3 avaliações
Yet another lame attempt to obfuscate the truth and cast further doubt on the situation to onlookers. All I heard was omissions, denial, and excuse after excuse. This whole documentary was yet another desperate wail for attention and sympathy from the despicable John Ramsey. They did a great job of disorienting and misdirecting attention I must say. At first, I almost believed them. But life is too short to allow this master manipulator to obfuscate your thoughts as he did to seemingly the rest of the world and the creator of this doc.
I recommend you watch the documentary on Nicolas Lepage's YouTube page, which is much more elucidating and unbiased.
I recommend you watch the documentary on Nicolas Lepage's YouTube page, which is much more elucidating and unbiased.
- ztsvnvcfks
- 26 de nov. de 2024
- Link permanente
Who killed her indeed? This infamous case is one of the most bizarre murder stories of the Twentieth or any century, or is it? Michael Piehl who made this documentary believes he has the answer, and at the end we hear a long scenario from a detective about how and why Patsy Ramsey murdered her daughter, and how her husband cottoned on after seeing the ransom note in what is widely and unsurprisingly believed to be her handwriting. Having done this, he was faced with a terrible dilemma: support his wife or lose her as well. Patsey was his second wife, and he had already lost one (adult) daughter in a car crash four years previously.
Occam's razor tells us this is what really happened, but applied to human affairs rather than to Nature, Occam's razor is often wrong. Would she really have had the time to compose the note? Yes, she was up all night. Could they have kept it together under the subsequent intense pressure? The facts speak for themselves. Patsy Ramsey died from ovarian cancer in 2006, and we cannot really expect her husband to talk. Although they were never charged, the Ramsey's have long been convicted in the court of public opinion, so one more adverse verdict by Michael Piehl is totally insignificant in the grand scheme of things, even though it is almost certainly the correct one.
Occam's razor tells us this is what really happened, but applied to human affairs rather than to Nature, Occam's razor is often wrong. Would she really have had the time to compose the note? Yes, she was up all night. Could they have kept it together under the subsequent intense pressure? The facts speak for themselves. Patsy Ramsey died from ovarian cancer in 2006, and we cannot really expect her husband to talk. Although they were never charged, the Ramsey's have long been convicted in the court of public opinion, so one more adverse verdict by Michael Piehl is totally insignificant in the grand scheme of things, even though it is almost certainly the correct one.
- a_baron
- 10 de jul. de 2018
- Link permanente
Who Killed JonBenet Ramsey? (2016)
** 1/2 (out of 4)
This mildly entertaining documentary basically takes footage from John and Patsy Ramsey's 2001 sworn testimony and uses it to show them in a very negative light. I think most people believe that they had something to do with the death or cover-up of their daughter's death and this here will have more people screaming that they must have.
As far as the film goes, there's certainly nothing ground-breaking here but it's put together in a way to where it's clear the filmmakers want you to know that the parents had something to do with the death of their child. As far as the testimony goes, yeah, it's pretty strange how both of them answer the questions and especially how they just try to throw off any evidence shown to them.
** 1/2 (out of 4)
This mildly entertaining documentary basically takes footage from John and Patsy Ramsey's 2001 sworn testimony and uses it to show them in a very negative light. I think most people believe that they had something to do with the death or cover-up of their daughter's death and this here will have more people screaming that they must have.
As far as the film goes, there's certainly nothing ground-breaking here but it's put together in a way to where it's clear the filmmakers want you to know that the parents had something to do with the death of their child. As far as the testimony goes, yeah, it's pretty strange how both of them answer the questions and especially how they just try to throw off any evidence shown to them.
- Michael_Elliott
- 4 de out. de 2016
- Link permanente