One of those goofy-humor, clichéd but still entertaining plot lines, sprinkled with bits of originality here and there. Self-absorbed Eddie fails his girlfriend, who leaves him. Eddie tries to go after her but gets trapped and dies a rather confusing death. Enter Charlie, the token socially-inept new guy who OF COURSE is the only one who can see dead people, or at least just Eddie. Eddie immediately falls into the trolling asshole ghost role before dropping the "if you help me move on I'll stop bothering you", and the race is on. Then we get the token ghost's-ex-girlfriend-who-doesn't-like-Charlie-at-first, although it doesn't end like we think it will. The humor is silly, some parts are predictable but there are some unexpectedly fresh takes in the plot. If you're a ghost story fan or just like this particular genre, it's not a complete waste of time.
16 Reviews
Even Smosh fans have a right to hate "Ghostmates"
horsebeaverfoxman6 January 2017
Smosh's second feature film, "Ghostmates," is so unbelievably incompetent that I don't know where to begin.
It's a movie starring YouTube comedians Ian Hecox and Anthony Padilla, known for their channel Smosh, as Eddie and Charlie. On the day he wants to ask his girlfriend Jessica (Francesca Galassi) to move in with him, he inadvertently chokes himself to death on his necktie when it gets caught in the door. But instead of going to heaven, Eddie is doomed to haunt the apartment until he can make things right on Earth and put himself at peace.
Enter Charlie, an unemployed cartoonist and electronics salesman who's been out of work for six months, yet somehow has money to shell out for a new home. He moves into the dead Eddie's suite, and Eddie twists his arm into helping him set things right so he can ascend to heaven. All of this is in spite of Eddie having the ability to interact with the world, like using a ketchup bottle to write on the wall or being able to enter people's bodies to possess them, and with a skill set like that, it's anyone's guess why Eddie needs Charlie to help him at all.
Even with a premise as worn and as overused as this one, the Smosh team still manages to make a mess of it. They don't add anything new, exciting, or surprising to a very predictable story, but that's not even the worst part of it. Even the easiest things they manage to muck up. There's no consistency for how Eddie the Ghost behaves, for example. He's able to walk through walls and inhabit people's bodies, but when his ex-girlfriend tries to touch his hand, hers doesn't phase through his. Eddie is also only able to lift up objects, it seems, when the plot demands it, because there are numerous circumstances when conflict could have been resolved if Eddie had just picked something up to prove he's actually a ghost.
On a technical level, the direction is lazy, the sound mix is abysmal, and the cinematography is that of a YouTube video with no effort being made to make it appear cinematic. Shadows on people's faces at nighttime? Really? For being produced by YouTube Red, this is a film that shows very little production value.
Its pacing is also abhorrent, and we don't even meet Padilla's character until we're almost at the 10-minute mark. Eddie doesn't even have a goal until 20 minutes into the movie. The middle is paced just fine, but there aren't any stakes for our awkward goofball leads, and the ending third is just speedy and weightless.
Yet the film's main folly is that its target audience is one that doesn't even know what the word "folly" means. Plot points are repeated over and over again, messages are hammered into the viewer like a brick to the face, and all of the comedy completely lacks both humor and subtlety. The "jokes" screenwriter Ryan Finnerty and stars Hecox and Padilla have devised for this film are uncannily bereft of any punchlines. And when there are comedic situations in the film, they exist only for a joke and not to serve the story. Why is T. Pain in this film? Because someone thought it'd be funny. Why is there a conversation about corn dogs that goes on for a full minute and serves no purpose to the plot? Because someone thought it'd be funny. Why does the story grind to a halt for an out-of-nowhere and probably offensive Bollywood spoof? Because someone thought it'd be funny.
That the film's jokes are aimed at such a young demographic that its audience wouldn't even care about the lack of punchlines would be forgivable if not for how seriously the film takes itself.
The things that people love about Smosh, based on their Food Fight videos alone, is their unabashed goofiness, their absurdist sense of humor, and their fast-paced, zany action. "Ghostmates" has none of this. It's taking two comedians known for their silliness and placing them in a grounded, dramatic piece that puts a dull story before the comedy, and I'm sure that's something that no one -- not even Smosh fans -- wants to see.
It's a movie starring YouTube comedians Ian Hecox and Anthony Padilla, known for their channel Smosh, as Eddie and Charlie. On the day he wants to ask his girlfriend Jessica (Francesca Galassi) to move in with him, he inadvertently chokes himself to death on his necktie when it gets caught in the door. But instead of going to heaven, Eddie is doomed to haunt the apartment until he can make things right on Earth and put himself at peace.
Enter Charlie, an unemployed cartoonist and electronics salesman who's been out of work for six months, yet somehow has money to shell out for a new home. He moves into the dead Eddie's suite, and Eddie twists his arm into helping him set things right so he can ascend to heaven. All of this is in spite of Eddie having the ability to interact with the world, like using a ketchup bottle to write on the wall or being able to enter people's bodies to possess them, and with a skill set like that, it's anyone's guess why Eddie needs Charlie to help him at all.
Even with a premise as worn and as overused as this one, the Smosh team still manages to make a mess of it. They don't add anything new, exciting, or surprising to a very predictable story, but that's not even the worst part of it. Even the easiest things they manage to muck up. There's no consistency for how Eddie the Ghost behaves, for example. He's able to walk through walls and inhabit people's bodies, but when his ex-girlfriend tries to touch his hand, hers doesn't phase through his. Eddie is also only able to lift up objects, it seems, when the plot demands it, because there are numerous circumstances when conflict could have been resolved if Eddie had just picked something up to prove he's actually a ghost.
On a technical level, the direction is lazy, the sound mix is abysmal, and the cinematography is that of a YouTube video with no effort being made to make it appear cinematic. Shadows on people's faces at nighttime? Really? For being produced by YouTube Red, this is a film that shows very little production value.
Its pacing is also abhorrent, and we don't even meet Padilla's character until we're almost at the 10-minute mark. Eddie doesn't even have a goal until 20 minutes into the movie. The middle is paced just fine, but there aren't any stakes for our awkward goofball leads, and the ending third is just speedy and weightless.
Yet the film's main folly is that its target audience is one that doesn't even know what the word "folly" means. Plot points are repeated over and over again, messages are hammered into the viewer like a brick to the face, and all of the comedy completely lacks both humor and subtlety. The "jokes" screenwriter Ryan Finnerty and stars Hecox and Padilla have devised for this film are uncannily bereft of any punchlines. And when there are comedic situations in the film, they exist only for a joke and not to serve the story. Why is T. Pain in this film? Because someone thought it'd be funny. Why is there a conversation about corn dogs that goes on for a full minute and serves no purpose to the plot? Because someone thought it'd be funny. Why does the story grind to a halt for an out-of-nowhere and probably offensive Bollywood spoof? Because someone thought it'd be funny.
That the film's jokes are aimed at such a young demographic that its audience wouldn't even care about the lack of punchlines would be forgivable if not for how seriously the film takes itself.
The things that people love about Smosh, based on their Food Fight videos alone, is their unabashed goofiness, their absurdist sense of humor, and their fast-paced, zany action. "Ghostmates" has none of this. It's taking two comedians known for their silliness and placing them in a grounded, dramatic piece that puts a dull story before the comedy, and I'm sure that's something that no one -- not even Smosh fans -- wants to see.
terrible
jimuellcharlescj25 July 2019
Smosh looking bored... the movie!
TheOneThatYouWanted14 January 2017
After watching about 15 minutes of this I had to just stop. Not a single laugh to be had in 15 minutes and me being bored out of my mind and beginning to be slightly annoyed. I just had to turn it off and never look. Plus I learned my lesson from the first Smosh movie, which was more entertaining than from what I saw of this film. But seriously, the guys from Smosh are great and their YouTube channel is one of few channel which consistently put out great content. But OMG they need to be more selective choosing which films they want to be involved in. It is strange because they literally look bored while acting in it. I'm just trying to figure out why they would make a movie when it looked like they didn't even want to be there. Whatever. I'm over it.
Lazy film making at it's worst.
Java_Joe15 August 2019
I'll put this right out there, I'm no fan of SMOSH. I find their humor to be juvenile and very "youtube" oriented if such a concept exists. I get it that they're hip with the kids but that's probably only because they haven't built up much life experience yet and still think farts are funny. You know, they were funny when you were 7 and your humor hasn't evolved since then.
"Smosh: The Movie" was bad but I can still say that there was some effort put into it. I would assume it was their version of a 90 minute youtube video. But it's a masterpiece compared to this. This movie isn't just bad. It's lazy and if anything that's a lot worse than just being bad.
There's no effort put into this to craft a joke or make a good scene. It's just stuff happening for no reason. Some guy dies and starts acting like an asshole and trolling the only guy that can see him to force him to help the dead guy get to heaven. Yeah, nowhere in the history of cinema has that plot ever been used.
From what I've seen even diehard fans of Smosh hate this movie. And that's saying something.
This is by far one of the worst things I've ever seen and if this is what Youtube Red is all about then it's a failed experiment.
"Smosh: The Movie" was bad but I can still say that there was some effort put into it. I would assume it was their version of a 90 minute youtube video. But it's a masterpiece compared to this. This movie isn't just bad. It's lazy and if anything that's a lot worse than just being bad.
There's no effort put into this to craft a joke or make a good scene. It's just stuff happening for no reason. Some guy dies and starts acting like an asshole and trolling the only guy that can see him to force him to help the dead guy get to heaven. Yeah, nowhere in the history of cinema has that plot ever been used.
From what I've seen even diehard fans of Smosh hate this movie. And that's saying something.
This is by far one of the worst things I've ever seen and if this is what Youtube Red is all about then it's a failed experiment.
Very Very Bad...
shanshan2986 April 2020
Let's be honest - I'm not a Smosh fan but I like Anthony's content.
All actors involved needs learn and improve their acting skills.
Some characters was really exaggerated (for example the black teacher), and acting was forced and too much, like cartoons but bad.
Overall, the humor is really stupid and I didn't enjoy the movie and could not finish it.
Maybe the target audience isn't me, but if you have an young teenage kid that have nothing to do but watch this movie... maybe it could work better for him.
I wish YouTube Premium content was better, I'm very disappointed so far.
Good movie, cringeworthy but some of the parts were entertaining.
giorgidzidziguri2 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
The introduction of this movie didn't make any sense, the death of the main character was so unexpected and stupid. Plot made sense, it had dozens of awkward moments, but some of them told us the truth and they had their own meanings, even one of them represented my life. In overall it was fine, liked it though.
Great Movie!
gamingkidftw20 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Has an excellent backstory as well as good CGI. It has good acting skills and I can tell that the producers/writers put a lot of work and effort into making this interesting, good movie. The fact that Ian played a good role and I think he fitted in as that role. And Anthony took the role as if he WAS Charlie. In my opinion, I thought the actor of Jessica wasn't very good at her important, main role. I thought the best actor out of all of them was T-Pain as he played a good ghost and put a lot of thought into his role.All together I thought it was a good movie, good actors, good producers/writers and overall the set and origin.
Good but occasionally awkward
katestergreatster10 March 2017
Good movie, not great, but fairly good, it has occasionally awkward moments. It would be a great plane movie. It is not like Smosh videos, as it stars Charlie and Eddie not Ian and Anthony. If you hated Smosh: The Movie you'll like Ghostmates. If you loved Smosh:the Movie you'll still like Ghostmates. Some of the plot sucks, but most of it is good. Overall, not the best, but great to watch if you're bored.
Definitely YouTube Red Material
kamikazeinfinite14 December 2016
This movie definitely fits into the new YouTube Red setting. Unlike their last movie which I will admit wasn't the best, this allows them to try and expand their options while staying with their YouTube fan base. Ian and Anthony definitely have the ability to become better actors and by doing this, I believe we will see a gigantic change within the next few movies (assuming they make more).
All in all, it was a good movie. Some of the parts dragged on a lot longer than they should have, and I did enjoy the small cameo of the Smosh crew. The story was pretty boring, but the comedy aspect was quite good.
All in all, it was a good movie. Some of the parts dragged on a lot longer than they should have, and I did enjoy the small cameo of the Smosh crew. The story was pretty boring, but the comedy aspect was quite good.
Smosh dudes
cekadah26 December 2016
The Smosh dudes pull another rabbit out of their funny hats! Ghostmates is the second Smosh feature film and they are consistently funny again!
The story is simple - Ed dies a goofy death and Charlie must help Ed achieve three goals before he can go to heaven. And the adventure begins! They meet two girls that are just superb carefree characters and loves follows. There is even a Bollywood takeoff in the story which is wonderfully done.
Watch it! It's worth every minute.
Writing more about the story will only ruin it for those who haven't seen it.
The story is simple - Ed dies a goofy death and Charlie must help Ed achieve three goals before he can go to heaven. And the adventure begins! They meet two girls that are just superb carefree characters and loves follows. There is even a Bollywood takeoff in the story which is wonderfully done.
Watch it! It's worth every minute.
Writing more about the story will only ruin it for those who haven't seen it.
Not the best that it could have been, but fairly decent.
actherandomthought30 June 2017
Honestly, this movie was okay, maybe a little less than average. The plot is tried-and-true, but it's not executed that well. Anthony Padilla and Ian Hecox, well known for their YouTube channel Smosh, do a fair job of keeping the watcher watching the movie because of their chemistry that is brought over from their web series, but even that becomes a little bit shaky.
Anthony plays Charlie, a socially inept cartoonist who is currently jobless, and Ian plays Ed, a recently perished young man who is forever doomed to stay "earthbound" (that's a reference to an awesome show that I will not mention directly) until he makes right with all the people that he left with on bad terms. I find the similarities between these two characters and the characters that both Anthony and Ian play on Smosh, as Ian plays the guy who tries to goad Anthony into doing something that Anthony doesn't want to do.
Ian's character Ed has some quirks that can be found funny to the right person. He uses the word penultimately incorrectly which actually ends up being a good thing for everyone in the end.
Overall, this film is one of those where you can take it or leave it. It doesn't bring anything special or new to film, but you can still enjoy it for what it is.
Anthony plays Charlie, a socially inept cartoonist who is currently jobless, and Ian plays Ed, a recently perished young man who is forever doomed to stay "earthbound" (that's a reference to an awesome show that I will not mention directly) until he makes right with all the people that he left with on bad terms. I find the similarities between these two characters and the characters that both Anthony and Ian play on Smosh, as Ian plays the guy who tries to goad Anthony into doing something that Anthony doesn't want to do.
Ian's character Ed has some quirks that can be found funny to the right person. He uses the word penultimately incorrectly which actually ends up being a good thing for everyone in the end.
Overall, this film is one of those where you can take it or leave it. It doesn't bring anything special or new to film, but you can still enjoy it for what it is.
Huge Plot-Hole(But they fixed it!)
micahasaunders27 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
The movie wasn't awful... but I did have one problem throughout the entire thing, as I was watching it. It's a massive plot-hole, and I would've rated the movie even worse if it weren't for the fact that they covered it up in the extra scene after the credits. Sure, it is a cheap way of acknowledging the fact that if they simply had Ian cover himself with a sheet to prove he's really there, they wouldn't have a movie at all... However, it was funny that they played it off as just Anthony and Ian being really stupid. Overall... not bad.
loved it
paulbadam14 April 2018
It's definitely not like the skits that smosh makes on youtube, but tbh, i enjoy their movies more than youtube videos. if you are expecting something like the videos they make on youtube, you wouldn't like it at all probably, but if you watch it as a movie, you'll "love" it
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
