Assault on Hill 400 (2023) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
Not worth the time
hrid-9238531 July 2023
Bad acting for the most part with a weak plot. Michael Madsen and Billy Baldwin's performance is severely lacking. These actors (and I use that term loosely for this movie) need to hang it up, if you see their names in a movie, it's going to be one to avoid. The best acting came from the nurse, who has a minor part and Eric Roberts is underutilized; mainly just clicking a camera every few seconds.

Some of the gear and uniforms were okay, while others are really poor quality; you can see better at a reenactment. It's apparent that there was no technical advisor and the Germans are for the most part laughable.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
This is joke. Bad one.
dejanstan11 August 2023
I like war movies, not because I am a military person (on contrary, I don't like period when I served in army). This should be "Band of brothers" kind of movie, no? Not by a light year.

I can forgive bad script and unrealistic dialogs. I can forgive amateur-like camera, and music like someone is turning on some classical music radio station on and off. What really bothers me is very bad acting and the fact that actors look like nobody ever saw any army nor any arms in their entire life. Their moves during the battles, kids that play Counter Strike know much better. Germans stand upright in opened space and shoot? Who does it, really? Right na ded soldiers stay behind the tree and shoot from the left side of it??? And so on, and so on. I had no stomach for this. This movie is such a waste of time and energy. Not sure about talent, didn't see much of it there.

If you like war dramas, skip this one. Better watch Band Of Brothers, or "Saving..." or... simply choose any random decent war movie.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
prob shouldnt review since walked away 5 mins into watching
gabs444-879-8463931 August 2023
After managing to not gag (with some effort) at the cliche'd lines being uttered during the innitial brief of the mission near start of the film, i could watch no more due to the annoying cameraman following the platoon clicking his camera shutter loud enough to drown out the lines being uttered by the overly talkative patrol moving thru the woods, presumably expecting to be attacked at any time from their stances, but never in a million years expecting to be ambushed behind enemy lines from their incescant talking.

Since i could'nt watch it further in disgust at known actors putting their name to an asylum movie as much as the annoyance at the film itself i probably shouldnt have wrote a review, but thought i may as well in hope people who like to make their own minds up about how bad a movie is like me may think twice about actually bothering if i described how far i got into the movie before gave up and wished i had taken notice of the reviews mysel in this preticular case ;P.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Worth a Watch
derekwiner1 August 2023
Not as bad as reviewed here.

Yes the acting is stale at times, but the ordnance and elements of realism make up for it. For me; dirty uniforms, dirty faces, and realistic firefights go a long way to making a war movie watchable. Arguably the dialogue is the likeliest of culprits towards holding back this movie. There are some interesting camera shots, though camera work is wildly inconsistent with down angles in the wrong spots and such... at least the settings are well thought out and visually interesting. If they'd have added some swearing, cigarette smoking, a military advisor for the script and some heavy machinery- this would be a welcome addition to the WWII playlist.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What's With All These Crappy War Movies Recently?!?
docbennett-472-5573299 January 2024
How to do a better job on this production?

First, hire a military consultant. That would get by the majority of the issues.

Next, hiring an acting coach. Not a really expensive one. Maybe a director from the Little Theater of east New Jersey.

Taking these two steps would great enhance the production value of this movie.

Then the next step would be to follow just a little of the historical facts associated with this battle.

This film is almost a disservice to the memory of the heroes that fought in this battle.

Dialogue is awful, could could have used a little polishing.

If nothing else I learned to never watch a film directed by this guy.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Asylum
chardy215 February 2024
Best thing the producers did was use Eastern Costume for the wardrobe or this film would have a 2/10 rating. I would expect better from an Asylum movie by now. Just grabbing a couple veteran actors is not enough to overcome bland script and poor special effects. Set locations were also very bad along with camera work. Cinematography is almost non existent save for one scene opener showing the hills with some very dense low fog. As far as the "battle sequences", not in any way plausible. So much for the crack German troops that were mentioned by the general with his helmet on in the HQ. Only other + was shooting on Red Digital. Thumbs down!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worst war film this decade
bonziuk29 December 2023
I am an avid war film watcher. The acting in this film is one of the worst I have seen. Helmets that don't fit and over their eyes, shooting from the most ridiculous positions you can imagine, and a pillbox that apparently can fire bullets that come back and it the wall below from slot they are firing from /facepalm

Then there is 5 soldiers that take out a farmhouse without being noticed by the obs point in an upstairs window, despite crossing a 300m open field!

As someone else mentioned German soldiers standing in open spaces in the line of fire waiting to get shot my goodness...

don't waste your time folks.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Usually love, cheesy warm movies, but this was the pits
EricTheDead13 February 2024
Saw this movie listed with a couple of actors I like thought it might be a fun movie to watch. This was an insult to my father and my uncles who fought in the second world war. Me and my dad used to watch all the old gung ho, American movies From World War II and some of those were really cheesy and we loved them but this is an insult for the intelligence to people firing rifles with the bolts not even moving machine guns bullet belts aren't even moving while firing a nurse with really bad German accent. I would never recommend this movie to anyone. It is a total waste of time. There are so many better movies out there to watch than this one, particularly on the subject of World War II.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed