Sharknado (TV Movie 2013) Poster

(2013 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
288 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
Sharknado Teaches That Cheesy Only Works When Its Entertaining
jaredpahl15 January 2017
Sharknado, the hit SyFy Channel original has positioned itself as critic-proof, cheeseball goofiness incarnate. The entire enterprise is a joke. Sharknado knows it is a cheesy SyFy original movie, and it doesn't apologize for it. It is tongue-in-cheek, self aware, and sarcastic. "How can you criticize this movie?" some might ask, "It's supposed to be goofy!". Well goofiness is great if it is entertaining. Sharknado is not entertaining in the least.

I'll skip the credits, skip the plot and get right down to business, this movie is a crappy made-for-TV snooze-fest, starring D-list celebrities and made by inept "filmmakers" who seem to have trouble differentiating between endearingly cheesy and downright bad. Sharknado is "critic-proof" because of the assumption that viewing the movie critically would expose its cheesiness, which is intentional. However, the problem with Sharknado is not that it is silly, it's that it is boring.

The cast has no charm, the effects are in a dead zone between not bad enough to be funny, and not good enough to be convincing, the look of the film is murky and dull, and the action scenes are incomprehensible and poorly edited. Sharknado is an absolute bore. It is an example of how a critic-proof, self-aware, tongue-in-cheek cheesefest can still go horribly wrong. Yes, I "get" Sharknado. It is meant to be a dumb B-movie, I understand, but dumb fun does require more than just conscious stupidity. Sharknado is not entertaining, a flaw that will sink any movie, whether it has shark-filled tornadoes or not.

20/100
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Brilliantly Awful
mafia-grim23 August 2013
While I give this one star, I strongly encourage everyone to see this movie. Not because it is good or has a single redeeming factor, but because if Ed Wood set out intentionally with an unlimited budget to make the worst movie ever, he could not have made something this bad.

The law of large numbers would seem to imply that in 86 minutes you'd have to get something right by accident, and yet this movie doesn't. A second look at Alien Apocalypse (which admittedly requires a masochistic nature to undertake) at least reveals passable cinematography and consistent lighting. And yet Sharknado rises above mathematics to give us a film that is bad in every single possible way.

Continuity is shrugged off completely. The same scene moves from daylight to dusk, rain to sunshine, storm surge to quiet beach, with every single new camera angle. It is so blatantly bad you are distracted from the more subtle inconsistencies like objects moving around, attire, wind, or quality of film from one cut to the next.

If you manage to close your eyes you are immediately taken in by the sound. How the sound editor managed to get to work on what had to be an acid-enhanced bender of epic proportions to warrant these results is beyond me. I'm reluctant to suggest using your stereo's sound-leveling technology for fear your sound system will simply melt from the strain.

One is almost loath to point a finger at suspension of disbelief when it comes to a movie whose premise is sharks in tornadoes, but whatever level you plan to come in with is almost surely going to fall far short. This movie has more WTF moments in 86 minutes than Lost could pull off in 86 seasons. And everyone gets to play, not just those with a working knowledge of wind shear or the physics that keep a helicopter in the air. If you've played pool, fished, surfed, driven a car in water deeper than two inches, been exposed to gravity, or otherwise in any way have interacted with or gained some understanding of the world around you, this movie has something for you to go "wha!?!" about.

And while you would think that once you had bad special effects, bad editing, and bad sound strung together you'd get at least one Bruce Campbell out of the cast to latch on to. Not so here, as every actor turned in a performance that shows they were more confused than the viewer about what was happening. We could guess it was because they were given the script out of order, but as a viewer of the final product I'm not sure I've seen the scenes in order, they are that disjointed.

I've tried very hard to find something that was done well or noteworthy about this movie and the only thing I can come up with is that it is the only movie I have ever seen that has failed on absolutely every level. If you tried to make a movie this bad you would inadvertently get something right purely on accident. And that is its one bright, shining point of light. That it would be almost impossible to make something this terrible ever again.
257 out of 280 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A whirl wind into the sublimely ridiculous
MartianOctocretr512 July 2013
With a title like Sharknado, you expect weird. This movie delivers.

Grab some friends, lots of snacks, and a mammoth amount of suspension of disbelief. You're now ready for SyFy channel's latest escapade into the realm of the psychotically silly. This movie acts upon the mind like a mind altering substance, taking it to a land of shark-infested water spouts, science gone mad, absurd visuals, and movie making run amok. Riffing is optional; the movie is goofy and deranged either way.

A freak-storm turns into tornadoes/water spouts that vacuum up a zillion sharks that are swimming around and whisks them off to southern California. Some of the finny predators are pitched into local freeways and everywhere else, while other sharks continue to spin around in the hurricane. The sharks take no prisoners as they swim around soggy streets and wreak havoc with laughable CGI attacks. I did notice however that they obeyed all traffic laws while they swam through the streets.

This movie swims its way ever further into the realms of the jawbone dropping bizarre, with several key scenes to be on the lookout for. Look for the random one-in-a-million rescue near the end, and the wacky idea the heroes use to try and save the day. This sort of chaos is common throughout the entire movie.

Kudos to the movie makers for this pure unabashed nonsense.
71 out of 81 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
We're gonna need a bigger chopper!
Let me just say that I watched this movie to be entertained—not enthralled or hanging on the edge of my seat but just distracted and carefree for a couple of hours. I got what I wanted. Only, I didn't expect to laugh so much. I'm thankful for the laughter, though, because it kept at bay any sort of aesthetic sense that might have interfered with my viewing pleasure.

Regardless of genre, most movies are a construction of thoughtfully planned scenes, each of which presenting plot points and character motivations that, together, form a plausible narrative, allowing for the proverbial "suspension of disbelief." Such careful craftsmanship is never more important than at a film's beginning. The creators of Sharknado didn't bother with any of that.

There is an opening sequence involving a fishing boat on a stormy sea. On board a greedy captain in a raincoat and an Asian man in a three- piece suit squabble about money (presumably for some nefarious service performed by the captain). Handguns are soon brandished, bullets are fired, and chomping sharks are washed on deck by the waves (à la The Perfect Storm). People are shot or eaten, and a massive water spout filled with digitally-rendered sharks stretches into the sky. Then the opening credits begin rolling, and it's as if that scene never happened. Other than the brief preview of the "sharknado" to come at the end of the second act (yes, I'm taking some liberties by using standard film vernacular to describe this storyline), it was as if this scene was jumbled together from leftover footage of some other SyFy shark movie. Did this bother me? Nope. In fact, it wasn't until after the movie's end that I even remembered the ship's captain and the shootout on the water. By then, I was still grinning too much to care.

One grin-evoking moment occurs when Nova, the leading female character played by Cassie Scerbo, stabs a shark to death with a cue stick in a bar. While this isn't the first shark encounter for the protagonists or even the first shark-on-land encounter, it does seem to set the tone for the rest of the movie. Anthony Ferrante, the director, wants everyone to realize that this is not—and does not aspire to be—Jaws.

Though he need not worry about anyone mistaking this shark movie for Steven Spielberg's classic, Ferrante repeatedly makes references to it. I won't use terms such as "allusion" or even "homage" to describe these references. Perhaps "farcical" might be more appropriate, or maybe "comic relief," but even those terms lend themselves to a more contemplative critique than I am attempting.

I think Ferrante's purpose was to preemptively counter all would-be critics who might say things like "This is no Jaws." He could have just titled the movie Another Killer Shark Film That Is Not Jaws. But that would have been too self-effacing and certainly not as much fun.

In carrying out this strategy, Ferrante doesn't waste much time. Moments after the sharks begin plopping onto the streets and docks, Fin—a bar-owner, father and former pro-surfer played by Ian Ziering of Beverly Hills, 90210 fame—makes quick work of one by shooting a diver's air tank that is jutting out of its gullet, causing it and the shark to explode. Remind you of anything? Yep, there's even a corny one-liner: "That's what you get for trying to eat me."

Later we have a quasi-touching expository scene that reveals Nova's pre-established hatred of sharks. The character of Fin's son, Matt, played by Chuck Hittinger, notices an unusual scar on Nova's thigh. To get her to talk about it, he lifts up his shirt and reveals a scar on his abdomen and explains its not-so-dramatic origin. When he asks Nova how she got her scar, she says she had a tattoo removed. Not buying it, Matt prods further and Nova tells a story about going fishing with her grandfather and his friends when she was a little girl. She says that their boat sank and sharks began to circle and attack them. The men managed to lift her out of the water and onto something floating nearby, but a shark still managed to take a hunk out of her leg. In summation, Nova says: "Six people went into the water and one little girl came out. The sharks took the rest."

The scene in Jaws in which Robert Shaw's character Quint tells the tale of the sinking of the USS Indionapolis is arguably one of the most memorable scenes in film history. Ferrante knows this. Nova's scar story, in a tongue-in-cheek sort of way, serves to again make the director's statement: "I am aware of Jaws, as is everyone in the civilized world, and this is not that movie!"

Later, this same point is made again, this time even more comically and pointedly. After fabricating some propane bombs, Nova and Matt take to the skies in a helicopter to hunt the tornadoes. Matt flies perilously close to one of the funnel clouds so that Nova can toss one of the bombs into it. She sees an enormous shark coming straight at them and declares: "We're gonna need a bigger chopper."

If you want to be moderately entertained, then I don't think you will be disappointed with Sharknado. Don't expect too much going into it—and bring with you a willingness to suspend your own sense of disbelief. Most important, keep in mind that this is not Jaws. I don't think that fact will slip you mind, however. The director made sure of it.
72 out of 98 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Doing bad movies the wrong way
extracrap199810 August 2014
People seem to think that this is the be all end all of bad movies when in actuality the movie was made this way on purpose. The thing that separates a good bad movie from a bad bad movie is intent. Take The Room for example. When Tommy Wiseau was making that movie, he had the best intentions and really thought that it was going to be a great movie. This is what makes it so satisfying to watch this movie. Wiseau put a lot of time and effort into it and it was utter crap. Sharknado was made to be dumbed down to reach their target audience and make them feel smarter than the movie. You can't point and laugh at the director because this is what he wanted all along. What makes a film "So bad it's good" is sincerity. Movies like Machete or Sharknado or the latest Asylum Mockbuster are either intentionally shitty or crass cash-grabs. Great terrible movies like the Room, Miami Connection, and Birdemic are completely sincere and honest in there awfulness, and that's what makes them special. Sharknado is just ruining the experience of bad movies for people. All in all, if you truly are interested in bad movies, I recommend you watch something like Troll 2 or Miami Connection. Then again, what do I know? I'm just some asshole on the internet.
51 out of 72 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
If only you could vote in negative...
mathew-pike5 October 2013
You have probably seen a whole bunch of reviews saying that it's so bad it's good. Well it's so bad it's worse than bad.

Do not waste your time with this movie. There is no continuity between scenes, one second it's flooding then in the next scene the streets are dry. The acting is terrible, the special effects are less than special.

Lastly, poor Tara, she had some good movies under her belt, but this is the latest in a downward spiral for her acting career. It seems like she has been taking acting lessons from the rest of the cast because her performance is no better than the rest.

Please watch something else. I beg you.
31 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Perfect Storm
thestarkfist12 July 2013
When waterspouts meet sharks they form the Perfect Storm of TERROR!! Just kidding! If you're looking for terror you'll have to look someplace else. This movie is as stupid as its title implies! I don't think Syfy is even trying to make good movies anymore. This flick looks and feels like some very silly people devoted an entire weekend to producing it. It fails on almost every level possible. It's impossible to say whether the producers intended this thing to be funny or not but I guarantee that you'll find yourself laughing at what you see on the screen. The "Oh Come ON!" moments abound in this crapsterpiece! In fact, if you can lay your hands on a DVD of this thing, the last half hour is not to be missed. You literally will not believe that anyone would ever commit something this idiotic to celluloid. So, if you're looking for spine-tingling chills, then avoid this movie at all costs. If, however, MST3K-worthy crap is your cup of tea then getcha a big bowl of popcorn, settle back and enjoy!
41 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Like Finding Nemo but with all sharks...and tornadoes.
halen1342011 July 2013
For anyone who hasn't seen the SyFy original movie, Sharknado; it's a heart-warming, coming of age story about a ragtag group of sharks uprooted from their home by mother nature's fury. The sharks must band together and overcome adversity and strife while trying, desperately, to make their way back to the only home they've ever known. Battling chainsaw wielding humans and B-list actors trying, desperately, to throw themselves into the displaced sharks' mouths every chance they get. If you love sharks and tornadoes, well...now you don't have to choose! Do yourself a favor and see this one before the Oscars! Sharknado is, truly, the cinematic experience of a lifetime.
824 out of 983 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Enough Said!
marshagentry24 July 2013
Instead of frequently used movie adjectives such as "Riveting," or "Unbelievable," the "Sharknado" billboard uses the descriptive words, "Enough Said." I don't know why but these words make me laugh, and they set the tone for this ridiculously silly movie. I love scary movies when the enemy is not a real threat to me or any other movie watcher. Therefore, I don't watch stalker or slasher movies.

There are sharks coming from every direction when they're catapulted into the sky by a freak storm that carries them everywhere. No place is safe.

Common sense is rarely used in this type of movie. I'll admit that "The Birds" is in a different league, but I always wonder why no one thinks to wear a hat that could deter at least some of the birds for awhile, especially a construction hat or football helmet. In Sharknado the sharks are vicious and hungry. Why no one in this movie can get away from these sharks baffles me. There are so many that its easy to get pelted by one. Pelted and then chewed, even swallowed. No one seems to remember that sharks can't walk or run on the land. Once they land on the ground, they would be stuck without rushing water to move them along.. Our hero---played by Ian Ziering---and his family and friends must take a proactive approach to fight these big fish while waiting for the torrential storms to pass.

This movie has some great foreshadowing. You can predict that certain characters will not be around much longer. But who cares? If you don't mind watching people get dismembered, or even swallowed, you may enjoy this movie as much as I did.
19 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Geeky Randy's summary
Geeky Randy7 August 2014
Is it the worst movie ever made? No. The cinematography is not half-bad, it's not afraid to kill off some key characters, and Jaason Simmons is somewhat worth rooting for. But is it awful? Absolutely. Many viewers who have assisted this garbage in attaining some sort of pathetic cult status insist the amateur CGI, bad acting and ridiculous premise is what makes this film so fun to watch. No… just… no. There are parts that really stink of effort, which completely ruins any chance of this movie having any sort of it's-so-bad-it's-good quality. There are many turkeys to choose from for Bad Movie Night, and SHAKRNADO isn't one of them. You'll make better use of your time staring at a blank wall.

* (out of four)
16 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Is there any possible way to give it less than 1 star?
dgattis516 July 2015
I'm going to start off by saying that this movie was absolute crap! I know that the premise is intended to be stupid but that no excuse for it's terrible casting, story structure, and character development! The actors in this movie are absolute crap! It's almost as if they aren't even human, they're cyborgs that speak very dull and have no kind of development whatsoever. It's movies like this that proves that the general public will watch whatever piece of crap is on television! If you watch this movie all the way through, I can guarantee that you will either lose a lot of brain cells, or puke at the repulsing sight of this god awful movie!
14 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Bad movie, great comic relief
Mafpmf1712 July 2013
The title should have been a heads-up for me. Sharknado is undoubtedly one of the most painfully stupid movies I have seen in a long time. The dialog is pin-headed, events and actions repeatedly defy the laws of nature and physics and some of the more dramatic moments were actually laugh-out-loud funny. A lame and overly ambitious mishmash of Jaws meets Twister meets Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Sharknado's greatest and most enduring value will likely be the comic relief it provides. Just because the movie takes itself too seriously doesn't mean YOU have to! If nothing else, it could make for an entertaining pizza-and-beer B (or C or D)-movie night with the gang.
25 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Gloriously Incompetent and Gleefully Terrible
flixspix12 July 2013
And yet with a group of pals you would be hard pressed to find a better time. Absolutely nothing make sense. Physics and natural laws are ignored. Horrible CGI and cringe-worthy dialog. Outrageous continuity exceeded only by horrible color correction and clunky editing. The all together wooden acting no doubt achieved in single takes is sincere, earnest and fails on levels that should win awards.

And you can't stop watching. My friends, yelled, laughed, joked, stomped, laughed some more and had a fine time. Now how many times can you say that watching a movie? It literally becomes an interactive experience.

It is surely a classic. Not sure exactly what kind. But it is a classic.
395 out of 477 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It's a terrible joy.
Sleepin_Dragon7 January 2018
I can't understand why the film has such a low rating, sure it's.a shocker, but for originality and sheer audacity it's a six minimum. It's almost like a zombie film was intended but at the very last minute someone burst into the office and said let's use sharks and have tornados. It's not meant to be taken seriously, I don't think the producers looked for awards, instead they delivered ninety minutes of enjoyable nonsense. Some of the effects are ok, some are pretty poor, they do however beat the stock footage shots. Plenty of continuity errors, rain one moment, dry the next etc, but I won't knock it any more, that would be too easy. It's ridiculous, outrageous, but funny and imaginative, that line 'we're gonna need a bigger chopper' felt like a thumbs up to the greatest shark movie of all time. A guilty pleasure.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sharknado!!
dcsmith7912 July 2013
I only wish this movie had been released to Drive-In theaters and been promoted on a twin bill with any other low rent/grade/brow cinematic masterpiece from the ill human beings at SyFy.

To paraphrase Elvis Costello- I just don't know where to begin.. Wooden acting, special effects from a Midwestern middle school science fair, a script that veers wildly from insipid to bizarre to total nonsense, actors that should face summary execution if they made only scale and still cashed their paychecks, a director that makes Ed Wood look like Ingmar Bergman. In other words a glorious triumph of B-grade movie making..

As you take in the visceral train wreck (that could only be better if released in grainy 8mm), you are reminded of what good/bad scifi is. Absolute suspension of disbelief, pure enjoyment of the insanity of it all, and a curious thought that you could not enjoy life more if you were shotgunned Thai sticks by Godzilla himself..

It is the generic Twinkie of B movies. Made all the better by the fact that it IS a cheap, sickeningly self indulgent wad of fluff that you feel doubly guilty of consuming.

God help me I do love it so....
60 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
So bad it's good? No, it's just bad
michaelradny28 July 2015
Don't get me wrong, this is a fun movie to create a drinking game around but that's it. Even if you just take this film at its face value, it's still a drag to get through and it will have you wishing you never started it in the first place. Everything from the filming, to the story (obviously) and the acting is third rate and the continuity is laughable, but come on what is to be expected.

I'm not uptight, but this is bad. Maybe if you switch 99% of your brain off you can appreciate it, but for the normal person this will be the worst decision of your life. Thanks for the 90 minutes I will never see again; 90 minutes of bad CGI sharks and chainsaw wielding protagonists.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Absolutely gorgeous movie
salt-shaker9621 July 2013
Absolutely atrocious, I had big expectations because an acquaintance of mine talked this movie up to be a brilliant flick. He compared it to Star Wars, stating that it was actually better and "if there were more movies in the series, it would out gross the two Star Wars trilogies." - Harry 'S'.

I understand that this movie was supposed to be corny and unrealistic, but it was just put together so poorly. I did not find this movie funny at any point, not the one liners or the pure corniness, and I've laughed at some pretty bad B grade movies *cough* Zombie Nation *cough*. Anyway I was thoroughly disappointed, even looking at this as a B grade film, it was worse than Bait. They didn't even hire Julian McMahon to uplift the unpleasantness of this flick. I would much rather do the work in year 12 Biology than sit through that film again.

Bottom line, don't watch this movie unless you find pleasure in terribly made films that are bland of all humor.
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
No excuses for this abysmal movie.
aforandromeda5 October 2014
From the people that brought you Mega Shark vs. Giant Octopus and Nazis at the Centre of the Earth, comes perhaps their most talked about and ludicrous movie yet. Yes, the Asylum and SyFy serve up more abysmal dross masquerading as a 'cult' movie. Sharknado follows a ragtag group of survivors of the worst hurricane to ever hit California, complete with multitudes of sharks being washed ashore after huge tidal waves. However, the tornadoes follow and guess what? That's right! They're full of hungry sharks!

This is truly bad, even by the execrable standards of SyFy movies. It's not even as if it's awful because of the bonkers high concept, it's simply a badly made movie on so many levels. The acting is, as expected, uniformly atrocious, with the exception of Cassandra Scerbo as Nova. She throws herself gamely into the nonsensical mayhem and may actually have a respectable career ahead of her. As for the rest, including Ian Ziering (a cinematic equivalent of porridge) as Fin and Tara Reid as his ex-wife what's-her-name, they're truly terrible. The lines between the cast are delivered so poorly, you wonder if all the scenes were directed by the second unit while the director was having a nap. Then there's the fact that editing and continuity are dreadful, with scenes making little sense as a result. There's no suspense, things just happen with no regard for timing and as far as the cars exploding and houses imploding for no reason whatsoever go, don't even get me started.

Then there's the sharks. The crappy, unconvincing CGI sharks. They really do look awful and not in the least bit realistic, so any attempts at portraying shark infested terror raining from the skies fall immediately flat. Mind you, surely the sharks would have asphyxiated being out of water for so long? The concept for this movie is unspeakably stupid and just does not work at any stage.

Although Sharknado is of course low budget tosh, there are no excuses for film making of such execrable standards. There are movies out there with even lower budgets that stand head and shoulders above this rubbish in every conceivable department. This is all so ineptly done by the crew involved, that even a budget twenty times higher would result in Sharknado being just as bad. My appeal to potential viewers of this movie is thus; ignore the hype and the fact that The Asylum want Sharknado to be instantly 'cult'. Take a bite out of something else, in fact just about anything else, not many movies out there are as unbearably bad as this one.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
just plain silly
erick212321 November 2013
Don't want to be black listed so im just gone say it was one of the most stupid films I've ever seen. If you must watch this movie you'll see what i mean. And the silly woman that gave this 10 stars and said tara reid emotionally connected with her because of the sharks is just lost. I dearly apologize if there are special issues there. I've just seen this on free to air TV. But i still want my money back i want to be bloody compensated for have seeing such utter crap. This is my first review on this site. I just had to have my say and hoped I've saved a family or couple a few hours of there life! your welcome. Im confident you could pick a better movie blind folded at the video shop or random clicking buttons on the pirate bay . Yours truly Erick
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Today's weather forecast: stormy with a chance of ... sharks?
Coventry3 November 2013
And here it finally is; the most retarded movie of the year 2013! Not coincidentally, this dubious honor practically always goes to a masterpiece from "The Asylum" studios. I didn't think it would be possible to come up with something even worse and more imbecilic than "Mega Piranha" or "2-Headed Shark Attack", but once again I've been proved wrong! "Sharknado" is the most ultimate "switch-off-all-of-your-brain-functions-and-laugh-out-loud" monster movie vehicle ever made and therefore the ideal junk to watch after midnight with some buddies and a whole truckload of beer and pizza. Quite obviously, the Asylum-formula works very effectively: cast a bunch of washed up Hollywood stars in degrading roles (that they don't even seem to mind), hire an army of marijuana-addicted monkeys to pen down the most over-the-top absurd screenplay imaginable (including deliberate mistakes and impossible twists) and waste the little bit of budget that you have on preposterous digital effects. The usually sunny and carefree coast of Los Angeles gets hit by stormy weather, and the tornadoes are so powerful that they shovel up man-eating sharks from the ocean and catapult them onto the streets. Never mind that these animals essentially need water to survive, because here they cheerfully continue their munching in the air and on dry land. The amount of nonsense and ineptitude in this film is nearly impossible to sum up. People are struggling to escape from the sharks in the pouring rain, while two streets further down the sun is shining brightly and everyone is minding their own business. Vicious 1,000lb tiger sharks are swimming around in the hero's living room, while outside the front door there isn't a single drop of water on the driveway. The storm winds are forceful enough to tear loose the letters of the Hollywood sign, but the people manage to remain standing on their feet. There's plenty more similar foolishness like this, as well as ridiculous gore (sawing sharks in half with a chainsaw, anyone?) and moronic dialogs (we're gonna need a bigger chopper). The nicest thing you could say about "Sharknado" is that it isn't pretentious, misleading or boring. It's awful rubbish, and traditionally I just have to reward it with the lowest possible score, but I'm not embarrassed to admit I was tremendously amused.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
One of those movies where the premise alone gives you a good idea of how the movie is going to turn out
TheLittleSongbird22 July 2013
Far from great, and it is easy for anybody- regardless of whether they are taking it too seriously or not- to criticise it, but Sharknado is also one of SyFy's/The Asylum's more tolerable and most fun to watch movies. That is saying a lot actually because usually with a few exceptions they are terrible(sometimes irredeemably so) There are some negatives that is difficult to overlook. The worst asset was the acting of Tara Reid, she doesn't look as though she was having any fun at all and acted at times like a porn actress trying to act, very mechanical and ill at ease. John Heard also has moments where he overacts to a painful degree, but still he looks as though he's trying so he isn't as problematic. The next worst thing were the special effects(nearly always one of the worst assets of their movies, so that was expected), they are some of the better effects to appear in SyFy's/The Asylum's output but the fact that they look so artificial and though they were made in a rush doesn't make that say very much. Thankfully, the melodrama and exposition is mostly kept minimal, but when Sharknado does go into that territory it falls flat with some overwrought clunkiness and where things lag slightly, not a surprise because exposition and melodrama has always been one of SyFy's/The Asylum's weak points. And if you are looking to see if there is any plausible science, look for another movie because the science here is rather dumb and impossible, enough to make scientists or anybody studying or teaching it despair.

Flaws aside, the exotic locations and photography that looks as though effort was made into making what was happening on screen coherent made for a movie that for how bad the effects are was serviceable technically. The music has a couple of creepy moments without being too derivative, but generally it stays true to the snappy tongue-in-cheek nature of the writing and story. The script can go overboard with the corniness at times but mostly it is witty and tongue-in-cheek, the banter is very amusing and the "looks like it's that time of the month" line is a classic, as well as snappily delivered. As for the story, really we can tell from the premise alone what to expect from Sharknado and what the quality is going to be. Reading the premise, it was clear that Sharknado was going to be ridiculous. And it was, and it was also clear that the movie and those behind it knew it as well. The difference was though that it was entertaining too(and the most original SyFy/The Asylum have had in a long time), the movie is surprisingly well paced and actually has a cohesive structure at times, helped by that it's not as melodrama/exposition-heavy as some of their other movies and that it actually knows what to do with itself. The sharks are not very well designed, but they actually have a personality, sometimes menacing but often with a goofy sense of fun, which makes their scenes fun. Their scenes admittedly are hilariously chaotic and incredibly dumb but interweave within the nature of the story very well, there are even scenes that are bust-a-gut-laughing-worthy, like character chainsawing their way out of a shark. The characters are not well developed, neither are they annoying. Likewise the acting isn't award worthy, but there's been much worse. The best of the lot is Ian Ziering, he's very funny and has good charisma, the character starts out a little obnoxious but you actually grow to like him.

All in all, not a great movie with some obvious flaws and maybe overpraised by some reviewers, but it is a lot of fun to watch and for a SyFy/Asylum movie it is one of their better ones. Not a 10/10 movie but nowhere near bad enough for a 1. Personal rating would be a 6/10, sort of a decent/guilty pleasure rating. Bethany Cox
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
hilarious idea, ran into the ground by terrible filmmaking.
glambot500020 February 2014
Let me preface this review by saying that I LOVE terrible, ridiculous, campy movies- especially those of the horror genre. I've seen every Troma movie at least twice, and dragged my sister kicking and screaming to see Piranha 3D with me. That being said, this movie was insanely hard to get through, and I was highly disappointed and genuinely mad at my friends who hyped it and suggested it to me. Perhaps the filmmakers should have allotted less of the budget towards luring Tara Reid out of oblivion, and more on, say, hiring a decent editor. I can stomach bad acting, bad writing, bad special effects no problem. But I am not kidding when I say a high schooler could have done a better job editing this film. But I guess as long as you have a hilarious and genius concept, you can crank out a complete turd of a film and people will still be into it.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
unbelievably bad
topping6511 July 2013
I do believe this is the worst movie I have ever seen. I know this channel is infamous for terrible movies and I have seen most of them.So I came in with very low expectations and I was still stunned. I have never seen a movie so chopped up and put together.One minute there are tidal waves of water & tornadoes, dry streets and sunny skies the next.The surfing scene is a great example of what I'm talking about. Everything is beyond preposterous and no explanations given. The budget for this movie must have been a Lincoln and a pack of gum. It's actually so bad, that it's not even funny. You're too busy going wha tha fa to even laugh.The terrible and ridiculous ending is the perfect way for this movie to end.
100 out of 160 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The Best "Sharks in a Tornado" Movie...EVER!
jmillerdp11 July 2013
...um, but of course, it's the only "Sharks in a Tornado" movie ever. :-) It's from The Asylum, the studio responsible (can you call The Asylum "responsible?") for close-to-day-and-date ripoffs like "Snakes on a Train," etc.

So, you know this is going to be really dopey and really silly! And, with The Asylum, you know it's going to have LOTS of filler. Getting to the "good stuff" is going to take getting through a fair amount of random character interaction.

Listen, we want to get to the sharks...in the tornado...NOW! Plus, if you've seen the trailer, you've seen a lot of the "Money Shots." But, the cast and crew are game, and the effects are fun, helped by the fact that they are getting more affordable to do these days.

Plus, SyFy Channel needs content, and The Asylum is more than happy to oblige! On a related note: Have you noticed that there has been exactly ONE good shark movie ever? Yes, "Jaws" was it. Its own sequels really sucked! And, movies like "Deep Blue Sea," etc. were almost as bad. Is it really that difficult to make a good shark movie? No, it can't be!

**** (4 Out of 10 Stars)
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
And they made five more of these?
Aaron137524 September 2018
I finally watched this strange flick, as me and my fiance enjoy watching shark movies. I call it a strange flick, mainly due to the fact that it has some sort of strange appeal to the point of spawning five sequels despite none of them having a very high score. I guess it is because people like riffing the films, but these films are a bit too easy to riff as they have so many faults to them. The premise and plot are utterly stupid, the effects aren't very good and most of the characters are very lame...though I did like the old guy and his bar stool.

So the story has a bunch of sharks coming up to the coast of California in record number due to a hurricane that is caused by global warming. Get used to that if you watch other shark films from Asylum, it is their go to cause for everything! Well a dude who runs a bar, a patron, some Australian and a hot waitress end up trying to flee amid sharks dropping from the sky. They go to rescue the bar owner's wife and daughter all while encountering one shark event after another, often times making little sense. Soon they hatch a plan to defeat the tornadoes! Yes, you read that right...

The plot is utter garbage. Sharks falling from the sky that somehow stay alive and still want to eat. I would think they would be severely injured and since they would be suffocating wouldn't be much in the mood for chomping anything. Also, the tornadoes in this film look bad, how hard is it to render a tornado, they did it in Wizard of Oz better than this! I am pretty sure an explosion would not dissipate a tornado and I don't think you could fly a copter that close to one. I am also pretty sure even if that one girl was alive in the shark, the guy launching himself in the shark with a chainsaw straight ahead would have taken her out too.

So maybe I am being too hard on this film, but it is utter crap and they pretty much made it that way. This in turn makes people watch out of morbid curiosity and to riff said film which makes viewers and so they are purposely making bad films which is kind of a smart move, but at the same time it is not the same as riffing a film that is bad, but the filmmakers thought they were making something good. Not sure if I'll watch anymore in this series, I just do not see it improving or changing things up vastly.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed