Widow's Point (2019) Poster

(2019)

User Reviews

Review this title
45 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Overweight, Middle Aged Men Should Not Wear Their Hair In A Bun! It's Dangerous!
AlexanderAnubis2 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
And this movie demonstrates why.

Horror author Thomas Livingston, (Craig Sheffer), convinces the owner of a haunted lighthouse, (played with remarkable vitality by the unwrapped, bleached mummy of Seti I), to lock him into the tower for a weekend to gather information for a new book.

Mr. Livingston spends a great deal of time pulling faces, sitting whenever possible, going up and down a wrought-iron spiral staircase looking for the backpack he is wearing, opening a multitude of small plastic bottles of water and finding that none of them are of the proper vintage, and regretting that he failed to check the expiration dates on his Wonder Bread and bologna. (The producers should seriously consider marketing a Thomas Livingston action figure.)

In short, things go from bad to worse until eventually Mr. Livingston must escape the accursed place by any means necessary.

Fortunately, a very large, cyclopean octopus with only four arms and a serious glandular disorder, intercepts the images sent from Mr. Livingston's malfunctioning wireless camera, falls instantly in love, and takes the Nantucket Sleigh Ride from his home near The Island of Misfit Toys to rescue the intrepid writer.

Unfortunately, when the heroic quadruped arrives and calls, "Rapunzel, let down your hair!" Mr. Livingston discovers that his bun has become entangled like the Gordian knot.

Attempting to loosen it using the harpoon stored on the third level, (all REAL lighthouses since the Pharos at Alexandria have been equipped with harpoons...Herman Melville said so), Mr. Livingston loses his balance, somehow slides past a metal grating with bars spaced about four inches apart, through a small window and falls to his death.

His soul is quickly snatched by an alien for the collection it has been building since 1832 when it caused the wreck of a Clipper ship, (even though the Clipper wasn't developed until the 1840s...now that's devious), where it will remain trapped in the lighthouse until said alien acquires the full mint-condition set, when it will auction them on EBay for the price of a ticket back home.

The octopus, (who had already been depressed since it was disowned by its parents Cthulu and Nyalarthotep), winds up in the Doldrums, hangs out with The Goat With A Thousand Young, gets a tattoo, and becomes an opium addict.

Seti, who neglected to get an indemnification from Mr. Livingston, (I presume), finds that his insurance rates become ruinously high, and he loses the lighthouse to Captain January who turns it into a shrine to Shirley Temple. The Historical Society objects and bitter litigation ensues.

A tragedy of star-crossed lovers not seen since the days of the Elizabethan metaphysical poets like Andrew Marvell, William Shakespeare or Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford.

Writer, producer, director Gregory Lamberson has done something very special here and may well become the true successor to the Polonia Brothers. Special notice should be given to the editing, which has enough non sequiturs to out-Wood Ed Wood, the costume design which includes a police officer's uniform with the American Flag on the wrong sleeve and hence backwards, and a family of four in the 1930s wearing styles from at least four different decades between 1880 and 1970 without one single article being from 1930-1939.

But it is the cinematography that has something truly unique: a ghostly bride who uses both hands to lift the hem of her gown above her shoes before starting to climb the stairs. Most filmmakers would fear this prosaic detail might spoil the supernatural effect and place the view a bit higher or edit it out, but this film dares to tread where others would only attempt to float.

The longest winter I ever spent was a weekend in Buffalo.

XYZ

Note: Craig Sheffer dropped out of sight shortly after the release of Widow's Point. There is an unsubstantiated rumor that when Gabrielle Anwar learned Mr. Sheffer had allowed their daughter to appear in the film she lured Sheffer, Anthony Michael Hall, and some other guy into an underground crypt with a tale of fabulous treasure and locked them in. Probably just nonsense.
24 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Welp...
haskel-729519 December 2020
This is so hard to review. On one hand, it is absolutely awful. I mean, it is as bad as anything I've ever seen. On the other hand, it is unintentionally hilariously. I laughed harder at this than I did the room. There is a sequence near the end with Sheffer channeling his inner Gary Busey in the most so bad it's good way possible. As a movie, this is cheap junk. As a late night, get your friends together and laugh joke, it's great!
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
And it shall come
nogodnomasters3 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Author Thomas Livingston (Craig Sheffer ) convinces the owner (Michael Thurber) of the haunted Widow's Point Lighthouse to let him stay there a weekend. He is locked in the lighthouse for 2 days.

There are ghosts in the film and flashbacks to previous events. It reminded me of "1408" except only half as good. I think with some name stars and a better script adaptation this would have been a good story. I wasn't too fond of the reason for all the deaths which we get 5 minutes from the end. Filmed at Point Gratiot Light in Dunkirk, NY.

Guide: No swearing, sex, or nudity.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not without some redeeming features
Milk_Tray_Guy1 January 2021
Low budget flick about a horror writer's stay in a haunted lighthouse to promote his new book (think 1408 by the sea). Some dodgy acting, although star Craig Sheffer is entertaining, and the bride ghost looks pretty cool at times. Shame the climax looks like it was ripped straight out of 1970's Dr Who. 5/10
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Pointless Waste
Vlad_Imirivan1 September 2020
Yep! it's one those complete with BS score Nothing here! move on...
22 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What A Shipwreck
tazweasel17 October 2020
I had hoped this was going to be a creepy ghost story. At first, it started that way, then it went rapidly down hill. The acting was atrocious, and the story line went too far over the top for my liking. I wouldn't waste your energy on this!
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
This is no Light house
Stanlee10712 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This is sad, really bad from the acting to the storyline. I have never wanted to stop watching a film before the end than this in a long while. This is irking beyond belief and the ghosts have been "inspired" from other movies and the music accompanying the scenes is cheesy folk-ie and does not suit the movie. Instead it is almost mocking it by proxy... Some of the sets look like they were shot from a cheap theatre.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Nothing much of any thrills to be had here...
paul_haakonsen5 September 2020
Well, granted I was lured in by this 2019 thriller's movie cover/poster, and I actually had no idea what the movie was about or who was in it. The movie seemed like a horror movie, little did I know that it was a mere thriller, so I sat down to watch it.

And "Widow's Point" was a swing and a miss from director Gregory Lamberson in terms of entertaining me. Sure, the movie was semi-watchable, but it was very, very slow-paced and rather uneventful. And when something did happen, it was just something bland which made me merely shrug my shoulders at best.

For a thriller, then "Widow's Peak" was stale and generic. The storyline was very scripted and predictable, which most definitely didn't add an ounce of enjoyment to the movie, to be honest.

What did work for the movie was the fact that Craig Sheffer was on the cast list. But even with him on the cast list it wasn't much of an uplifting addition to the movie, because he had very little to work with.

The special effects in "Widow's Peak" were not impressive. They worked as intended, for sure, but they were by no means impressive, especially for a movie from 2019.

I am rating "Widow's Peak" a mere, but generous, three out of ten stars. I wasn't impressed nor entertained. And chances of me returning to watch "Widow's Point" ever again are about as big of a me winning the lottery; and since I don't play the lottery, well...
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I couldn't take the terrifying acting...
chrisgilmer3 September 2020
I watched 35 minutes of this movie and couldn't take anymore. This is an awful waste of film and anyone's time who sits through it.
14 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A complete waste of time. don't even think about watching this
ajanelson-0828827 September 2020
After the first 10 minutes I knew it would be an awful film. The acting is terrible. What was worse was I paid money to rent the film thinking I'd have a nice Sunday afternoon ghost film. I tried to stick with it but my wife almost became a 'widow' because I could have died of boredom. Do yourself a favor and don't waste 80 minutes of your life watching this!
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wants to be Cusack's 1408 but without the 148.
LordCommandar2 September 2020
From the premise this C list of players film wants to be Cusack's 1408 but ends up without the 148. Oh boy can anyone say misfire dud. Simply put....this was not a good movie. 1408 was very decent ,this was very dumb. Not worth a watch.
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
such fun to watch!
kpetri-8596813 November 2019
Great acting... a slow burn, outstanding sound track.
6 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Deserves a better rating
tariqzafar-1202012 September 2020
The premise might not be new but still engaging. The lead actor expresses well the psychological stress he is going through.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Craig Shaffer? What Happened to you?
vinskmd18 January 2021
I'm a huge horror/B- horror fan. I comb through all the FF, UFO, paranormal stuff, and creative features available on Prime. Seeing this movie starred Craig Shaffer along with an acceptable preface I have it a shot. First, what happened to CS acting? I consider him just under an A list actor and have enjoyed his films. This movie opens with absolutely awful acting. CS agent is one of the worst in the film. All of the actors were just unbearable to watch. I was hoping CS would make this movie bearable. After a box of Cheezits....he just didn't. If you're a fan of hidden gems, avoid this one. It needs to remain hidden.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Beyond horrible!
nickpedersen8 September 2020
This is bad....I mean really really bad! The actors is reading their lines without any expression what so ever. The "scary" parts is laughable depressing. Its so bad that bad dont define it....
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Eek
BrokenGlassOfWhiskey30 November 2020
I understand that this is a relatively low budget movie, and production values will be limited; but this was pretty bad, all things considered. I was hoping I would like it, because it sounded interesting. Unfortunately, it seems as if this movie was trying too hard to take itself too seriously, with acting that can't be taken seriously at all and it made me turn it off about halfway through. Plot holes, cinematography and less than ideal acting led me to lose interest. Now that this can be watched for free, go right ahead and do so, but I can see why it quickly ended up there.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
I can't believe I watched the whole thing
bosscain3 January 2021
Growing up, I would watch bad movies, it was fun. I would get a kick out of how bad they were and some of those bad movies are now considered cult classics. But this one is irredeemable. The scene at the end of the movie looks like it was made on a home computer from the early 90s. The best part of the whole movie is when Rosa takes off her shoes.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Weird flick.
holmcindy6 December 2020
It was good to see Craig Scheffer still alive though. I thought that guy died like 20 years ago.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Boring, lackluster
TheTruthofItIs3 October 2020
The director is still new to the craft and he's got a lot to learn. Most of the actors' performances were sub-par and the pacing was its own horror, we fell asleep twice, then had to use the FF control to get to the end. I can see this attempt only effective on those under-10, just bad.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
I assume Craig Sheffer did something horrible.
berg-7453222 December 2020
Craig Sheffer was never A list but this is one of the worst movies in years. Sheffers character in the movie desperately needs money and I'm assuming in real life so does he. Horribly acted cast and executed, not a single redeeming feature start to finish. And considering of all the dead people portrayed in this movie this is the sole acting credit for those who played them. I would watch a Little Rascals stage show with the reanimated corpse of Alfalfa before I'd consider watching this again. Actually if reanimating Alfalfa becomes possible it might be the biggest thing in entertainment since talkies. This movie was the epitome of wasted time.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Crap.
queenfreak8 February 2021
Absolute nonsense. Amazed I made it all the way through. Historically inaccurate references, decor, buildings and costumes. The acting is shockingly bad. Really, don't waste your time.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
How to destroy a great book
Ex-Player19 January 2021
I wish I could rate this with negative numbers . .

The fact that this hack filmmaker has the audacity to take a "Written By" credit on this cinematic sewage should tell you everything you need to know.

While the exceptional novel by Richard and Billy Chizmar is indeed listed, Greg Lamberson does not acknowledge this wretched opus as an adaptation or take a simple "screenplay by" credit. He opts instead for "Written and Directed by" - which means he is the one solely to blame for this muckfest.

The opening drone shot (and, boy, does it drone . .) sets the stage in that it's blatantly obvious that rather than the lonely, atmospheric, isolated lighthouse so beautifully crafted in the book has been replaced by some crappy tourist-trap obviously located in a public park, probably ten steps away from the local Denny's.

The ham-fisted utter lack of filmmaking "skill" continues throughout as this talentless auteur just shoots the locations as they are, with absolutely no thought or imagination used to create any atmosphere of dread or supernatural ambiance at all; and after the first few minutes it's blatantly obvious that he hasn't the cranial matter to even conceive such concepts.

I get that it's low budget, but we've all seen micro-budgeted films that utilize style and ingenuity to more than make up for their lack of resources . . but this guy couldn't care less about such trivialities as mood or tone. Indeed, the "night" scenes in the one-window lighthouse room (which is so cheap it looks like flats borrowed from a kiddie TV show) are so bright it appears to be broad daylight. With a lantern clearly in evidence, you'd think they'd go for stark shadows or threatening-looking props looming out of the darkness . . but no, the supposedly spooky scenes in this room were as bright as the Jolly Holiday in Mary Poppins . .One can only presume they didn't know how to shoot a dark scene with digital equipment, so they just lit the heck out of it instead . . so what if it kills the mood, right? So what if they're in a room that hasn't been entered in 70 years and there's not so much as a speck of dust or a single cobweb. It's haunted, right? So even the spiders and dust bunnies shy away . .

I feel badly for the director's daughter, whom he decided to thrust into a key role. She tries, but clearly does not have the acting chops to pull it off (neither, for that matter, does anybody else in this hellish monstrosity,) and her father, the director, does NOTHING to help the poor kid's performance and pretty much betrays any trust she might've had in him. However, again, this is not an isolated incident as all the actors come off as AWFUL, which means they got no direction as the "director" was too busy trying to figure out what he was doing.

Bottom line - - read the book, skip the movie. As the director's previous features generally average a 4 or below on IMDB's rating system, this stinkbomb should surprise no one. Ten bucks says the only high ratings posted for this film were written by the filmmakers themselves.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Enjoyable and pretty chilling ghost effort
kannibalcorpsegrinder10 September 2020
Arriving at a supposedly haunted lighthouse, a writer working on investigating the history of the area for a new book, but the longer he and his team of assistants monitoring the situation stay there the more he becomes affected by the ghosts from the lighthouse's troubled past and must control his sanity to make it out alive.

On the whole, this was a pretty enjoyable and chilling ghost story. Among it's more enjoyable aspects is the simplistic setup that gives this quite a natural small-town-haunting setup. Detailing a history of chilling and somewhat true-sounding encounters that have plagued the area for years to signal the curse hanging over the lighthouse, there's a great build-up on display here that uses it's slow-burn charm to great effect as this early setup work offers the perfect launching point for later on. With this setup in place, the later scenes carry a far bigger weight with the ghostly encounters being progressively creepier. Not only do the flashbacks to the various incidents plaguing the lighthouse much more chilling as time goes on, but the current-day sequences have plenty to like with the troubled investigations into the claims about its haunted past. As the haunting nature of these scenes shows more of a psychological outcome on his psyche, this offers quite a lot of chilling aspects to the multitude of elements present here, from the time-displacement, eerie voices in the distance and much more on display, making for a great time. There are some slight flaws to be had here. One of the main flaws featured here is the cutaways to the past incidents about the tragedies within the area. It's not truly problematic but it's more an idea of how long it takes before the practice is spelled out about the scenes being used to describe the events that have taken place to haunt the lighthouse as there's no real clue about them or their intention. Rather, the film simply launches into a movie crew shooting on-location with no real warning and it's quite jarring with no warning of doing this. As well, there's also the slight issue of some questionable scenes here that tend to undo the suspense present. By constantly presenting the spirit as an ethereal figure wandering around in the background unnoticed by the character and only signaled by the egregious musical sting accompanying the moment, the scenes just come off as cliched and not in the slightest bit scary. That this happens often enough to be a real point of contention with its usage is distressing that it needs to rely on such an underhanded and outdated tactic. Neither of these issues holds this one down that much but just lower it slightly.

Rated Unrated/R: Graphic Language and Violence.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Enjoyed it
BandSAboutMovies6 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Widow's Point is a supernatural horror adaptation by screenwriter-director Gregory Lamberson of the best-selling book co-written by Richard Chizmar and his son, Billy.

The sorely-missed-from-the-big-screen Craig Sheffer (Yes, of A River Runs Through It . . . but this is B&S About Movies, bud. So we remember Craig for his start in Voyage of the Rock Aliens, as the rich-dick in Some Kind of Wonderful, and Clive Barker's Nightbreed) stars as Thomas Livingston, a Stephen King-esque writer who spends a self-exiled weekend in a haunted lighthouse to help promote his next book-and where he's taunted by the Point's supernatural forces.

Dow on his luck and in desperate need of a new best-seller, he decides to write a book on "true events" that occurred at the Widow's Point Lighthouse in Harper's Cover-with the hopes the advanced publicity will generate advanced sales. At that point, things go a little Blair Witch-cum-Poltergeist as Livingston's assistant, Rosa, along with Andre, a filmmaker, will accompany him to the island to chronicle "the stunt." Of course, the mysterious lighthouse keeper will take the rental cash, even if it's a "bad place," because greed is good. And as far as Livingston is concerned, ghosts and their related curses are just urban legends and fables. And Parker locks the door to the lighthouse. . . .

Before we get to the Poltergeistin', Livingston's book research unfolds a series of flashbacks about the house's history: the suicide of an actress that occurred while the house served as the backdrop for a Hollywood production, an early-1900 father slaughters his family-by-hammer, and a young girl who comes to meet the lighthouse's ghostly occupant in the woods surrounding the house during a family outing. And as the stories unfold (sort of like an unofficial anthology under Sheffer's whiskey-soaked, wraparound story-cum-voice narration), things get to 'giestin' for him, Rosa, and Andre, as they come to discover the urban legends of the lighthouse are true-and that they're about to become the next chapter in the lighthouse's never-ending tale. . . .

Gregory Lamberson has come a long, long way since his deliciously weird '80s VHS renter Slime City (1988)-an amazing career-trajectory growth that reminds of William Riead's late '80s work on the Dirty Harry-cum-Chuck Norris actioner Scorpion (1986) culminating with his biographical passion project, The Letters (2014), which explored the life of Mother Teresa.

Lamberson's adaptation of the family Chizmar tale commands a novel-analogous-courtesy of Livingston's voice over as he researches-writes-slow burn unraveling a fear that turns to dread for the characters. You're not watching a movie: you've just curled up with an engrossing, good book for the evening. Not many films can pull that "feeling" off.

Remember how you felt when you watched Frank Darabont's spot-on adaptations of Stephen's King's The Mist and The Green Mile? That's the level of quality Lamberson has brought to the big screen in this, his eighth feature film writing-directing credit. And while Sheffer may have fallen off our radar (younger fans will know him from his from nine-year run as Keith Scott on TV's One Tree Hill), it's great to see him again in a mainstream feature film, showing us why we became fans of his work in the first place. Here's to hoping Craig Sheffer's Oscar-caliber work in Widow's Point will propel him out his recent work as a TV series guest star and direct-to-video leading man back to carrying quality films, such as The River Runs Through It and Nightbreed, all those years ago.
1 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Seriously Craig. WTF dude?
kimbg-909-81807620 February 2021
I have been a Craig Sheffer fan since " Fire with Fire" when I was a teen. He's kept a very low profile over the years and resurfaces only to appear in a terrible movie like this? Seems like his movies have gotten worse and worse. I'm beginning to think rent was due and he needed acting gig so he took this role. I understand he took a hiatus from acting to B care for family but he did not redeem himself very well.

I painfully watched the whole movie in 2 attempts. It wasn't scary and looked more like a parody of horror. The acting was terrible ( except for Craig and the woman who played Rosa I think- she had a decent sized role ). The whole thing was a mess. Craig is so talented and I hope to see him in something good before he hangs up the acting hat for good.

Oh and the man bun on Craig. Who's idea was that? Just no.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed