154 reviews
I loved this series, especially Ewan McGregor is as excellent as always & so was the actor who played his captor. The set was magnificent!!!
My only complaint for a beautifully written and Art Directed series is the utterly ridiculous and insensitive "diversity " casting. What an insult to all Russians that their culture is trivialised by casting people of all different ethnicities in roles that are historically completely incorrect. Millions died in this revolution and each culture deserves the respect by movies and TV to not smother it in silly PC characters. Would they remake ROOTS with an Asian cast? No, because that would be an insult to that culture. It's also so distracting as you cannot suspend your disbelief when the clang of the casting smothers every scene.
My only complaint for a beautifully written and Art Directed series is the utterly ridiculous and insensitive "diversity " casting. What an insult to all Russians that their culture is trivialised by casting people of all different ethnicities in roles that are historically completely incorrect. Millions died in this revolution and each culture deserves the respect by movies and TV to not smother it in silly PC characters. Would they remake ROOTS with an Asian cast? No, because that would be an insult to that culture. It's also so distracting as you cannot suspend your disbelief when the clang of the casting smothers every scene.
- danniaharnett
- May 10, 2024
- Permalink
I LOVED the book LOVED IT . I have anxiously waited for the adaptation .
1) DEAR PRODUCERS ... stop rewriting history !! The Black actors were great ! BUT there were basically no black in the Soviet Union then and now . This drives me CRAZY. Something campy like Bridgerton, I could ok , let it go . BUT not in a serious show where the HISTORY is central to the plot .
2) I was not expecting Ewan McGregor as Rostov. I am DELIGHTED by his performance. I think he did FANTASTIC .
3)The directing and cinema photography was sublime.
4) The actor that plays the evil commie hotel manager did a wonderful job .. I have pure hatred for him.
I gave this 8/10 because of color blind casting. I would have done less except everything else was superb .
1) DEAR PRODUCERS ... stop rewriting history !! The Black actors were great ! BUT there were basically no black in the Soviet Union then and now . This drives me CRAZY. Something campy like Bridgerton, I could ok , let it go . BUT not in a serious show where the HISTORY is central to the plot .
2) I was not expecting Ewan McGregor as Rostov. I am DELIGHTED by his performance. I think he did FANTASTIC .
3)The directing and cinema photography was sublime.
4) The actor that plays the evil commie hotel manager did a wonderful job .. I have pure hatred for him.
I gave this 8/10 because of color blind casting. I would have done less except everything else was superb .
- balancelife1969
- May 10, 2024
- Permalink
Good adaptation, McGregor impeccable. The only bad thing is the forced casting. It doesn't make sense given the historical setting, full of black characters in the Bolshevik Revolution. It doesn't make sense. I hope they stop this nonsense once and for all. Just tell the stories as they are. What is the need to force everything? It's ridiculous. They destroy the illusion and only harm the product. When filmmakers alter historical accuracy for the sake of diversity, it detracts from the authenticity of the story. This kind of forced inclusivity feels artificial and disrupts the immersive experience. The focus should be on staying true to the period and its realities, not on modern social agendas.
Not read the book, so based on the drama alone. Very enjoyable yarn with an unusual plot. Generally well cast and well acted. McGregor is excellent and carries the Count's breeding, eruditeness and whimsy well. The supporting cast also work well. I love Johnny Harris's performance - his Osip is scary. I don't mind the varied accents (I don't want cod Russian accents). Unfortunately, I cannot get over the (African) elephant in the room. The black actors are good actors and their performances are good, and in any modern or unspecified setting i am happy with "colour blind" casting. But, even though the story is fiction, it is a historical drama and so has a "mise en place" - it must reflect the historical setting and have some realism (a black minister of culture in 1930's Soviet Union?).
I loved the book A Gentleman in Moscow so much that I read it as slowly as possible so I could savor every beautifully written page. I was was looking forward to the show and liking it well enough until the second episode when diverse Bolshevik and Russian characters started appearing which is completely historically inaccurate. It's frankly ludicrous and does such a disservice to the book I love so much, because otherwise the set, costumes, hair, etc are appropriate. The casting is distracting and makes it hard to enjoy the show. Why not cast ethnic Russians and stay true to the book?
This show also isn't going to age well given the historical inaccuracies. Disappointed.
This show also isn't going to age well given the historical inaccuracies. Disappointed.
Great story line. I have not read the book but would like to point out that Russia's Black population has been, and still is near zero.
I understand the need to maintain an unbiased acting crew thus the description should be changed to Fictional Drama.
The series is entertaining but certainly not historical. Ewan McGregor does an excellent performance as the victimized product of the Russian Revolution.
For those unfamiliar with actual history the importance of informing the viewers that the show is an entire work of fiction by using a period in time and place to create a fairytale, which is what a Gentleman in Moscow is.
I understand the need to maintain an unbiased acting crew thus the description should be changed to Fictional Drama.
The series is entertaining but certainly not historical. Ewan McGregor does an excellent performance as the victimized product of the Russian Revolution.
For those unfamiliar with actual history the importance of informing the viewers that the show is an entire work of fiction by using a period in time and place to create a fairytale, which is what a Gentleman in Moscow is.
- sossullivan
- Apr 8, 2024
- Permalink
Myself and my partner waited every Friday night to continue with this saga, when you get past some of the casting issues (pretty sure there were no black people in Russia during this period, happy to be corrected) then you quickly realise that Gentleman in Moscow is something compelling, I found myself glued to this period drama. Ewan as the lead plays the part extremely well as does Johnny Harris, this particular relationship is warming. The entire series is filmed in a hotel but don't let this put you off, as the story develops it takes up all the space. There are characters you love and characters you loath. If you are going to watch this just stay with the story line.
- kkbnjhrwkc
- May 16, 2024
- Permalink
Would have given a 10 in Cinematography and the acting of Ewan Mc Gregor and as well as other. But the Casting is absolutely ridiculous! For God's sake! Reinventing history with characters that were so obviously of russian ethnicity (including slavs and mongols) and replacing them with these black-minority actors in major roles borders absurdity. We may allow some creative freedom but this is way passed absurdity
Otherwise the story line keeps you hooked and interested with a beautiful rythm and funny dialogues intertwined with the tragedy of those soviet days. Not to mention what an enjoyable experience it is to watch a beautiful hotel from the gone-by zarist Russia era.
Otherwise the story line keeps you hooked and interested with a beautiful rythm and funny dialogues intertwined with the tragedy of those soviet days. Not to mention what an enjoyable experience it is to watch a beautiful hotel from the gone-by zarist Russia era.
- lballdesilva
- Jun 23, 2024
- Permalink
This is a well-written and well-acted series. It's nice when a show or movie does not have to depend on special effects and action to be good.
As others have mentioned, I just have trouble believing some of the casting. It's bad enough that most of the actors have English accents. Having more Russian actors, or at least actors that look and sound Russian would have been preferable.
The most unbelievable aspect of the casting is the number of actors of African descent. I have a hard time believing there were that many (if any) people of African origin in Moscow at that time, and I'm sure none that would hold a position like Minister of Culture. Very unbelievable. I know when I visited Russia (including Moscow) around the year 2000, the only African people I saw were young, male African exchange students going to a university, and I saw less in all my travels around Russian than I see in one episode of this TV series.
As others have mentioned, I just have trouble believing some of the casting. It's bad enough that most of the actors have English accents. Having more Russian actors, or at least actors that look and sound Russian would have been preferable.
The most unbelievable aspect of the casting is the number of actors of African descent. I have a hard time believing there were that many (if any) people of African origin in Moscow at that time, and I'm sure none that would hold a position like Minister of Culture. Very unbelievable. I know when I visited Russia (including Moscow) around the year 2000, the only African people I saw were young, male African exchange students going to a university, and I saw less in all my travels around Russian than I see in one episode of this TV series.
If we are going to go down the path of casting a historical production to reflect modern society, then let's truly embrace it. I mean, what the hell? I've maybe seen one actor who looks Asian and then there are none of obvious Latino background. Why does diversity in this case mean only one non-white ethnic group in particular?
But in all seriousness, what is wrong with these people? They have taken a wonderful book and made it impossible to suspend disbelief, something quite necessary when it comes to period pieces.
I really enjoyed the first episode and thought Ewan McGregor's performance and charm was amazing. Then a couple of episodes in I started catching on to the casting dynamic. Oh boy.
But in all seriousness, what is wrong with these people? They have taken a wonderful book and made it impossible to suspend disbelief, something quite necessary when it comes to period pieces.
I really enjoyed the first episode and thought Ewan McGregor's performance and charm was amazing. Then a couple of episodes in I started catching on to the casting dynamic. Oh boy.
I am a huge fan of the novel, A Gentlman in Moscow and Amor Towles other novels. It is an instant classic. I have been waiting for a year or more for the television series but I am reserving judgement until I can see all the episodes. To write a review before based on a couple of episodes is ridiculous. The book is a work of art and reads like a fable. It is not intended to be a history of the Russian revolution. It is about the triumph of the human spirit against authoritarianism, ignited by the spirit of a unique young girl. It is charming, profound and beautifully written.
The author is on record saying he is very happy with the adaptation so I am eagerly waiting to see it in its entirety before passing judgement. Any video adaptation of a book has to leave out a lot of nuance and rarely works well. To me the book is inevitably better as it can accommodate much more detail but, given the author's enthusiasm, I am optimistic and await the full series with great anticipation.
The author is on record saying he is very happy with the adaptation so I am eagerly waiting to see it in its entirety before passing judgement. Any video adaptation of a book has to leave out a lot of nuance and rarely works well. To me the book is inevitably better as it can accommodate much more detail but, given the author's enthusiasm, I am optimistic and await the full series with great anticipation.
- robbieoconnell-10888
- Apr 5, 2024
- Permalink
I really enjoyed the first episode, and look forward to the next.
Here's the deal: if you don't know the book, and you're looking for action, this won't be the show for you.
If you do know the book, you'll likely love it.
If, however, you don't know the book, and you enjoy a slow burn with great acting, you may be in luck.
Taking place shortly after the revolution, the plot revolves around the life of one of the last aristocrats of Russia. He's been imprisoned for life in a hotel, if he ever leaves, he'll be killed on the spot. Ejected out of his posh suites, he's forced to live in old servants quarters in the attic.
Episode one shows us a glimpse of his past, and gives us a sampling of his character. The Red Guard are everywhere, and have filled some of the hotel positions with spies, looking for traitors. Anyone deemed a threat is taken out of view and summarily executed by a bullet to the head.
It's a nice balance of whimsy and darkness, with a creature of politics and privilege navigating the murky waters of a revolution in progress. Will he survive? Will he be able to use his connections and intelligence to escape?
For myself, I can't wait to see where the story leads....
Here's the deal: if you don't know the book, and you're looking for action, this won't be the show for you.
If you do know the book, you'll likely love it.
If, however, you don't know the book, and you enjoy a slow burn with great acting, you may be in luck.
Taking place shortly after the revolution, the plot revolves around the life of one of the last aristocrats of Russia. He's been imprisoned for life in a hotel, if he ever leaves, he'll be killed on the spot. Ejected out of his posh suites, he's forced to live in old servants quarters in the attic.
Episode one shows us a glimpse of his past, and gives us a sampling of his character. The Red Guard are everywhere, and have filled some of the hotel positions with spies, looking for traitors. Anyone deemed a threat is taken out of view and summarily executed by a bullet to the head.
It's a nice balance of whimsy and darkness, with a creature of politics and privilege navigating the murky waters of a revolution in progress. Will he survive? Will he be able to use his connections and intelligence to escape?
For myself, I can't wait to see where the story leads....
I watched it and thought it was good, not great but I'm a fan of ewen McGregor so I was willing to sit through it. What dawned on me as I continued to watch it was that it's so timely. Young people do not know or understand why they should be afraid of Russia or China, of communism or more generally autocratic rulers. This tv series is a great reminder of what autocracy always leads to.
Not many shows nowadays provide a glimpse of history that doesn't denigrate the west but this show illustrates that the alternatives to the western system may be worse, way worse.
I appreciate what the series is about and what I've gleaned from the show.
Well worth a watch and hopefully if you're young take away the idea that it could be a lot worse.
Not many shows nowadays provide a glimpse of history that doesn't denigrate the west but this show illustrates that the alternatives to the western system may be worse, way worse.
I appreciate what the series is about and what I've gleaned from the show.
Well worth a watch and hopefully if you're young take away the idea that it could be a lot worse.
- ucanemaleme
- May 17, 2024
- Permalink
A Gentleman in Moscow is a wonderfully entertaining novel, full of pathos and subtlety.
I recently read an article where the author Amor Towles gave the green light on this adaptation and is Executive Producer. So I believed it to be in safe hands.
After watching two episodes I can say the cinematography, production and costume design are top rate. The casting is not. Ewan McGregor is a fine actor, however he cannot disguise entirely his Scottish accent which is jarring for a Russian Count. Some of the other actors come across as caricatures.
Because of the diverse casting policies now, one of the Russian Bolsheviks is played by a black man with dreadlocks which clearly would not exist in the 1920's.
History whether fact or fiction should be accurate in every way in my opinion.
I won't be bothering with the next episodes. I want to keep my memories of the book intact.
I recently read an article where the author Amor Towles gave the green light on this adaptation and is Executive Producer. So I believed it to be in safe hands.
After watching two episodes I can say the cinematography, production and costume design are top rate. The casting is not. Ewan McGregor is a fine actor, however he cannot disguise entirely his Scottish accent which is jarring for a Russian Count. Some of the other actors come across as caricatures.
Because of the diverse casting policies now, one of the Russian Bolsheviks is played by a black man with dreadlocks which clearly would not exist in the 1920's.
History whether fact or fiction should be accurate in every way in my opinion.
I won't be bothering with the next episodes. I want to keep my memories of the book intact.
- mezzaitaliana-89131
- Apr 8, 2024
- Permalink
This is truly leading up to be a great show.
The acting is superb, the set designs incredible and with the score and filming in world class - this is a show to watch.
It may not fit all viewers, but if you're interested in history, period costumes, and like quirky thrillers, this is for you. It's dark but a bit cheerful at the same time, which makes the darker parts seem even darker.
Also, one cannot avoid seeing some parallels to more recent history - not in the same way, of course, but food for thought nonetheless.
It is a truly interesting and thrilling show that draws you in from the very beginning of the first episode.
The acting is superb, the set designs incredible and with the score and filming in world class - this is a show to watch.
It may not fit all viewers, but if you're interested in history, period costumes, and like quirky thrillers, this is for you. It's dark but a bit cheerful at the same time, which makes the darker parts seem even darker.
Also, one cannot avoid seeing some parallels to more recent history - not in the same way, of course, but food for thought nonetheless.
It is a truly interesting and thrilling show that draws you in from the very beginning of the first episode.
I found this quite difficult to assess. The are some moments that are very dramatic, quite heartfelt and nicely constructed. However, the series falls down in several of the broad strokes that the production has decided to make in order to fit the running time of this limited series.
Firstly, the creators have gone for a largely Disneyfied, PG 13 telling of the story, which juxtaposed with the horrors of of the communist regime in the early part of the twentieth century, is odd. In the book, the eternal cheerfulness of our protagonist is the juxtaposition.
Also, I have to say that the casting was a problem for me. I have no problem with casting for 'modern' audiences in modern movies but in period pieces it automatically pulls me out of the moment and dilutes the drama.
The ending is badly underplayed.
Overall, worth a watch.
Firstly, the creators have gone for a largely Disneyfied, PG 13 telling of the story, which juxtaposed with the horrors of of the communist regime in the early part of the twentieth century, is odd. In the book, the eternal cheerfulness of our protagonist is the juxtaposition.
Also, I have to say that the casting was a problem for me. I have no problem with casting for 'modern' audiences in modern movies but in period pieces it automatically pulls me out of the moment and dilutes the drama.
The ending is badly underplayed.
Overall, worth a watch.
- stevelivesey-37183
- Jun 1, 2024
- Permalink
I had begun to think that finding a series without swearing, sex, or very little violence and with a good story was a thing of the past. This has restored my faith, quite simply it's a stunning story that is a slow builder where the numerous characters are developed over the series. It's powerful and emotional. We just didn't want it to finish. Ewan McGregor is brilliant as the leading character but it's unfair to single him out as the acting from the whole cast was superb. We hope this receives all the awards it deserves. This might sound like a family friendly series, which it is, but best viewed by a discerning adult audience. Highly recommended.
This show is superb in many ways, but I caution anyone watching; this is a Russian period piece, the days of Vladimir Lenin and the birth of the United Soviet Socialist Republic and it's many human rights violations. The forced use of actors that do not fit the time period nor ethnic background was shocking to me. It's like watching a bunch of white people reenact Roots. It's not only strange but extremely distracting. A lot of the people, aside from using people of African and English descent which, to this day, there are very few in that country, will still be delighted with this shows message. Please though, next time you folks decide to make a period piece, don't adulter it.
- davidbeamanjr
- May 30, 2024
- Permalink
Just finished the series finale! Had no idea that I would love this show like I did!!! It was truly wonderful and completely touched my soul! It's been a while since a show has affected me like this with the graduation of my daughter from college last week and her ensuing wedding in 2 weeks. It was the perfect show at the perfect time! I can always count on Ewan McGregor to sweep me off my feet, and the addition of his real life spouse, Mary Elisabeth Winstead, to the mix made the experience that much richer! Thank you for a true piece of art on my television screen! We need more of shows like this on our screens. Well done Showtime and Paramount!
- AggieMomShannon
- May 18, 2024
- Permalink
I loved the book and it was beautifully written. I enjoyed its similar vein to the 100 year old man who climbed out of the window. Melding the life of the Count as the main protagonist whose life in the hotel bubble is juxtaposed with events of Russian history. At the same time whilst his class has given him manners and good humour this is seen as an anachronism within the revolutionary context. His adaptation to the circumstances is necessary but the relationships that he establishes with all those he meets is consistent. It reminds us that a person whose conduct is impeccable to all will transcend any definition of class which is naturally prone to bias. McGregor has captured the Count's personality so well and a number of great moments from the book have happened. My only concerns are that reading such a great book will inevitably lead to some disappointment as rarely can TV truly recreate such art. There will always be plot lines removed or layered or simplified (and that is why I feel books are a dominant medium for intellectuals). This has happened a bit but my wife has not read the book and is really enjoying the TV version so that for me is an important barometer for the production. As someone who did read the book the only weird thing for me would be to try and convince me to deny this is set in Russia during the revolution. I enjoy Russian history itself and it was this context that made sense for me in the book and it shapes the drama and humour, the motivations and characters behaviours. I'm not interested in trying to parallel this with modern Russia or any other view of a distopian adaptive society. Otherwise the book / TV show would not be a Gentleman in "Moscow" but a Gentleman in "any distopian context you care to imagine". Maybe that is what is wanted but it could be considered revisionist and culturally disturbing given the supposed desire for integrity and authenticity.
I've read articles implying that Moscow is not an important factor and should be lessened so that broader messages can be portrayed of a modern context. Maybe this is spin to attract viewership and might help. But I'd still hope people would read the book for it's gorgeous. My view is that the Russian past is the past and is also its past. It should be respected for what it was however agreeable or not to those outside Russia. It is not a predictor of alternate countries present or future which is to use an analogy why Civil War is about America and not a metaphor for any other country.
I've read articles implying that Moscow is not an important factor and should be lessened so that broader messages can be portrayed of a modern context. Maybe this is spin to attract viewership and might help. But I'd still hope people would read the book for it's gorgeous. My view is that the Russian past is the past and is also its past. It should be respected for what it was however agreeable or not to those outside Russia. It is not a predictor of alternate countries present or future which is to use an analogy why Civil War is about America and not a metaphor for any other country.
I hadn't read the book and I understand that those that have love to crow at how much better it is - but was it ever thus. I have however watched every episode. Initially (knowing nothing of its pedigree) I skipped it on cursory glance, but after a friend who had read the book urged me to watch it, I decided to give it a go. Oh boy. I instantly fell in love with it.
Filmed almost entirely in one large set you could be mistaken for thinking it's a stage adaptation, but the claustrophobia simply reflects the plight of the titular character, condemned to live under house arrest in poverty whilst observing the last vestiges of Moscow opulence around him. In many ways this is why I fell in love with the production. Instead of blowing millions on location shooting and expensive CGI, the show focuses instead on the characters who intertwine and flow gracefully through the story.
These characters are so beautifully observed by both the writer and the cast that you become deeply invested in their stories and ultimately their plights.
McGregor has risen to new heights for me. I always thought positively of him but as a character actor, the natural evolution of all actors as they approach middle-age, he does a magnificent job of bringing Alex alive. The gradual growth of the character through the ages in terms of his emotional development and his reaction to the affection from all around, is a dream to watch.
I know there have been some comments about the choice of ethnicity for some of the characters at a time and place where it would not have been commonplace and as a stickler for historical accuracy I understand that. But, ultimately the choice works well in reflecting the backgrounds of those characters and only adds to the richness of the tapestry.
A Gentleman in Moscow is a must watch if you harken for a time when a great story was allowed to breathe and develop and those involved believed passionately in the work beyond simply a means to a pay cheque.
Filmed almost entirely in one large set you could be mistaken for thinking it's a stage adaptation, but the claustrophobia simply reflects the plight of the titular character, condemned to live under house arrest in poverty whilst observing the last vestiges of Moscow opulence around him. In many ways this is why I fell in love with the production. Instead of blowing millions on location shooting and expensive CGI, the show focuses instead on the characters who intertwine and flow gracefully through the story.
These characters are so beautifully observed by both the writer and the cast that you become deeply invested in their stories and ultimately their plights.
McGregor has risen to new heights for me. I always thought positively of him but as a character actor, the natural evolution of all actors as they approach middle-age, he does a magnificent job of bringing Alex alive. The gradual growth of the character through the ages in terms of his emotional development and his reaction to the affection from all around, is a dream to watch.
I know there have been some comments about the choice of ethnicity for some of the characters at a time and place where it would not have been commonplace and as a stickler for historical accuracy I understand that. But, ultimately the choice works well in reflecting the backgrounds of those characters and only adds to the richness of the tapestry.
A Gentleman in Moscow is a must watch if you harken for a time when a great story was allowed to breathe and develop and those involved believed passionately in the work beyond simply a means to a pay cheque.
- adamfstone
- May 10, 2024
- Permalink
I absolutely loved A Gentleman in Moscow by Amor Towles, and was excited for the TV adaptation. While the show has been generally enjoyable, I feel it misses the charm of the book. I understand they added plot lines to increase the drama, but what was magical about the book was the way The Count learns to appreciate life as the everyday moments and interactions within the hotel, rather than the grandeur of his past life. It's missing the funny little plot lines he has with his friends in the hotel, the games he plays with Sophia, and the general wit and whimsy of the book. That said, it's still a good watch, just more political and dramatic and less philosophical.
- alainacramb
- May 16, 2024
- Permalink
"A Gentleman in Moscow" television series beautifully captures the essence of Amor Towles' beloved novel, transporting viewers into the elegant world of Count Alexander Rostov. Set against the backdrop of post-revolutionary Russia, the series masterfully navigates themes of resilience, friendship, and the enduring power of the human spirit.
The casting is impeccable, with each actor bringing depth and nuance to their respective characters. Whether it's the charming Count Rostov portrayed by Ewan McGregor, the enigmatic actress Anna Urbanova played by Mary Elizabeth Winstead, or the hotel staff who become like family, every performance is captivating.
The production design is equally impressive, as viewers are treated to sumptuous visuals of the Metropol Hotel and its opulent interiors. From the grandeur of the dining room to the coziness of the Count's attic quarters, every detail feels meticulously crafted to evoke the time period and atmosphere of 1920s Russia.
What truly sets this adaptation apart is its ability to delve into the philosophical musings and introspective moments that made the novel so poignant. Through dialogue and performances, the series invites viewers to ponder life's complexities and find beauty in the most unexpected places.
Overall, "A Gentleman in Moscow" is a triumph of storytelling, seamlessly blending historical drama, romance, and wit. Whether you're a fan of the novel or discovering the story for the first time, this television series is a must-watch masterpiece that will linger in your thoughts long after the final credits roll.
The casting is impeccable, with each actor bringing depth and nuance to their respective characters. Whether it's the charming Count Rostov portrayed by Ewan McGregor, the enigmatic actress Anna Urbanova played by Mary Elizabeth Winstead, or the hotel staff who become like family, every performance is captivating.
The production design is equally impressive, as viewers are treated to sumptuous visuals of the Metropol Hotel and its opulent interiors. From the grandeur of the dining room to the coziness of the Count's attic quarters, every detail feels meticulously crafted to evoke the time period and atmosphere of 1920s Russia.
What truly sets this adaptation apart is its ability to delve into the philosophical musings and introspective moments that made the novel so poignant. Through dialogue and performances, the series invites viewers to ponder life's complexities and find beauty in the most unexpected places.
Overall, "A Gentleman in Moscow" is a triumph of storytelling, seamlessly blending historical drama, romance, and wit. Whether you're a fan of the novel or discovering the story for the first time, this television series is a must-watch masterpiece that will linger in your thoughts long after the final credits roll.
- amylynnosborne
- May 10, 2024
- Permalink