Bad Samaritan (2018) Poster

(2018)

User Reviews

Review this title
334 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Decent, but with some glaring issues *some spoilers*
valarik5649 May 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The absolute best part of this movie was the acting from the main cast. Tenant, Condon, Sheehan, Byers, and Olivero were all great, and helped keep this movie from falling flat. For the most part, the writing was pretty good, if a bit cliched in some instances (Sean, the more-hero-than-antihero antihero, literally says "Take me, take me instead"). The storyline didn't push the plot very far out of a reasonable realm of possibility, which made it that much more compelling.

This is a long review, and you will likely finish it by thinking I hated the script. I don't hate the script, and most of it was honestly pretty well done. That being said, I have several issues with the movie that didn't ruin it for me, but not for lack of trying.

First and biggest of the issues is the role of law enforcement in this movie. The only police officer we get to know at all seems competent, if weary and cookie cutter, and even has a scene where he's questioning Cale (Tennant) in the house where the girl was supposed to have been tied up that gives all the telltale signs that he's starting to suspect something, but is savvy enough to play it off in the moment. This is apparently a wrong impression, as he immediately afterward all but accuses Sean (Sheehan) of stalking and harassment. This was very much a ludicrous turn, as Cale is very obviously lying, the cop gives all the signs of coming to the same conclusion during the interview (including the whole "Oh yeah, one more thing" thing that suspicious cops do in the movies), and then goes the complete other way.

The FBI also gets involved, as the aforementioned cop directs Sean to them to file a missing persons report (which seems odd, as I'm 95% sure police do that as well), and each and every one of them sounds like their lines were written by running every CSI episode through an algorithm that finds bland dialogue and then makes it worse. They were at best phoned in, and frankly, the plot didn't even need them. They filled in gaps, that were entirely unnecessary to know, of Cale's background, and arrested him at the end, his having already been thoroughly subdued by Sean and Katie (Condon) to the point that they became almost a redundancy.

Secondly, the plot does not have a satisfactory resolution. Yes, the bad guy gets caught, the captive girl gets saved, and we can assume that everything else went fine after that. But that isn't good enough. My main issue with this is that Sean's girlfriend, Riley (Byers), is in the hospital on a ventilator (more on that in a bit), and hates him for things that were not his fault. We can assume that things are resolved between them, but we have absolutely no way of knowing that. While this isn't necessarily a problem, the way it was handled is. There's a certain feel to a scene that is given by all the techniques of storytelling and filmmaking that tell you what to expect in that arc of the plot. The way the plot with Riley was told, the hospital scene expected a resolution that was to come, that never came. There is no ending of that arc, and it's clear (as there's no reason for it) that this wasn't intentional, it was just bad story telling. I was caught off guard by the end of the movie because I was expecting that resolution, and as I'm entirely sure they weren't just leaving it for the sequel, that's not a great thing to leave the audience with.

Lastly, some plot point questions and grumbles:

1) Riley gets her head smashed into a brick wall twice, and then is thrown down some stairs, landing on her back/neck. She is later seen in the hospital, when Sean goes to visit her to try and explain things. She is conscious, with no neck brace, is able to freely move her head, and is of a mental and physical capacity to reach for and write normally upon a notepad. She's also hooked up to a ventilator, implying that her trauma made it hard for her to breathe. All of that combined seems immensely implausible, especially as it's indicated that Sean would've gotten to her within a few hours of the incident, having been summoned by a call from her phone made by someone going through her emergency contact list. Came across as lazy writing.

2) Cale blows up his house after setting a trap for Sean, who he (correctly and reasonably) assumed would come back after seeing Riley in the hospital. He does this by turning on his gas stove, letting it spread through the house, and setting up a bomb in his oven with a timer, and remotely locking all of the doors once Sean is in the house. A few points on this: Sean gets in through a window, which is not remotely controlled, and could easily be used again, though it isn't; if you're a bad guy trying to get away and possess a sophistaced level of smart home functionality, setting up a bomb instead of just an innocuous ignition source, seems poorly planned; if you're a bad guy trying to trick someone into a house that's going to blow up, you probably don't want to give away the game with more than 30 seconds to go before the explosion, nor would you put a bomb with a timer that's easily visible and inherently gives useful information to your would-be victim; where did Cale get sticks of dynamite, and who makes bombs that look like something a Looney Toons cartoon would have? It's just silly on its face.

All in all, I think that someone had a good idea for a movie, had some genuinely good ideas for making the script come to life, and then filled in the gaps with whatever came to mind first. So, good, but not great, and a little disappointing on reflection. It had a lot going for it in cast and general plot, but the little bits hold it back.
49 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Done Before, But Not Too Bad, A Little Extra On The Formula
neener37074 May 2018
Over all not too shabby, definitely better than I expected. So yes its been done many times before, person (or in this case; people) break in to someones house for some ulterior motive, only to discover the home owner is either hiding something or is some sort of killer. But it throws a little extra into the formula, some works, the emphasis on the killer and his story was refreshing. But is it scary? Is it a horror movie? Because lately so called "horror" movies are indeed not scary at all. And as far as this film is concerned, I'm not sure what I want to say, because some of it was effective, and some of it wasn't. First of all, I like how they expanded on the typical story line they were telling, and without giving to much away, it creates this admittedly tense cat and mouse chaotic situation for all parties involved, so I liked how it just didn't stick 100% to the "Rear Window" and "Disturbia" formulas.

But was it scary? I'd say it was in places and was not in some, it was as simple as that for me. Some of the scenes/situations/jumps got me, and I got a little tense, but some other scenes just didn't do it for me, maybe because I'm so desensitized to brutal horror movies. The acting was also hit and miss, some actors did a fine job while others, were just... meh... And to be fair some of the good acting added to the intensity. I also didn't like some of the editing choices. I liked the color scheme of the film, the dark and deep colors, something you would expect from a James Wan or Hammer Films movies. I really want to say I liked it, because i definitely did like some of it, but some of it just didn't tickle my horror bone like it could have, but overall it was not too bad, much better than I expected.
61 out of 90 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great B-Movie
ThomasDrufke8 May 2018
Bad Samaritan is a film that I simply did not know was even being released until I looked on Fandango and checked what movies I could go see yesterday. And besides David Tennant, there's really no big name here at all and there wasn't a single bit of marketing that I saw, so there's that. Really, Bad Samaritan will likely be a film that comes and goes and never knows that it existed. However, I actually thought it was a pretty well made film. Granted, it starts to fall apart after the hour mark, but if you're just looking for a cheap thrill with some fun performances, creepy imagery, and good time at the theater, then look no further than Bad Samaritan. The film has no place making some of the third act decisions it does however, it never fully jumps the proverbial shark, and it's always entertaining.

7.3/10
28 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Bad Samaritan Plays it too Safe
Stars-and-popcorn4 May 2018
Warning: Spoilers
'Bad Samaritan' is a movie that I've been looking forward to for a few months. Ever since David Tennant gave his incredible performance as Kilgrave on the Marvel Netflix series Jessica Jones. The idea of him playing a totally demented psychopath had me giddy with anticipation. However, when it comes to this film that's about where the fun ends. Even with David Tennant playing the big bad wolf, he stumbles too much to save 'Bad Samaritan' from being, well, a bad movie.

I really wanted to like 'Bad Samaritan', especially because I'm a sucker for a good horror movie that can make your skin crawl. There are definitely some moments in the film that will make audiences jump and cringe. However, a lot of those scenes that make you cringe are the ones where David Tennant's American accent starts to slip. I'm not sure why they decided to make his character American, possibly to make Robert Sheehan's Irish accent stand out more, but it's definitely not one of Tennant's strong suits.

There are plenty of other things that are cringeworthy in 'Bad Samaritan' other than the occasional accent slip. Brandon Boyce tries to create a creepy serial character to act as the menacing villain of the movie, but fails miserably when it comes to his background. Tennant's character, Cale Erendreich, is a unimaginably rich trust fund brat who was so obsessed with horses that breaking them no longer thriller him. So, he took to breaking humans much like horses. It's a premise for a serial killer that feels more suited to being a 'Criminal Minds' psycho of the week than a big screen villain. Even ignoring the motives behind Erendreich's character, he never comes across as threatening. Sure he has money to throw at problems and proves to be incredibly cunning, but he lacks the right kind of presence for something like this. His performance though it incredibly chilling at certain times. There's no question that Tennant is a great actor, but the character he's given to work with is kind of pathetic.

The title of the film itself comes from the protagonist who is vallet that burgles people's homes while they're at dinner. Sheehan manages to make the character charming at times, but he feels incredibly out of place when it comes to this movie. For some reason the character is made Irish, which really doesn't add much to the overall story at all. More than that though he seems incredibly unsuited for the situation he finds himself in. The script makes him more bumbling than he needs to be when it comes to trying to convince the cops or those around him that Erendreich is a monster walking among them. It's just another one of the horror movie tropes that I can't stand.

Then again, despite the fact that 'Bad Samaritan' is riddled with cliches, it does get a few things right. With Tennant more focused on psychologically breaking his victims rather than just killing them off when they become problematic, it allows the stakes to continuously rise for the hero. His life is slowly taken apart by a man who is not only smart, but has the resources to destroy the struggling millennial. It's during this sequences of events that Tennant manages to do his best work. The scenes where he gives his maniacal rants though seem forced and cumbersome. In a lot of ways, Tennant does his best work in 'Bad Samaritan' when he isn't talking.

There isn't a lot in 'Bad Samaritan' that we haven't seen before in one way or another. It's filled with the same cliches from so many other horror movies/ thrillers and plays it safe for much of the film. In a way though, that's good because it pretty much follows a paint by numbers when it comes to what audiences like from these sorts of things. Though it stumbles from time to time because it tries to pound square pegs into round plot holes, there is enough salvageable here to at least let fans of the genre have some fun while watching it. Of course, if you're looking for something really scary then you're better off just skipping this one.
38 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
An enjoyable and competently performed suspense film
cmharelson-621605 May 2018
For the most part, this film was well shot, very well acted, and well paced. My only real criticism for the film is the elements I felt were a bit over the top. These would include a bizarrely done flashback snippet, some odd plot occurrences, and a score that I felt elevated the cartoonish nature of the film. Still, would recommend a watch for those who like cat and mouse thrillers.
23 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Decent suspense thriller with one box of crazy turn by Tennant
george.schmidt5 May 2018
Warning: Spoilers
BAD SAMARITAN (2018) **1/2 David Tennant, Robert Sheehan, Jacqueline Byers, Lisa Brenner, Carlito Olivero, Kerry Condon, Rob Nagle, Hannah Barefoot. Decent suspense thriller with Sheehan's petty thief stumbling upon a victim-to-be of a serial killer when he attempts to rob the home and winds up in the crosshairs of an ultimate grudge match/cat-and-mouse with a few good jolts delivered and one box of crazy turn Tennant as the seriously f'd up creepazoid. Director Dean Devlin and Brandon Boyce's clever script combine for enough popcorn pleasing moments of meta-scream-at-the-screen scenes and even a few canny self-asides to aforementioned sequences.
21 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Bad Samaritan: Not half bad
Platypuschow29 August 2018
David Tennant stars as the movies antagonist in a clever little thriller that deserves more recognition than it appears to have recieved.

It tells the story of two friends who through their valet job proceed to rob people while they are at the restaurant. But on this occasion one of them finds a little more than he expected as the home contains a chained up woman.

Now Bad Samaritan immediatly suffers from a flaw that a lot of movies have have lately. Namely protagonists that I can't care for. Why am I supposed to root for criminals? These people are robbing folks, why am I supposed to care about them? Sadly this has been a big thing lately and really badly needs to stop.

The story is great, David Tennant is excellent (As always) and it all plays out really well. But our lead being a thief just kept nagging at me and bothered me considerably more than it perhaps should.

Putting that aside I can confidently say Bad Samaritan is a smart little film, well constructed and well performed so if the bad protagonist thing doesn't bother you then it's well worth your time.

The Good:

David Tennant

Very well made little thriller

Solid concept

The Bad:

Unlikeable protagonist

Things I Learnt From This Movie:

David Tennant needs more high profile work

Bad guys need to play bad guys, thieves should not be the protagonists

Women still haven't established that allowing themselves to be photographed topless/naked is a bad idea
19 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Better than expected!
Top_Dawg_Critic3 August 2018
For a B-grade film, this was surprisingly better than I expected. The acting was great by all cast members, the directing was on point, the writing was actually pretty good - without many plot issues one would normally expect, the cinematography perfect, the pacing was great, especially for the 107 min length, and the editing not too bad except for the flashbacks. My only critique was the terrible score, especially towards the last act. Had the score been more professional and consistent through out, the suspense would have been stellar instead of adequate. Overall an impressive film. A well deserved 8/10 from me.
132 out of 168 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Samaritan to the Crime Drama Formula
rgkarim4 May 2018
With the success of the Avengers last weekend, it is hard for other movies to try and take follow such an impressive record. Still, another week comes with movies that are going to try and fight for their place in the silver screen. My first movie of the week is the latest Horror/Thriller to try and keep you on edge. Robbie K here with another round of writing to help you guys with your movie choices. Sit back and read on as I review:

Movie: Bad Samaritan

Director: Dean Devlin Writer: Brandon Boyce (screenplay) Stars: Kerry Condon, David Tennant, Robert Sheehan

LIKES:

Decent Pacing: If you've read my work, you know I like movies that movie, which Bad Samaritan does. I'll admit it takes a while to lift off in an attempt to set the stage, but as the robbery goes bad and the thrills start, things start to pick up. From then on, it seems to move, only hitting rough patches of diverging slowness for small amounts before looping back to the story.

Acting: Another plus here, the cast has quite an art to helping keeps the audience invested in the story with performances that are quite believable and well developed. The secondary characters are fine for their limited appearances, but the two leads are by far the pillars of strength keeping this movie up. Sheehan as the protagonist plays the man at wits end quite well, a nice force of morale integrity with a drive to make changes his world needs. It's a nice puzzle of emotion and he was able to bring all the pieces together to make a protagonist you want to get behind. Yet it's David Tennant who will most likely grab your attention. The former Barty Crouch Junior has taken his insanity up a level, still having that strategic genius of a serial killer, but this time being much louder and less subtle. Seeing how deep his madness goes is probably the only mystery at hand, as one tries to figure out what caused such devoted madness. The rivalry between these two is the relationship that drives the whole film, and certainly the thrilling component of the movie.

Thrilling at Times: The movie has a dark edge to it, and dark often brings thrills and suspense to the screen. Bad Samaritan has those moments that are real on the seat sequences that you crime show lovers enjoy. All of them attempt to make you jump and potentially look suspiciously over at your fellow audience member, but most of these moments are short lived. What does bring suspense though, is that feeling of unknown as to what Tennant's character will do next. That uneasiness is truly the source of the thrills in the movie and perhaps one of the more realistic scares of the year in movies.

DISLIKES:

Predictable: What drowns the movie's suspense is how linear and predictable this film is. Bad Samaritan holds few surprises in this regard, much of the plot can be seen from a mile away and seldom surprising me outside of how short some of the suspense moments are. It's much of the same story that crime shows love to take full advantage of in their relentless need for repeats.

Lacking Villain Development: The extent of his madness is visible in this film, his back story, not so much. Bad Samaritan's villain is just shown as crazy, with only fleeting memories of animal torture (another thing I hate) to give you any sort of understanding. Eventually, the bomb is dropped into the incident that developed his psychopathic tendencies arose, but it's only in the form of a three-sentence part to wrap it all up. This lack of details and impasses to uncover his history means one thing... boring. Part of the fun of a thriller is getting more insight to the monster at hand and it just didn't deliver in this movie.

Underutilization of secondary characters: Sigh, the protagonist had so many connections set up at the beginning, each an important cog to Sheehan's character's life, but also a valuable pawn in the killer's game of chess. Unfortunately, these pieces are super underdeveloped, dropped in for only small time talk before quickly being used for more life altering madness. Most of these stints are just flown over, but a couple do try to bring that nasty bite to get you feeling the pain they want you to. Had more of these guys been brought into the game, Bad Samaritan may have again developed the edge it needed.

The Stupidity/Mistakes: Bad Samaritan falls into the usual trepidations of characters making stupid decisions and paying heavily for it. These bad decisions are essentially the core of the movie, and while a few could be appreciated, some of these moments were sheer displays of how dumb the writing was at times. How did this master of seduction/schmoozing screw up so much for this kid to best him? Why would they be so stupid to leave obvious clues? Why were the cops so ruthlessly dumb/ignorant? It's just those background noises they want you to annoy, but in this movie that is hard to do given the set up they make. The inconsistencies are a tad annoying to me at times.

The Ending: Sigh, another movie that is left to tease and feel unfinished. Bad Samaritan's final moments are rushed display of mistakes, coincidental serendipity, and a sudden cut to black worthy of the Sopranos. It opens the possibilities for another installment yet could provide lackluster closure to those who want it. Nevertheless, this film didn't quite end as strongly as one would hope, leaving many questions unanswered, and many ties still unknotted.

The VERDICT:

Bad Samaritan is an okay movie, capable of finding ways to make you jump and trying to keep you engaged in this manhunt. With good acting and a good pace, the movie certainly feels like a crime show that has a film worthy budget. Yet, the movie still holds some rather big deficits that rob it of the thriller aspect it wanted to bring. More character development and suspense are going to be needed for further installments, but it at least sets the stage. Worth a trip to the movies? Can't say it is for me but give it a shot at home to not worry about being robbed of your money for an anticlimactic ending.

My scores are:

Horror/Thriller: 7.0 Movie Overall: 6.5
34 out of 67 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
So incredibly silly
gallagherkellie11 June 2022
I don't get why this has a semi decent rating! Good premise but wow it got so silly, the characters made terrible decisions, the cops were useless and everyone should have died 100 times. I gave it 4 because I did keep watching and want to know how it ended.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Entertaining!
celestinoavilajr17 August 2018
Good movie! Great plot! Edge of your seat twist and turns! Picture and acting qualities are excellent!.... If theirs anyone looking for good reviews and not sure of watching. Pay no mind to the bad reviews. If you like crime thrillers.. this is a good one!
68 out of 89 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not Bad actually...
bangel33225 March 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This was actually better than I expected. I was expecting something close to Don't Breathe (which I hated) but this was more enjoyable. Like the little twist it took with the villain trying to ruin the protagonists life. I liked that. However the reason my low score is because I was left feeling a little cold by David Tennant's performance. He didn't portray the villain as I would have liked to have seen it done. Needed someone more menacing. Basically a better actor. Plus I would have liked just a little more background on the villain. I didn't find his reasonings for what he was doing convincing. Parts of the story were a little far fetched, but all in all, decent.
13 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Ridiculous, viewers are much more intelligent than this LAME writing
actorgal19 March 2020
I don't know where to start. Except to say how dumb do writers think their viewers are? So this "bad guy" can make one phpne call and get people fired? Can start police investigations? Can ruin people's lives? Ahh-yep This one bad guy can ter down his pleasure room amd mudere room completely in an hour? Ah yep...We're smarter than that writers, start WRITING like we are. Thank you
30 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
nice thriller
SnoopyStyle4 September 2018
Sean Falco (Robert Sheehan) is a good guy at heart with girlfriend Riley. Secretly, he's a small time thief with his buddy Derek Sandoval. They use their valet jobs to sneak into unsuspecting diners' homes. One such diner is ill-tempered Cale Erendreich (David Tennant). When Sean breaks into Cale's home, he discovers a woman chained up inside. He tries to do the right thing which has its repercussions.

This is an old fashion thriller and I like it as such. There are a couple of things that I like about the characters and a couple of things that I see possible improvements. I do like Sean's unabashed need to save the girl and I also like Derek's realistic need to save himself. I like both performances. As for Tennant, he is perfectly creepy. He does need to kidnap the girlfriend. That's the big opportunity missed by the movie. Instead, it becomes a misunderstanding which leaves her looking clueless. On the other hand, I don't mind the clueless police detective. He has reasons to be clueless. It's nice to have a smart FBI agent although she has a few too many backups. They're trying a little too hard. It's more intense to have Agent Fuller alone struggling inside the system. Overall, I like Sean as a smart normal thief who has morality which drives him and drives this movie.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I Came For David Tennant, Stayed For Robert Sheenan!
icocleric14 June 2022
I normally prefer straight up horror rather than suspense films, but I decided to check it out because of David Tennant. And I'm glad I did because it was really enjoyable.

The tension throughout the film was really good, the acting was really great. I did especially enjoy Robert Sheenan. And although there wasn't loads of originality with the plot there were a lot of nice touches and details to it all.

It wasn't scary in the horror sense, but had a psychological triller aspect going on. I thought it ended pretty great too.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sheehan and Tennant shine in a serviceable thriller
vandeman-scott7 January 2021
Robert Sheehan, his marvelous accent, and David Tennant take a script with a solid plot (if weakish dialog) and make it, well, thrilling. They pony up believeable, lived-in performances, doing so much more than just going through the motions.

Indy thriller BAD SAMARITAN keeps you on the edge of your seat for the duration of its 110-minute running time. Are there plot holes? Sure, a couple, but they're minuscule compared to most contemporary films, and they don't detract significantly from the overall effort. Every one of its twists and turns is fairly supported, and nothing is distractingly illogical or implausible.

The filmmakers do rely on some well-worn movie clichés to move things along -- the simple-minded, uncuriouos cop who ignores overwhelming evidence that something is seriously amiss jumps to mind -- but they don't detract from the important conflict. Sheehan as the hapless ne'er-do-well with a heart of gold, and Tennant as the malevolent and twisted serial killer, are believeable if unlikely foes as they engage in a suspenseful battle of wits.

BAD SAMARITAN is yet another example of why indy films are often better movies than multi-million-dollar features. With the blessing of smaller budgets, filmmakers must rely on craft and creativity over special effects, and this frequently makes for a more compelling movie experience.

This film isn't perfect by any means. The story is one that has been told before, though usually not so deftly, and some of the minor characters were deserving of a bit more substance. The law enforcement element also could have been better developed. Nevertheless, missed opportunities and all, BAD SAMARITAN is a cut above average and does what it's supposed to do: It entertains.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Does not deserve the current rating, worth a watch
adventuressasheton27 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Is this a 10? No. Would I recommend it to someone and was it enjoyable? Yes. This has a lot of good elements from a nice thriller plot with a creepy villain, a lovable hero that has his own flaws, and a well wrapped up ending. There are also a few comedic relief moments, especially towards the end, you'll know when you see it. There were some unrealistic plot holes of people being stupid, characters and cops alike but that never bothers me, you have to have that for some movies to move along. If you like a thriller and are a murderino you'll like this movie.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Sold!
krice2325 November 2018
Original script. Believable cast. They make it work easily & all in all it looks like what a thriller should look like! For once I'm not grumbling in disappointment over lack of continuity or missed opportunities. Several layers thick with multidimensional characters that behave unexpectantly individual and unique instead of plotted. A pleasant surprise, indeed. Perhaps I should have rated it a 9!?
43 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Surprisingly good thriller
SaraEmelie23 August 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I was going to give this movie a 6, but because of the good jumpscares...I decided to give it a 7 instead. Tennant acts really well along with the victim. Sure, there has been similar movies before, but I still think this movie still makes you wonder what will happen next.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Borning, predicatable, dull
philipphoerning22 May 2020
Saw this movie on Amazon Prime. God, only because of the good reviews here i kept watching until the end. Jesus was this thing boring. At some parts beyond logical human behaivior. Who wrote this script? A twelve year old? I really despise lazy screenwriting where characters act far from any logic. Above all, the movie is BORING. Do yourself a favor, dont watch it.
20 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Impressive!
patrickc-763838 May 2018
This movie takes you on an rollercoaster-like adventure that is suspenseful while also favorably is unpredictable. That being said, another thing this movie does well with is its realism. Each scene you see feels natural and true to life.

In addition, this movie doesn't cut any corners in the storytelling; there aren't any holes in the plot that you wonder about later while watching the movie.

In conclusion, this is a very well executed thriller and I would honestly recommend this movie!
53 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not sure how I feel about this one
debitspread4 May 2018
I don't normally have much respect for movies like this. It's a story about a wacko who does bad things to people. So, my temptation is to say that it's just some contrived Hollywood product, designed only to give us the sensations of pseudo-fear and a little excitement. But then, I think about some of the murder, rape, and enslavement cases that have made the news lately, and I start to wonder: Maybe there is more truth to this story than I would like to admit.

I used to think that scaring an audience is really not that hard, but after seeing Bad Samaritan, I need to adjust that opinion. The challenge is to scare people in an artful manner, and I now see how difficult that can be. Personally, I think the makers of this film did a pretty good job; not great, mind you, but pretty good.

I'm glad the writer clearly outlined the protagonist's moral problem, as well as the courage it took to "do the right thing"; i.e., fight his evil opponent. I guess the bottom line for me is that it's too bad we have a movie industry that makes money by dealing with deranged story material like this. There is obviously a market for it, however, and that may be the saddest thing of all.
18 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Best if you turn your brain off for this one.
Otkon6 August 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Whether you are a serial killer or not, you do not hand your Maserati (with the glove box unlocked) over to parking attendants without giving them the limited access valet key and writing your mileage down on the claim ticket.

Plus why would a supposedly smart serial killer turn off a single security feature when leaving his quarry captive alone at home? There should have been always-on cameras, infrared detectors and a silent alarm covering every inch of that house 24.7.

Who writes checks anymore?! That was his ultimate downfall. If only he had gone paperless.

And what is up with Sheehan getting to stay Irish while compatriot Condon could deliver the only memorable line of dialogue in a competent North American accent?

It was an okay movie but could have been better.
20 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nice little Thriller
stevendbeard5 May 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I saw "Bad Samaritan", starring David Tennant-Jessica Jones_tv, Doctor Who_tv; Robert Sheehan-Geostorm, The Mortal Instruments:City of Bones; Carlito Olivero-East Los High_tv, Blood Heist and Kerry Condon-Three Billboards Outside Ebbing Missouri, Better Call Saul_tv. This is a nice little thriller about a psycho serial killer. Robert and Carlito are two guys that work as valet parking attendants that are not on the up & up. They park your car and then steal anything they can find. Sometimes, they grab stuff left in the car and sometimes they go to the owners house and burglarize it-hey, they are eating and will be gone for an hour or so. Up comes David. Driving a fancy car and just being rather snotty to the guys. Robert decides to check out David's house and finds, among other things, Kerry, chained to a chair, with a gag in her mouth and signs of being beaten and tortured. What to do, what to do. Robert tries to set her loose but it is chains bolted to the floor. If he calls the police, he might risk getting in trouble for burglarizing the house-why was he in the house?-but he can't just leave her there at the mercy of David. Of course when the police do get involved, they don't find anything. That's when things turn into a game of cat & mouse, with David-the cat-messing around with Robert's-the mouse-life. It's rated "R" for violence, language, drug use and some brief nudity and has a running time of 1 hour & 51 minutes. I enjoyed it enough that I would probably buy it on DVD.
11 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great Acting, So-So Story
spilledinkcinema18 November 2018
I'm a fan of David Tennant, so I can't complain, even if it seems he's a bit typecasted for the bad guy lately. This was all around solid acting film with some dumb choices and a little too convenient plot twists.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed