"Murdoch Mysteries" Toronto's Girl Problem (TV Episode 2015) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Nice surprising revelation about Emily Grace
mariettebliekendaal6 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
In this episode, Emily Graces comes out as a lesbian -or perhaps bisexual. I really think the character build up was there in earlier episodes. Her storyline reminds me of several women I know who came out as lesbians in their late twenties. They, like Emily, always dated men who were sweet nice guys, but they broke off the relationship when it became too serious.

With the brash nephew of Thomas Brackenreid acting as a catalyst, Emily decides to take a chance on real love, a big risk for a woman in that time. I enjoyed the dialogue at the end of the episode with inspector Brackenreid, who warns Emily at the end of the episode about her "saphist" tendencies. "That's not how the world works." Well done screenwriters for bringing some depth and suspense here.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
it ended with a kiss, whoever thought it would come to this
miles-3310825 November 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Inspector Brackenreid looks very pleased as he introduces his nephew, Constable Charlie Brackenreid, to the officers of Police Station 4. The Inspector asks his colleagues to give his nephew no special treatment, but then immediately tells Constable Higgins to vacate his desk so Charlie will have somewhere to work from. In the same way, when Murdoch asks Constable Crabtree to go with him in response to the finding of a body, the Inspector stands Crabtree down, so that Charlie can accompany the Detective. Eager to get Charlie involved, Detective Murdoch asks Charlie to make his observations when they reach the scene. They are astute, as far as they go.

When Dr Grace arrives, she is taken aback to discover that she recognises the woman who has died. Indeed, she and her friend Lilian Moss were guests at a party the previous evening hosted by the victim, where they shared a brief conversation.

Taking Constable Brackenreid, Murdoch visits the place the party was held, and discovers that the victim was Diana White, who rented the room from time to time. Following up a lead to Miss White's home address, the Detective and Constable find it a place of paradox, a lowly dwelling in an upscale area, packed with luxury goods. Miss Moss calls in at the morgue to tell Dr Grace that she had mistakenly taken someone else's coat when she left the party, and later discovered that the coat contained secret pockets, which were filled with jewels.

Murdoch decides to try to find out where the jewels might have come from, and he finds a jeweller who recognises some of the pieces. He tells Murdoch they were stolen some days earlier, but that he didn't report the crime, fearing that the bad publicity might harm his business more than the value of the pieces. However, the jeweller points out that not all the pieces Murdoch showed him were originally his. Other Jewellers' shops had also been targeted.

The Inspector divides Toronto's Jewellery Quarter between himself, Murdoch and Constables Crabtree and Brackenreid. Thus, George Crabtree is on hand to witness a woman stealing jewels in one shop to which he has been sent, but she switches her box containing the stolen jewels with another woman in the shop, a move which Crabtree fails to spot, resulting in George apprehending a woman with an empty box, while her partner escapes aboard a horse-omnibus with the jewels.

Crabtree arrests the woman he caught, whose name is Alice Henshaw, and Murdoch questions her about Diana White. This is the first she has heard about Diana's death; all she knows is that Diana was due to meet a man after the party. Murdoch suggests to Inspector Brackenreid that the gang may consist entirely of women, but the Inspector dismisses the idea, only for Constable Brackenreid to speak of a London female gang called the 40 elephants, which has been operating for over 100 years.

The Inspector theorises that Diana White may have been the leader of the gang, who may have been killed by another gang member in a bid to take over the gang. In that scenario, there would be a new leader trying to assert herself, so perhaps the thing to do would be to apply some pressure to known fences in order to get the next lead. This he does, visiting one Eddie Crawford, but it doesn't go as well as hoped, So he invites Dr Grace and Lillian Moss to visit the next party under cover, and to return the coat containing the stolen jewels to see what happens.

So, will the plan succeed, with the Doctor and Lillian gleaning more information about the gang, or will the women end up like Diana White? Will Inspector Brackenreid continue to be blind to the effects that his nepotism is having on the officers of Police Station 4? This episode includes many twists and turns in the plot as well as more than its fair share of surprises. Action-packed is the only way to describe it.

As to the scene that occupies the final 13 seconds of the episode, it is clear to me that this main character has been severely undermined by those with whom she works, she has faced death threats which could turn out to be very real from those she has helped to put behind bars, she has alienated the only male character who was really growing to love her, plus this particular character's back story is full of such episodes. In this moment when she is so very vulnerable, she seeks out human company from a member of her own gender: what choices does she have? Some people are so quick to rush to judgment now, in the 21st century. How much worse would it have been in 1902? We do not yet know what price this character will have to pay for those 13 seconds. Perhaps the best thing to do is to wait and see.
9 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The thing about Emily
reb-warrior2 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Wow, Brackenreid's nephew turned out to be a grade A jerk, didn't he? They did look alike tho, didn't they? Poor George and Henry.

Love that George found the key piece of evidence. Love that Brackenreid tried to engage with Emily about what he found out. At first, it started off fine, but then he went too far, IMO. It was none of his business. But he understood what would happen if it were public. It's 1902. Just being honest here. I mean I think his intentions were to try and help, but he wasn't being helpful at all. Later in a future episode, we'll see that Thomas can be very compassionate and empathetic, and protective when it comes to Emily.

I feel like this episode was an Emily episode. Especially since she went undercover with Lillian. As for Emily being a sapphist, ie, a lesbian, there were some clues since she's been on. She broke off her engagement with Jerome in the past. She broke it off with George and started seeing Lesley Garland. She then broke it off with him, although with good reason. Her interest in Elva Gordon from 'Journey to the Centre of Toronto', and their conversation gave off some very lesbian vibes. There's the episode when Emily decides not to wear a corset anymore and Lillian unties the lacing in the back. There's a "Warrior Princess" line in another episode. To me, this was a very blatant clue coming from being a huge fan of 'Xena Warrior Princess.' That show has a huge LGBTQ audience.

Anyway, there have always been LGBTQ people throughout history. They just weren't able to be out in the open. But let's face it, they were just everyday people doing all kinds of different jobs. Some were even married. I did like George & Emily, their friendship, hanging out together, and their burgeoning romance. But once she started making eyes at Garland I knew something was up. Good on Murdoch Mysteries for portraying a gay character. A very realistic thing that could have happened in that time period. 10/10.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Murdoch Series Suffers as Writers Get Off Track
musicmandan2 October 2015
Warning: Spoilers
We've loved this series from the beginning, and promoted it eagerly among our friends. However we've been very disappointed with the writers' trends on several points, and this episode broke the camel's back. Unless you are very comfortable with open homosexual behavior, you will find the ending disturbing, not only for the lesbian kissing displayed by a main character, but for the absolute ludicrous pretext and absence of any necessity for the same.

It seems they have abandoned championing Murdoch with his deep convictions of right and wrong, and his special gifts and fascinating insight, (we see that less it seems now) all of which were the qualities that attracted people to the series. In a ridiculous imposition of modern day "values" into an early 1900's period mystery series, Murdoch now takes a back seat to the awkwardly imposed, and historically inaccurate occurrences of homosexual activity. This episode does not leave you in awe of the hero; it leaves you with two women kissing each other passionately. So much for staying on track. The writers just flipped the bird to every traditional valued viewer. It's equal to closing an episode with an extreme commentary about gun control or abortion. Get back where you belong - in crime, deduction, evasion and capture.

Remember how the writers wrote the gloriously inspiring episode where Murdoch chose true right over the law and helped a woman escape from an unjust sentence, even at a huge sacrifice to his own love interest? Where did those writers go?

To be honestly accurate, rather than transparently agenda-ized, the occurrences of what was called "deviant" behavior in those days, in such a close circle of people, would be so rare as to make it disproportionate to even mention it in a series like this.

In this episode the champions are now women, not just in their worthy pursuit of equal rights, equal pay etc., where they deserve praise, but in the pursuit of homosexual passions. "Yay them for throwing off the mean moral restraints of the day". Don't the writers know those restraints are the underpinnings of the personal character of the show's hero? When they sensationalize homosexual actions of one key and well-like character, Dr Grace, that violate the deepest values of the show's Catholic hero and protagonist, they create an unnecessary conflict that can have no winner - the show can only lose by offending half of its audience.

It's all nonsense of course because the rate of occurrence of homosexual activity at the turn of the last century was so low, and so hidden from society, and so disdained by the general populace, religious or not, as to make the inclusion of it at all in such a series ridiculous. Too bad because in other areas (wardrobe, scenery, historical characters, language usage) the series has excelled in accurate historicity. The 2000 U.S. Census Bureau found that homosexual couples constitute less than 1% of American households. It is estimated that 100 years prior in 1900 the incidence rate would have been at most 1/4th of 1%. At that rate an honest representation would be 1 appearance in 400 episodes.

Murdoch was unflinching in his beliefs and thus was an admirable anchor around which the follies of others were exposed. More and more they have made him question and yield his convictions, not in deference or grace to other characters which he always did before, never forcing his convictions on others, but now the writers have launched Murdoch on a learning curve of 21st century mores. As if this will make him a better hero. No, this will kill the series.

Bring back the old Murdoch. Give him the guts to stand against the things an early 1900's Murdoch would stand against, regardless of modern day political correctness, and let's watch how that unfolds. Put the show back into the correct context of its time, amidst the mores of THAT day, not ours.
28 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Show is starting to become too PC
tert7213 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I watch the show to see the inventions, meeting people of legend and good detective work. Now while it was important that women vote, run for office and be able to hold any job that men hold, the show has leaned more towards social policies back in the day, but the show doesn't even do that right. They take the misconceptions of today, and shoe horn them in the show, which had NOTHING to do with anything back then. Society was closed minded back then about homosexuals. Not only was it frowned upon, you were an outcast even in the most progressive cities, as Toronto seems to be... (watch saving hope) but to openly almost flaunt it, was something that just wasn't done. This show is starting to slam men and make it look like women can do no wrong.... Equal rights means both can be bad and both can be good. I did cheat a little and look at the reviews for the next episode and it does seem that when the priest is found out to be a woman, all the sudden murdoch thinks she is sincere.... What? Women can't lie? Can't kill? Can't cheat? Are the writers such beta males that they basically neuter murdoch (Julia has had his testicles since the first season) that they can't write the main character as being strong and have a backbone? Murdoch constantly throws out his convictions, well they aren't really convictions are they since he so easily tosses them to the side. As I mentioned today's issues should not be shown and pushed in a show that takes place in the 19th and very early 20th century. It was wrong that women couldn't vote, it was wrong that gays could not be public, but in that time period it was what it was, and could be reflected in the show. But it seems that women could do whatever they want when they want and you are being a sexist if you disagree... So at the end Dr grace who seemed to be a total heterosexual, now is bi??? Or whatever she is... Is she gay now? Does she identify as a man now? More and more episodes are becoming like this... I thought this was a show about a cunning detective who believed in faith and science and used contraptions to solve murders. Dr grace needs to go though. She burned Crabtree really bad, and good for him to stand up for himself!!!! But I guess grace got hurt so hooks up with a woman.
14 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A kiss is not always a kiss, very disappointing!
rmsalty31 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
It's in the kiss! There's been a few episodes that we've ether stopped watching or turned off in the beginning, this by far was the worse, I know it's facts are not 100% actual and are made up, that's partly part of enjoying this show, it is shameful and most people know it, We will officially stop watching this show with this episode, it being shoved down our throats and we being made to look like the bad guys, keep it up I don't want to go down this rabbit hole with them, you won't like what you find in the end! It is actually to be expected most tv show and movies have gone in this direction alongside the commercial's well soon be tossing the tube because of the decline in moral behavior that is being deemed normal!
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed