The only man of honor, a fighter of truth and life. And what did he get for his honesty? Defamation and misunderstanding, contempt and condemnation ... And from whom? From these ambitious, spiritual degenerates, who care about their name at the expense of their personality. Why are these adaptive ants ashamed of themselves? What for? To get your useless rank. Disgusting from this hypocrisy, however, I got excited from one question, is it worth this mimicry, defamation of its interests? On the one hand there are examples of Stalin, who from the outside looks like a total bastard, because believing in a communist bright future is nonsense, so if he only covered himself with this red veil, then he can be called a true superman. However, I'm still his ideological enemy, because I do not know his true motives. But I definitely respect him much more than the same Molchalin, who was servile and in every way humiliated for the sake of affectionate treatment to him, but you can not be such an idiot to let yourself be caught. Apparently you can, but if you really play a role, then play completely and always, do not give cause for exposure. I still sympathize with Chatsky, he is truthful and close to my soul. He is just as simple a guy as I am, says he thinks and lives with it, proudly Gather your burden. Certainly not a superman, but definitely a passionary. I admire and nourish to him sentiment. Lying for my own good I do not scold, I even envy such people, but unfortunately I'm not that kind, it's easier for me to tell the truth and take responsibility for myself. The double-thinking available to the superman is inaccessible to me, I am too weak for this, my personality is being blurred due to this acting, so I chose the path of unity with myself.
In the end, I even shed a little tears from this grief, Chatsky did not deserve such an attitude to himself, unjustly condemned him these cockroaches, people-cogs. The louse is useless, nothing more.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
