Jamestown (TV Series 2017–2019) Poster

(2017–2019)

User Reviews

Review this title
95 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Entertaining, soapy fun
fandomfatale16 May 2017
I checked out the reviews on here before I watched the first episode, and proceeded despite the overall negativity. I'm glad I did - I was hooked right away and I won't find the wait until the next episode easy.

I understand how some people care about historical accuracy - but I couldn't care less and I'm sure that's true for many viewers too, and I don't think you could call any of this show's mistakes egregious. They made some compromises for convenience, some to spice things up, and some probably out of ignorance but if it's spoiling someone's enjoyment of the story then that's on them because there's nothing ridiculous.

Overall I think it's a finely polished show, focused mainly on the relationships between the characters, and particularly the struggles of the new female arrivals to find their place in the settlement and carve out some agency for themselves. I like all of the main characters a lot, and I don't get to say that very often. Verity and Jocelyn in particular are delightful. I can't wait to see what they are going to do and say next.

It's not as witty as Downton Abbey, but it's soapy in the same way. However, I wouldn't assume it would attract the same kinds of fans.
84 out of 110 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great Fun
damian-18313 May 2017
I can't see what the other reviewers are worried about. This show isn't meant to be a historical documentary, it's a brain out the box piece of pop corn silliness, and as that it's very good. The acting is fine, the scenery is beautiful and who cares if they aren't covered in mud all the time. I enjoyed the historically inappropriate over strong women and the fun story line. I enjoyed the show and will watch the rest with enjoyment without over analysing it.
94 out of 129 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Getting better as the storyline progresses
chrism-3331031 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Whilst I disagree with a lot of previous reviews, I will agree that the first episode was awfully slow paced and seemed to drag on a little bit, However I feel from episode 2 onwards, we see a better development in character and storyline

Hopefully this show is renewed for a second season as I feel there needs to be more of these types of gritty period drama without the pride and prejudice romanticism.
17 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Good Entertainment
blondicrivitz19 May 2018
I've seen people whining that it isn't historically accurate. But I've yet to see a show that truly is. This show is everything it needs to be. Thrilling, captivating and well acted. Period dramas are just that, dramas, set in history. It's not a documentary so if that's what you're looking for, look elsewhere. Great and entertaining show.
51 out of 71 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great cast & premise wasted on a poorly written script
Kallithrix3 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
It looked really promising - heavily touted as a period drama about the arrival of women in the new world colony that has been solely inhabited by men for 16 years. What a great concept! Plenty of tension and conflict in that! But there just isn't. Tension between the sexes seems to fizzle almost immediately as all the women settle into their relationships with barely a murmur - Verity complains more than most, but even she doesn't seem overly bothered about being sold in marriage to the local drunk. And the early thwarted romance, which might have provided romantic tension and some much needed 'will they/won't they?' drama, is unthwarted by episode two.

The 'political' plot involving the authority figures of the colony never gets going, and the baddies are just a little bit too stupid and pathetic to provide any proper villainy. Whatever conflict briefly raises its head in the form of a love triangle with the blacksmith is quickly resolved when he turns out to be a nice guy and politely steps aside, and the fact that the secretary's wife actually ADMITS TO HAVING MURDERED A MAN is just quietly brushed under the carpet when the governor's devoutly Christian wife decides she's been through enough already, poor wee lamb.

I was shocked when the series had ended, because there was no sense of it either building to anything, or completing a story arc. In fact, there's no clear series storyline at all - events just seem to happen one after the other in a seemingly unconnected succession without ever amounting to anything. With the exception of Verity and Meredith, who provide some mild comic relief as the most unlikely couple ever, there's really not a single character I care two hoots to know what happens to. I can't believe that forgettable, lacklustre fair like this gets a second season, when the hugely enjoyable (if equally silly) Halcyon gets canned. I hope season two ups the drama, but if it's anything like Downton, it'll just keep going downhill to dullsville...
31 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Don't expect a docudrama
rubya3 June 2019
If you expect a factual, realistic and historically based drama, this is not the show for you. If you are looking for simple entertainment value and not having to think too hard, this show does pretty good. The characters are good if a little caricatural with the obviously good and honourable James Read, the nasty greedy Governor Yardley and the scheming and sneaky Widow Castel. There is a hint of depth to them but nothing that will make you wonder very much. Yet you start to like some of them and hope they'll prevail.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
good show
springboks-2830619 June 2017
Hey...Keep it coming.

Thought it was a lot better than expected. Maybe needs a little more depth of content.

I really like it a lot. I hope they keep it. I like the characters and still want more back story of each one.
39 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Another show with revisionist history.
pack_fan_dave27 November 2023
As stories go this was very well written and the acting was exemplary. Once again however we are reminded of why we should not learn our history from Hollywood. As far as to history this show is extremely inaccurate. Only one of the characters (James Reed) was actually on the censor from Jamestown at the dates listed. Jamestown was founded by the London Company not the Virginia Company as the show narrates. It was originally known as James Fort during the time this show takes place. Life in Jamestown was also a lot harder than shown in the show with almost 80% of the inhabitants dying from starvation, dysentery, or disease over the first three decades of the colonies formation with the colony actually being abandoned twice, the second time after the colony was burnt to the ground. None of this is mentioned in the show.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Jamestown is compelling & important.
nqe560727 December 2019
I rarely pen reviews of films etc on IMDb but there don't seem to be many regarding the PBS TV series Jamestown, or what reviews there are are pretty negative, and I think that's just unfortunate. I also don't like to write about topics I know very little about, the real history of Jamestown belonging firmly in that category. I don't want to write much here, but I would like to at least state that I thought the series was very good, and that it deserves more attention than it seems to have received. Well, now that it's been cancelled after only three seasons, it can at least claim fellowship with another TV show which went on to have an enormously successful afterlife: Star Trek!

Why do I think it is 'very good'? Well, for the record, I thought it was better than just very good, rising to brilliant on more than one occasion. Certainly, I would say that the level of drama, the cleverness of the intrigues, the acting, the use of the historical background, the production values, the script, the characterization, and more, were all excellent. Do I hear 'nay!'? Yes, I do. Do I hear: 'Soap-opera! Flimsy drama! Superficial depiction of history. Unrealistic! Not believable!' My response: it depends on what you expect a TV series in this era (now being 2019) to produce. Ratings depend on weekly intrigue and violence and romance and beautiful ladies in danger and mysterious happenings which need to be resolved within the 45 minute span. Such criticisms may well have their place, but they might also be superficial and unrealistic. What would you expect, for crying out loud? OK. So why does any of this matter? Well, because this drama was able to depict some extremely important aspects of that history, and in a manner which was shockingly real and relevant. That's why it matters.

Sure, the two lead black characters might not have acted and interacted with their white overlords quite in the way they are depicted as doing, but as viewers we should be able to accept certain superficially false aspects in the process of engaging with the deeper aspects of what their actions and situations tell us about slavery. And once we do that, we can see, if we have eyes to see, that this drama was exposing the reality of slavery in the most uncompromising way, a depiction which does nothing but add fuel to the accusation that America was built on the back of some pretty racist white supremacist attitudes.

Then, of course, there is the depiction of the interaction between the white settlers and the indigenous population. Here, also, Jamestown the TV series was able to articulate in a very sophisticated manner the way in which these two peoples acted toward each other. It is compelling. And the way things are slowed down to build up over the entire series is a measure of the artistic approach: not seeking to sensationalize things, but to lay out, step by step, the kinds of interaction there was, or might/must have been, and the difficulties in which people on both sides became embroiled. There is delicacy and insight and sensitivity in all of this, and it is delicacy and insight and sensitivity serving both the needs of historical accuracy and the needs of drama. I think that is a remarkable achievement. The build-up to tensions takes a long time, but a three season series can do this, whereas a film might condense everything and fail. And those inter-racial difficulties which occur are the stuff of great drama. As with the focus on the slave characters, the drama here lays bare the awfulness of the intruders' behaviour in coming to a land which was not theirs and imposing rule, and their racial condescension. Among the cast of characters there are many who appear to voice outrage as to the imperialist actions of the settlement's governors: that may just be a nod to modern sensibilities, easily judged unrealistic by those who know the history, but their outrage is part of the raison d'etre of the show. Jamestown shows the ugly reality of what it meant to come as an uninvited guest and then proceed to take over the land.

However, the series is not only about unremitting outrage and awfulness, or punishing the myth of foundation as a wonderful thing: the producers put in plenty of light amidst the dark, making the characters attractive and colourful. There is humour in the series and that humour derived from the intelligence of the holistic approach and the emphasis on humanity. As with Trek, while there is plenty of brutality and violence, often the conflicts in Jamestown are resolved by invoking humane solutions to human problems. This is a measure of its sophistication. Viewers, however, should be advised that sometimes shocking moments occur. They are never gratuitous.

I have to say Jamestown does a great many things, and deserves much more acclaim than it gets. It brings history to life, and it is simply unfortunate that it is now cancelled. Maybe it will revive, like that other show from the sixties. Or maybe it will just resonate.

Hurrah for the actors and writers and creators of Jamestown!
19 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Wth happened to Alice?
alysonveit5 August 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Just finished S3. Overall plot was bananas but at least all the main plotlines got tied up. Except one...Alice and Silas? Ummm seriously? She just leaves? And you never bring her back or even tie that loose end? I mean, send us a letter and let us know how the little boy is doing for goodness sake...not complaining about all the naked pamunky silas torso...but man that was some lazy writing.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Well acted ridiculous script
scvj-0691113 May 2017
I thought, "oooh, from the producers of Downtown Abbey, that bodes well." I quickly decided that the producers should have stayed in the 19th - early 20th centuries, and across the pond. There's only so much suspension of disbelief one can expect from a viewer, and this is Historical Fiction not SciFi/Fantasy.

Examples: There was no gold in or anywhere near colonial Jamestown. Wolves do not spontaneously attack humans. Clothes do not walk themselves magically clean after a struggle in a swamp. In a society where men are so terribly starved for women, how is it there's a handy ladies' maid waiting patiently for an imported mistress to serve? No idiot would publicly admit that he cheats at dice in a culture that hangs thieves. And another reviewer mentioned the nagging detail about an ocean-going vessel docking in obviously shallow water at a small upriver pier. Even the music sounds unoriginal--I swear it's recycled from the show, Hell on Wheels.

I sincerely hope they get a script writer who has read some history. The cast deserves it. (And note to the reviewer who complained about the bleached blonde: that actress is actually blonde. It's the red head who was dyed for the part.)
126 out of 160 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Well acted not meant to be a historically accurate
acmoffice23 March 2018
Not everything has to follow the history books, though i normally prefer that it does, I have run out of anything decent to watch and have found that this is well acted, and filmed.
23 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Why
Headturner112 September 2022
Are people comparing something set in the 1600's to something set in the 1930's?!? Am I missing how people are comparing a serie about the lives of an aristocratic family of the 1900's to colonizers of the 1600's?!? Downtown abbey is bleak and non factual. This may not be either but it's more exciting than dreary Downton Abbey where they all speak with those horrible artificial British accents they so often display back then! I fall asleep a lot throughout as I watch it late after I'm done with other things I am watching but none the less it's a decent , intriguing show. Yes Mercy, Jocelynn the one idiot Burn Gorman and some others are irritating it's a decent watch with all the trite available out there now..
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Great Acting but the script fails
ppco8927 June 2017
I thought the acting was very good and the characters worthy, but right from the beginning the script was lacking and you notice things are off. Coming out of the water or the woods and the character is spiffy clean? the clothes are not perfectly period, though that won't bother many, the ship mooring as some others have mentioned, and honestly, a gay man wearing an earring in the open, in such a tough society? he'd have been flogged and tossed off the ship before it even landed. I found too many things that were not believable and a script lacking. Too bad because I love period drama's.
55 out of 74 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Totally hooked & hoping for a third series!
hesketh274 April 2018
Am now halfway through box set of Series 2 on NowTV and loving every minute of it! I am addicted to historical drama / fiction but if you are expecting much accuracy in 'Jamestown' then forget it. The acting quality ranges from excellent to poor but any shortcomings are compensated for by the attractive ensemble cast and lush photography that makes full use of the stunning scenery - this show is beautiful to look at. It's very easy to become totally involved in the life of the characters as this is purely and simply a soap opera in fancy dress. Don't bother to analyse - switch off your brain for 50 minutes sit back and enjoy!
16 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Accents
twombombadil-347285 June 2017
Why are the accents modern day English? The English accent was equivalent to the modern Northern American. In other words, in 1607 even the British SOUNDED American. When will TV and movies get this straight? If British actors are imported for the appearance of "authentic", when is the UK going to get with it? The massive shift to the "modern" accent was not complete before at least 1750, and most of it occurred between 1700-1750.
22 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fun Enough
annlevtex29 May 2019
The series started out stronger than it finished, but that happens when a series that is hoped to go for more than two seasons gets axed I suppose. I liked it well enough. It has some great actors like Burn Gorman from "Turn" and "Game of Thrones" and Sophie Rundle from "Peaky Blinders." I was interested in the couples for the most part, but the characterization got a little wobbly and aimless toward the end. The introduction of the slaves in S2 was a good idea but kind of rushed.....they appeared and it seemed like right away they were all speaking English. A lot of political intrigue, some interesting, some convoluted and unbaked. My favorite couple ended up being the "comic relief," the drunk tavern keeper and his sassy wife. Limited budget obviously, but the scenery was still lovely. The ending didn't satisfy but they tried their best. I had hoped for a little more closure. Oh well, a two season binge watch is not a big commitment, so I'd say it's worth it.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Well worth your time
mstaffordca10 June 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Great show with many different storylines going simultaneously not to mention quite a few beautiful men!! So glad they didn't cancel this show! Please keep the seasons coming! I must see Silas Sharrow and his wife come back together!!
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Enjoyable and believable
heatherandthistle19 June 2019
I really enjoy watching this show. Been watching it from the get go. Great characters that you grow with as the seasons progress. I just hope they continue with a season 4.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Love it
robinnation13 December 2018
I totally love this show it is entertaining sat is beautiful the characters are well-thought-out I find this show very intriguing and I'll continue to watch it I would recommend it to anyone else who's watch Downton Abbey loves this type of drama it's great I hope that keep it coming
13 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great story but....
dexter_bad1 April 2019
Again only make nudity. This is sexist in its own right. Very depressing.
4 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not a serious historical drama
xiomatic28 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I barely made it through the first episode. I won't be watching the rest. I am a fan of historical shows and was looking forward to this one. But this is just trash. I would rather shows like this were not made than trash like this served up. No attempt has been made to any kind of authenticity; aside from period costumes and mud, this could be set in modern LA or NY. But worse, even if you accept that it is simply modern soap in costumes, the plot and characters are just unbelievable. Literally cardboard cutout boo-hiss characters and pretty women being oppressed.

I'm sure the writers did not intend it but all I saw were modern people in dress-up with put on accents and otherwise behaving like modern Hollywood types.

This show is not as advertised. It is not a historical drama, it is a modern poorly written and unbelievable soap opera with costumes and mud. It's not to be taken seriously, best only for daytime TV methinks.
19 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Love it!
irelanddoterra26 May 2017
I love this show and I hope it continues running for a long time.

It is made for women more than men. The women are strong characters and you want to cheer them on.

Who cares if it isn't exactly as history says it should be. It's entertaining! Go watch a documentary if you want factual history.
21 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I enjoy watching this and would recommend
maedurant-238-44423022 January 2019
I don't even care that this show isn't completely accurate anymore because I like the characters and their storylines. I look forward to seeing the third season and which direction it goes in
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
not meant to be a documentary
mfivejude-12 February 2020
I wonder sometimes did I watch a different movie? 1.the women are weak? really ms rutter able to cope fine without her man.2.Jocelyn, dignity,elegance, intellect and bearing 3.silas 's wife? confrontational,courageous. and the men,able to show emotion and vulnerability.beautiful scener y even if it's Hungary. i just sat back and enjoyed 3 seasons of great acting,costumes,plots and if I need an infomercial on the early colonies there still is google !
11 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed