Salomé (2013) Poster

(2013)

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Not the Best Interpretation
Tweetienator21 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I must say - Im a little disappointed. I like Pacino and Chastain a lot and they play their roles well but the trouble with this interpretation of Salome lies imo not in the acting but in the interpretation of the material. The use of modern day clothes and very reduced staging for example is overused and just contemporary mainstream theater stuff.

Another very weak point is imo the figure of king Herodias - he resembles more a kind of Pilatus (Im innocent but forced by circumstances or a mistake I made - my pledge - to do the wrong thing) and the lust or craving for Salome (or her flesh) never felt really convincing to me. On top Herodias "kill that woman"-order in the end make things just worse (a killing of Salome is never mentioned in the Bible etc). I simply like the "picture" of Herodias as a scrupulous, decadent, maybe not fully sane mind more than this guy portrayed in Pacinos Salome.

In contrast to the superb play of Chastain the highlight of this movie, the climax - the Dance of Veils - is rather poorly presented. How its well done shows the phantastic performance of Imogen Millais-Scott in The Last Dance of Salome or Brigid Bazlen dancing the Dance of the Seven Veils in King of Kings.

So whats left to say!? Al Pacinos interpretation of the classic tale of Salome is not bad but can't keep up with the refreshing Salome's Last Dance (1988) or the very experimental flick of Carmelo Bene from 1972.

Anyway - this Salome got Al Pacino and Chastain - there is for sure far more bad stuff around to "waste" your time on.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Unknowingly they made a movie about the most tragic event in human history
ntech-1621322 October 2022
Something most people don't know about this event is that it is according to the Bible Salome getting John the Baptist's head on a platter caused the largest Biblical curse of all time. And it's still running BTW.

Put a basically as possible the murder of John the Baptist triggered the curse contained in Malachi 4. Which made Jesus Christ the "HE" that struck the earth with a curse. In Matthew 17 Jesus claimed John the Baptist was Elijah. So looking for the details of the curse you actually find them in the book of Hosea. Specifically verse 6-2. But what Hosea tells us is Israel and Judah were to face a 2000 year top level Leviticus 26 curse. Which also appears to be the curse of Malachi.

So all things considered Salome and her mother are guilty of the biggest crime in all history. She had Elijah killed and triggered a curse that's been responsible for the flow of human history for the past 2000 years.

The horrors she must be facing in Hell....
1 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Modern dress, modern mess.
mark.waltz22 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
While it seems that Al Pacino is desperately trying to outdo the bad Hebrew accent that Laurence Olivier had in "The Jazz Singer", it's obvious that he's trying to be sincere as King Herod on the throne desperately trying to save the life of John the Baptist after stepdaughter Salome (Jessica Chastain) demands it in return for her dance. This is a rendition of Oscar Wilde's play, as if it was being done on the stage (part modern dress) and the audience (including Wilde) not seen as they were in the Ken Russell adaption, "Salome's Last Dance", and it's like imagining that there were modern film cameras present to capture the play as it was being done.

Taking on the role of the regal Queen Herodias (played previously by Judith Anderson and Glenda Jackson on film) is Roxanne Hart, and she has the perfect look for the part, the Hebrew version of Rome's Empress Livia. I had hoped it would be Dianne Wiest (who appeared in the Broadway revival with Pacino), but Hart is quite subtle, more so than Pacino and Chastain who obviously are trying to recapture early 20th Century styles of acting which over 120 years later seems absurd. In retrospect, this will appeal to theater historians and Pacino fans, but it's so close to Ken Russell's film that it hardly seems necessary. For me, I'll stick with the 1953 Rita Hayworth/Charles Laughton version which may be lacking in historical truth but is far more enjoyable than this or the 1988 film.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Deeply Moving and Brave Interpretation of a Classic Tale
Vils124 May 2015
I could not believe that there was only one review of this great film. It was released on DVD together with the documentary 'Wilde Salomé'. A great double package explaining the background, the journey and the making of to good effect. I watched Wilde Salomé first, which I think helped before seeing the 'main course'.

The overall effect was deeply moving - covering the whole range of emotions. I can't say too much more without it being a spoiler.

Some will struggle with the theatrical presentation and modern clothes. However don't let that put you off as the acting and the message are top notch.

It still moves me months later - the sign of a good film.

Highly recommended - when you are in the mood.
21 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
EACH MAN KILL THE THINGS HE LOVE
nogodnomasters31 July 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The film is a documentary about making the film Salome with Al Pacino starring and directing. Pacino informs us the reason he is making a film of the film/play is so he can capture how he feels about the play. Seriously? Isn't that what a director/actor supposed to do without a documentary, by letting the work speak for itself? So was this supposed to be a film about a man who can't direct and act? I thought I had caught the clue.

The production was more of a bio of Oscar Wilde then the play. The bio gets stars, the play does not. The play was performed in the garb of Wilde's time period, for better or worse, in in my case I took it as a worse. Jessica Chastain, looks more Irish, then a a relative of Herod. Again a play done as a tribute to Wilde.

I really couldn't get into what is another artsy Hollywood self gratification film. Pacino didn't impress me. Chastain didn't really dance, but rather whipped around in a frenzy losing her top.

Note: Wilde wrote "Salome" before going to prison. It could not have influenced his writing of the play which he did hastily and in French.

Guide: F-bomb and Nudity (Jessica Chastain)
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Top psycho drama
jirimoucka22 November 2018
The drama of power, paternal, marital, prestigious. Herod is caught up in a network of relations and contradictions of their positions. not able to make decisions of the wishes of his daughter the princess Salome. however, even she, his apple, has not decision simple. the drama of three live charactersd courtiers. a riveting range of expressions of the soul of Salome and Herod. so powerful psychodrama is unique. thanks to mr AlPacino, ms. Chastaine
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Yuck!
chrismackey197216 April 2015
Putridly boring. What were they thinking when they decided to make this? These people must've been desperate for a paycheck. They should've just made a movie about Salome as a period piece rather than this play version in modern clothes. It was hard to take them seriously talking like that while wearing suits and dresses.

Even though these people are good actors, they were not here. That's not to say anyone else could've done a better job. I just think the material was...bad. It was such a struggle to stay awake.

There is a topless scene that Jessica Chastain does. It lasts for close to one minute. Throughout the rest of the movie, she keeps a long, red scarf draped over her shoulders covering her breasts.

I gave this a 3-star rating. If you close your eyes and just listen to them, it might be better. However, the modern clothes really took away from the storyline using the old-style way of speaking. I do NOT recommend. There are better ways for people to waste their money.
23 out of 90 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
You'll either love it or hate it....I sure hated it.
planktonrules11 December 2023
"Salomé" is a one-act play written by Oscar Wilde in French. It's a rather obscure play, as it was legal to show it on stage in the UK until many years later. For more on that, read the Wikipedia article on the play.

This filmed version was directed by Al Pacino and I have no idea who it was made for, as it doesn't look like a movie but an avant-garde play put on video. It does not look anything like you'd think the play would look as the players are all wearing modern outfits...normal, everyday clothes at that.

The story is taken from the Gospels and Wilde created a story where the kinky step-daughter of Herod fell for John the Baptist but John rebuffed her advances. So, later, she dances a sexy dance and following this, Herod promised her anything...and things get really weird.

This was an unpleasant film. The language was stilted and old...which is odd with all the modern touches. But most of all, it's boring...boring, boring, boring. I really think the average person would be equally bored...though one of the reviewers found it all 'deeply moving'. I am glad they enjoyed it...I just think Mr. Or Miss Joe Average would NOT enjoy the taped play.

By the way, although this play is based on a Biblical reference, it is NOT a film most religious folks would enjoy due to the nudity in the program....just something to keep in mind.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A play on screen... I do feel obligated to stand for a round of applause...
afallguns5 December 2015
WOW!

I'm breathless after watching it... The play Wilde is of course a great material to work on... But it could suck in so many levels...

I have to say a loud and clear "F*CK OFF" to anyone who thinks that Al Pacino is over... He's a legend, both in screen and stage... As actor and director... And as Herod... Man, its only possible to think that Wilde only wrote the play to Al Pacino direct this version...

Some people complained about the clothing... Great actors were on stage, and they could be wearing black capes, futuristic clothes or even costumes of that time... I doubt that would be that different... Maybe with the proper costumes they wouldn't be that good... I mean, they would have the visual at their favor... Maybe they wouldn't put as much effort... OF COURSE THEY ARE GREAT PRO-ACTORS AND THEY WOULD BE GREAT EVEN IF THEY WERE NAKED!

For me, the movie have only one flaw... It was a little confusing at the beginning... Voices in off... Shots of stage and out-stage... BEFORE SALOMÉ ENTER IN SCENE I WAS KIND OF LOST... Unable to really get what was going on... I was distracted...

But Jessica entered... From that point to the very last scene, I couldn't blink... WOW!

Today, is pretty much obvious that she is one of the greatest actresses in activity... But the movie was rolled, I guess, between 2008 and 2010, before Jessica Chastain be THE Jessica Chastain. Al Pacino was the one who shown the world what a great artist she was.

I can only dream of watching it live... Its probably transcendental...

In resume: GREAT PLAY, great direction, Al Pacino was really good as Herod and the rest of the cast played their part very well either. BUT JESSICA CHASTAIN JUST BLEW MINDS WITH THAT PERFORMANCE...
18 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Embarrassingly bad
fkeeve19 March 2022
I think this must be Pacino's worst performance. Fortunately, he has a body of work that supports some great performances and he is one of our great actors. Sadly, this is not one of them. On so many levels, a wide miss.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Phenomenal interpretation of a classic
I_Ailurophile25 March 2022
Al Pacino's 'Salomé' represents a production of nothing if not the utmost professionalism. Hair and makeup, costume design, set design, props, and lighting all very distinctly impress in their perfection; my commendations to everyone in the crew who helped to bring this to fruition. I can only imagine how captivating the play would have been to see on the stage - oh, how I would have loved to have been in one of those seats - but Pacino demonstrates wonderful capability as a director to capture every tiny instance with exquisite deftness, amplifying the tension and drama. To that end, my congratulations as well to experienced theater director Estelle Parsons, who took a very low-key rendition of Oscar Wilde's work and, with her practiced hand, guided an electrifying exhibition of the tremendous skill of all involved. It takes no time at all as a viewer to be wholly enraptured - this is outstanding!

Small separate touches added to the feature film, establishing the setting or focus of particular moments, may to an unwitting spectator seem superfluous, and undesired. Having previously watched Pacino's documentary, 'Wilde Salomé,' that was part of this ambitious project, I can appreciate the place those embellishments have in both this edited 2013 form and in that 2011 exploration. In a like fashion, I broadly have a harder time engaging with stage productions that update their subject to a modern setting, and indeed we see in this take on 'Salomé' a very 2010 sensibility of sartorial arrangement. Again, however, I can only reflect that watching Pacino's documentary has instilled a wider perspective on the artistic choices made here - and I admire them all.

Of course, one could speak at great length about all the little details that together constitute a picture or a play. But as important as they are, and as brilliant as they may be (as they are here), they are not the critical substance for which an audience attends. Of far more significance, in the first place and at the core, is the writing. It's clear that Pacino's 'Salomé' is built directly upon Oscar Wilde's own magnificent wit, and the playwright's intelligence is a legend unto itself. His sharp dialogue, and his directions for the cast and crew, are terrific - engrossing and vivid as they bring life to an ancient tale. Wilde's play is a true classic, and has very deservedly been staged and adapted time and again - and, to my pleasure, this is as worthy as any version could be.

And of course, as much as the writing, the cast is essential to theatrical production - not just embodying their characters, but realizing with their performances and our imagination the visuals that would instead be given actual form in a movie. So it is with 'Salomé,' with some tiny facets appearing only by gesture and fancy. More crucially, though - every actor assembled for this piece is exceptional. Roxanne Hart has only a supporting part as Herodias, but nonetheless carries a biting presence and strength that makes the queen larger than what is written. Kevin Anderson has relatively little time on screen, but similarly makes the most of his role with a somewhat unsettling turn as John the Baptist - little more than a raving lunatic whose ramblings bear only as much sense as may be interpreted in passing, but lively and impactful as Anderson portrays him.

Above all, however, 'Salomé' is a dazzling, spellbinding showcase for its top stars. Over 70 at the time the play was staged and this movie filmed, Pacino offers a deceptively sophisticated performance as Herod. For much of the length he comes across as a bit aloof and disinterested, perhaps not summoning the full power we know he possesses. Yet Pacino's acting here is an illustration of subtlety, and the quiet influence of an expert's force of personality: he depicts Herod with an air of both arrogance and whimsy, bordering on madness, and declines until the psychological moment to advertise the brunt of that fabulous command he has over the medium. Truly, it's a privilege to witness. Yet remarkably, even Pacino is overshadowed by the exceptional, exhilarating display we see from Jessica Chastain. She embraces every shifting, conflicting, confused emotion of the title character with marvelous range, force of personality, and physicality. Hers is a presentation that's altogether enthralling, from the girlish innocence Salomé first seems to sport, to the demanding impetuousness and recalcitrance she wields upon insult and expected favor, through to the broken sorrow as all concludes. And this is to say nothing of Chastain's alluring, invigorating Dance of the Seven Veils, a centerpiece for any rendition of 'Salomé' that doesn't always land with all due stimulating import - but Chastain absolutely sells it, and makes it her own. She has more than proven herself in all the pictures she's made, yet maybe more than any other, this film is worth watching for Jessica Chastain alone.

Vibrant, fiery passion courses throughout 'Salomé,' both in the acting and in the very doing - the love of storytelling and of the two mediums represented herein. What excitement I had upon first learning of the project, and the casting, was moderately tempered by first watching the documentary - only to flare to splendid new life once I sat for the feature. I can understand that the presentation of a stage play, caught on film for posterity, may not be the type of movie that appeals to all viewers. Yet the superb value herein matches or bests the drama to be had in many conventional titles, and it's fantastically well made of its own accord. Whether one is a fan of the cast, of theater, or of Oscar Wilde, or just an avid movie-goer generally, I must enthusiastically give 'Salomé' my highest recommendation: this is an excellent, absorbing piece of cinema that deserves much more recognition!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Any movie with Jessica Chastain (if not an action movie) is a gem
valipod7 November 2022
This woman can change mud into wine, really (like I said, unless it's an action movie, she's not Jesus, after all). I don't know if that's a good thing, but I have almost missed the plot altogether just observing the terrific monster of an actor that she is. Al Pacino could barely keep up, really.

Yes, it's an ancient tragedy and this not really appealing for today's standards. TV-theatre is difficult in itself, I would say. But it's more an acting exercise, take it as it is. Some people here have even complaint about the modern clothing. Come on, people... Just observe the best actress this century has produced and be glad you are alive at the same time.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed