User reviews

Look, the movie is great, it has some good comedy, it shows how the characters are doing in the future (maybe not exactly), but the thing is that the movie has the same plot as the first one, but the difference here is on the judgement part, because João Grillo is the only one being judged, and Jesus and the Devil were interpreted by the same actor "as the angel and demon of João Grilo", and the judgement didn't feel the same thing as the judgement of the first movie, like, they tried to make it way more serious than the first judgement (they can do something serious but i think the execution didn't work well) Conclusion, is a great and funny movie, but its the same formula of the first movie, otherwise, i would give it a 9/10, but its a 7/10 because its a funny, but weak writting.

"A Dog's Will 2" arrives with the tough task of continuing one of the most beloved films in Brazilian cinema, a movie that transcended its classic status to become part of the emotional fabric of entire generations. The challenge was no small feat: keeping the irreverent and critical spirit of the original alive without Ariano Suassuna as the creative compass, while also speaking to a Brazil that's changed a lot since the year 2000. The result is a sequel that flips between moments of brilliance and a lingering feeling that it could've dared a bit more.

The reunion with João Grilo and Chicó is, without a doubt, the film's biggest win. Selton Mello and Matheus Nachtergaele slip back into their characters with impressive ease, like time has only polished their chemistry even further. Their dynamic is still sharp, with the same street-smart humor and quick wit working just as well as before. Directors Guel Arraes and Flávia Lacerda know exactly how to tap into that, especially in the snappy dialogue and the absurd situations the duo gets tangled in. The film's opening is promising, with a fast-paced rhythm and a curious look at the changes in Taperoá-a town now touched by the modernities of a more connected Brazil, yet still drowning in old inequalities.

Visually, the film makes some interesting choices in recreating Taperoá with a theatrical flair, nodding to cordel literature and Northeastern folklore. The use of artificial sets, which had a charming, fairytale-like vibe in the original, now leans more stylized, trying to balance the real with the dreamlike. At times, it works beautifully, especially in indoor scenes where the set design feels more controlled and evocative. But the overuse of digital effects in outdoor scenes breaks that spell a bit, leaving everything with a plasticky look that clashes with the rustic, enchanting atmosphere the film is trying to recapture.

The sequel's biggest issue lies in its narrative structure. The film introduces some intriguing new elements, like the political clash between a local coronel (Humberto Martins) and a media mogul (Eduardo Sterblitch), along with the exploration of João Grilo as a "folk saint," mythologized by his own community. These conflicts had real potential to expand the story's universe, but they get swallowed up by the decision to stick to the original's formula. The third act is a clear example: João Grilo's celestial trial, which was a brilliant, meaningful climax in the first film, feels like a rehash here-lacking the same dramatic weight or creative freshness. It's déjà vu, but with less impact.

This reliance on nostalgia doesn't just limit the film; it also dims the shine of new characters who could've enriched the plot. Luís Miranda and Eduardo Sterblitch deliver solid performances, but their arcs are underused in favor of revisiting familiar beats. Taís Araújo, despite her charm and talent, can't carve out a new identity for Nossa Senhora, stuck under the heavy shadow of Fernanda Montenegro. This isn't a knock on her acting-it's more about a script that seems too hesitant to let go of the past and create something truly new.

That said, "A Dog's Will 2" is far from a failure. Not even close. The humor is still sharp, the social commentary is there (though a bit watered down), and the protagonists' charisma keeps the audience engaged until the end. It's a film that's fun and touching in many moments, especially for those who have an emotional connection to the original. The problem is, instead of using that foundation to soar higher, it chooses to play it safe, stuck in the comfort zone of what's already worked before. In the end, it's a pleasant reunion-but one that leaves you wishing the visit had been a bit bolder.

What a shame! Why did they make this sequel? The production quality is so poor. Why didn't they use the at least the same locations to maintain the originality of the first film? It's hard to find a single laughable moment in this sequel. What a waste of talent! As an admirer of Suassuna's work, it's disappointing to watch such a miserable production. It's strange how the jokes were made without any new elements, just a terrible rehash of the first movie. Even Selton and Matheus didn't bring the same emotion to their performances. I know some might say I'm being too harsh or too focused on a film made 20 years ago, but this project was doomed from the start. Every true admirer of this classic knows it.

Haters exist everywhere nowadays. Haters will hate this review only because I rated this movie an 8.

But it got my eyes in tears at some parts (like the first one). And that's what movies are for. To make you feel human.

Of course this movie would not be par with the first one. That's impossible, the first one was a masterpiece.

However, if you give a chance, and try not to compare both movies but just enjoy the verses, the acting, the wit of the characters, you will see that it is a good movie. It may even touch you.

I prefer to live in a world where I am able to watch and enjoy this sequel (even if it doesn't compare with the original), than living in a world with only the good memories of the original movie.

A Dog's Will 2 is an utterly deplorable sequel that tarnishes the charm of the original Brazilian classic. The plot is a chaotic mess, cobbling together tired tropes and forced humor that lands with all the grace of a lead balloon. João Grilo and Chicó, once lovable rogues, are reduced to caricatures spouting cringe-inducing dialogue that feels like it was scraped from a rejected sitcom script. The direction is sloppy, with jarring cuts and a pacing that drags like a funeral procession, making the 90-minute runtime feel like an eternity. The cinematography is uninspired, and the soundtrack is a forgettable mishmash of generic tunes. Even the cultural wit that made the first film a gem is replaced by lazy stereotypes and cheap gags. It's a soulless cash grab that betrays its legacy-avoid this cinematic trainwreck at all costs.

The history is about people that live in a very dry region o Brazil. People suffer a lot because the lack of water, but they trust in a better time of abundace. The faith in Saint Mary make them stronger in the journey.

João Grilo is the main character, in some way a lier, but at the same time a believer. His friend, Chicó, is a very funny guy, coward and a poet. Together, they are stronger, friends forever. Grilo ressurected twice because his beliefe, but he never remembers of the other side. He received some chances to change, but he always easier ways to solve the problems. He is a natural politician, he could be a good leader of that suffering people.

The Dog's Will2 manages to capture the magic and charm of the original while bringing a refreshing quality necessary for renewal. The direction by Guel Arraes, a master at balancing humor and social critique, guides the plot with finesse, maintaining the irreverent and captivating tone that made the first film a success. Matheus Nachtergaele and Selton Mello return with the same impeccable chemistry, delivering new moments of genuine comedy and emotion.

The storyline is an intelligent mix of elements from northeastern Brazilian popular culture, with touches of the supernatural and reflections on life and death. The interactions between the main characters, João Grilo and Chicó, and figures like Holy Mary, reaffirm the importance of faith and goodness, while still keeping the sarcastic and questioning tone that Ariano Suassuna's work has always had.

The introduction of new characters and challenges involving the afterlife creates an engaging and unique narrative. At the same time, there is a tribute to our traditions, beliefs, and existential dilemmas, with memorable scenes that uniquely blend comedy and drama. The art direction and cinematography also stand out, reinforcing the atmosphere of the Brazilian backcountry with its vibrant colors and poetic simplicity.

The Dog's will 2 is a continuation that respects the original work while offering something new and relevant to today's audience. It is a cinematic experience that combines laughter, fear, reflection, and above all, hope.