Love, Once and Always (TV Movie 2018) Poster

(2018 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
22 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Lacking chemistry.
savethewatchmaker12 March 2018
Warning: Spoilers
This movie was straightforward and sweet as most of these Hallmark movies are, but this particular movie's cardinal sin was that its two leads had shaky chemistry at best. The premise is charming--two past loves find themselves reunited when they both inherit half of a house that they have different intentions with, and are forced to work together as they attempt to sell the house--but the characters do a weak job at selling it, especially Amanda Schull as Lucy, who lacks relatability and a connection with the audience. Her character is even introduced to us as someone who is telling a group of children all about how she spent her summers growing up in a luxurious mansion, which immediately gives her the air of a spoiled snob--not a great first impression to give.

This impression is hardly alleviated as the movie goes on as we're familiarized with Lucy's gorgeous London accomodations and later on, the very mansion she's inherited half of from her aunt. In general, the premise "two people squabble over what to do with a massive mansion" does not evoke sympathy in its audience, yet at no point does the movie fight to show us how down-to-earth our protagonist is. It does a better job with Duncan, Lucy's ex-boyfriend, as he is given the role of selfless caretaker who has sacrificed much of his time and effort in order to travel to Rhode Island (although he works in Boston) in order to help with the upkeep of the house. While Lucy demands that the house be cherished and protected, he argues that after decades of dedication, he's officially done with it. It's easier to side with him than Lucy at this point.

Afterwards, the movie sinks into its own plotholes. They manage to make enough money quickly selling off a few antiques to renovate the house, yet they are still extremely dependant on the investing of a billionare in order to fix the majority of the house's internal problems. They propose a plan in which half the town uses the house as selling grounds, and although they would have plenty more antiques to sell off for cash, they still require the billionaire's investment, and without it, are completely without a hope. In the midst of all this, Lucy and Duncan have a few moments in which they reconnect (consisting mostly of Duncan offering Lucy compliments here and there) and even share a short, awkward dance during a Gilded Age Ball being held in Lucy's aunt's memory. This ball would've been a fabulous opportunity to show off the newly repaired beauty of the mansion, and I wish it would have been fleshed out some more beyond the quick speech and dance that's cut off when Lucy remembers she has a presentation to give for work. It's evening in Rhode Island, yet she calls into England for a conference call, never mind that it would most likely be the middle of the night in the UK. Whoever was in charge of figuring out the logistics of time zones here must have taken a day off.

The following day, the deal with the billionaire falls through. Lucy then proceeds to overhear Duncan telling his friend that he intended to persuade Lucy of his plan of selling the mansion as a golf course, and although she already knows this, she storms off in an indignant huff. She intends to fly back to England, but Duncan manages to intercept her, and the two of them present a last-ditch offer to the billionare that he ultimately takes. One year later, we get a close-up shot of Lucy's left hand so we pick up on the fact that her and Duncan are now engaged. At no point is this fate not obvious, nor do we as the audience fear for the couple's happy ending at any point either. The suspense hardly had a chance to build before it was already over.

Better acting would've considerably elevated this film. Peter Porte does an admirable job as Duncan (he is a naturally likable face) but still, he fails to bring real emotion to his relationship with Lucy. Alongside a few annoying nuances, such as the horribly fake British accent of Lucy's coworker Josephine, this movie falls down in its rating considerably.
14 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Well worth watching
jewelch20 April 2021
I have seen some bad reviews on this but heck IT IS A HALLMARK MOVIE and a really good on, so if you DON'T like movies where love wins, DON'T WATCH HALLMARK. Enough said I really enjoyed it. James Welch Henderson, Arkansas 4/19/2021.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Heart, Home and History
atlasmb26 April 2021
Lucy (Amanda Schull) is the Director of Development for a London Museum. When she inherits the Wycliff Mansion in Rhode Island, where she spent her favorite summers, she travels to the U. S. to complete the paperwork. But she finds the situation is complicated; half of the estate is owned by Duncan (Peter Porte), the son of the property caretaker.

Each has a different vision for the property, which is in a state of disrepair. While they struggle to reconcile their differences, they must share the dwelling.

The two protagonists, who dated years ago, each work on plans to convince a developer that his/her plan is better. Lucy wants to preserve the historic property, while Duncan thinks the only practical solution is to develop the property as a golf course.

I have always been a fan of Amanda Schull ("Suits") and she enchants as usual in the role of Lucy. Peter Porte has a strong, affable presence that makes them a good pairing.

One cute scene comes when Lucy admits she is self-conscious of dancing. Those who have followed Ms. Schull's career know she started as a ballerina.

There is a wistful moment when Lucy says, "That's the great thing about history...it lasts forever." Since this film was made, those words have taken on deeper meaning, as recent history has seen the intentional destruction of many historic artifacts and the elimination of many historic names from the public marketplace of ideas.

If you like this film, you might want to check out another Hallmark film that has some similarities: "Autumn in the Vineyard".
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Amanda Schull
dallasallis29 January 2022
Dumb, dumb premise and Hallmark girl-with-a-cause cliché aside, Amanda's performance was terrific. Worth it just to watch. Peter Porte did his best with what he had to work with.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Overly done same old same old
MickyG3337 April 2023
6.4 stars.

Hallmark burnout is the best way to describe 'Love, Once and Always'. This is the story of a woman who left her summer hometown in Rhode Island 10 years ago and went to London to pursue a career working in a museum. This whole idea of female protagonist leaving town, going to London, or some other big city, and coming back to town where she left a man behind...It's way too dreary a plot once you've seen it 126 times.

We aren't sure if she actually grew up in this town, but she says she loved the memories of spending the summers there at her great aunt's estate. She left a man behind who should have begged her to stay, but he didn't and the rest is history. Note the usual Hallmark repetitive stuff: she was gone for 10 years exactly. When someone leaves town and comes back it's almost always for 10 years. Sometimes 15 years, and rarely 20, but we never see an odd number like 13, or a reasonable number such as 6, 8, or 11. And when people have died, it's always 2, 4, or 5 years ago, sometimes 10.

She returns to town because they have both inherited half of her great aunt's huge estate. This whole "inherit half the estate" madness has been beat to death and it's so unlikely, so I'm just bored with it at this point. But the film was in 2018 so maybe if I'd seen it back then I would not feel this plot was overly abused at the time.

There is a lot of tension and anger for the first 45 minutes of this film which is quite alienating for the audience. These two leads have very little chemistry. He's a very good looking man, and I don't recall ever seeing him as a lead, so maybe his acting is a bit off. I've seen her in several Hallmark films, and I typically enjoy her work.

I won't be re-watching this movie ever again, unless perhaps I'm stuck watching it at a car dealership or the doctor's office waiting room.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I've seen this trope before
allmoviesfan3 January 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Hallmark's continued fascination with throwing old flames together i adversarial circumstances - usually after not seeing each other for about a decade, and usually following a relationship that breaks down badly - is alive and well!

'Love, Once and Always' tells the story of Lucy (Amanda Schull, the best reason to watch this film) who returns to Rhode Island from London following the death of her great aunt. Said great aunt has left her a historic estate that has sentimental value for Lucy.

But that's only half the story, because she only owns half the estate. The other half belongs to her old flame, Duncan (Peter Porte) who wants to turn the property into a golf course, whilst Lucy - a history buff - wants to preserve it as is.

Schull was good, and quite attractive, it must be said. Porte was annoying. Same themes and formula as so many other Hallmark films...this one without much spark between the couple after their early adversarial phase was done.

Could have been a whole lot better.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Very bland love
TheLittleSongbird4 August 2022
Despite there being some good Hallmark films from 2018 and liking almost all of the films released prior to 'Love, Once and Always' (especially the Countdown to Valentine's Day films), expectations somehow were not high. Despite it having a setting that hasn't been done to death by Hallmark, the story didn't sound that interesting and what little that has been seen of Amanda Schull and Peter Porte has mostly been on the fence at best. Sometimes though stories that don't sound appetising turn out to not be what is expected in a good way.

'Love, Once and Always' did absolutely nothing for me, despite a few redeeming merits. Of the 2018 Hallmark films up to this still early stage of the year, it was the only one that was worse than mediocre and by quite some way and by the end the 2018 Hallmark output ended it for me was easily one of the weaker faring ones in a very mixed bag of a year. Is it completely terrible? No. 'Love, Once and Always' however is very weakly executed in most (nearly every) areas and does nothing to make what was already not a promising concept appealing or interesting.

It is beautifully filmed and some of the locations are suitably picturesque.

The supporting cast do what they can in their roles and do quite well considering what they were given.

Which was pretty awful actually, a lot of cheese and awkwardness going on and all the supporting roles are underwritten. Can say nothing good about the two leads. Schull badly over-compensates, over-acting every one-dimensional emotion and looking panicked. Even worse is Porte as a really irritating character where his appeal is completely lost on the viewer. He is also very indifferent looking and wooden. The chemistry is non-existent, looking more like feuding siblings than a romance. Which is not fleshed out at all and has no charm or anything genuine about it, and both their characters are overboard unlikeable and annoying (Porte's especially) .

Furthermore, the script is continually stilted and toe curlingly cheesy, with a lot of forced banter. The story stretches credibility straining to the limit and exceeds it even, with too many things that don't make sense due to the excessive amount of jumping around. It also drags badly, due to too little content stretched out, and everything is easily foreseeable long before it happens (especially the contrived and by the end too pat final act). There is no suspense, charm or emotion. The music is not memorable and is too constant and intrusive.

Overall, very weak. 3/10.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Another Hallmark romance
Mlle_Chouette11 March 2018
It was a pleasant romance. Nothing intriguing, as always in Hallmark movies, but obviously we watch it for good mood, not super original plot. The story idea was used in numerous hallmark-movies, but still I enjoyed it. The leads are cute and the chemistry was ok, the estate decorations were also great. Although now as I think it definitely leaks something maybe only one storyline was not enough and the major conflict was not so serious, but let's leave it to the critics and serious watchers, I just wanted to relax and spend some time watching a sweet movie and this one went great.

So, if you're a sucker for hallmark romances as I am, I guess you'll enjoy it!
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Some fun history, but not enough romance for me.
cgvsluis15 April 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Walking history buff and British museum director Lucy inherits a New England estate and mansion with the former caretakers son and her ex-sweetheart Duncan. Unfortunately, they both want different things. Duncan, who is now a successful architect and has been helping Lucy's aunt keep the mansion from crumbling to the ground, wants to sell it to a real estate developer who wants to tear it down in order to build a golf course. Lucy, predictably, wants to preserve all of the history and keep the mansion in tact.

A few antique sales later and together they come up with a plan to try to sell the investor on keeping the mansion and having a golf course. It's too bad the investor doesn't go for it.

I feel like the mansion solution was a bit bug-y and I still don't understand how they make it there home in the end. A lot of time was spent on logistics and not enough time was spent on the romance for me, plenty of backstory for Lucy though.

I loved the history but wish there was more time devoted to building the romance on screen.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Predictable
moviereviewer994 March 2019
VERY predictable, but the relationship between the 2 main characters wasn't believable.

No spark, no nothing.

Found myself trying to look at the architecture of the mansion, because I like old architecture, vs. the movie as it dragged on.

Definitely won't be watching this Hallmark movie again and I LOVE Hallmark movies.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fantastic movie
aksqwhite20 March 2018
One of my favourites The romance was really cute Spoiler the romance involves a house
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Irritating hero
susan509619 January 2019
I've watched a hundred or more Hallmark movies. This was one of the few that I have deleted before finishing it. I gave it two stars because I like Amanda Schull, who can pull off a romantic role. I found the male lead so unlikeable that I chose not to spend more time watching a light romance, when the hero is just plain mean. Hallmark movies often are based on the exact kind of conflict as used in this movie. One of the keys to the movie's success is a hero who disagrees with the heroine but is charming enough to make the viewer want to get to know him further. Andrew Walker handles this kind of role superbly and did so in a movie first shown within the last year. Porte is not charming and it's not the script in the part that I watched.

I agree with the other reviewer who pointed out that the "mansion" is ugly. It also is nothing like the mansions built in Rhode Island by American tycoons during the Gilded Age.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
where's the spark?
ronbokirk20 March 2018
The story, by Sidney Sidner, would have been a good starting place for a real writer to develop a good story. As written it had holes you could drive a tank through. It had no feeling, no emotion, no chemistry and no spark. I watched it 3 times hoping I was missing something because the cast was great. It was not at all what we have come to expect from Hallmark.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
No spark, had potential
jessica_orenstein21 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Reading other reviews. I have to say that everyone is right on point. Ironically since we were saying some of the same things before we read them. First of all, we realize they're not the same age, didn't make sense that they were childhood sweethearts. We like all of the actors from other movies, not together in this script. There isn't chemistry between them, and it's tough to feel empathy for the character opposite Amanda Schull. The story could be ok but without chemistry on screen,it doesn't go anywhere. We absolutely love Lacey C and B Elliott, even our kids do! Their onscreen chemistry and lighthearted moments make it a favorite. Key to Hallmark movies is the conflict, chemistry and ability to believe the fantasy is possible foe true love!
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Love Hallmark- not this one
deniselynnette7 September 2019
No chemistry between lead characters. I love a sappy love story, but this one seemed to drag on and on. No romantic tension....just seemed like 2 siblings bickering the whole time.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
I know who this movie is for.
nogu-063468 May 2020
The Script feels like it was being wrote at the same time they were making the movie. There is a scene 10 minutes into the movie with the main character walked in the door I laughed so hard I almost cried. The actors sleep walk-through the movie. The reason for the billionaire buying the state border lines on the oxymoronic.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not one of hallmarks better movies
krichter-2472420 April 2019
I didn't like her acting. This movie put me to sleep, I changed the channel. Bring Lacey and B. Elliott back. Do a sequel 4 to all of my heart best movie ever. Turn it into a series!
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
One of the worst Hallmark movies
chrisjordan2526 October 2019
Amanda Shull is so fake and a terrible actress! Watching her in a romantic role is so off her character and God such over acting! Amanda is better off playing the Bitch in a film, that would be more fitting and closer to who she truly seems to be. Please more convincing actors!
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
HO HUM
toncincin18 January 2019
Just a ho hum movie. Terrible leads. Stupid, over used story line. Just a question: Why oh why does Hallmark continue to cast gays in heterosexual romantic relationship movies? It really makes it hard to believe the relationship blooms.
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Okay movie
dianamarinelli26 May 2021
Fine film nothing special just the same old formula.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The house isn't pretty enough
phd_travel16 September 2018
This Hallmark romance is centered around real estate. But the house isn't that nice - definitely not real estate eye candy. Amanda Schull is cute - always been a fan. She and Pete Porte are okay together. They are ex couple who both jointly inherit an old house. She wants to preserve and he wants to sell and move on. When they agree to preserve the house and still have a Golf course there is a little misunderstanding. Not too bad.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Love, Once and Always
studioAT13 August 2023
While there's no doubting that Hallmark films stick to a very rigid format in terms of their plots, you perobably shouldn't be able to see a film go through the gears of that format quite so rigidly.

This is a fine Hallmark film, but certainly is not one of their better outings, and I think the fact it sticks so closely to the standard tried and tested formula doesn't help.

The female lead in Amana Schull tries hard, but other banging on about how he wants a golf course, her male counterpart's character doesn't offer much.

It's fine, it's entertaining enough, but lacks any real wit or imagination.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed