District C-11 (2017) User Reviews

How is this crap rated 6.3?

[wijnandbodrij · 2/10 · 18 February 2019]

6.3 Really? Probably another fake rated movie here. Watched this because of the rating to be honest and was hugely disappointed. It has nothing to do with Sci-fi,it looks awful and the acting is really bad. Some of the music sounded like elevator music to me. Avoid at all cost please, and don't fall for the fake rating. Another solid 2 out of 10 here since a 1 score from me is reserved for a very select few!

The night brings out the demons.

[nogodnomasters · 1/10 · 14 January 2018]

The film opens with an usual background of the world in turmoil over "religion and land" with riots and marshal law being declared everywhere but Boston, where a mayor is killed. Then we jump 10 years later into a police drama where 2 cops go up against Boston's top drug dealer who controls the new mayor. Add a sister and a mayor's assistant and you have the story.

I am not sure what the opening world situation had anything to do with the film. The acting and dialogue hit bottom from the start. The cinematography was bad. Even the few fight scenes were a joke. The film is worth a punch on the hacker's card if you can make it all the way through it.

Guide: F-word. Brief Nudity.

Boring

[shepelx · 1/10 · 20 February 2019]

There is just no reason for a viewer to sit and enjoy the movie. There is just nothing sci-fi in the movie. Terrible acting,terrible voice recording,terrible story and a waste of time.

Another flick to ignore

[junna2022 · 1/10 · 8 February 2019]

I found this movie so terrible, I could not watch beyond the first 30 minutes.

Do not bother

[jarviscasey · 1/10 · 11 January 2018]

This is the worst movie, I have ever watched. Period. I only give it one star, because there is no option for a 0. There is better acting in Lifetime Chanel movies. Children on the Disney Chanel act better than this. The plot was horrible. The beginning has a narrator, which is never heard from again. There are too many issues to point out. Bottom line, save yourself from this movie. Do something else with your life for 90 minutes. Go to the local park and listen to an old homeless man ramble on for 90 minutes. I am sure that conversation will be more interesting than this film.

This movie is why you should wait for more reviews...

[poffleya · 1/10 · 1 January 2020]

This movie is bad, I mean bad. It does a disservice to "B" movies by putting itself in the same camp. The acting was horrible, the "effects" were beyond ridiculous, and this is a perfect example of why you should never believe the first reviews out for a new film (and I hesitate to call it a film). Stay away from this stinker, and the folks who rated it any higher than a 2, you need to be heavily medicated. Bad.....just bad.

Warning!

[emmarebsdorf · 1/10 · 22 February 2020]

Waste of time... the story line has NO MEANING and was SO disapointing. Do not watch! - also the worst ending ever...

What Happened here?

[computermusen · 1/10 · 10 January 2020]

I think its the worst movie I have, ever seen. I cant understand how its rated 6.9! So bad story, bad acting... Everything is just bad. Camera angles Are so wrong, effects is a joke. Sorry Guys, dont spend time watching it. It just make you feel bad. Well, normally you would call it a b- movie. But how about z-movie? Is, that taken?

Total waste of time.

[njweltz · 1/10 · 20 March 2020]

I have never seen a film that bad. Useless acting and dialogue. Field asleep and had to start over. Yes, I gave it a chance, but it didn't work. Choose another film to watch or read a book instead. My honest review os zero stars, but I couldn't go below one! /Weltz DK

Solid 2 star

[ml70 · 1/10 · 28 February 2020]

The most impressive aspect about this movie is the amount of fake reviews pushing the average rating to over 6. The cover, poster and prologue (civil war, purge, mass uprising) have pretty much nothing to do with the actual content of the film, which is just endless social gossip blabla without meaning or substance, and a few short comically boring action sequences. Like one episode of a bad tv show, not even worthy of fast forward.

Entertaining!

[waltererivero · 10/10 · 16 January 2018]

This movie is low budget but it is done well i was able to enjoy it from start to finish! The acting was good and i thought the characters were believable. The story has a cool twist that you don't expect at all! As for all you wannabe movie critics out there rating movies 1? really? 1 anyway i challenge you all to do better!! Props to all of you that made this movie!

I recommend it!!!

Poor

[bengt-30457 · 1/10 · 26 March 2020]

This is a waste of time. Bad sound, poor effects, poor acting, poor directing, poor plot, poor everything.

Some crap films are watchable.

[TepesTheImpaler · 1/10 · 18 April 2021]

This steaming pile is not.

Bad acting Bad directing Poor storyline Don't waste your time.

After 20 minutes I gave up and decided the lint in my tumble dryer has more personality and can act better than anything in this film.

What happened?

[ncm-33860 · 2/10 · 1 December 2021]

With that monologue introduction, I was hoping for more. It's truly a terrible movie, that originally had a good idea, but failed to follow through. The acting, is so bad, you can't look past it, no matter how hard you try.

Watchable, barely!

[davidkingnp · 3/10 · 31 July 2022]

Not every movie can have a $200 million dollar budget filled with CGI. Actors do a good job with bad story and no budget. But the worst part is having the suffer through the commercials on Pluto.

Wow.....can't believe how bad that was!

[abrns · 1/10 · 8 December 2023]

Well that movie has left me astounded. Astounded that somebody found such a wooden cast, illiterate writers and a brain dead director. The story what little if it there is loses any form of sense around 25 minutes in. The end doesn't exist at all, they just decided to not add one at all. It barely has a start so I suppose it fits in. I love B movies normally, however this was just a total waste of time. An infants nativity would be better acted, also pretty sure the kindergarten teacher can direct far better! It's like the put a bunch of people off the street with no acting ability into a room and said make a movie. What happened to the director? I honestly don't know, maybe he read the script from the back of a packet of smokes and decided to not bother, you wouldn't blame him. Come in guys, anybody could do better, so why don't you??

Finally, the bad guy wins!

[damiencurtisbattista · 9/10 · 3 March 2019]

There are some issues you could point out. But end of the day, they did their best on a small budget and gave us an ending that no one would have seen coming.