There was closure to a degree of satisfaction, but I never understood what career path Rady (the lead male actor) was embarked upon considering how it ended. I like that fact that Leclerc (the lead female actress) was a born leader and it showed some multi- taking dynamics that would not be successful without the vision (focused) on her destined choice and where her happiness was in all of those choices presented to her. Yes, the money offers looked appealing, but would she have been happy on a path she did not have in her vision/focus all along? Interesting how options and choices can alter our course as humans. Yes, most of us want the money and that is the ultimate goal if you can get both the happy , fulfilling choice right along with the money. But most of us tend to go the money route and forego the latter, when ideally we need both paths to work in our favor. Money is the biggest topic of many love relationships. So, does that say the money is important to us? Absolutely! Shame on whomever does not feel this way because money is the topic that splits a lot of love relationships up. So we need more focused happy, satisfied and fulfilling money paths early on is our youthfulness, so we can feel a lot more independent and not 'NEEDY' of each other. The movie was great because it helped me shed light on options/choices and how best to satisfy my future with prosperity/abundance of all things I love/desire, including money and maybe a love partnership if that is ever in the cards. It's not a need, but a future desire. Thank you Hallmark for another movie that makes me think!
9 Reviews
Generic, derivative, redundant, and San Diego
Larry-R9 February 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Hallmark seems content to take time tested formulas for plots and characters, where any weaknesses in any aspect have been chipped away, and the highest quality has been demanded of the production and creative people.
An example of something that's annoyed me about previous movies like this one... I am used to the anchorman being a stupid chauvinist jerk who hits on the lead female character, but in this movie the anchorman is a nice, smart guy who's respectful and helpful to her.
It seems to me like movies on Hallmark have gotten to a point where reductionist criticism seems pointless. The script was good, the acting was good, the sets were good, the costumes were good, the cinematography was good... but that's to be expected on Hallmark.
But I think I can safely say in some senses this movie is generic, derivative, and redundant. I don't really care though, because I liked and enjoyed it more than similar movies that came before it, and I expect to watch it again.
The dozens of mentions of San Diego did get on my nerves a little, even though I usually have no objection to subtle product placements.
An example of something that's annoyed me about previous movies like this one... I am used to the anchorman being a stupid chauvinist jerk who hits on the lead female character, but in this movie the anchorman is a nice, smart guy who's respectful and helpful to her.
It seems to me like movies on Hallmark have gotten to a point where reductionist criticism seems pointless. The script was good, the acting was good, the sets were good, the costumes were good, the cinematography was good... but that's to be expected on Hallmark.
But I think I can safely say in some senses this movie is generic, derivative, and redundant. I don't really care though, because I liked and enjoyed it more than similar movies that came before it, and I expect to watch it again.
The dozens of mentions of San Diego did get on my nerves a little, even though I usually have no objection to subtle product placements.
A copy of cloudy with a chance of meatballs?
hallmarkmov3 April 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I can't remember when cloudy with a chance of meatballs came out but this main character seems to be a complete copy of her, even down to the red hair and glasses. So I find it ironic with the talks of contracts and using someone's imagery when they copied an animated movie. Anyways, back to this movie. So this entire station had no one knowledgeable about weather until this girl came along?! A weather station that doesn't have in house meteorologists? People to read the data? Make analyses? I like the lead actors, they played the characters very well. I was annoyed by the dissertation storyline. There's no way you are still writing important aspects of your work or the presentation that this veryyyy last minute! You should have this stuff done years ago. Did anyone in hallmark actually do a PhD or are they writing made up stories like with every other career. The friend was useless, annoying, and selfish. The supervisor or whatever role she was, was also obnoxious- as much as the other girl we are supposed to hate. There too many b storylines and it didn't need that. There were great actors and strong characters that could carry this movie. I am confused why Vera wants to be a professor. She seems to want to be a model? Or maybe she is going to be one of those awful profs who sleep with her students for years to come. Did the supervisor really have a family emergency? Sounds like a lame excuse students make. Do weather girls really make $245k? That is insane. That's the salary of some university deans or even presidents! Once the presentation was over, the movie seem to drag on a lot longer than it should have and my interest waved significantly.
slightly outside the Hallmark envelope... Rady and Leclerc add their own stamp
laurelmcf24 February 2015
I love Hallmark films for their predictable formula: single woman-focused screenplay in which too-successful, insufficiently caring "perfect" but workaholic guy must be shed for an authentic man of feeling.
What I especially love are the Hallmark tropes: new guy must be thrown into an early, intense encounter with single girl's parent/s; numerous late model cars must be driven pointlessly around town with elaborate driveway exit scenes; characters' occupations are bipolar business/law vs wedding planning, writing, art. As predictable as this makes a Hallmark, variations on this theme become deeply satisfying, as we watch these elemental themes -- the search for the authentic life, the rejection of empty success, the social pressure for the conventional path, play out again and again. And thus each Hallmark character takes on allegorical significance in this larger search for authenticity.
Hallmark movies remind me of a comment Sana Haque made about the great French writer Roland Barthes' Mythologies: "Barthes deciphers how wrestlers take on tragic or comic "stock" personas for the benefit of their fans and how their exaggerated gestures, drama, and Good vs. Evil conflicts perform a cathartic function for the audience, a venue through which frustrated emotion can find a release and the complexity of modern existence revert to black and white simplicity."
So, in this allegorical frame, Cloudy with a Chance of Love shakes it up a (very) little bit. Here on the road to the authentic life, the sub-theme is change. Katie Leclerc's character, a PhD meteorology student at a mythical San Diego university has spent her life happily in one place, focused on one consuming interest (the heavens). On her heretofore uneventful road to a fellowship and professorship, she now encounters a TV news director, played by Michael Rady, who pulls her toward a huge change when he convinces her to sub as a meteorologist at his station. He even tries eventually to get her to leave San Diego in a two-fer deal to try network news in New York.
Michael Rady has matured from his days of Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants. In this movie he channels Ken Olin from his Thirtysomething days-- the sensitive and empathetic listener to a well-educated woman's earnestly related hopes and dreams and self-doubts. There's a soulfulness here to Rady's acting that was unexpected and welcome in a Hallmark.While his ambition to go back to network news in New York nearly sinks a budding romance with adorable Leclerc, he manages an unusual Hallmark workaholic accomplishment. He gets the girl despite all that, once he finds his own "authentic" path back to San Diego, and "saves" her by firing her and reconnecting her with her academic destiny.
John Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress, and other towering works of allegory have tread these familiar paths many times before Hallmark screenplays, but how nice it is to turn on the Hallmark channel and watch these characters play out our hopes and fears. When the actors are as sympathetic, and winsome as Rady and Leclerc, and the chemistry believable, it is an evening well spent. It would be great to see both Leclerc and Rady enter the pantheon of Hallmark repeaters-- those actors we love to see in other Hallmark themes and variations.
What I especially love are the Hallmark tropes: new guy must be thrown into an early, intense encounter with single girl's parent/s; numerous late model cars must be driven pointlessly around town with elaborate driveway exit scenes; characters' occupations are bipolar business/law vs wedding planning, writing, art. As predictable as this makes a Hallmark, variations on this theme become deeply satisfying, as we watch these elemental themes -- the search for the authentic life, the rejection of empty success, the social pressure for the conventional path, play out again and again. And thus each Hallmark character takes on allegorical significance in this larger search for authenticity.
Hallmark movies remind me of a comment Sana Haque made about the great French writer Roland Barthes' Mythologies: "Barthes deciphers how wrestlers take on tragic or comic "stock" personas for the benefit of their fans and how their exaggerated gestures, drama, and Good vs. Evil conflicts perform a cathartic function for the audience, a venue through which frustrated emotion can find a release and the complexity of modern existence revert to black and white simplicity."
So, in this allegorical frame, Cloudy with a Chance of Love shakes it up a (very) little bit. Here on the road to the authentic life, the sub-theme is change. Katie Leclerc's character, a PhD meteorology student at a mythical San Diego university has spent her life happily in one place, focused on one consuming interest (the heavens). On her heretofore uneventful road to a fellowship and professorship, she now encounters a TV news director, played by Michael Rady, who pulls her toward a huge change when he convinces her to sub as a meteorologist at his station. He even tries eventually to get her to leave San Diego in a two-fer deal to try network news in New York.
Michael Rady has matured from his days of Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants. In this movie he channels Ken Olin from his Thirtysomething days-- the sensitive and empathetic listener to a well-educated woman's earnestly related hopes and dreams and self-doubts. There's a soulfulness here to Rady's acting that was unexpected and welcome in a Hallmark.While his ambition to go back to network news in New York nearly sinks a budding romance with adorable Leclerc, he manages an unusual Hallmark workaholic accomplishment. He gets the girl despite all that, once he finds his own "authentic" path back to San Diego, and "saves" her by firing her and reconnecting her with her academic destiny.
John Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress, and other towering works of allegory have tread these familiar paths many times before Hallmark screenplays, but how nice it is to turn on the Hallmark channel and watch these characters play out our hopes and fears. When the actors are as sympathetic, and winsome as Rady and Leclerc, and the chemistry believable, it is an evening well spent. It would be great to see both Leclerc and Rady enter the pantheon of Hallmark repeaters-- those actors we love to see in other Hallmark themes and variations.
Different but not as feel-good as some
SunnyDaise10 January 2023
If you're bored of the usual plots in the TV rom-com genre, then this is a bit different. However, it isn't as feel-good, being quite stressful at times. I probably would watch it again when I want a change, but it isn't a go-to movie for 90 mins of uplifting entertainment. The spoof title sort of implies it is going to be funnier - but there's definitely plenty of other movies that make me laugh more. The casting works well and there's a lot to identify with, whatever your job, in many respects, but probably less so later in life. Also, I didn't find the meteorological aspect entirely convincing.
Love with lots of charm and not too cloudy
TheLittleSongbird21 April 2023
There is with me at least one reason to see anything, whether it is part of a completest sake, liking a certain actor/actress/director and/or liking the concept. All that applied with 'Cloudy with a Chance of Love', as someone who has been seeing a lot of Hallmark for a while, who likes the likeable Michael Rady and the concept was sweet. Will admit though to being put off by the very cheesy and saccharine title, Hallmark films often have cheesy titles especially when playing on titles of existing films.
'Cloudy with a Chance of Love' was a winner in many areas. Much better than what the title suggests and immensely charming and fun, not to mention it featuring one of the few interesting and properly likeable female lead characters of all the 2015 Hallmark films. 2015 was a very variable year for Hallmark, and 'Cloudy with a Chance of Love' is one of the best to me as well as a close second best of that year's Countdown to Valentine's Day seasonal block.
Actually found very little wrong here, which has not been the case with most of that year's Hallmark films. Did not care for the character of the friend, who was annoying and felt incidental to the film.
It did for my tastes get a little too complicated later on.
However, there is so much to like about 'Cloudy with a Chance of Love'. Kate Leclerc was a bundle of radiant joy in a performance full of one hundred percent commitment without trying too hard. She also plays one of not many female lead characters of Hallmark's 2015 output to not bore or annoy me, not coming across as too perfect or having negative traits taken to extremes, instead a character that felt real with a relatable situation and clear and not unrealistic motivations. Rady is more understated, but also matches LeClerc in the likeability factor in a performance full of pleasant down to earth charm in a way that's not too lightweight.
Gregory Harrison has fun as a character that just about avoided being a cartoon, one that is different from most Hallmark boss characters and that was appreciated. Having fun without being hammy. Apart from the friend, the supporting cast are all fine and a vast majority of the characters do engage and don't annoy (regardless of them being cliched). The script is pleasantly frothy while also flowing naturally and full of playful light hearted-ness, not going too far on any schmaltz. The story is predictable and doesn't have a lot of depth, but is very upbeat and heart-warming and nothing felt dull.
Production values are attractive, especially the scenery, it's assuredly directed and the music didn't come over as too constant or too loud.
Summing up, very nice. 8/10.
'Cloudy with a Chance of Love' was a winner in many areas. Much better than what the title suggests and immensely charming and fun, not to mention it featuring one of the few interesting and properly likeable female lead characters of all the 2015 Hallmark films. 2015 was a very variable year for Hallmark, and 'Cloudy with a Chance of Love' is one of the best to me as well as a close second best of that year's Countdown to Valentine's Day seasonal block.
Actually found very little wrong here, which has not been the case with most of that year's Hallmark films. Did not care for the character of the friend, who was annoying and felt incidental to the film.
It did for my tastes get a little too complicated later on.
However, there is so much to like about 'Cloudy with a Chance of Love'. Kate Leclerc was a bundle of radiant joy in a performance full of one hundred percent commitment without trying too hard. She also plays one of not many female lead characters of Hallmark's 2015 output to not bore or annoy me, not coming across as too perfect or having negative traits taken to extremes, instead a character that felt real with a relatable situation and clear and not unrealistic motivations. Rady is more understated, but also matches LeClerc in the likeability factor in a performance full of pleasant down to earth charm in a way that's not too lightweight.
Gregory Harrison has fun as a character that just about avoided being a cartoon, one that is different from most Hallmark boss characters and that was appreciated. Having fun without being hammy. Apart from the friend, the supporting cast are all fine and a vast majority of the characters do engage and don't annoy (regardless of them being cliched). The script is pleasantly frothy while also flowing naturally and full of playful light hearted-ness, not going too far on any schmaltz. The story is predictable and doesn't have a lot of depth, but is very upbeat and heart-warming and nothing felt dull.
Production values are attractive, especially the scenery, it's assuredly directed and the music didn't come over as too constant or too loud.
Summing up, very nice. 8/10.
Out performs its genre!
rosey-1417 April 2022
Finally a romance TV movie which actually has a credible female lead! She looks and sounds strong and convincing, still ticks the romantic lead boxes but adds something extra! I would love to see more of her and leads like her.
The story itself was likeable, if a little bland and the male leads puts in a pleasant of lightweight performance as he usually does. The supporting cast were all very capable and it leads to a very enjoyable film for once.
The story itself was likeable, if a little bland and the male leads puts in a pleasant of lightweight performance as he usually does. The supporting cast were all very capable and it leads to a very enjoyable film for once.
Wonder and awe
Jackbv12327 April 2020
I'm a baseball fan since 1960. So one metaphor that is extremely familiar for me is this - getting to the Big Show. And I love stories that follow that idea. Much of the first part of the movie plays on that idea although in a different theatre and does it pretty well. The wonder and awe of making the big time. It's a bit more complicated than that because this wasn't Deb's dream. In fact it was a diversion to her life's dream which made the story even more interesting. Deb experienced that wonder and awe, even if it wasn't her life's dream. All of this, and the way it was done, makes this a slightly different plot device as a premise. Later in the movie, we get some other plot devices that aren't new, but also not as rehashed as many in this genre. The story gets a little complicated, but somehow I saw almost every detail of it coming together, except the final detail that resolved everything and even that still fit into a more general, but very predictable plot device. (I'm trying to stay away from spoilers, and I think if you have watched the movie, the previous sentence makes more sense.) I loved the wonder and awe. I was OK with the predictable flow through the end because it had to be.
Something else that really impressed me was Katie Leclerc. I browsed her filmography, (and except for one TV movie I don't remember hardly and my rating says I barely liked,) I haven't seen her before. She does the wonder and awe really well, but with a hint of remaining down to earth. Later, she plays the beginning of being tainted by fame and then what follows pretty well also. Michael Rady has always been solid and is here. The two connect with good chemistry.
Gregory Harrison does the conceited anchor man to the hilt, but I think also with a little bit of fun on his part. Then he pulls a nice surprise which did have a couple of little foreshadowing clues along the way.
We get a quality selfish villain and a rival who falls just short of evil. Did I see a touch of respect? Hallmark movies want us to think all the corporate types are the same, and perhaps they are. The dean (?) was a overdone caricature of a clueless academic.
Lately, my ratings often reflect the question - do I want to watch it again and how much? This movie hits high on that scale, but I think it also deserves a thumbs up because it has some good story elements and good acting by the leads.
Something else that really impressed me was Katie Leclerc. I browsed her filmography, (and except for one TV movie I don't remember hardly and my rating says I barely liked,) I haven't seen her before. She does the wonder and awe really well, but with a hint of remaining down to earth. Later, she plays the beginning of being tainted by fame and then what follows pretty well also. Michael Rady has always been solid and is here. The two connect with good chemistry.
Gregory Harrison does the conceited anchor man to the hilt, but I think also with a little bit of fun on his part. Then he pulls a nice surprise which did have a couple of little foreshadowing clues along the way.
We get a quality selfish villain and a rival who falls just short of evil. Did I see a touch of respect? Hallmark movies want us to think all the corporate types are the same, and perhaps they are. The dean (?) was a overdone caricature of a clueless academic.
Lately, my ratings often reflect the question - do I want to watch it again and how much? This movie hits high on that scale, but I think it also deserves a thumbs up because it has some good story elements and good acting by the leads.
Upbeat story, likable stars
phd_travel25 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
There is an upbeat energy to this Hallmark rom com that carries it along. Doesn't get painful and dull like some others have. It's not a silly story either.
I love Katie LeClerc in "Switched at Birth". She does so well at playing a deaf girl and speaking like one that it's surprising to see that she is actually isn't deaf. Her facial expressions are similar to Switched. She plays a meteorology graduate student facing a choice between becoming a TV weather anchor and pursuing academia. Good supporting cast. A slightly older Stacy Dash of Clueless and Gregory Harrison as TV makeup artist and anchor respectively. Michael Rady plays the TV station executive trying to woo her career wise and romantically. The choice is San Diego vs New York. Fulfillment vs financial success. The outcome is a bit predictable. The only thing I wonder is if they give up the Big Apple what are they going to live on? Her fellowship grant?
I love Katie LeClerc in "Switched at Birth". She does so well at playing a deaf girl and speaking like one that it's surprising to see that she is actually isn't deaf. Her facial expressions are similar to Switched. She plays a meteorology graduate student facing a choice between becoming a TV weather anchor and pursuing academia. Good supporting cast. A slightly older Stacy Dash of Clueless and Gregory Harrison as TV makeup artist and anchor respectively. Michael Rady plays the TV station executive trying to woo her career wise and romantically. The choice is San Diego vs New York. Fulfillment vs financial success. The outcome is a bit predictable. The only thing I wonder is if they give up the Big Apple what are they going to live on? Her fellowship grant?
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
