The Professor and the Madman (2019) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
489 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Ignore the pompous "professional" critics
brad-eauclaire1 April 2020
Nothing more than critics trying to show solidarity for Hollywood. The bad reviews are backlash against Gibson and Safinia for false rumors about their conduct on set. Icon productions and Voltage failed to complete the script which left huge plot holes. That was Gibson and Safinia's gripe and lawsuit. They wanted the movie COMPLETED not FINISHED.

It's a great film, great story (fill the gaps by reading the book synopsis) , great acting. Just enjoy it ! This was a passion project for Gibson, Penn, and Safinia and they were screwed by the production companies.

This is why I almost never look at critic reviews. I've seen countless movies that they drool over that I think are trash, and have seen plenty that I find entertaining that they rate collectively below 30%
384 out of 401 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nice movie,nasty reviews
hestia-8675613 October 2019
It seems to me that there is some critique-conspiracy going on around this movie. I just found out there were some legal issues surrounding this movie,but I still don't get all those bad reviews about the movie itself. Normally,I wouldn't even look those up,but they are just popping up whenever I want to google something about the plot or the true story behind it. Anyways,the movie was really enjoyable. The acting was great in my opinion,the story was interesting and captivating. It was shot beautifully. It is not perfect tho,not all parts could hold my attention,but it's a film I would recommend to my friends.
142 out of 150 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great movie!!!
mooveefan-871885 January 2020
I wanted to see this movie as soon as I heard about it. Yeah, I know, Im a bit of a word nerd. To find out that Penn and Gibson were going to star in it absolutely fascinated me. It does not disappoint. It is 2 hours long and yes, it is a bit slow, but this kind of movie can't be done in any other way and it is a story, I thought, had to be told. Penn is dynamite!! I love his acting style, where you can see his character's feelings from head to toe. He simply drew me in in every scene to the point where scenes without him in it paled in comparison. Im not much of a Mel Gibson fan, but enjoyed his performance. I thought he and Penn had great chemistry.
120 out of 129 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Stellar film
stephenw-3018017 April 2019
I could write much on the accolades this film deserves but will stick to the basics of why this film is great.

Acting across the board is spectacular. Penn and Gibson are in top form and have great chemistry. Coogan and Marsan are also in top form as usual. Ehle and Dormer do a terrific job in bringing that soft feminine touch much needed to balance out the relationships between the main characters.

The film has its emotional ups and downs while staying on point to tell the amazing story of how the most important English dictionary came to be. It is a testament to the difficulty and perseverance needed to accomplish such a Herculean task in defining the vast English language and the trials and tribulations endured to realize its completion.

The beauty of this film is in the storytelling of the relationship between the two main characters. The Scottich wordsmith and an American surgeon who suffers from mental illness.

In order to not divulge more about the narrative I will just end by stating this is a powerful film that will leave you feeling many emotions. A triumphant accomplishment! Time well spent.
145 out of 166 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
was skeptical at first.....
bradleydavis-1003117 April 2019
I mean going in, how interesting could a movie about making a dictionary be? was blown away by the acting from Gibson, Penn, and the other characters. A great story all around.
30 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A phenomenal story to learn about
masontwin2 June 2019
First of all, I didn't ever think Sean Penn could out perform his role in Mystic River for which he won the oscar for and is one of my favorite movies. But he took his role in this film to a different level and couldn't have been done any better by anyone else. Mel Gibson's role was just as powerful and I don't think anyone could have done it better than him and goes to prove that Mel can still play a leading role and still be considered at the top of the list to make a memorable movie. Sean Penn will definitely be a contender to win another oscar and in my opinion, he should win it again because I highly doubt he'll be surpassed this year by another actor. This year's oscar belongs to him hands down. The Professor and the Madman is a remarkable story of history that deserves to be told and rewarded.
230 out of 246 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I was fascinated by this movie. And not only because of their imposing beards.
peterp-450-2987165 September 2019
If I am to fashion a book, I'll need a spine.

Sometimes you are awed by cinema films because of the immensely beautiful special effects and the use of unparalleled images. The other time it's the inventiveness of a story and the way it's structured. And in other films, you look with admiration at the way certain actors play their role. Is it obligatory that a movie looks phenomenal to you? Or does it happen sometimes that while reading a novel, in which the sophisticated juggling with words creates literary excitement, you have difficulties to keep your eyes open and your head nods back after a short period after which a little snoring is heard? Well, in that case, it might be better for you to ignore this film. Because in "The Professor and the Madman" there are no breathtaking special effects to be found and the emphasis is on the literature from this world. For me, this was a masterful and fascinating story about how the world-famous "Oxford Dictionary" was put together.

Even though this takes place around 1850, there are certain facts that can be found in our contemporary society. And, of course, there are also substantial differences. The film is not just about the realization of an almost impossible assignment with limited resources. It's also about the existence of class differences, scientific ignorance and the application of inhumane practices in psychiatric institutions. It demonstrates the pretentious behavior of the wealthy class and the political juggling in intellectual circles. And in between these topics, there's the Scotsman James Murray (Mel Gibson) who, with the help of countless strips of paper, miles of knitting yarn and with a ton of patience, tries to contain and interpret every existing English word in literary history. An assignment that requires immense efforts to the detriment of his wife and children.

I'm aware that literature (at least for me) isn't exactly a sexy subject. I already assumed that this film wouldn't be intense or exciting. But just like with "Kill your Darlings", this historical drama fascinated me. And this because of the challenge Murray took on. I looked in disbelief at the method that was applied. And I was constantly wondering if this was achievable. It's an era where people didn't know the word digital yet (one word they don't need to concentrate on) and they didn't have computers at their disposal. No indexed work file with linked cross-reference tables on which one could release SQL statements, to do big data analyses. No, everything was scribbled down with old-fashioned ink pens on sheets of paper and then attached to the walls. Can it be more primitive? It's wonderful to see that James Murray actually applies the principle of content management here by encouraging the English people to write down English words and send them to them by mail (indeed no e-mail).

It's mainly the brilliant acting of the gentlemen Mel Gibson and Sean Penn that makes the film more interesting. Gibson plays the Scottish academic and autodidact who, despite the opposition of the established values from the Oxford Board of Directors, is appointed as the driving force behind this renowned work and is a model of perseverance. My favorite scene is where he's introduced to these intellectual snobs who don't even bother to hide their aversion. The moment Murray lists all the languages he knows and I saw those bewildered faces of the narcissistic academics, it immediately reminded me of the scene in a student bar with Matt Damon in "Good Will Hunting". There, too, such a rich man's son with a snobbish attitude was put in his place in a brilliant way.

Mel Gibson's sparring partner is William Chester Minor (Sean Penn), an American army-doctor and war veteran who is haunted by delusions. In a phase of extreme madness and schizophrenia, he kills an innocent passer-by and ends up in the Broadmoor Criminal Lunatic Asylum. In short, an institution for criminal madmen. The doctor on duty there, Dr. Richard Brayn (Stephen Dillane), initially envisages a decent treatment (which leads to certain privileges such as a large room with a gigantic library). But towards the end, he eventually seems to be a supporter of terrible techniques anyway. It's thanks to a book that Minor received from his victim's widow (In my eyes, the weakest aspect in this film) that he finds out that Murray asked the English people for help. And that's the impetus for Minor to get to work and to overload Murray with thousands of words for the dictionary. The way Penn plays this tormented and insane man is simply formidable. And yes, this tends to look like overacting. But isn't it necessary to portray this type of individual? Minor is after all nuts.

There are several facets that are beautifully worked out. Such as the detailed decor in which the story takes place. London during the 19th century with its typical costumes, way people behave and attributes. But above all, the interaction between the two extremely brilliant gentlemen is perfectly portrayed. Two tortured intellectuals. The one because of the obstructions and impossibility of the assignment. The other because of the inner demons that make his life unbearable. An individual suffering from a post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). An unknown condition in those days. The dialogues in which the two gentlemen show their love for English vocabulary is sublime to watch. The way in which they both perk up while saying one word after the other with a smile is a feast for the eyes. Perhaps the corny storyline about the widow Eliza Merrett (Natalie "Game of Thrones" Dormer) didn't really fit in with the whole and the emphatic message about regret and forgiveness was a bit over-the-top. But despite those shortcomings, I found this historic film based on true facts fascinating enough. So if you have questions about the origin of dictionaries, you shouldn't miss this film. At the same time, you also have an idea about academic intellectualism (and their self-righteous and arrogant attitude) and the horror of 19th-century psychiatry. But what I wondered the most: are Gibson's and Penn's beard the result of natural beard growth or props?

More reviews here: movie-freak.be
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Critics didn't like it. No wonder I did!
skyscrewer19 December 2019
Interesting true story well played by competent actors. Written without insertion of political, sexual or cultural bias for a refreshing change.
212 out of 227 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Moving tale
npjy8320 April 2019
I was dubious about watching a movie about how the dictionary was created, and put it aside for several days. When I came to watch it, it was a gripping tale of two men with two backgrounds who came together and helped write the dictionary. The story did drag on quite a bit, however it was very intriguing and interesting to watch. Excellent acting once again by Sean Penn, who creates a believable character. As a Scotsman myself, I can spot a fake Scottish accent, sorry Mel. However Mel Gibson's acting was top notch as well, both Mel Gibson and Sean Penn both masters at acting, complimented each other throughout.

If you want to watch a historic movie, that fills in some spare time, then I recommend this one.
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Outstanding film with Oscar-worthy performance by Penn
Top_Dawg_Critic19 April 2019
I wasn't thrilled about a biographical film story regarding a dictionary, but this one impressed me! Who would've though to know the history behind a dictionary?

Farhad Safinia makes his first full length feature film debut as writer and director, and nailed it. Produced by and also starring Mel Gibson - who was also great in his role, this film was directed exceptionally well, and the writing was good. I felt the screenplay was all over the place in a few areas, and the 124 min length a little too long for the story being told. I'm not a fan of slow paced films, but this one was just right. Casting was great, including Game of Thrones' Natalie Dormer, but wow did Sean Penn give an Oscar-worthy performance in his role as Dr. Minor. Glad to see him back on the big screen. The score was perfect and the sets/costumes on point for the era.

This is by no means an action packed Hollywood blockbuster, but instead a historical biopic produced extremely well, and a must-see.

A well deserved 9/10 from me.
318 out of 348 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Lack of focus
cbarcinap25 April 2019
Despite an auspicious beginning and an interesting and promising development on the characters involved on the dictionary project at the end of the nineteenth century, which seems to be the central theme, the plot meanders tediously through the narratives of (implausible) love, religious redemption and the vagaries of mental illness and academic institutions without the viewer not knowing too well where it is all going. Tedious: too long, slow, or dull; tiresome or monotonous. Favourite synonyms: dreary, soporific, plodding, lacklustre.
30 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Screw the critics ... quality storytelling wins out again
staceyallyn23 June 2019
When politics and social messaging run rampant in today's movies, it's hard to find a good story (even better when true) with a script and actors who sign on to simply do the job at hand - making a quality film worthy of anyone's time. It doesn't matter who you are or what your views are to be completely engrossed and enlightened by this one. It has friendship, courage, kindness and sadness at its heart. It's also further proof that reality is stranger than fiction. Not over-acted or overly anything. Ignore the critics again on this one and enjoy a little known story you won't forget.
227 out of 247 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Takes an otherwise improbable subject for onscreen treatment and turns it into something surprisingly entertaining
MrDHWong2 July 2020
The Professor and the Madman is a biographical drama film based on the non-fiction book "The Surgeon of Crowthorne" by Simon Winchester. Starring Mel Gibson and Sean Penn in the leading roles, it takes an otherwise improbable subject for onscreen treatment and turns it into something surprisingly entertaining.

In 1872 in London, retired US Army doctor William Chester Minor (Sean Penn) is put on trial for the murder of an innocent man but is later found not guilty by reason of insanity and is sent to Broadmoor Mental Asylum. Meanwhile in Oxford, Professor James Murray (Mel Gibson) is given the monumental task of overseeing and editing a collection of every word used in the English language. In an attempt to aid him in this difficult assignment, Murray sends out written appeals to as many English speakers as possible around the world to contribute their own definitions of words. One of these appeals finds its way to Broadmoor, which Minor comes into possession of and decides to send in over 10,000 entries, some of which are of incredibly obscure and rarely used words. Stunned by these unique contributions, Murray decides to meet with Minor and the two form an unlikely partnership in creating what would later become the first edition of the Oxford English Dictionary.

On paper, the origins of the first English dictionary ever conceived sounds like it would never work as a film in the broadest of terms. However, thanks to the efforts of the great acting from its two leads and the proper treatment of its historical subject matter, "The Professor and the Madman" succeeds on screen for the most part. Throughout the film, we are reminded how large the English language truly is and how every contribution counts towards us gaining a better understanding of the importance of expanding our vocabularies. While I wouldn't say it's essential to have an unyielding love of etymology (the study of words) like I do, I believe it certainly comes in handy when watching something like this. Personally, I'm part of that niche audience who likes films about historical events no matter how overlooked they are so I can't really speak for all potential viewers out there. With that in mind though, I think there is enough for casual filmgoers to appreciate that shouldn't bore them too much.

Director Farhad Safinia, who previously collaborated with Mel Gibson in 2006's "Apocalypto", juggles the two intersecting plotlines of a schizophrenic doctor and an Oxford professor with varying degrees of success. He chooses to juxtapose the character of Dr. Minor, whose brilliant mind has been permanently damaged by his civil war PTSD, with that of the steadfast Professor Murray, who has a strong determination to complete what he has been assigned with, and this combination of conflicting personalities is what drove things along for me. The anticipation of knowing that these two will eventually meet and decide to work together makes for an intriguing story and had me curious as to how it will turn out. There were times, though, where it felt like moments of sensationalism were added in simply for entertainment purposes rather than as a means to advance the plot. For example, there were some long and drawn out scenes involving Dr. Minor's collapsing mental state that felt unnecessary and didn't really add anything to the story. Thankfully these weren't too frequent but they still left an unfavourable impression on me and likely anyone else who might be watching.

Both Sean Penn and Mel Gibson played their roles convincingly and had solid onscreen chemistry with one another. Their personal lives aside, I still think the two of them are great actors capable of holding the viewer's attention even through some of the most exposition laden of scenes. Penn has always had a knack for playing mentally unstable characters capable of bouts of impulsiveness whereas Mel Gibson has often shone as reserved individuals whose unpredictable nature may or may not be acted upon. This film uses their talents to its advantage and it comes as a surprise that this is the first time the two have starred alongside each other as their interactions felt uncannily natural to watch. I wouldn't mind seeing more films with these two actors in the future should they ever choose to work together again.

Overall, while casual viewers may be put off by the concept of a film about the origins of the dictionary, I think there should be a select few out there who will appreciate the efforts in bringing such an important but neglected historical event to the big screen. It's easy to take for granted the language that over 20% of the world's population speaks but it's nice to know that a film like this exists to help show us that it can still make for something entertaining. I do wonder, however, if there will be a spiritual sequel involving the creation of the Thesaurus. I guess we'll have to wait and see/view/perceive/observe/watch...

I rate it 7/10
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A Shame to Simon Winchester
ASuiGeneris13 September 2019
I cannot be bothered to say much more than that. Please do everyone a favor and read this incredible book. Winchester laboriously researched and masterfully penned a fabulous dual biography, and this Hollywood rendition diminishes its wonder.
11 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
admirable
Kirpianuscus7 November 2020
A great film, fascinating subject, magnificent performances, an unique challenge for Sean Penn and nothing more than admirable work. A film about words and their people, powerful, impecable crafted, telling not exactly a story but showing the bones and muscles of it. Short, an old fashion project, ambitious, impressive, touching and precise in each line of its message.
24 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
MJM REVIEW
MovieJunkieMonkey27 September 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This isn't a movie I would typically go for, but I am so glad I decided to give it a watch. It is based on a true story and a portrayal of all the hard work and backstory of the Oxford English Dictionary. Sounds boring right? You would be forgiven if you were put off reading a brief description of this movie. It just proves we sometimes we need to leave our comfort zone and take a leap into the unknown, in terms of what we think we normally like. I suppose that goes for life as well.

Regards to the history of the Oxford English Dictionary. I certainly had no idea of all the problems, hard work and dedication it took. The scale of the task was enormous and the length of time it took to complete was never ending. This is due to the continuous evolution of the English language that still goes in to this day and beyond with all the new words, slang and trending sayings etc. It is beautiful in a way how complex language actually is and how adaptable we are as a species. It definitely gave me awareness to the story that I would probably never have if this wasn't made into film, and there's the beauty in it. Film making is such an art, and the world would be a sad place without it.

It gives well overdue credit and appreciation for all the scholars involved and coveys the total dedication they had for their jobs. This especially applies to James Murray, who was a highly intelligent, self-taught man. However, the main man is the mad man himself, Dr. William Chester. More than anyone else, he almost single-handedly made this project a success whilst it was on the cusp of failing. These two men found a connection to each other through a common goal. There is also an emotional aspect to this story as it portrays all the struggles of the mad man, his victim and a powerful statement of forgiveness and human connection.

Mel Gibson was brilliant as always, however the star of the show here was Sean Penn, who played the mad man extremely well. Phenomenal performance. I love being pleasantly surprised with a movie like this, especially when it is fact-based. I am so glad I watched it, and although it isn't one I would watch repetitively, it certainly merits another watch in the future.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Amazing watch
anjoma5 April 2020
I haven't seen a movie this good for around 10 years. Truly unbelievable performances from Penn and Gibson. I was balling my eyes out from half way though. Thank god there are still film makers out there who understand the art form.
100 out of 107 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The first edition of the Oxford English Dictionary...
Thanos_Alfie4 March 2020
"The Professor and the Madman" is a Biography - Drama movie in which we watch the story of the first edition of the Oxford English Dictionary. It started in the mid 19th century from Professor James Murray who received help (10,000 entries) from Dr. William Minor who was a patient at Broadmoor Criminal Lunatic Asylum.

I liked this movie because it had a very interesting story which is based in true events. The interpretations of both Sean Penn who played as Dr. William Chester Minor and Mel Gibson who played as Professor James Murray were exceptional. I also have to say that the interpretations of Jennifer Ehle's who played as Ada Murray and Natalie Dormer's who played as Eliza Merrett were equally good. Regarding the direction which was made by Farhad Safinia, I believe that he did a good job on it and he presented very well the stereotypes of that time, the difficulties of life on that time and how high society was influencing people and their opinion. I recommend everyone to watch this movie because except of the nice way of presenting those time in England, it's a good way of learning how the first Oxford English dictionary was created and of course the story behind it.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Oscar winning Performances
greencarmena17 April 2019
This film is for real cinema lovers, who dont need special effects and flashing images to get excited. I had no expectations when I sat down to view this amazing piece of work. The acting was superb, period costumes on point, casting down to the children, the broadmoor guards all wonderful. Sean Penn deserves an oscar for this extraordinary performance.
309 out of 342 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Solid but forgettable.
Pjtaylor-96-13804420 May 2020
By all accounts, the film's production was a complete mess. Missing scenes, unfulfilled obligations and lack of promised finance all led towards a lawsuit and a distinctly splintered release. It was so bad, apparently, that Gibson actively discourages his fans from watching the thing, and the director - who may or may not have been replaced during filming - is credited only as 'P.B. Shemran'. Thankfully, aside from having a couple of out-of-place 'GoPro' shots, 'The Professor And The Madman (2019)' doesn't seem to be affected by its tumultuous creation. It tells the tale of the man who spearheaded the first edition of the Oxford English dictionary, while also chronicling his friendship with a Schizophrenic doctor residing in Broadmoor Hospital. It's an entertaining enough period piece with an interesting setting, even if it isn't exactly enthralling or, even, all that memorable. The performances are good and the script is steady. Ultimately, it's a generally solid experience. It doesn't have all that much impact, though. In fact, it sort of goes in one ear and out the other. That's not necessarily bad, mind you. The piece passes the time admirably and it is, perhaps surprisingly, generally well-made. If you think you'll like it, you probably will. 6/10
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I found a jewel.
bola_de_pu28 May 2019
Of those movies that teach you to value life. Let's see what you did wrong and a way to amend your path. The importance of forgiveness and love, between reason and madness. I think it's one of the best movies of recent years and with a brutally magnificent Sean Penn, perhaps with his most legendary performance, and that's hard to say with a resume like his. In short, a very well directed film, with emotionally descriptive scenes and with a cast of the first order. Do not go looking for shots, bursts of simultaneous action and rampant sex. You will not find them. I recommend this movie for people who see beyond the basics. For a moment I am grateful that I did not pay attention to Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes.
145 out of 159 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Kind of OK
mformoviesandmore16 April 2019
An interesting back story but told in what felt like a very procedural way with each person going through the motions of acting out some basic characters.

Nothing inspiring in the way this was told.
21 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
If not love...then what?
maha-sidahmed30 March 2019
Walked into the film with no expectations or knowledge of what it was about, except that it starred Gibson and Penn.

Walked out of the film blown away. The script, cast (each and every one of them), the story... all beautifully portrayed.

Though-provoking, heart-wrenching and inspiring.
351 out of 396 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
cliche
murat-gurler28 April 2019
Maybe my expectation was high. Other than Penn the film was too cliche for me. scenario develops as expected. I looked for the producer afterwards and found out Gibson as guessed.
14 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The mainstream critics are wrong!
dhudsonsr30 October 2019
I don't normally read the reviews on or anywhere else, nor have I ever submitted one. Nonetheless, something told me that I should delve into them after watching this wonderfully moving story.

While each of the viewer's reviews I read heaped praise on this film, the professional "critics" all panned this exceptional piece of cinematic art.

The Professor and the Madman soars on the stellar performances of Penn and Gibson. And this from someone who wholly disagrees with Penn's politics and much of Gibson's personal history.

The "critics" should stick to their praise of aliens, super heroes, explosions, and CGI. This movie requires the viewer to confront one of history's darker moments...the British asylum system, and recognize the truth that genius comes in many forms. The collective IQs of the "critics" are simply unable to keep up.

Cheers to the writers, directors, cast, and crew for giving us such a masterpiece that requires us to actually listen as well as watch. Think, instead of react. Wonder how we had no clue of this backstory to the O.E.D.
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed