Infidelity in Suburbia (TV Movie 2017) Poster

(2017 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
22 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Marcus Rosner is hot, but that's the only reason to watch
mgconlan-126 February 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Last night's first Lifetime "world premiere" was something with the rather clinical title "Infidelity in Suburbia," though it's different from all Lifetime's other movies about infidelity in suburbia only in the relative affluence of the characters: they all have big homes with spectacular views and both the hero and the villain own boats which are parked next to each other in the local marina. Greg Halpern (Peter Benson) is a successful attorney β€” at least we think he's an attorney because there's a passing reference to a big case he's supposedly working on β€” only he's so busy he leaves his wife Laura (Sarah Butler, top-billed) home a lot. Looking for something that can occupy her during his long absences and also help overcome her sexual frustration β€” even on the rare occasions they're under the same roof at the same time they can't make love, it seems, without being interrupted (in the opening scene, even before we know who these people are, Greg's attempt to get it on with Laura is broken up when their son Jamie, played by Arlo Hajdu, innocently but annoyingly walks in on them in their bedroom) β€” Laura persuades Greg to allow her to get their kitchen remodeled. Alas, Greg makes the mistake of hiring as his contractor hot young Elliot Graverston (Marcus Rosner, a glorious hunk of man-meat director David Winning makes even more delectable by showing him with his shirt off a lot), and Elliot soon makes his lascivious interest in Laura quite apparent. They have sex for the first time while taking a shower together and then they become a typical American adulterous couple, with her constantly expressing guilt feelings about what she's doing and then going ahead and doing it anyway (the attitude Mike Nichols and Elaine May brilliantly satirized in their 1960 comedy routine "Adultery" on their album "An Evening with Mike Nichols and Elaine May").

One of the reasons Laura let herself have the affair with Elliot was she was convinced Greg was cheating on her with his office assistant Hannah (Lucie Guest), not only because they were working long nights together but because she found a pair of purple panties on her husband's boat and later looked up Hannah on a singles' dating Web site and saw a photo of her wearing similar purple panties. It turns out that Greg and Hannah were just working together those long nights, and the panties were left there by a teenager who sneaked on to Greg's boat with her boyfriend for their own sexual experience at night β€” but in the meantime Laura is predictably in over her head with Elliot. That's right: Infidelity in Suburbia is yet another Lifetime movie in which the writer (Christie Will this time) can't be content just with making her character a master seducer and so drop-dead gorgeous no woman in the dramatis personae can resist him β€” not Laura, not her single friend Mira (Miranda Frigon), and not Hannah when she finally meets Elliot at a party Greg is throwing in his backyard. No, he has to be an insanely possessive psycho as well, determined to get Laura to leave Greg for him and willing to stop at nothing, including murder, to make that happen. It was pretty much another Lifetime loser, and as with some previous movies on this channel (including "Open Marriage") I've had the feeling that if, instead of portraying the "other man" as crazy and evil, they had kept it a story about a couple tempted to the sexual underground but ultimately deciding that they're better off both physically and psychologically staying together, director David Winning and writer Christie Will (names that seem to invite bad puns) would have had a stronger and more moving film.
16 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
More like Psycho in the neighbourhood
kosmasp31 August 2018
Although I have to admit, I don't even remember where he was staying at. And this is a TV movie, believe there is nothing that will surprise you. Well unless you include certain acting choices I guess. Since this was made for TV there is also no racy stuff never mind anything explicit like nudity. Just pointing this out, in case anyone thought otherwise.

This should not play a role in how much you enjoy this or rather in this case do not enjoy watching it. Some odd editing choices make certain scenes and the acting seem more wooden than it probably is (no pun intended). Ms. Butler is pretty and the infidelity predator is too. So while it lacks other qualities, maybe you like looking at good looking people
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Watch it for what it is
gusalexandrakis8 January 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The reviews on here are hilarious. First of all, this is NOT meant to be a great drama or romance....it's mind candy .

Yes, the plot of lonely wife, tempted by sexy (and psycho) contractor has been done many times, but obviously people find it entertaining or it wouldn't be such a perennial.

My husband, who watched this with me, renamed the movie "The Shirtless Man Chronicle" because this seems to be said contractor's only qualification: he looks good shirtless. Anyone who's ever hired a contractor KNOWS (1) they don't look like male models and (2) they don't show up to go over plans with you, naked from the waist up. Nor, considering they work with power tools, raw lumber, and nails, do they prance around semi-clothed on the worksite.

So...take this movie as female fantasy (with requisite guilt). And as to the confusion about the child who interrupts the lovemaking at the beginning of the movie, I believe that's supposed to be a flashback to when the contractor was a child. It's made obvious in the story, he had 'issues' from an early age, having been exposed to too many 'stepdaddies'' (his mother was promiscuous); his odd reaction to his pet being killed shows he's already unbalanced.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Wouldn't it be great if.....
golfer_0880726 October 2017
.....at the end of one of these "same old, same old" movies, the husband were to be seen packing his clothes and telling his cheating wife that he could no longer be married to her, as he had no trust in her and no respect for her. At least that would be a non-predictable ending.
24 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Pure Garbage
gaspy7519 January 2019
If you want to lose 1hour and half or start to sleep so fast it's perfect!!!! 30cent for big marshmellow's bag is better than spent in electricity to view this garbage
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
WARNING: For Vegetarians only ----- REASON: Because this is sooooo corny
Ed-Shullivan20 February 2018
Having watched the entire film to see how it ends I can only say the film started off lousy and only progressed downward from an already lousy beginning. I don't care if the actors/actresses agreed to work for free, and the director picked up this script from the "Buy 1 and get 3 scripts free" bin this is just so boring that I cannot pick out even one scene where the dialogue was worthy to be edited in.

Who would even accept responsibility for putting their career ending name to this piece of junk? The film genre is listed as a Thriller much like the (1987) Fatal Attraction was which includes a love triangle that goes terribly wrong where the innocent and unsuspecting spouse is threatened by the unscrupulous scorned third party lover. Sound familiar? Well "Infidelity In Suburbia" is the end result of one person watching the original (1987) Fatal Attraction, and passing the film content by word of mouth from a first person 1 through person 1,000 and what you have left of a half decent film is this diluted piece of junk.

The ending if I told you what happened, would not be considered a spoiler, because the entire film is spoiled from beginning to end. After investing 90 minutes just to watch a terrible ending that I would rather have washed the dinner dishes and thrown out the garbage instead of wasting my time watching this garbage.

I give it two thumbs down because I only have two thumbs.
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Dumb!
mikeuyekubo16 June 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I wanted to like it but.... the dumbest move ever. When Laura gets away from Elliot in the bedroom, she stops downstairs and tells her son to go get help???? Why dont they run out together to get help n get away?!?!? All time dumb move.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
...a Waste of time and good mood !!
bennbumm16 December 2017
...first at all..my girlfriend choose this film to watch...she liked soap-style movies with a bit of thrill....my pain barrier is high....but after aprox. 20 minutes i had to stand up and go to the back porch,because the movie is so trashy (in the very bad way..not like trashy but GOOD..acting,script,etc)...even my girlfriend came in a few minutes later...what a sick-making movie..waste of time and lost of good mood !! CONCLUSION : DonΒ΄t watch this movie,...its completely rubbish and disgustig in every sense,trust me ( i canΒ΄t remember watch a movie wich is even more worse)
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Just another woman's (the author) stupid fantasy
jleon2526 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Just another woman's (the author) stupid fantasy. Somehow the married couple can never get it on with the bratty kid around but she can easily find time and privacy to open up her thighs for the hunk, her stupid husband let in the house to do work on a kitchen, and at a discount too. Are so many people that naive.

Let's see, with just watching the movie for about 30 or 40 minutes. As I changed channels. Here is what I think and hope for this story.

For the stupid husband, that's neglecting his wife, and not putting the kid over his knees a few times and after delivering a hunk, to his dumb wife, on a silver platter. Deserves his wife cheating on his neglect to get the job done. When the hunk hands off flowers to his wife, and the husband sees them, the best he can say is, best get them into some water.

The assuming naive wife deserves, what I hope for, is an affair with a psychopath and ends up dead, after he abuses the hell out of her. I just love it when she keeps repeating for the boyfriend to stop while she is spreading her legs apart.

For the kid, I hope his father ends up marring a bitch of a wife that abuses the hell out of both of them.

Now, at least, my version, would get you some satisfaction.
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
this low budget flick was advertised as "knisternder erotikthriller" by moviestar ...
articstorm16 December 2017
Well it has horrible plain dialogues, plot and you are searching for some erotic in it. It is not thrilling either and at least the german version had a really bad syncro. (no worries there is no way i can spoiler the plot, because its such a bad generic plot)

That is one of the movies you shouldnt even watch, when you have nothing better to do, because even then you will feel how much time you have wasted.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Fateful Fire on Danton Island
lavatch24 August 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Laura Halpern is in a happy marriage to her husband Greg, and they have a beautiful seven-year-old boy named Jamie. But Laura makes an error in judgment in falling for the seductive carpenter who is remodeling the family kitchen. While Jesus may have been a carpenter, Elliott Graverston is the mama's boy builder from hell.

In Elliott's past, there was a fateful fire of the family home on Danton Island. Both Elliott's beloved mother Stella and her new husband perished in the flames. Laura is led to Danton Island through a lead on the blog about Elliott that was written by a user named "Purple Wallflower."

Laura discovers from a local cafΓ© owner that Purple Wallflower is in fact Winnie Hammell, who is almost the spitting image of Laura. She learns that Elliott had nearly busted up the marriage of the Hammells, just as he is attempting to destroy the relationship of Greg and Laura. One casualty in the film is Greg's assistant Hannah Jopkins, who questions Elliott's masculinity and pays the ultimate price.

There was a good set of secondary characters, including Laura's effervescent neighbor Myra and Norma Delizie, the garrulous owner of a local bakery. Norma has a set of photos on her wall that includes one of Stella and her little boy Elliott. It is from Norma that Laura learns the details of the mysterious fire that took the life of Stella and marked forever the little arsonist and mama's boy who burned down the home on Danton Island.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
OMG!
Hclambake7 November 2019
Our world seems to thrive on making stupid movies with even stupider lead women. Walk away, walk away!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Yawn!
haroot_azarian1 July 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Sorry nothing personal but I do not like Marcus! This is the third LMN movie he's been in as a total psycho, the other two being Killer Downstairs (Cindy Busby) and Killer in the Guest House.(Chelsea Hobbs), and thankfully he finally met his demise in the latter!

And what a stupid script! So she has sex with him twice to really make sure she made a big mistake? Oh and on what planet do handymen just do their jobs topless with their man-tits out? I Spit on Your Grave 1 & 3 remain Sarah's best movies!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Almost laughable
Sean_Biggins20 February 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I watched this on the Women's TV Network, so I guess it was made as sort of movie version of a Harlequin Romance, attempting to titillate housewives (if there is such a thing anymore).

It was made in Vancouver BC so I suspect it was probably some kind of tax write-off movie. The acting was actually fine, but it's just a silly, predictable movie.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Only have one reason to see this
msing-268473 May 2018
I agree with mgconlan-1. I would only watch this movie because handsome Canadian actor Marcus Rosner is in it. If Marcus Rosner did not appear in this film, I would NOT bother watching it at all. His body looks very good shirtless. He is the only guy that would interest me in that film. I would want him for a husband instead of Greg (Laura's spouse). Greg is not really my type for a husband. He was kind of boring! The stupidest part of the movie was when the internet cafΓ© owner gives Laura the information of where his customer (Winnie) lives. If I were the guy's internet cafΓ© customer, I would be furious. Also, I would not want Laura to know where I live!
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Should have been titled "Psycho in Suburbia"
mja584 April 2021
First time I saw this LMN movie and it proved to be the standard fare - frustrated wife and mother ignored by husband, cute kid, and good looking love/lust interest.

However, I found the following items rather unique:

1. The graphic depiction of sex (for LMN) - usually it is implied, or if shown, the man and woman are clothed. The sex scenes here were the opposite (although there was no censorable nudity).

2. A reason was given for the psycho's behavior, unpleasant as it was.

3. The relationship between the husband and wife.

Recommend to watch at least once, but don't expect a Hollywood Blockbuster.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
I would watch another 90 minutes if the wife gets karma at some point.
sooftennegative5 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I just watched this movie and like some others, I am dissatisfied with the ending. Do not despair because there was an alternate ending that was filmed for release in the United States. Just as a reminder, the Canadian ending shows the wife upstairs at home smiling as her husband and child play outside a window. The alternate ending takes place at the home shortly after the wife has killed the contractor and rescued her husband from the boat. It goes like this: A police detective arrives on the scene and says to the wife, "Do you know why your contractor killed your husband's assistant and then attempted to kill him." She replies, "Well, I had told him I thought my husband was having an affair with his assistant." The detective says, "So you conspired with the contractor to kill your husband and his assistant." "No, the affair wasn't true," she says. He says ", So you told him that just to get him to kill them for you?" She cries out "No, why would he do that?" The detective replies "To get rid of them for you. Weren't you having an affair with the contractor? We have a neighbor ready to testify to that fact." The scene switches to the upstairs window where the husband and son are watching police officers handcuff the cheating wife and lead her away to jail.

I guess the ending I found (somewhere on Youtube I think...very, very difficult to find:)) indicates my dissatisfaction. I have a preference for cheaters in movies and television. There needs to be bad karma in the end. I did not get to witness enough on her part. Give me retribution for disrespecting a spouse or get a low rating!
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
More of an explanation than a review
aether2216 December 2017
Warning: Spoilers
From the other reviews I was left curious as to what the scene others were objecting to, clearly offensive, but I was too curious. Well the objectionable scene involves a boy holding up a bloody pet collar, reporting that the cat (or dog?) got stuck in a mouse trap, in a very psycho manner.

So, clearly the kid is a psycho.

I didn't watch the rest of the movie besides a quick scan, the cinematography is ok (it's not a zero budget indie flick) but it looks uninspiring.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
An Affair with Disastrous Consequences
Uriah4331 July 2023
This film begins with a bored housewife by the name of "Laura Halpern" (Sarah Butler) starting to suspect that her husband "Greg Halpern" (Peter Benson) is having an affair with his secretary "Hannah Jonkins" (Lucie Guest). At around the same time, she meets a young man named "Elliott Graverston" (Marcus Rosner) who agrees to work as a handyman on a project in her kitchen. One thing eventually leads to another, and Laura has an affair with him which she quickly comes to regret. Unfortunately, Elliott doesn't particularly respond well to her request to break things off between them and things quickly take a turn for the worse from that point on. Now, rather than reveal any more, I will just say that this was one of those films that relied upon both suspense and eroticism but, because of it's made-for-television format, was somewhat limited in that regard. It does, however, feature a good performance by Sarah Butler who definitely stood out from all of the other actors. That being said, however, she wasn't quite able to overcome the rather mediocre plot and for that reason I have rated this movie accordingly. Slightly below average.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Horrible
andreak-4262626 February 2020
Unfortunately you can tell right off the bat that it's a Canadian made, low budget film. Horrible, horrible, cheesy acting. I couldn't even watch the whole thing. Made me cringe!
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Completely disgusting and unwatchable
blondeblue116 June 2017
I couldn't get past the first few minutes of this horrible movie, when a vile, nasty little brat stands at the bedroom door of some woman having sex with some man (don't know if it was her husband or the contractor she supposedly has an affair with, and don't care), holds up a most disgusting object, and says something in a creepy, deadpan, psychokid voice. Something so appalling and sadistically offensive that I immediately changed the channel.
11 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Bad actors and worst plot..
biswashok6 May 2021
Really disgusting plot and movie.. Just worth of 1 star ....🍌🍌🍌🍌🍌from my side ,literally for everything;plot ,acting and scenarios...
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed