Lords of Chaos (2018) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
182 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Equal parts funny and harrowing; an enjoyable "true story"
Bertaut10 April 2019
Authenticity is perhaps the most important currency in music. Bands who can legitimately say "it's all about the music" and actually back that claim up are automatically head and shoulders above their less authentic rivals, who may sing a good game, but who live a very different life. Think of how fake Guns N' Roses made the glam metal bands of the 80s look. Think of how pampered Nirvana made Guns N' Roses look only a few years later. With this in mind, Lords of Chaos looks at late 80s/early 90s Norwegian black metal, and asks, "was its extreme image authentic or manufactured".

Adapted from nm9657667 and Didrik Søderlind's 1998 book, written for the screen by Dennis Magnusson and Jonas Åkerlund, and directed by Åkerlund, the film depicts black metallers as fostering an image of a cult-like group of militant anti-establishment Satanists who practised human sacrifices, championed suicide, and advocated anti-Christian violence. Behind the scenes, however, most of its adherents knew such declarations were simply marketing, not to be taken literally. Lords of Chaos is about what happened when some black metallers took them very literally, leading to suicide, arson, and murder. Equal parts darkly funny and unflinchingly disturbing, Åkerlund's film never takes the scene as seriously as it takes itself, and, depending on your perspective, that's either its greatest strength or its most egregious failing.

Oslo, 1987; it is three years since Øystein "Euronymous" Aarseth (an excellent Rory Culkin) established his band, Mayhem, determined to create a new subgenre of "true Norwegian black metal". The band has met with little success thus far, but that changes when they hire Pelle "Dead" Ohlin (a superb Jack Kilmer) as lead singer. Showing self-destructive tendencies from the start, as time passes, his behaviour becomes more erratic (cutting himself at gigs and spraying blood into the crowd, sniffing from a bag containing a dead bird before performances), ultimately resulting in his suicide. Meanwhile, Euronymous meets awkward fan Kristian "Varg" Vikernes (a very creepy Emory Cohen), on whom he initially looks down, but who he soon welcomes into the fold. However, as time goes on, and Varg becomes more and more extreme, a dangerous power struggle between himself and Euronymous slowly develops.

An extreme offshoot of thrash metal and death metal, black metal was generally derided by the mainstream and criticised for its misogyny, racism, homophobia, and glamorisation of suicide. It was also seen as both anti-semitic and anti-Christian, and a number of practitioners have been accused of neo-Nazism and hate speech. Often wearing "corpse paint" and flaunting Satanic iconography, musical integrity was paramount, and to remain a true black metaller, one couldn't court mainstream success.

One of the film's most salient aspects is that black metal wasn't simply a genre of music; it was a way of life. However, Åkerlund (himself a co-founder of black metal band Bathory) isn't especially interested in valorising the movement, with the majority of the film designed to chip away at the image of black metallers as evil incarnate. In this sense, the story is primarily about image and marketing. Euronymous isn't an especially gifted musician, but he is an astute businessman, particularly when it comes to selling himself, knowing exactly how to cultivate the reputation he wants - a picture of a corpse here, some "evil" lyrics there, and soon the mainstream is in a frenzy and doing his work for him. Proto-outrage culture, if you will. Whereas some of the others saw evil in a literal sense, he saw it in terms of branding. Nowhere is this clearer than when he finds Dead's body, taking pictures which he would subsequently use as an album cover to bolster the band's reputation as extreme.

It's in relation to the manufactured nature of black metal's evil that much of the film's ironic humour is to be found. Euronymous and Dead's answering machine message is a growled, "we can't come to the phone right now because we're too busy sacrificing children". Describing their style, Euronymous proudly declares, "when people hear our music, we want them to commit suicide." Later on, he admits, "all this evil and dark crap was supposed to be fun." One member of Mayhem is shown riding a pushbike. Euronymous has to borrow his parents' car to get anywhere (it's difficult to be taken seriously as a purveyor of terror when you're in your dad's Volvo). An impassioned speech about the nature of black metal is interrupted by someone being told their kebab is ready. Euronymous complains of Christianity, "they're oppressing us with their kindness and their goodness". And in easily the funniest scene in the film, as Euronymous and Varg wait outside a recording studio, a group of elderly women emerge, with Euronymous running up to them and growling, "Hail Satan!"

Where the film treats its subjects more seriously is in relation to things such as Dead's depression, which ultimately results in his suicide, and the misogyny of virtually every member of the movement (it's telling that the first time we see Varg exert authority, it's in a scene where he forcefully tells (fictional) groupie Ann-Marit (Sky Ferreira) to take off her clothes). In relation to Dead, when he cuts himself on stage for the first time, the camera shows us he is utterly unmoved, suggesting he doesn't even feel the pain anymore (when he is first introduced, there is a shot showing scars up and down both arms). As he sprays blood on the crowd, the camera pans over to Euronymous, whose face betrays a mixture of horror and jealousy - he knows, even at this early stage, that he could never be that extreme.

From an aesthetic point of view, the film features three notable scenes; two murders and one suicide. All three scenes are long, shot matter-of-factly by cinematographer Pär M. Ekberg, and sparsely edited by Rickard Krantz. The two murders feature repeated stabbings that seem to go on forever, but it's the suicide that really got under my skin. I'm not sure if it's the length of time it takes (Dead slowly slits one wrist, then the other, he waits a bit, then cuts his own throat, waits a bit more, and then shoots himself in the forehead), if it was Mattias Eklund's sound design wherein we can literally hear the knife tear the flesh, if it was the lack of cutaways, or if it was the close-ups of the wounds, but I found the scene harrowing. Brilliantly done, but harrowing.

Another aesthetic element worth mentioning is that the actors all speak in English with their own accents (think Sean Connery in The Hunt for Red October (1990)). Personally, I find this far less distracting than everyone speaking English but with Scandinavian inflexions - why would Norwegians be speaking English to one another in Norwegian accents? It's a little jarring at first, but you quickly acclimate yourself to it, and it ultimately proves far less distracting than an actor with a God-awful accent.

In terms of problems, some will take issue with how ironically the film approaches the material. The repeated shots of band members leaving their parents' homes does seem to betray something of a judgemental jokey disdain. Additionally, the film never tries to convey just what drove these young men to make this kind of music in the first place, or why these poorly recorded ultra-depressing songs garnered such a fanatical following. It wouldn't have taken a huge amount to address this, and the absence of any material which speaks to where the black metal ideology came from leaves a sizeable lacuna. A knock-on from this is that the film downplays the movement's more horrifying activities; suggestions that they were just dumb kids who let things get out of hand provides an excuse that isn't justified, and undercuts the severity of what some of them did. The film also avoids the racism and homophobia in the movement.

In one respect, Lords of Chaos is an act of de-mythologizing, attempting to show that this frightening group of Satan-worshipping church burners and murderers were really just middle-class kids with a case of ennui. On the other hand, it illustrates that what had started out innocently led to some serious real-world ramifications. Euronymous is depicted as a wannabe cult leader, but one who doesn't subscribe to his own ideology of violence and rebellion, and is completely at a loss how to put the genie back in the box when certain members take his words literally. Lords of Chaos is his story before it is the story of black metal, and this is a vital point. Unafraid to show that the movement was built on a flimsy hodgepodge of paganism, Satanism, and Nazism, Åkerlund suggests the underpinning ideology is convoluted nonsense. For adherents, this will prove offensive. For everybody else, the ironic humour, harrowing violence, and thematic nihilism gel to form a fascinating film that's well worth checking out.
114 out of 139 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Based On Truth, Lies, & What Actually Happened.
JohnnybGhoul18 March 2023
The title says it all. I find when people say this didn't happen this way or that way, this part isn't true, etc I like to think "how would you know"? The director (Jonas Åkerlund) of the film ran in the same circles at the time. He was in black/viking metal band called Bathory from 1983-1984 era. He knew these guys. So if anyone knows most of what actually happened, Jonas is the guy. Plus, I find if Varg didn't like it & says it's untrue then it's no doubt the opposite .

I was not expecting to like this movie as much as I did. I didn't really know what to expect, to a great extent. I was shocked at how well it was put together. LOC is a very engaging, if compelling film about a bunch of true Norwegian black metal guys who founded the band Mayham, fanatics who cause it too, in little old Oslo. It's very well acted with some disturbing themes. One involving a candid suicide, another involving a random bloody murder, & another horrific murder of betrayal. LOC kills on all levels. Confrontingly violent, well scripted, & very well acted. Jack Kilmer's (Dead) short lived role, is hauntingly brilliant! Rory Culkin's (Oystein) performance is shockingly impressive. And the unhinged Varg, played superbly by Emory Cohen. His acting stuck with me. There were some powerful moments that truly unnerved me. He's a great acting force to be reckoned with. This is an important film with a so tragic, & violent ending. In ill respect, the film is very funny too, & the music is of course well suited.

Overall, it's a well-acted, directed & produced film, & a faithful depiction of the events that transpired. I highly recommend it.
18 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Tongue-in-Cheek Look at the Personalities Behind the Birth of Black Metal
AnDread_The_Blind23 February 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I'm a huge metalhead, and though I enjoy all kinds of metal-traditional, death, doom, industrial, progressive, stoner, thrash, even a few glam and nu metal bands here and there, I've always struggled with black metal. The music often eschews melody for dissonance, structured around repeated chords that, depending on the speed, create an atmosphere of plodding doom or frenetic chaos. Production tends toward lo-fi, either intentionally or as the product of financial limitations. And then there's the earnestness in the lyrics and imagery, taken so seriously by musicians and fans alike, with an elitist mentality that at times veers into the murky waters of nationalism, fascism, white supremacy, and eugenics. Still, I've always been fascinated by the history of black metal.

While Lords of Chaos the film, unlike the book it is ostensibly based on, is not about the birth of black metal as a musical subgenre and aesthetic/philosophical movement (if you really want to call it that), it does provide a close look at the personalities behind that pained emergence. I can see this making the stories of the figures in Norway's "Black Circle" more accessible to a non-metal audience unfamiliar with black metal or the crimes committed by its founders. And while metalheads, especially black metal elitists--purveyors of the trve and kvelt--have complained that the film is inaccurate, doesn't focus enough on the music, or sensationalizes the events depicted, these criticisms do not hold. As for accuracy, this film is a dramatization, not a documentary, though as far as I know, in general it doesn't depict anything that contradicts what is known from news reports and interviews. Some of the details may be invented or exaggerated for effect, but that's to be expected. And as far as the conflict between Euronymous and Varg goes-the central crux of the film-there have been contradictory statements made by Varg and others involved in the early Norwegian black metal scene, so that it's impossible to know what "really" happened between them.

As for not focusing enough on the music, I will admit this was a bit of a disappointment for me, as the aesthetics of black metal are very important to understanding the actions of those early black metallers. There's enough to give those unfamiliar with black metal a taste of its sound-with inclusion of Mayhem's iconic "Freezing Moon," perhaps one of the greatest and well-known black metal songs of all-time. But they rarely talk about music. There's a hilarious conversation about the progenitors of black metal, British speed metal band Venom (in paraphrase): Varg scornfully sneers: "Despite all their Satanic lyrics, with Venom, they said it was all just part of their image. They didn't really believe in it." Euronymous answers: "Saying it's all part of their image is...just part of their image." Since the movie is more about the people behind the music than the music itself, I suppose going into further depth was unnecessary, so I don't think the film deserves to be taken to task for not doing something it never set out to do. Still, would I have appreciated a little more music? Sure.

As for sensationalizing events, the actions of the Black Circle included suicide, church burnings, and brutal murders. So they're already inherently pretty dramatic. Now, if these things were done by people not directly responsible for two of the most foundational black metal bands of the early 90s-Mayhem and Burzum (Varg's solo one-man project), or if it made these actions seem the product of truly evil, otherworldly villains who actually were trying to unleash Satan on Earth, then that would be sensationalizing the events. But the film takes a more humanizing and subtly satirical approach, showing Varg eating toast, Euronymous getting flowers from their parents, and-gasp-even showing shreds of feeling for people. Perhaps this is what bothers black metallers: rather than shown as incarnations of evil, Dead, Varg, Euronymous, Faust, and others are shown as rebellious, vain, insecure, spoiled, and sometimes naïve teenagers trying to provoke the most extreme reactions possible by claiming all the things seen as taboo as their own. In Norway, one of the most prosperous countries on the planet, with socialized health care and cushy prisons (just watch videos of Varg in prison; it looks much nicer than what a lot of people outside of prison have in the U.S.), they got bored and needed something to make them feel alive.

The actors all do fine jobs of conveying all that and what I would imagine the various figures to be like. Dead, Mayhem's original singer, as a quiet, morbid, tortured soul; Euronymous, Mayhem's guitarist, a pompous but savvy propagator of the black metal aesthetic, who maybe was in it more for the thrill than actual belief; and Varg, who transforms from a meek and shy admirer of Mayhem to band bassist and competitive sociopath desperate to prove his commitment to a mysteriously sinister "cause." The real Varg isn't happy with how he is portrayed as "power mad" in the film. You killed someone, dude, and I don't buy the whole self-defense shtick. For anyone who is curious, watch a few of his videos on YouTube or read a few pages of any of his weird pagan-neo-fascist screeds. Actually, just take my word for it: portraying him as a power-hungry sociopath is pretty much accurate.

I don't know if I've done a good job of describing the actual film. Let me try to sum up by saying it's partly tongue-in-cheek, partly raw and unflinching portrayal of a small group of Norwegians creating a new subgenre and anti-establishment aesthetic. Despite the touches of humor that show the Black Circle as pretty much similar to glam rockers (thriving on beer, sex, juvenile delinquency, and loud music), it takes the church burnings and deaths seriously. We see Varg and Euronymous setting a few churches ablaze in the northern sky, and you get a sense of both the communal loss their destruction engendered, as well as the perverse thrill of taking down such hefty religious and national symbols of pride.

Dead's suicide comes with a sense of sad banality-he was in one of the most influential metal bands of all-time, his parents seemed to love him, yet depression had such a grip on him that death appealed to him more than life.

Faust's murder of an older gay man is depicted as an impulsive, senseless, brutal act.

And the final confrontation between Varg and Euryonomous is realistic and painfully drawn out-after all, Vikernes stabbed Aarseth 23 times. If there's one distortion, it's probably in making Euronymous look more sympathetic than he actually was. The film even uses a voiceover from him throughout, as if the audience needed a heroic anchor to keep from being disgusted by everything and everyone involved. If you're interested in the "truth," there's plenty of resources out there, including the book Lords of Chaos, though that's been criticized for inaccuracies as well. Black metal isn't pretty, but it is fascinating, and this film has helped along my growing appreciation of it. Excuse me while I go listen to my Darkthrone records.
110 out of 169 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Don't believe the haters
continual-one28 February 2019
I didn't expect to like it, but it was pretty good! Brutal scenes and seemed to stay true to much of the information I've accrued over the years. Varg hates everything, but this seems to be more of his angle on what happened, which in general terms was that Euronymous was a "poser" and took credit for things that weren't his. Hey, it's a movie not a documentary. Only Varg really knows what happened that night and he's already told the his side of things. It's well made, entertaining, and very brutal at times. Give it an honest go and see what you think.
102 out of 164 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Tacky and tasteless? Or a narrative well told based on tragic events?...
paul_haakonsen13 August 2020
Well, as a listener of metal for more than 30+ years, of course the tragic story of of Dead, Euronymous, Varg and the other people involved in the events that shook a nation in the early 1990s wasn't exactly unfamiliar territory to me. However, I wasn't aware that they had actually turned it into a movie. It was by sheer random luck that I happened to come across the 2018 movie from director Jonas Åkerlund here in 2020. And of course, this was a movie that I had to sit down and watch.

First of all, I have to say that I don't understand why director Jonas Åkerlund opted to go for an English speaking direction of the movie. It just took away so much authenticity from the movie that everyone were speaking English and the fact that most of them weren't even Norwegian or Swedish actors. That was a shame, because had it been in Norwegian and with a native Norwegian and Swedish cast, this would have been so much more impacting.

And also I happened to cringe when I saw that the movie was fronted by Rory Culkin. A Culkin in a movie such as this; surely that seemed like an atrocity in its own. But I was put to shame, because Rory Culkin walked tall and carried the movie phenomenally with his performance. I was more than genuinely surprised with how he handled this performance, it was just spectacular. Color me more than impressed with Rory Culkin in this movie.

Now, the story told in "Lords of Chaos" is a brutal story that is based on true events, real people and actual happenings. Which just makes it all the more hard-hitting. So the movie might not just be suitable for just anyone in the audience.

The narrative drive in the storyline was good, and while the movie ran for about two hours, it never really felt slow or uneventful. And that was a great accomplishment for director Jonas Åkerlund. However, one might debate whether or not a story as tragic and, well outright insane, as the story was is suitable entertainment for a movie. But, of course, that boils down to a matter of preference. Personally, I think the narrative was delivered quite well, and the story was presented in a very acceptable and fulfilling manner.

The movie also offers some insight into the early beginning of the black metal scene, and also delves into the elements of Euronymous's talents in terms of running a record store and a music label.

Whether or not you are interested in Norwegian black metal, the tragedy that struck Mayhem and the black metal community, then "Lords of Chaos" is a movie that definitely is noteworthy, because it has such a powerful punch to it. Definitely a movie that is well-worth taking the time and effort to sit down and watch. Just a shame that they didn't go for authenticity in terms of language and performers.

I was more than adequately entertained by this 2018 movie, and my rating is a seven out of ten stars.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hilariously bad.
j_glentzes18 January 2019
This works great as a parody. What is presented here has nothing to do with the real events, most characters are straight out of an American teen movie, every character is completely different from the real life version in everything (looks, behavior) and the story is insultingly false. The book was already bad, the movie is about 100 times worse. No band gave the rights to its music, even bands that had no real involvement in the true events that the movie is trying, and failing spectacularly, to portray. I love the few good reviews and the downvoting of the one negative review that says the truth, the movie will bomb either way. If you want to see an American teen movie with romance, sex, American humor and a bit of fake drama then this is for you. If you want to see a serious drama based on tragic events then avoid it like the plague.
222 out of 419 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Bloody horrific!!
kop_lad25 March 2019
Some really disturbing scenes in this piece, based loosely on the tragedy. Not for the faint hearted, some good acting and very lifelike gore. Not a bad film by any means!
23 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Movie isn't dumb, People are
natepritchard786 April 2019
If you find yourself mad that this movie isn't based off real life you probably get offended easily. 99% of horror movies BASED on real life exaggerate key points of the story. Otherwise they wouldn't be horror. This is just based off a book of short stories and accounts of the time. Watching any movie for educational purposes is always a bad idea. The director will always change things in the name of storytelling.
14 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
There's a lot of fan thing crap spoiling the reviews
AnusPresley29 March 2019
Get something straight up front - this is a movie, not a documentary. It will have errors. Get over it, move on.

As a whole it does well to bring to life the schizo genius/idiocy of the roots of black metal. It is ~90% accurate which makes it leaps ahead of most docu-dramas. To the unwashed, this may seem like a parody of sorts. But the reality is that the main players were a fringe crazy that was beyond parody. Yes, they were all probably like that and the film understates it if anything.

Black metal is a thing. Yes there is a point about the desecration of Asatru shrines. No it does not justify anything. If the film does have a flaw it is in emphasising satanism and odinism - no, their thing predates that. It is otherwise a fine retelling, Don't listen to the _Mayhem_ cultists. This is a good movie.
63 out of 94 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
No Citizen Kane, But Quite Accurate
boris_unanimate24 February 2019
Some will like this for what it is, a well done biopic, but one things for sure - the whole Norwegian Black Metal scene will hate this movie, or at least all the true necro grim Black Metal elitists. Having read the book this movie is based on before there was even talk about a movie, I am happy to see it didn't disappoint. I expected no masterpiece that would be lauded as the best musical biopic of the year, but I'm glad it turned out better than expected.

This is not a movie for Metal heads only. If you like controversial figures and want to know about the history of Mayhem and what happened a long time ago to a bunch of kids as well as hear a decent soundtrack, go for it. The actors did a well enough job and it stayed almost entirely true to the book by the same title. If you can't bother to read it, watch it. And, Varg was portrayed probably better than he deserved, but so did everyone. Light a few black candles and let the mayhem begin!
41 out of 91 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Wasted opportunity.
polakphil27 February 2019
The real life story of what happened in the Black Metal scene in the early 90s is an enthralling, insane, and equally disgusting crime story about murders, suicide, jealousy, revenge, egoism, mass vandalism, court cases, jail, seriously right wing politics, and the scourge of society. One could have given it a similar platform to some of the Netflix series like for Ted Bundy, or OJ Simpson, and it would be edge of your seat stuff.

But what we get here is some kids cartoon version. With parties, blowjobs, made up girlfriends, jokes, horseplay, and a total mockery of all the main characters and the events for humour purposes.

I legitimately think that this movie is trying to troll the scene and the story by flipping all the characters and making up their personalities to seem like they're the kind of people you'd associate with a nerdy internet forum. Instead of some seriously messed up individuals that were in the wrong place at the wrong time for these crazy set of events to take place. They've really made a serious crime story into a teen party flick of some kind.

This movie may appeal to some people, not sure who, cause if you want some teen flick there are much better ones out there, maybe it's for people that have heard of the bands involved but don't want to hear the real disgusting story, but want to laugh at the edgy kids from the 90s that used to wear the face paint and make the loud noisy music in Scandinavia.
57 out of 105 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Looking at this movie as a film, and a film only.
dsayshi25712 March 2019
What I mean by my title is that I am not too familiar with the real story, and I have seen a lot of reviews on here bashing the movie for not being true to reality. I understand where they are coming from but as someone who knows only surface level stuff about Mayhem, I will review this movie just from a movie perspective, no bias over real events.

So, just by looking a this movie as a film, I enjoyed it quite a bit! I thought that the story was intriguing and sad, and I found myself very engaged with what I was watching. There were three scenes in particular that really stood out and shocked me. I thought they were relatively realistic and very emotional, but what really stood out to me was the performance by Rory Culkin. I think he was absolutely fantastic in this role and I can't wait to see what else he is going to be in in the future.

Overall, it is far from a perfect movie but for what it is it is sad, entertaining, brutal and emotional with a standout performance by Rory.
40 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Worth the Watch
squareshells25 February 2019
I'm a fan of Jonas Akerlund, so maybe I'm biased. I will say the movie was uneven. The book this movie is based on is one hell of a story and I think, sure, it could have been pulled off in a tighter, more hollywood-style film. But Akerlund has a specific style and he sticks to it and I think it's cool.

Rory Culkin does an okay job with a great role. I don't want to hate on anybody's acting here, because all around it was okay. But someone else could have really shined in the lead role. The real stand-out actor in this film for me was Jack Kilmer, who plays one of the smaller roles, unfortunately.

I enjoyed the movie overall. It's a nice violent movie about dumb kids who like metal and live in Norway in the 90's who do incredibly dumb things.
26 out of 57 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What's the exact opposite of a masterpiece?
mark-hall422 February 2019
A completely cringe inducing dud! Just baffling how they screwed this up so bad. Just astounding. I'm not going to blame the actors for this embarrassment (Caulkin is quite good, and the only positive element in this entire debacle), I blame the producers. Whatever one might happen to think about the political and social happenings of the black metal scene during the period this film pretends to depict, this story deserves a much, much, much better treatment.. I mean, the true story material alone is a dramatic goldmine; In the hands of great writers and a director on the level of say... Paul Thomas Anderson or Bennett Miller, this could have been a wonderfully complex study of these young men's rapid decline into extreme Sociopathy. Instead we are given cartoon characters. Goofy portrayals, with ham-fisted and lazy character archs. Which it seems, is purposefully embarrassing to the metal scene as a whole. Vice have had their grubby exploitative fingers in the black metal pie for a while now, as part of their larger mission to truly celebrate and hype the worst and most superficial traits of human nature. This is just another wasted opportunity to make something special, flushed down the toilet to make a quick buck whilst poking fun at the metal fans.
65 out of 126 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A bunch of made up C$%P
greatdeceivah27 January 2019
In the words of Varg Vikernes, this "movie" is a bunch of made up C%&P., it is fictional and mostly made up propaganda to vilify the people portrayed.
85 out of 212 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Recommended
Groverdox7 March 2020
"Lords of Chaos" is better than I expected. Jonas Akerlund in the past seemed like a typical music video brat-cum feature filmmaker; ie. his movies were full of gimmicky rubbish effects like "Spun" that works to get the attention of audiences of five minute video clips, but just gets tiresome with a full-length movie. I liked "Small Apartments", though.

"Lords of Chaos" shows that Akerlund has become a capable filmmaker. They say directors become great not by adding, but by taking away, and this one feels gritty and realistic due to the restrained approach he has employed. It doesn't feel like he gets in the way of the actors, which is to the film's benefit, as Rory Culkin is great as Euronymous.

The movie is also, surprisingly, funny. It's not afraid to point out the ridiculousness of this story. These oh-so-evil black metallers were part of some kind of Satanic cult that was bent on taking over the world... and they had to hide the flowers their parents sent them when their pals came over because they weren't evil enough. Sure, they burnt down some churches and even killed a guy, but when Varg went public with this in an interview, turning the lights down, hanging his beloved Swastika on the wall, the reporter almost walked out of the interview, not taking the man seriously - and who could blame him?

The movie culminates in one of the most brutal murder scenes I have seen in a film. This is not a spoiler - you already knew that was how it was going to end. This scene must set some kind of record for the number of stab wounds in a movie scene.

I do have a big problem with the movie, though. And that is the character of Ann-Marit. You knew a movie made in the new millennium telling a story which was really entirely about men couldn't be told without the introduction of a Strong Female Character (TM). You know, the female voice of reason, the only one who understands the poor foolish man, the one he never could have succeeded without, the one he should have listened to.

Only problem with all that garbage is the fact that of course, the character never existed. One could even argue that she couldn't exist. What is such a Strong Female (TM) doing hanging out with a bunch of losers like Mayhem? She had to know they were heading for prison time, at least. The only women attracted to these guys would have been the idiots Varg is shown ploughing through.

It's so lame that every movie has to introduce this lame stock character. With all the other restraint the movie showed, I wish they'd followed through and left her out. Her role is thankfully rather negligible, still allowing the movie to shine.

Lastly, you have to agree that it deserved an honorary Oscar just for casting a Jewish actor in the role of that boring pretend-Nazi puts, Kristian "Varg" Vikernes. If it made him mad (and it did) you can't deny that's a plus.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Watch it and decide for yourself...
tobiasklaye24 February 2019
I love all genre of music, Can't say I'm a huge fan of death/black/speed/grind/etc metal but I do remember hearing about these guys years ago and I admit I did walk in blindfolded only to research the facts afterwards. My humble opinion is, everyone poo poo'ing this movie is an angst person that probably loves the fiction over the fact or visa versa. "What have you done lately" The direction is good, the acting, the story and yes, it is quite visually graphic at times, but if you do some research then you will understand the necessity. Far from the best movie, however a very well made insight into a tragic event that never needed to happen.
11 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A strange movie about one of the strangest stories in rock 'n' roll history.
mwilson19769 April 2020
The real life story of how 'True Norwegian Black Metal' became a worldwide phenomena thanks to the church burning antics of teenage headbanger Euronymous and his band Mayhem. This film directed by Jonas Åkerlund (former drummer in proto Black Metallers Bathory) is based on the 1998 book of the same name, and stars Rory Culkin as Euronymous and Emory Cohen as his arch rival Varg Vikernes (aka Count Grishnackh). Jack Kilmer shines as Dead, the original singer of Mayhem who committed suicide, and received praise for his portrayal despite the real Dead never actually killing any cats like he does here. Åkerlund was granted unprecedented access to police reports as well as photographs of Euronymous's record store Helvete and the house the band lived in, but was denied the rights to using the music of Vikernes by the man himself due to his criticism of the source material. He turns in a pretty strange movie that is heavy on sensationalism about one of the strangest stories in rock 'n' roll history.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A weird one to rate
grinthorn9 December 2019
So I watched it yesterday and in the first 20 or so minutes I felt really bad by the way they were presenting the metal heads as a whole - it looked and felt like a parody. Close to insulting. Than it got turn for the better and told an interesting and engaging story. It felt like it left a lot untold, but you can get the general idea easily. It actually glued me for the second act and at the end I really enjoyed it.

I am struggling to give it a higher than 6 rating (which is above average), mostly because of those first 20 minutes - I felt it could get a bit more serious/dark there and not show just some troubled teenagers, but also, I don't know, I guess it could tell the story better and even though I liked the acting (Emory Cohen with a stellar performance), it felt like it needed more fleshing of their turmoils and turns in characters that lead to A, B, C, D.

All in all - when I am getting back and thinking about the movie the day after, it means that it was actually a good movie.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Better Than I expected (Black Metal Fan)
bavillar23 February 2019
We all know the story, and now it was put on film. It made Oystein a very likable if not fake persona, the film is brutally honest about how Varg thought Euronymous was fake and only wanted attention, while in the same breath Varg went to the media seeking the attention. The casting for Varg was questionable at first but I thought Cohen brought a good perspective on the narcissism of Varg after watching it twice now. It made all of this seem very possible and realistic which was admirable on Jonas's part. Everyone was called out, no one was spared. The violence is gruesome and the most realistic I've seen in a while. It was funny, violent and had a sex scene, it's got alot of layers to it that BM fans would consider "gay" and pointless, but then again as the director says "If black metal fans are against everything why would they be for this film?" Touche.
53 out of 94 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
So torn...
daradyj18 July 2019
I would like to start out by saying I am a big Mayhem fan and I tend to tell the band's history to people who obviously don't care enough to listen. But the film was...meh. They touched on the Wikipedia references that I already knew but I was still excited to show my husband (a cool dude that doesn't like black metal) a version of the stories I've always told him. My biggest problem was the casting. I don't entirely understand why they chose actors that kind of sort of looked like their real life counterparts, but didn't bother to seriously acknowledge the Norwegian heritage of the band. They didn't even bother with accents. The whole point of the black metal movement is to contrast the church's rule over government and lifestyle of their citizens (which still goes on by the way). It missed the heart and soul of the movement in favor of surface level reasoning that essentially boils down to "varg was a neckbeard who took things too seriously." Less than half way through the movie I realized that I was making excuses for the dramatic retellings of the story and I just decided to stop taking it seriously and treat it as a movie that I happen to know the ending. It's disappointing for any fan, but to any curious and open minded "normies" I can see it being a decent drama. Also, when I saw "Vice Films" I instantly dropped a star from any rating I would give it. I think that's why it might have come off more corporate and off-putting to fans.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Until the Light Takes Our Laughtrack
BandSAboutMovies12 March 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I've always felt that the black metal scene of the early 1990's is hard to explain. The music that emerged from it is pretty much timeless, but in order to enjoy it, you need to either embrace or get past a lot of things. And by things, that word seems pretty light. Those things are murder and arson just for a start.

Based on the book Lords of Chaos: The Bloody Rise of the Satanic Metal Underground by Michael Moynihan and Didrik Søderlind, this Jonas Akerlund directed film falls prey to some of the issues that book has. Namely, who can know exactly what was going on in the scene unless they were there? Varg Vikernes - who recorded as Burzum and appears as one of the main characters in both the book and movie - has been a major critic. Vikernes states that the authors of the book had no insight or knowledge of what Black Metal was and they still filled the heads of a generation of metal fans with lies.

He hasn't gone light on this film either. In a series of YouTube videos, he's denied the filmmakers the rights to his music. He wasn't pleased at being presented as being power mad. He's also claimed that the movie is made up and plain wrong. Then again, this is the guy who murdered the other main character in this movie. So, like I said, black metal has a lot to get past if you're going to go any deeper.

The film begins when Euronymous (Rory Culkin, Signs) forms Mayhem with Necrobutcher, Manheim and Maniac, but soon the last two members leave and are replaced by drummer Hellhammer (Anthony De La Torre, who played young Jack Sparrow in Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales) and Dead, a singer who was once killed for several seconds by bullies in grade school. As a result, he has become defined by death, sending his vocal audition to the band along with a crucified mouse.

Mayhem soon becomes big within the metal scene, playing shows where Dead cuts himself and throws pig heads at audience members. As Metalion - a journalist who created the Slayer Mag that would document the scene (you can grab the collected issues from Bazillion Points) - films a show, the band meets a fan named Varg Vikernes, who is initially made fun of by the band.

Meanwhile, Dead decides to slice up his body and use Euronymous' shotgun to commit suicide. Instead of calling the police right away, he takes photos of the body and takes pieces of Dead's skull fragments to make necklaces. This causes Hellhammer to leave the band.

Euronymous then opens a record shop called Helvete that becomes the social center of the scene, drawing people like Varg, Darkthrone's Fenriz and Emperor's Faust (Valter Skarsgard) into becoming the Black Circle. Euronymous' ego is threatened by Varg's growing popularity - particularly amongst women - and willingness to live up to the anti-Christian rants and do things for real.

It becomes a battle of who is in control of the Black Circle. While Euronymous can lay claim to creating true Norweigan black metal, Varg has been the one willing to actually burn down churches and incite others like Faust to commit murder. While all this is going on, a new version of Mayhem that features Euronymous, Varg, Blackthorn and Attila record "De Mysteriis Dom Sathanas."

Helvete is soon shut down by the police and Varg is arrested as the prime suspect of the church burnings after he does an interview with a newspaper claiming he committed every crime. That said, Euronymous does the same in a Kerrang! article. Varg is arrested but soon released for lack of evidence. And after an argument over who was in charge of the scene and what true black metal means, the two men reach the point of no return. To Euronymous, everything he said was just promotion. To Varg, selling records is meaningless next to his cause and his former mentor is now seen as fake.

That's when Euronymous starts telling stories about how he's going to kill Varg and make a snuff movie out of it. To him, this was all probably just talk. To Varg, these threats are real. So on the morning of August 10, he goes to Euronymous' apartment and kills him. The knife stabbing extends on and on, probably like it did in real life. Varg would go on to serve the maximum sentence of 21 years in jail, which he served, despite escaping once.

So what did other people from the scene think? Mayhem's Attila spoke for the current band members, saying that their position regarding the film and its creators is a "big CENSORED you." He also pointed out that the movie only focused on Mayhem during the 1990s, not the whole black metal scene. That said, he did allow some of Tormentor's songs to be used in the film and his role is played by his son, Arion Csihar. He was also on set for the church burning scenes.

Mayhem's founding bassist Necrobutcher said, "I will do everything I can to stop this film. Tell the Swedes and the Hollywood people to go CENSORED themselves." That said, the director claims that he got the band's support. Their actual music doesn't appear in the film. Instead, the songs were re-recorded by Malparidos re-recorded their songs for the picture.

So how did I feel? I hated this movie from three minutes in. Its tone feels like it wants to be a comedic tour through the formation of Mayhem and the fun - such as it is - of the scene. Let's keep in mind how strange it is to portray many of these events - like church burnings - as buddy buddy moments. I didn't believe in anyone in the film, didn't see them as these near-mythic people they are portraying. Maybe that was the intention, to show us that the true Black Circle was just a bunch of silly kids acting up. But it just feels false. And false is at the very heart of everything that black metal stood against, demanding truth and devotion to a cause, no matter how patently insane it could be. I'd compare it to gangster rap, another genre that demanded that artists live up to the lyrics they recorded.

There's nothing here that answers why one of the most gorgeous places in existence could give root to one of the darkest sub-genres in music. I guess I shouldn't expect that much from a movie. But with Akerlund having some knowledge of this scene - he was in Bathory, which predates this era - but this all rang as false as the black metal band in Rob Zombie's Lords of Salem.

If this is your first exposure to this music, there's no way you're going to want to listen to it or enjoy it. Even the end, where Euronymous tells the audience to CENSORED off and proclaims that he invented true Norweigan black metal, feels fake. It sounds like words on a page, not something proudly proclaimed. For all the faults of this film, that's the worst. And when its followed up by cartoony fun images of church burnings and devils, it's just upsetting.

This could have been so much more. Instead, it's worse than nothing.
75 out of 149 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Engaging, but people will hate it
nicksbrittin23 February 2019
I'm not sure how a person who isn't a fan of black metal would react to the film, but I enjoyed it. It's funny at times, and as a former elitist teenager who wouldn't associate with "posers," I can verify that the jerky attitude displayed by the characters is probably accurate. It gets better as it progresses, and by the end of the film, there are some very interesting discussions on art and philosophy. People will hate it, however, because most metal fans fancy themselves experts on the scene, and they'll be too cool to admit that it's actually a good movie.
39 out of 70 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Escalation of Evil
madli-5-943459 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Former Bathory drummer Jonas Åkerlund mostly is known for his impressive music videos. "Smack My Bitch Up" or "Turn The Page" are just two examples of his countless successes. But also especially his first movie "Spun" gained benevolently critics. With his thriller "Horseman" he could win Dennis Quaid as main actor, "Small Apartments" is an outstanding comedy and on Netflix recently "Polar" premiered. But if he did himself a favour with this one is questionable.

The story of the early Norwegian Black Metal and the bands Mayhem, Burzum, Emperor and Darkthrone is widely known not only in the scene itself. A singer that shot himself and his band colleagues use a picture of his corpse as a cover and pieces of his skull as necklaces. A series of curch burnings and the killing of a gay man. Plus the summit of the power struggle of two protagonists ending in the brutal stabbing of Euronymous, who was founder of Mayhem and is the main character in Lords Of Chaos.

Slam Alternative Music Magazine presents the movie at the Filmcasino. That it was produced at Vice Studios let the first ones in the audience murmur. During scenes like the brutal suicide of Dead people even leave the room. Jack Kilmer does a great job as do Rory Culkin as Euronymous and Emory Cohen as Varg Vikernes. Their characters appear convincing, and Åkerlund manages that the actions act conclusively.

The start of the band and their way of living are told quickly in the beginning. But the longer the story goes on, the more the music itself gets the minor matter. Key locations are the cottage where Mayhem lived and the record store Helvete (nowadays Neseblod Records). Apart from all the violence, the script leaves space for some jokes, e.g. about Death Metal. For actions like the lighting of a cigarette Åkerlund uses his typical fast editing, but for the crimes he takes his time.

And so the film ends with Varg, who is no longer the shy boy from the beginning, brutally stabbing Euronymous. His off-voice that leads through the movie relativizes his own death by saying he created Black Metal and Mayhem. Lords Of Chaos is no documentary even though Åkerlund used some nice archive material, but a great entertainment film "based on truth, lies and what actually happened".
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Just a really bad movie
waahanmei2 October 2018
Absurd placed humour, graphic scenes and weird editing. You dont get really close to any of the portrayed characters, and the lack of music makes this potenial strong movie film of tragic events even worse. I had really high expectations, and since I live in Bergen I, like many others, all know the story. But this was dissapointing and akward.

The lead took the movie from 1 and up to 2 stars. He acted great.
122 out of 254 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed