show promise, but it's the final act where the baton is dropped and the race sort of comes to a quick end. Candyman's twist is crammed in at what feels like a last minute surprise, taking all that build up and sort of dousing the fire too quickly for my tastes. Other characters also show signs of some interesting background stories, especially the female lead who held a lot of trauma in her story and yet we barely got any of that. All the other characters with names held potential to be integrated into the tale, but alas, they seemed to have run out of time and needed more politics vs. Execution of their story.

The Rushed Pace At the End: Sadly, the other elements also suffer at the end, all the horror elements again compressed into a 20 minute finale that feels sort of disrespectful to the work they put in at the movie. The hunt becomes sort of off camera focus, the impasse is rather laughable in how easy it is solved, and the political component being the primary focus. It feels very much like Peele's writing, only without the finesse that he did in Get Out and Us. Thus, this finale may have some moments that will have some happy, but for me it was a bit of a letdown given the potential that was hinted at the early parts of the film.

The VERDICT: Candyman turned out to be better than I anticipated at many parts given the trailers and modern take on cinema. The first few parts of the tale show promise, a fantastic display of artistic decisions to build up the potential and hint at some deeper levels of horror lore the film has needed. Great acting, alongside tributes to lore with other elements keep the tale interesting, with enough horror moments mixed in to snack on in the midst. Alongside the great makeup and use of a style not seen, there were some great things to celebrate in this film. However, it's the final act where the movie crashes down, and the rushed finale does little to drive that full punch that I think they wanted. A laughable impasse, dropping the story and other characters, and so many other elements are minimized in order to just put something out there and wrap things up. Candyman almost could have used another thirty minutes or maybe a second act to keep the promise going and that was disappointing to me. As such, I think this movie is best left to a home viewing or with a group than alone.

My scores are:

Horror/Thriller: 6.5 Movie Overall: 5.5.
39 out of 90 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Doesn't want to entertain, just wants to ram a message down your throat
jtindahouse16 September 2021
I saw the original 'Candyman' film back when I was very young. I remember being completely bored by it. It wasn't scary then, and it certainly isn't scary now. A good test would be to go to the mirror after seeing this and say "Candyman" five times over. If it's easy to do then the movie has not done its job.

It felt like this version of 'Candyman' was so intent on giving a political message that it forgot to be an enjoyable film along the way. It's ridiculously preachy and self-righteous. It's not ever what I want out of a horror movie (or any film for that matter).

The characters are extremely bland, the scares are more or less non-existent, the concept is stupid and the film refuses to get off its high-horse. There are far better ways to spend your time and money than this film. Not recommended. 4/10.
440 out of 744 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great horror movie
schore-1921228 August 2021
Good on so many levels. A sequel not a reboot. Expands the Candyman mythos. Captures the mood of the original. Great story. Gory. Great acting. Great art direction.

I love the original and this may be better.
17 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Could have been good, if only the agenda was set aside...
garber011829 August 2021
I think the directing, acting, and especially the visuals with the story telling was really good, but the constant racial side agenda was a bit distracting and took away from the plot... made me look forward to the dinner I was going to have after the movie cause I just wanted to get through the creator(s) personal point of view I'm now getting force fed, instead of a cool horror movie I thought I was coming to watch.
45 out of 108 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Total woke waste of money
clintonnesvold17 October 2021
I'm 41 grew up watching the original movie, not my favorite horror movie but a good horror movie. I was excited for this remake as the first seemed like it suffered from a lower budget but instead was treated to a working pile of garbage, with a bigger budget. All I wanted was a great remake but instead i got a terrible attempt at a remake. If your a true fan of horror movies think terrible remake of nightmare on elm street on steroids. The remake of Friday the 13th is better. Which isn't saying much, who the hell is rating this movie high enough to give it a 6/10?
43 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Boring....
pnwyet27 August 2021
The movie started really slow and thought it would get better, but i WAS SO WRONG. So dissapointing and the ending was stupid and bad. My rating 3/10.
51 out of 127 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Woeful and terrible
patatkelly4 September 2021
How did this movie get 85 percent on one site?!! This movie stinks.. It has no story line and can deicide what it's Ment to be. One of the worst movies iv seen this year avoid!!
246 out of 414 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Watch this movie! The negative reviews are politically motivated!
hellhath-0198520 May 2022
I can't even fathom why there are so many negative reviews until I started reading them and realized it's a bunch of people who somehow find discussing heinous acts against a black community and gentrification a sensitive topic for them. You guys are a joke. This movie was beautifully done. If you didn't "get it" in 1992 then you won't now. Please ignore the negativity and take the time to see this. It's creepy, mesmerizing and in addition casts very important messages. The cast did a great job!
20 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A little better than expected
crom-dubh5 December 2022
Looking at the reviews here, I was expecting this to be a great deal worse than it was. While the first film was better overall, this one does have its merits. And yes, this is a sequel, not a reboot.

Some people seem to be really put off by the social commentary here. I will say that at times it was rather heavy-handed, but for me it did not spoil the film. I preferred the fact that in the first film it was more subtle.

I think fans of Jordan Peele will definitely like this. He only produced it but I think you can tell in certain scenes that his directorial influence was to be felt. The parts involving Candyman himself were often cleverly staged, being very careful about what to show and what not to show, which I think is essential to quality horror. The other aspects of the film including acting and music were also pretty well done.

Overall I would say some clumsy storytelling and a bit of bad dialog here and there held this back from being better than it was, but I would still say it's worth watching.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed