Scream Machine (2015) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
My Friend Jeffrey
nogodnomasters5 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This is similar to Scarlet Fry's other work. The anthology was 5 poorly acted, poorly scripted low budget stories with cheap gore effects. The sound quality was bad too. The low spot of the feature was a MM necrophilia scene with two chubbies. 5 tales in 68 minutes.

Lloyd Kaufman introduces the film without Debbie Rochon.

Guide: F-word. MM sex. No real nudity. Some fake junk.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
My Review Of "Scream Machine"
ASouthernHorrorFan10 March 2015
There is a cool intro featuring indie SOV icon, Lloyd Kaufman, which is carried into the beginning narrative set-up by Dr. Fry.The story we are giving is a bit over complicating to the host segment, not in complexity as much as it is unnecessary. The horror hosts are engaging, the back-n-forth is amusing and the atmosphere is set. All the extra info and back story stuff just bogs down the piece. The segment does hold the anthology together and leads us comfortably into each of the twisted tales. I love horror hosted series and it is nice to see Fry back on the scene.

The first short which really sets the attitude and perspective of Ruether's film is " Sledgehammer". The short follows a pitcher and catcher being scouted, a grotesque mishap then leads into classic horror finality. "Sledgehammer" is a revenge piece that holds to the normal premise for anthology shorts. You know, the whole wrongs are righted based on the principles of revenge. Now the story begins simple enough, the story makes sense enough if you take them at face value. I didn't really by those to characters as they were presented to me as athletes or rising stars in the game. It doesn't stop the story dead and the arc holds from beginning to end. The cool, bit about "Sledgehammer" is the finale with the masked killer, more gore and that bit of dark humor.

Up next we have "Cannibal Pen Pals". This short was set in the 90's and a twisted love letter to Dahmer. It is an odd choice not just for the subject matter but for the character set up. Separate both parts of this story, the husband on the down low, and the obsessed Dahmer, are plausible, acceptable premises, I just personally found it contradictory when combined in a single character.Still, it is a completed, nicely directed piece that is twisted enough that some macabre amusement can be found. I didn't care for the ending, but it is interesting when writers chose to break with acceptable norms and let the evil win in the end without retribution. It is hard to make it work in a way that is satisfying.

The third horror short, " April's Fool Party" is a fun, totally wrong short filled with geeked-up dope fiends, and a cracked out dealer. Right up my alley, I am a sucker for drug fueled mayhem. The look and feel is a bit more reductive in quality compared, but strangely enough it is the best thus far in the line-up. The middle section with the April Fool's trick is dark, modern horror with evil delinquents run a muck. I liked this one right up to the uneventful ending. There was so much publish build up to what should have been a thrilling, twisted ending. Unfortunately it just ends with a shrugged "oh well" attitude. Plus like the second there is no real morality of action and consequence that usually ends these situations.

"Septic Shock" follows up "April Fool's Party" and tests the gag reflex. Hateful spouse, an affair , and easy access to the septic take does not bode well for one man. The way this short is directed and filmed is great in pushing the viewer into believing the premise. Obscure angles, shadows, special effects and sound all create the gross atmosphere. Anything with fecal matter grosses me out anyway, so this one did an effective job at reaching its intended objective and is a touch back to earlier Ruether stuff found in his previous anthologies.

The final horror short is titled "Deadly Indie Drive-in". It like the first falls back to the classic horror short set-up. A drive-in date, a lady off her meds and delusional make fore some classic low budget gruesomeness. The story is well written, it is twisted and satirical. A strong short to finish the series on. The special effects moment that centers everything in this one is a bit cheap and takes from the piece a bit but overall it is the second strongest, and goriest in " Scream Machine" and everything around this scene in question is done right, so it is a fun, entertaining twisted tale that I enjoyed.

Overall "Scream Machine" is by far the best of Walter Ruether, and gives good SOV . The jewel of the anthology is of course the horror segments that hold the series together. Fun, entertaining moments that take me back to early horror hosts. I never got the connection between the anthology's title and the hosting set-up but I like the title, I like the theme song so I am cool with that. The stand out shorts for me personally are "Septic Shock"and " Deadly Indie Drive- in". The film has moments that hit and moments that miss. Same rings true with the practical effects. The soundtrack and effects are total energy and vibe well in "Scream Machine". Just know that this is low budget home grown horror when you set down to watch it. It is not an anthology that will please everyone and haters will hate. I personally enjoyed it, and appreciate it for what it is, a real indie, home grown horrorfest that gets the relationship between the twisted minds and the funny bone.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Zero redeeming values
Leofwine_draca21 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
SCREAM MACHINE is another shot-on-video horror anthology without a single redeeming feature. There are five stories collected here with Lloyd Kaufman introducing them at the outset. All are terrible and sort of meld into one another in a big cloud of lameness. The bad editing and poor direction gives this film a really cheap and amateurish feel. Of the stories, the one about the guy trapped in the septic tank is the most fun, but the rest go for the gross out effect and are merely exercises in bad taste.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Absolutely terrible
seppy-7802427 April 2020
Not even a b movie. If there was something after z it would be that.. Absolutely terrible. I love terrible films and have seen many scifi channel horror channel etc.. But this is just the worst.. Honestly don't even waste 10 mins of your day even seeing if its bad because that's as far as you'll get...
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
This Machine will make you Scream !!!
guestar573 March 2015
Stars: Lloyd Kaufman,Scarlet Fry and Paul C. Hemmes.

Scarlet Fry and I got our start in Don Dohler's Cinemagic magazine in the '70s and Scarlet has re-captured those glory daze of Shot- On -Video with Scream Machine.

This anthology is pretty amazing and through crowd funding producers, Scream Machine is able to achieve it's full potential and 'Scare The Drug High right out of your Gourd' ! 5 segments : SLEDGEHAMMER : Haven't Baseball Horror since THE CATCHER '98( with Joe Estevez & David Heavener),Seriously Sport Horror flicks,A Lost Niche' ?=This segment is really good with a nice build-up of suspense,good characters and awesome gore.

CANNIBAL PEN-PALS : So this LBGT person has a thing for Jeffrey Dahmer ( Oh,I guess it's a flashback to when he wasn't offed by cell-mates) and mimics 'Jeffrey-isms' wink/wink/nudge/nudge.

Missed the third segment's title card,But it's about April Fool's Jokes gone really,really bad…Kids Don't Do Drugs ! SEPTIC SHOCK : Funny,Gross and great script set-up to eventual come uppance.

DEADLY INDIE DRIVE-IN : Okay,So this is the final spot and gives the 'New' Discovery – Paul C. Hemmes a chance to shine and has some cool '4th Wall Breaking' goodness.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed