Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueInternet sleuths and professional investigators re-open some of Hollywood's most notorious and controversial celebrity deaths.Internet sleuths and professional investigators re-open some of Hollywood's most notorious and controversial celebrity deaths.Internet sleuths and professional investigators re-open some of Hollywood's most notorious and controversial celebrity deaths.
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis à la une
Feels like the whole point of this show is to drag the reputations of these people through the mud. Armchair sleuths rattling off opinions, pseudo-facts, gossip and ridiculous conspiracy theories. Their evidence? Sub-reddit pages! Everyone of these vile, disgusting characters should be brought to task. These are dumb, ignorant, uninformed, gossip mongers, and, Vice is more than happy to add them to their already despicable repertoire of crappy"entertainment". This is nothing more than one of those shows that goes nowhere, but, takes an hour...with commercials). Seems fitting Vice belongs to the Discovery Channel Family. Garbage content cleverly disguised & packaged to appear as educational/informative programming...READ A BOOK!
You cannot disprove a negative, it is one of the most basic facts of science. It is also a fact that is ignored by this show seems to ignore. The show seems to go with if we can't prove it with concrete evidence, despite police withholding evidence or other missing facts, they will dismiss it as impossible. There is one point where they say many things went wrong leading to the death, but there is no evidence of any curse. The fact that so many different things went wrong, in the only way: option, order etc. That it lead to the death is highly improbable. Some would interpret the high improbability of those mistakes lining up perfectly as proof of a curse and yet the show dismisses the idea of a curse completely assigning it all to perfectly improbable coincidence. Be open to alternative possibilities or don't call it (Re)solved as if you are (Re)investigating anything but in reality you are just sharing the official report.
This show seemed interesting, expecting it to delve into the facts around deaths of famous people and eliminate the rumors. This show is based largely in rumors and speculation but in the end agree with the official report. The one commentator has a bachelors in IT but considers herself an internet sleuth. She does not have a degree in criminal investigations or even investigative journalism or any training in medicine she only knows what she can find on the internet. Which might be why she said that most times cpr is performed if breaks ribs. I originally got my cpr certification 20 years ago and kept renewing it and the fact is you break the sternum but you shouldn't break ribs especially in an adult male. If you do breaks ribs it is usually only a couple not 9. A quick google search resulted in a study in the National Library of Medicine that said only about 26% far from the vast majority the commentator seems to believe it is and calls into question her internet sleuthing ability. There are points where they seem to contradict themselves, like when they say there is no evidence of an injury after saying it was mentioned in the ambulance report by the EMT. It is strange how they seem to pick and choose what they believe, in some cases they believe what appears to be little more than rumors and seem to dismiss legal and/or medical reports. I think in ever episode I saw they agree with the official story and any mystery remains largely or entirely unexplained despite the show being titled (Re)solved as if it adds clarity or facts when it doesn't.
This show seemed interesting, expecting it to delve into the facts around deaths of famous people and eliminate the rumors. This show is based largely in rumors and speculation but in the end agree with the official report. The one commentator has a bachelors in IT but considers herself an internet sleuth. She does not have a degree in criminal investigations or even investigative journalism or any training in medicine she only knows what she can find on the internet. Which might be why she said that most times cpr is performed if breaks ribs. I originally got my cpr certification 20 years ago and kept renewing it and the fact is you break the sternum but you shouldn't break ribs especially in an adult male. If you do breaks ribs it is usually only a couple not 9. A quick google search resulted in a study in the National Library of Medicine that said only about 26% far from the vast majority the commentator seems to believe it is and calls into question her internet sleuthing ability. There are points where they seem to contradict themselves, like when they say there is no evidence of an injury after saying it was mentioned in the ambulance report by the EMT. It is strange how they seem to pick and choose what they believe, in some cases they believe what appears to be little more than rumors and seem to dismiss legal and/or medical reports. I think in ever episode I saw they agree with the official story and any mystery remains largely or entirely unexplained despite the show being titled (Re)solved as if it adds clarity or facts when it doesn't.
This is kind of interesting to watch at first, but then you suddenly stop and wonder why these people are even making this show?
The shows title is not at all what this show is about. It's about a couple of nobodies, pretending to be somebodies, talking about the deaths of celebrities and what they personally think, suspect, theorise and speculate, but in the end, not a shred of evidence to prove anything. Nothing is actually solved.
The most annoying one is Deanna Thompson who can't open her mouth without telling you about what other investigations she's appeared in. She just has tickets all over herself. She comes off as someone who believes self promotion means more than the death of somebody and how their family and friends would react having to watch her love and admiration for herself everytjme she opens her gob.
Overall, this show is nothing more than a useless series devoted to useless opinions. It might clear up how an actor died IF you didn't know already, or you didn't hear the whole story. But that's it. The rest is whoevers speaking personal opinion they want you to believe because it's what they believe.
Everything else is pointless background filler. At least shows like Unsolved Mysteries had updates and resolves now and then, this show has cases that no one will ever know the truth to. This show is the equivalent of a passing YouTube comment saying "I THINK the butler did it"
The shows title is not at all what this show is about. It's about a couple of nobodies, pretending to be somebodies, talking about the deaths of celebrities and what they personally think, suspect, theorise and speculate, but in the end, not a shred of evidence to prove anything. Nothing is actually solved.
The most annoying one is Deanna Thompson who can't open her mouth without telling you about what other investigations she's appeared in. She just has tickets all over herself. She comes off as someone who believes self promotion means more than the death of somebody and how their family and friends would react having to watch her love and admiration for herself everytjme she opens her gob.
Overall, this show is nothing more than a useless series devoted to useless opinions. It might clear up how an actor died IF you didn't know already, or you didn't hear the whole story. But that's it. The rest is whoevers speaking personal opinion they want you to believe because it's what they believe.
Everything else is pointless background filler. At least shows like Unsolved Mysteries had updates and resolves now and then, this show has cases that no one will ever know the truth to. This show is the equivalent of a passing YouTube comment saying "I THINK the butler did it"
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does (Re)Solved have?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant

Lacune principale
By what name was (Re)Solved (2023) officially released in Canada in English?
Répondre