We Are the Flesh (2016) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
37 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Odd, Disturbing and More
gavin694228 February 2017
After seemingly wandering a ruined city for years in search of food and shelter, two siblings find their way into one of the last remaining buildings. Inside, they find a man who will make them a dangerous offer to survive the outside world.

For me, this film is all about the rich color of the cinematography (from Yollótl Alvarado), the depth of the sound (from Esteban Aldrete), and the overall atmosphere. I could have used a bit less dizzying camera movement, however, though it does have an underlying purpose. Whether you appreciate the plot and situations or not (and many will not), there is no denying the craft of the camera and sound.

Variety noted that the film was an "extreme Mexican fiesta of incest, cannibalism and explicit sex that should earn detractors and fans in equal measure." Other reviewers have called it simultaneously boring and shocking. It really is all these things... some moments were too much for me to really enjoy the picture, as the shock factor seemed gratuitous -- unlike the extremes of "Visitor Q" or "Salo", which have a clear satirical purpose.

Now, to be fair, "We Are the Flesh" does have its satirical moments. It has digs on "blind patriotism" and attacks the ritualism of religion, specifically Catholicism. As the film progresses, more of this is evident and we realize how much the social conventions and expectations are turned on their head. (Some of the most subtle moments are not even realized until we learn the "names" of the characters from the credits!)

"We Are the Flesh" made quite the impact during 2016 on the festival circuit. I had my first opportunity to see it at Montreal's Fantasia. There was never any doubt that it would be picked up for distribution, though it comes as a surprise that the ones who came along were Arrow Video. Arrow is without question one of the best film distributors in existence, but their focus tends to be classic cult, not contemporary.

Regardless, Arrow pulls all the stops with their Blu-ray. We have new interviews with the director and cast, as well as a highly enlightening visual essay from critic Virginie Sélavy, where she explains easily-overlooked symbolism and draws parallels to the work of Alejandro Jodorowsky. Perhaps best of all ,the disc has two other short films from director Emiliano Rocha Minter: "Dentro" and "Videohome", to really round out the experience.
24 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
We Are The Art Hipsters
bloodbath66614 January 2017
I read a lot about this film before seeing it, and not many people had anything nice to say about it. It's being regarded as a crime against humanity! With that, I don't agree. I found the beginning to have been very well acted and the theme was setup well.

Then, it just goes off the rails in some surrealist artsy-fartsy direction that loses grip on what it was about in the first place (freedom = exploring the dark corners of your mind and embracing your taboo). It's not nearly as controversial as Serbian Film or Nekromantik, so if that's the hangup, people need to get over themselves. You spend 59 minutes of the 79 minute film not really knowing what is going on. All you can do is take in the pretty camera-work, which I thought was excellent. The musical selection was also really good. Basically, I wanted to hate this, but I'm able to easily find some noteworthy aspects to prevent me from throwing it away altogether.

This film is a bold slap in the face to the big studios who put out the same exercises in banality week after week. When you see the same romantic comedy and superhero movie over and over again, filmmakers tend to try to shock to get attention. Clearly We Are The Flesh accomplished that in spades with a mediocre film.
17 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Oh BOY!
curbicon10 February 2019
This film right here, it's by far one of the most surreal, nihilistic, & sexual theatrical experiences i've had. And that's kind of what makes it good? Aside from the confusing story, where this film takes the crown is it's unpredictability and it's cinematography. We Are The Flesh is just as confusing as it is shocking & beautiful. That being said, the plot itself lacks substance and an actual direction. If the ending could clear up how all of this takes place a little more, it'd make this experience a lot more complete.
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Awful, and pretentious as hell
nihilnoctem29 December 2016
Was there even a script for this film? It feels like a three-year-old's version of "shocking," when it's boring, pretentious, and so on. We're treated to a crazy homeless guy who lets a brother and sister squat with him, but in exchange, they must do whatever he wants. He wants incest, torture, and murder. In the hands of a better filmmaker, this might be something, but it's one of the worst films I've ever seen, and I rather enjoy bad movies --- the so bad they're good kind. It takes a hell of a lot to make me actively hate a film. The most astonishing thing about this movie is why so many film festivals saw it as "art" and choose to screen it.
42 out of 88 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Hauntingly Beautiful, but Infuriatingly Incomprehensible
AnirudhGod11 August 2021
How can I like and not this film at all. I just don't really know what to say about this. Siblings feed into the depravity of humanity, by some insane man for food. That's the supposed story that can be deduced to. I felt emotionally disconnected to the proceedings after the movie veers off into an incoherent narrative. The insane man, Mariano, had something interesting to him, but, suddenly, we are plunged into supernatural incoherence. Lots of sex and symbolism kinda makes this film look pretentious. I wouldn't even want to say 'pretentious', because the film is pretty solid in its imagery and cinematography. But it's pretty much lacking in emotional resonance. Well, the symbolism could be that of insanity through pleasure, and how one would eat themselves and others while delving into insanity. One thing is that, I was not emotionally moved by the story. It was pretty confusing, and pretty insubstantial to warrant the need for another viewing to fully comprehend the narrative. Only, if there was one.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
What Did I Just Watch?
kirbylee70-599-5261798 April 2017
Warning: Spoilers
There is a select genre of film in the world that doesn't fall into one specific category. It can be science fiction, western, mystery, drama or more. It is a wide ranging genre that you won't find listed among categories on Netflix of Amazon Prime or Hulu. I call the genre "What the hell did I just watch?" This category often rambles from one scene to the next, sometimes never connecting those scenes or plunging us into what feels like a drug fueled exploration of themes with no sense of direction or even providing little to no story as it moves forward. Many times that isn't so much a question of no story so much as it is the writer/director putting his own vision on the screen even if the rest of us can't make head or tail of that vision. WE ARE THE FLESH falls into this genre.

Let me start by trying to explain what we seem to be watching. A man is confined to his home in what must be a post-apocalyptic world. He mixes various items into a vat and extracts from that some form of drug that he both uses a stopperful at a time and trades for eggs with some unseen benefactor. Into his world arrive a brother and sister hungry and looking for a place to crash. With a maniacal glee and a look reminiscent of Charles Manson, he takes them in, feeds them and eventually breaks them down to the point they have sex with one another. More happens but I'll leave it at that for those inclined to take the journey being told here.

But I should also let you know that the journey is strange and by the end leaves you wondering what it was you just watched. It makes you question what the point of the movie was or if there even was one. Maybe there isn't one. Or maybe this is an art film where only the director can interpret the film, translating what the images he placed on screen meant or represented. In other words it's more art film than your average movie. If you like that you'll enjoy this. If you like more straightforward fare then this is one you'll hate.

There aren't many straight out disturbing images here as many films in this genre are prone to offer (consider the odd "baby" in David Lynch's ERASERHEAD) but it will offer something that people will talk about and discuss or be offended by. Short of watching a porn flick the film offers plenty of sexual situations and close ups of genitalia. It also offers what appears to be various forms of on film sex starting with oral sex. If you're easily offended that should be your clue not to seek this film out. If it doesn't offend you don't think that this film will stimulate you. It's sort of like porn on acid with bright colored lights shining on the action and shot in a weird world of curved walls and slanted flats.

When all was said and done the ending twisted the entire story I'd just watched. Yes, it has a twist ending. It doesn't make the movie good or bad but makes it even stranger still. Once more, whether you view that as a good thing or a bad thing depends on how you view the movie. For me it's not something I will revisit and was more bad than good. It left me feeling nothing except wondering how funding for films like this seems to come easily for some while other projects I would find more interest in are left in the dust. But that's just my perspective. Some will come away loving this.

As far as the disc being offered here once more Arrow Video outdoes themselves. Would anyone expect less? The quality of the print is sharp, crisp and clean. Love or hate the images they are there to see in perfect clarity. The extras are for fans of the film and the director offering two shorts by director Emiliano Rocha Minter (Dentro and Videohome), interviews with director Emiliano Rocha Minter and cast members Noé Hernández, María Evoli and Diego Gamaliel, a video essay by critic Virginie Sélavy, the trailer and a still gallery. The film is in Spanish but English subtitles are available.
17 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
To the extreme
kosmasp18 May 2017
This is a strange movie to say the least. I read some choice words from the director after I watched the movie and I'd still say that there is more to it than just the flesh you'll get to see. And you are going to see a lot of flesh and skin. This is very explicit to say the least. The three main characters have a strange relationship to each other and our main older guy is coming off as a creep.

But as I stated before, this was done to shock and also to appall, but also to really mess people up. You probably will have mixed feelings about the movie or just downright hate it. A movie that can create such passion in the viewer might be onto something. It's not about enjoying what you watch (especially the scenes of sexual nature are not really there to arouse, but rather to make one uncomfortable), but being taken someplace you don't want to be. It feels like this tries to convey a state of society that has gone way too far ... or maybe I'm reading too much into it ...
14 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Trying to be David Lynch and failing
spamvictim-334-98696318 March 2022
This film's main problem is that it doesn't make any sense. He's trying to be David Lynch and failing. I don't mind the "transgressive" routine, it's that it ultimately doesn't really go anywhere. Ambitious, but ultimately... meh.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
WTF: We are The Flesh
cgearheart27 September 2020
I went into this movie blindly, barely knowing what I was getting myself into. Let me tell you, I was not disappointed. I was taken aback, disgusted, confused, and thrown in for a huge loop. But I was definitely not disappointed. Once I thought I knew what was going, the story would throw a weird curve ball and just keep going. Fascinating but I can't say I recommend it.

B-
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Special feeling here..
mrdonleone13 October 2019
It is very hard to have an opinion about We are the Flesh: in one way it says nothing at all,, but on the other hand it shows a great apocalyptic vision of people brought together in a situation driven to despair... at least in some way. I didn't like the boredom of the movie,, but I highly cheer for the level of experimenting in this movie.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Go into this film with an open mind and appreciation of rarely explored themes.
roarshack803 January 2017
Never trust reviews from people who walk out of a movie. Reviews are opinions stressed by people who watched the whole film. When people write reviews of films they walked out of, that's not a review: it's an uninformed comment.

This is as much as a review as it is an honest opinion by someone who watched the film in its entirety. Keeping in mind that great films shouldn't be loved by everyone.

We Are the Flesh is a cinematic version of dark thoughts and ideas most people immediately remove from their train of thought. As long as you are human enough to understand what is right and wrong in reality, there isn't a single thing wrong with examining dark and even grim thoughts that every single human being has from time to time.

This film explores those themes and presents them in ways that are meant to be hard to watch. These are themes that you normally wouldn't bring up in random conversations with random people. These are themes that aren't meant to be visited often but should be explored at least once. Just to see what they look like. Just to see what dark and grim things you otherwise would not have in your life (by choice) but are curious to see the repercussions from the vile acts that go on in dark places.

For me, We Are the Flesh depicts a horrid version of common, hopeless and deprived humanity. It's a brief example of those dark things I never would allow myself to act upon physically or emotionally. But I find those areas of the unknown panning out visually stimulating. Afterward, I can walk away when the film ends satisfied for experiencing a story that made me think of things I don't want to think about. But I can leave those dark questions answered by putting them behind me and leaving them with this film.

Which to me, makes for a wonderful and well made film.
62 out of 96 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Wild, Depraved, Sexual, and Brilliant!
bryank-0484423 January 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Filmmaker Emiliano Rocha Minter has certainly cemented his name in the annals of art house horror and sexual fantasy cinema with his Spanish film 'We Are The Flesh'. Standing in the same room with films of Gaspar Noe ('Irreversible', 'Enter The Void'), John Waters ('Pink Flamingos'), and dare I even say Pier Paolo Pasolini ('Salo: 120 Days of Sodom'), 'We Are The Flesh' takes a very violent and sexual look into a surreal apocalyptic scenario in something that you've never really seen before. For all of its taboo subjects that it has no problems or apologies for showing on screen, sometimes which is up close and personal, Minter gives a very Kubrick-esque look at this bizarre story.

It's fairly hard to find the plot here, as we focus on an older man (Noé Hernández) who would give the boogeyman the creeps. This man is obsessed with building something out of cardboard and tape, when two teenage siblings enter the dilapidated building he's residing in. He agrees to let them stay in turn for helping him build what looks like to be a cave to hell. Also, he has them act out explicits sexual acts on each other. There is no real idea as to what's happening outside this building, but it's alluded that there is a war or apocalypse of some sort and that this old man is providing his own version of a perverted salvation, which delves deeper into a sadistic abyss of torture, death, and sex.

The teenagers are great here, but Noé Hernández is unbelievably scary and excellent on film. I've never seen anything like it before in a performance. People who are looking for something soft and kind or if they feel like they are seasoned gore hounds might even find this film a bit disturbing. However, Minter doesn't mess about with the super gory shots or quick cuts. Instead, he takes his camera into an unflinching and unescapable place where we the audience are forced to watch everything that happens on screen in a sort of filter-colored hypnotic nightmare that only gets worse as time goes on.

'We Are The Flesh' is a slow burn film. It's one that pushes the bounds of taste and art, but in that good way in that you want to see more from this filmmaker. People in the independent film industry should take note of Emiliano Rocha Minter, because he has a beautiful eye for film and has something to say.

RECOMMENDED!
9 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Maybe a little too artsy for me?
subxerogravity23 January 2017
Wish I could say it wasn't that bad, I like it, or rather parts of it.

When I saw the poster at a local theater I was thinking this was going to be a Si-Fi horror film. Even the synopsis gave me this ideal, and it was horrifying but more in a human way rather than super natural.

So two kids end up in a place were they meet a man whose out of his mind and the three have bizarre sexual encounters with one another.

I did like the crazy dude in the film, he was disturbing in that horrific sort of way.

Plus, I can't give a movie to low of a score considering it had so much awesome nudity and strong sexual content in it (Just being honesty).

But what I was expecting from the small paragraph that help me get interested in seeing the movie was not what I ended up seeing. I felt the ad campaign was met to be a metaphor of something. We Are the Flesh is very similar to M. Night Shyamalan's the Village in that all it's not what it seems, but with far less story (Or no story at all cause I really have no idea what this movie is about or trying to say).

When the movie starts and I realizes that it's a very small indi film in a foreign language I was expecting far more talking, but a lot of what I got was interpretive movement and in your face nudity (Which is where I think the actual name of the film was met to be about).

So I'm into hard core sex in mainstream movies but whatever the filmmakers wanted me to feel by watching this experimental feature I did not feel (Unless they wanted me to feel horny).
17 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
I had to walk out of this one too....
domwhoseekshisdom22 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Ouch. Fantasia 2016 is not starting off well for me. I first walked out of The Lure (3/10) and now We are the Flesh joins my walk-out film list.

Like The Lure, the film started off with tremendous promise, introducing us to a first-time director with a very unique uncompromising vision that isn't afraid to push taboos. Unfortunately, We are the Flesh tries *too* hard to be shocking that I found myself rather numb with boredom by the halfway mark. The explicit sexuality became repetitive, the momentum of the film ponderous and eventually pretentious.

Kudos for a very game cast and the director for having the balls to go wherever he wants to go. Next time, spend a bit more time on the story and a bit less on the bodily fluids.
18 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Wow, what a waste of time and money.
curtismenne2 July 2019
Warning: Spoilers
For starters I watched this entire film and thankfully din't pay to watch it either as I wouldn't want to contribute to the people who thought they were making an art film. By a waste of money I mean that making this film wasted investors money. I see on here that some people are dismissed for their negative reviews because they just don't like the rape and incest in this movie but I could care less about that. I enjoy Handmaids Tale and damn near every episode has a rape scene but is still artistic while sending a very clear positive message.

This film on the other hand has a dumb message and was clearly made to satisfy some old dudes kink fantasies. Don't people realize that you can just watch porn for free on the internet?

This movie pretends like it is art because the movie is about rape and drugs are bad MMkay?! Seriously... The movie pretends like there is some unexplained apocalypse so these sibling hide in a cave where a gross old guy makes them have sex and do nasty stuff for him to stay there or something dumb like that. A bunch of weird crap happens and in the end you find out they are just heroine addicts who were strung out in an abandoned building while the real world still exists or something stupid like that. I honestly lost interst half way through out of boredom so it wasn't even succeeding at being shocking. My interest was at least held through Serbian Film because it was shocking and interesting in a way that held my attention while that movie also had a stupid message hid behind sexploitation it was at least made well.

So the message is drugs, rape, and murder are bad mmmkay and people do messed up things for drugs or something... Well duh. If you wanted to be a real artist you would just film a bunch of real junkies blowing a dude in an alley to score crack and then film real addicts strung out and homeless while someone overdoses. Film a real person overdosing until they actually die and put it into Cannes as a documentary and you will have made real art with a real message. Not this exploitation crap that wasted my time. It isn't fun to watch, it isn't a new message, nor is it an old message presented in a way that is shocking or filmed in a way that entertains.

Honestly I just wasted too much time rambling about a boring movie with some incest. If you like sexploitation than you will enjoy it. Otherwise it is just kind of boring. I will save you time and money...

RAPE, INCEST, MURDER, AND DRUGS ARE HAPPENING IN THE REAL WORLD AROUND YOU EVERY DAY!!!! OH NO!!!!
11 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Rated TV-MA
okpilak16 October 2022
Rated TV-MA in the version I saw, but certainly not for any television station I could ever think of. Way rougher than that. There is an abundance of flesh, often shown in different color filters, which add impact to the scenes. It is supposed to be set in a ruined city in a decrepit building, where two young people come across a rather disturbed man who seems in charge of the building. He gives them shelter and food, and in return they work to erect structures inside the building. The two are brothers and sisters. It is difficult to say anything more without spoiling the movie. To say the least, it is rather far out. But also intriguing. Certainly not for everyone. Many wold appreciate the creative use of color and shadow in telling the story. I am straddling the rating, as some may rate it higher for the unique approach to film making, and others lower due to the subject matter.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Visually beautiful
hughchilles24 May 2023
A strange ride, if you're in the mood for weird, graphic sex and horror you might be engaged. It explores some visceral themes, was deeper than I expected, thought provoking in a lot of ways. The main actor Noé really carried it, he wasn't just acting, he was the whole movie, like the movie put all it's goals and aspirations on his shoulders and he just said "yep no worries". Worth watching just for his performance really. The visuals were stunning (a lot of the 7/10 is for that), the subject matter was bizarre and challenging, like about intrusive thoughts and existence, life and birth and death. Fascinating in a lot of ways, hard to watch in a lot of others, but very smart and a lot more intriguing than I ever expected. Loses points because it meanders a bit and is a bit too arthouse for it's own good, fine you have a closed set kind of story but it needs to make sense in the world you've setup or it's just stuff happening. It answers a lot of interesting questions confidently but makes very little sense narratively. Maybe there's more to the storyline than I give it credit for but I didn't like it enough to think into it further. The brown tape budget was higher than other films I have seen, I also didn't know you could make gasoline from bread and animal fat.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Not really much of anything
CinematicPersona19 July 2017
This should probably be the worst movie I've ever seen. I guess luckily for the filmmakers, it's not. It's not really a horror film, and it's not really an art film. It's just kind of dumb and scatological. It made me laugh a few times, but I really don't feel like it was trying to be funny.

I'm going to forget everything about this movie, save for a particularly out of place impression of a balloon squeaking out its air, which is genuinely hilarious.
8 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Magic mushroom pipette switch
ilozzoli2 February 2020
I guess we all had this "brain off/flesh on" experience that this movie tries to depict. The experience can be rather arousing at first, and then extremely uncomfortable for quite a while. This is my best guess what this movie is about, but you can read a lot of things into it, starting from drug abuse to magic mushroom sects, and from doomsday caused by falling morals to experimentation of whatever type. Technically it is not a bad movie, the director has a concept, the people involved clearly know their trade, and do their job well, but the whole atmosphere is extremely grim, which makes it a pretty hard watch.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Hated it!!
angelaamerson411625 May 2018
Nothing was food, lighting, dialog thatight have to do with translation, but still...dont waste anymore effort, turn it off and go watch Centipede movie!!!
7 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Don't watch this with your mother
matthewdmckenna9 January 2019
An excellent film. Highly stylized and unflinching. Recommened.
14 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Cute
GothYiayia25 August 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Other than the ending you could see kind of see coming from a mile away, this was an enjoyable ride. Don't watch it with family unless you're as close as the ones in the film.

This isn't by any means an award-winning screenplay but it doesn't deserve the single star ratings it's getting. Lighten up, yeah?
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
More of an Experience than a Movie
timothygartin25 August 2022
First, there is no story here. Stuff happens to people. I don't believe there is a narrative where the characters develop in any understandable way. I also don't think it is possible to explain what happens. One thing does not cause another thing. For a moment at the end, I thought this could have been some kind of anthology of interrelated but independent stories. No, it's not.

The lead actor is great as the crazy lead character. The other actors do not bring anything at all to their characters. Ultimately, this movie is not even that disturbing. It is just weird.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Over-pretentious and tedious attempt to be provocative
johannes2000-14 October 2022
There are some reviewers here on IMDb that see great depths in this movie, justifying all the craziness and sex and hysteria as an attempt to picture one's deepest drives and fantasies. Maybe that was the genuine ambition of director Emiliano Rocha Minter, but even so, that not necessarily stands for a good movie. In my opinion a movie has to be at least in some way involving, so that it makes you want to watch it (and keep watching it).

For me this was not the case. The movie lacks any (fathomable) narrative; the settings are dark and filthy; the editing is weird, with many scenes or close-ups that are drawn-out way too long; the few characters are extremely annoying and their irrational behavior and screaming almost unbearably tiresome; and the nudity and sex-scenes seem primarily gratuitous (like two long close-ups of a male's and a female's genitals that seem to serve no purpose whatsoever). I've got nothing against nudity and sex, but it should at least be in some way functional, within an understandable context.

It's probably my simple brain that made me miss tons of metaphors, but I couldn't help feeling that the main purpose of the makers was simply to be as provocative as possible. Well, you could argue that they partly succeeded in that, albeit in a very unenjoyable, uninteresting and even tedious way.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Absolutely disgusting
zendyude6 July 2021
I'm no prude, and explicit sex and all that is totally fine. But this is a whole diff level of twisted. You cannot unsee some of the psycho junk in here. In the guise of being "artistic", this is an expression of some demented minds and should be avoided like the plague. Yup, with mainstream culture reaching this kind of a low, the world is probably going to end soon.
3 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed