The Pit (I) (2021) User Reviews

Why?

[mmarianne · 3/10 · 7 August 2021]

Why would these two characters ever go out on a camping trip together? They don't like each other and it's not as if they have some plan on what they are going to do out in the wild...

They are just too unpleasant to feel anything for, you sort of just want them to die to make the film shorter. Much shorter.

The filming is low budget, which can be real good sometimes, but the fighting scenes are so badly done that there is nothing to it more than just fill-out.

I used to love watching survival man before he started to claim that he was the only "real" one out there, which is just bitterness, and I guess he is trying to make some money out of his old fame, but he is no actor, in my never humble opinion. (see, I am like him in that way)

But what really makes this movie bad is that they're just not likable at all.

An ok short story made too long

[supermellowcali · 3/10 · 7 August 2021]

If it was a story you'd read in a few pages, this might be ok. The acting was fine but the dialog was too uninteresting to me to carry on so long.

The set bugged me too. In theory both men could fall into the same pit, but this opening was so small that it seemed unlikely. That would be overlookable if not for the inexplicably weak attempts to escape by two apparently relatively capable men. It might have worked for me if the hole had been different or if they had attempted to dig as if their lives depended on it. But it seemed like they would have succeeded if they'd really tried.

Maybe the point is that Mister Survival is lame and, as with most people claiming expertise, doesn't really know as much as they believe they do... as in, two hillbillies that think they're smart? If so I'd add a couple stars for theme and ironic humor, but I don't think that's what this movie was going for.

Overall this felt like a play that was movie-ized but maybe should have stayed on the stage.

This Might Have Worked as a Short.

[ReaLMoisan · 3/10 · 7 August 2021]

This is a very low budget affair. With three cast members and a dog, and it's all shot in one location. It's also darker and more crude in tone than I expected, and it gets a little crazy near the end. There seems to be a script for the dialogue, but some of the lines and scenes feel ad libbed. It could also just be an issue with the editing, because lines of dialogue are being repeated after camera cuts.

Most of the exposition of the two primary characters is done through flashbacks. Though they do provide context for their relationship and history together, they could be cut entirely from the film. The scenes are jarring, and visually unpleasant due to camera focus, and after effects. These scenes are bloated and unnecessary, and the exposition added could have been delivered in more effectively ways.

The movie does make a clear distinction between a cenote and a sinkhole. With a cenote being formed in limestone, so you know the characters are surrounded by stone, and not soil. Which means they can't just dig themselves out. The issue is a real lack of continuity and establishing shots of the cenote size and depth. It's hard to get invested in characters, if you can't appreciate the situation they're in.

By far, the most perplexing issue with the film is seeing some really poor survival techniques on display. The twist ending maybe an excuse for these issues, but it still doesn't actually work narratively. When you have the Survivorman playing the lead, you don't expect bad survival practices.

A few such issues, without really going into spoilers is being severely pierced by an object, and pulling that object out of the wound. Using fire to cauterize a wound (this is one of those dangerous tropes), and the treatment used for a bite that is fatal in less than 1 in 1,000 occurrences.

The ending was a real disappointment too. This type of twist ending is one of the worst tropes in all of film and television. Without spoiling anything, this trope is a slap in the face of an audience, saying this was all a waste of time.

I now dislike Les Stroud

[Porkleaker · 1/10 · 23 September 2021]

I had followed him earlier in his career doing Survivorman and even some of his other shows but this the worst of the worst, it's almost as bad as his Bigfoot show, you know, that one with the fake puppets and whatnot? 100% proven to be fakes and he promoted that. Seems like he's making a lot of bad career decisions or doesn't have any.

2.7 !?

[gregorionchant · 1/10 · 11 August 2021]

This was so bad it's downright embarrassing.

0/10.

What?

[lsbarney · 2/10 · 29 May 2023]

I still love Les Stroud, have watched his survival series for years but, honestly, I don't think he should do another movie. So many survival mistakes were made during this film that I was almost yelling into the screen. For example, they conclude that they have no rope and they try tying clothes together; then, at soon point Les comes up with huge roll of orange paracord? Six weeks of survival in the pit (eating cottonmouth snakes) and yet neither look thin enough to squeeze through the cave opening that the dog got through? And no note on the dog who came and went freely in/out of the pit. I learned enough through the Survivorman series that I could have escaped that pit within the first 24 hours. Les knows better than to carry a backpack that doesn't contain food. Water and shelter items. I think there should be a contest where the winner is determined by the number of survival mistakes they can find in this movie. Could that have been it's purpose?

entertaining

[princesspupuce · 9/10 · 12 August 2021]

I loved it ! We don't know what's going to happen so it keeps us entertained! I am easily distracted and this one kept my attention until the very end so that says something !