The Reckoning (TV Movie 2015) Poster

(2015 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Conclusion
Jackbv12326 August 2023
You could almost watch this without the first two, but I started watching this with no clue it was a trilogy and immediately realized I was missing backstory. It is partially filled in but it's a little rough catching up. I found the other two.

This is more of a romance but there is still a lot about finding yourself. I think this is where watching the whole thing helps. There are some elements that follow the typical romance from Hallmark. It has a current fiancé vs the old hometown sweetheart. That part is the usual, although the loser has maybe fewer flaws than most of the rivals I've seen in other movies.

Overall I probably didn't appreciate this as much as the other two. I can't say I "enjoyed" the first but I did appreciate it. The second was enjoyable. This wasn't bad, just not as good.

There's a point where Katherine wants to say grace and Justin is shocked. This far into their relationship is a little late for him to realize how strong her faith is. She certainly has wanted to say grace before.

There is a strong Christian vibe to this movie, and not just Amish. But there is little preaching.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It was ok
youngandrestless1234526 July 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Third movie in the Trilogy. The main male actors have changed and that makes this one not as good. Someone from Katie's past show up and that's handled pretty badly. Also, Daniel never tells her he left a letter for her mother to find (2nd movie). That was a pretty important thing to leave out.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The puzzle pieces of romance.
Reno-Rangan24 February 2018
The third and final film, based on the Beverly Lewis' 'The Heritage of Lancaster County' novel trilogy. This was an unexpected watch. I mean I was not going to watch these films. But I had a short time, so I had to pick a short film and television films are always less than 90 minutes long. Once I saw the first, I could not leave behind the remaining two. After all it was not a bad watch. If you are like close enough to 30 or above that, you will find these films decent. Because that's what life is about. You are mature enough to understand them. Ten years ago definitely I would have not enjoyed them as of now.

As I've mentioned in the previous review, that I did not know what to expect from it. For me, the actual story had ended in the previous part itself. This was just an extension, extension of Katie Lapp's new world's new life. Surely some people would be very interesting to know how she makes her new lifestyle. Because there's a lot to learn, especially being too kind in this tough world. Every step forward is a new lesson. Anyway, she has trusted people all around her. What she now needs is a man and his unending love and care.

After inheriting wealth from her mother, now herself entangled in a new situation. The first film was about unveiling the truth, followed by in the second, she reconnected with her root, and now the romance. It's a three way romance, she does not know whom to choose. Caught between past and present, the film focused on her journey of self-discovery. She's helping those who needs it. Besides, it helped her to realise what her heart says. In the end, it all ended up happily as always for a Hallmark film.

-xX] I think before you make a future with Justin, you need to make peace with your past. [Xx-

To watch it on an average day, it won't be that bad. But if you pick it with lots of expectations, then you are in a wrong film. The families would approve it easily. Yet this third film was not as good as previous two. Because the romance theme they have used in this was so common in most of the same themes. What uplifted the film was those orphan segments. It had told some meaningful aspect of the wealthy people with a good heart. And that's the that, the film did not impress me on the overall. One of the reasons was, again, the casting.

Three films and each time a bunch of new actors stepped-in on someone's role we were very used to. I know what you might be thinking. It's not Katie Lapp, but some supporting characters. Katie's Amish parents particular. The original actors were brilliant. They never had more scope for their parts, but I loved them in their short span. It was too late to switch to a new pair. So, I felt out of synch with the narration when their parts came in. I have never seen a trilogy that messed up like this.

My pick is the middle one. I liked the second film very much. But the first was decent and expected to end the trilogy in a same way. Despite re-cast, the actors were good. At least they should have stuck with the same director. Though this director was okay. Another thing is, the end. That's not what I'd expected, but that's fine for not giving what the viewers had expected, but it did make sense, except leaving a bad impression on Katie of what she has chosen. I mean not the man, but what kind of life. So my conclusion is, this part was least decent in the series. But as a trilogy not bad for once trying.

6/10
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Neat ending
phd_travel13 September 2019
For the sake of completeness you want to see how things end in this trilogy. The storylines come to a close and it's satisfying to watch. Katie LeClerc is still very watchable. Some of the other cast have changed. In some ways it's the weakest of the three. There still are Amish vs non Amish contrasts.

A few weak points. A rather tiresome triangle between her Englisher fiancé and her Amish old flame. Why did they choose such a sketchy looking guy to play the Amish guy? Her orphanage project isn't that interesting.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Hard to follow due to many actor changes
waterstradtc7 September 2018
So basically it is all new cast except the same Katie as The Confession. I had a hard time with this one because every actor was changed so trying to figure out who is who and then trying to reimagine the character as the new actor was hard. Also, this movie was terribly predictable. I don't want to spoil it for anyone so I won't tell you why it is predictable. I wouldn't watch it again.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
No. No. No
cjjohnson6420 August 2022
There was too much wrong with this. The actors. Who she ends up with. I fast forwarded through much of the middle. Bad acting. Bad storyline. Just nooooo.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Loved all three Movies
jewelch18 January 2021
It is a continuation of The Shunning and The Confession. I was a little disappointed that Panibaker didn't continue the series. However it is every good and follows the sequence. It answer the question did she leave fold or did Katie girl run back to the ways of her childhood. Really Good James Welch Henderson, Arkansas 1/17/2021
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Third in a Series.
jamiekwilding13 June 2023
I agree with other reviews, too many cast member changes across the three movies: The Shunning, The Confession and The Reckoning. I'm not sure there were any actors in all three movies. They even used a different mansion in the third movie and it was pretty ugly. Katie's accent in third movie was terrible, sounded more like Russian accent German. In the second movie, Daniel was buying a necklace for Katie at the end of the movie, never mentioned in third movie. Also not mentioned that he is the guy who pretended to be Katie's cousin in The Confession. It was fairly entertaining but could have been better.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Most of the 8 stars for Katie Leclerc
Racingphan220 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I've been a fan of Katie Leclerc since Switched At Birth, and try to watch anything she's in. Unfortunately this is the weakest of the trilogy, full of forgettable characters and boring story lines.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
This is one bad movie
steiner-sam11 June 2021
This is the conclusion of the Beverly Lewis trilogy on the Heritage of Lancaster County. It immediately follows "The Confession" (2013) in the storyline.

Katie Lapp/Katherine Mayfield (Katie Leclerc) has now inherited everything from her wealthy birth mother, and heads up the foundation that her birth mother had established. She's in a relationship with Justin Wirth (Chad Connell), the administrative head of the foundation. He has a blue-blood heritage having gone to Harvard and worked for Google.

Katie has written letters to her adoptive Amish parents, Samuel Lapp (Kevin Rothery) and Rebecca Lapp (Vanessa Holmes), but because Katie is banned, they do not open the letters.

The foundation decides to give major support to the Oak Vale Home for Boys, and hires a counsellor who turns out to have a connection with Katie.

Katie's old Amish boyfriend, Daniel Fisher (Jacob Blair), shows up and causes Katie to wonder about her choices. She makes some different choices.

This is one bad movie. The script is stilted, and Katie's accent is bad. Katie is the only hold-over actor from the previous film. Her adoptive parents seem to have had personality transplants from the previous film. Justin's parents are caricatures of the "Upper Class." Katie's heritage has turned into a conservative Protestant one rather than an Amish one. She's happy to lead out in oral prayer, though she never would have done this back in her Amish community. Her religious language has minimal Amish roots. There's a bizarre barn-raising scene with troubled youth that has little relationship to an Amish barn-raising except for some visual effects.

This felt like a film made to fulfill a contract with as little creative investment as possible.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Disappointed
merinb-1399723 September 2022
I know it's hard to get the same actors after a couple years, so I can for go that one. The other things.... So much of this fantastic story was left out, not even mentioned or changed. I know they didn't mention Katie's best friend in the second movie, I thought they might make up for it in this one. Seems like they focused a lot on Katie and not on the whole story. It is frustrating to think this is what people will see when it doesn't do the books justice. I know that it is a fictional story but there are just some things you don't change. Please read the books! I am so glad I did, before watching the movies.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Great stories but disappointed in the main characters
Dodibird12 June 2022
I really loved the storyline, and they were all three well made, but I couldn't have been more disappointed with the roles being played by other people. It nearly made me wish I would have not seen any of it to be honest. The original actress Danielle Panabaker was absolutely stunning and fit the role perfectly as did the original actor who played Daniel. They were perfect and they drew you in to fall in love with them. The actors who took on the roles were not bad actors, but just didn't fit, especially Katie. She just didn't look the part whatsoever. If new actors have to be brought in at least make sure they look the role. Just my opinion I suppose, but it really took the heart out of it for me. Even Katies Dad was played by someone else in the end. Without the changes I likely would have given this a 9 or a 10, but not now. At least I'm forewarned on Beverly Lewis movies to check these things out before making a purchase in the future.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed