The best part about this movie is seeing Morgan Freeman, Michael Caine, and Alan Arkin all on screen together. They have fantastic chemistry, and you really feel like their characters have actually been friends for 30+ years. They just glow on screen, and seeing them riff on each other and have a good time made for me to have a good time as well. They all gave great performances. The supporting cast was also really good. It was fun to see Christopher Lloyd pop up in a film again. We also got see some good performances from Kenan Thompson and Ann-Margret. Look, with this movie, there are no revolutionary jokes. It's everything you would expect there to be. I do tend to prefer edgier comedy than this, but I made my peace with it the second the first joke hit. This isn't meant to be a Seth Rogen kind of comedy. This is supposed to just be a fun, light- hearted, feel-good comedy, and it was really good for what it was...
163 Reviews
Retired (?)
kosmasp16 October 2017
Let's hope not, for a long time. While it's not a perfect movie, the 3 leads are so charismatic, they carry anything the movie throws at them. Some things may bit coincidental and may feel too convenient, but again you won't be thinking about that while watching the movie. You know a couple of things just by watching the movie and you can almost guess the "twists" entirely.
That still doesn't take away too much of the fun you can have while watching it. Dialog is nice and they play into the generation thing (social media, wordplay and of course limitations of age). But all in a really respectful way and yet still funny. If you like to have a good old time (no pun intended), you could do worse
That still doesn't take away too much of the fun you can have while watching it. Dialog is nice and they play into the generation thing (social media, wordplay and of course limitations of age). But all in a really respectful way and yet still funny. If you like to have a good old time (no pun intended), you could do worse
Like Eating Comfort Food
bankofmarquis11 April 2017
The new film, GOING IN STYLE, is the equivalent of eating a Grilled Cheese Sandwich with Tomato Soup on a cold, rainy Sunday afternoon - very familiar, very welcome and very comforting. It's not going to win any Academy Awards or change the course of movie history, but this film delivers - competently and professionally - what it promises to deliver with no fuss and no muss.
Starring film veterans Michael Caine, Morgan Freeman and Alan Arkin, GOING IN STYLE tells the story of how these three are pressed against the wall, financially, and their last resort is to rob a bank to get the money they need.
And...it's fun...not hilarious...not groundbreaking, but fun. Caine, Freeman and Arkin believably play 3 long time friends who are nearing the end. There is a comfort there with each other and it was pleasant to spend time with them. Joining them was the one and only Ann- Margret and the always fun Christopher Lloyd (in, hands down, the best performance and most interesting character in the film).
Notice, I've used the words comforting, pleasant and pleasing. I did NOT use the words groundbreaking, hilarious or epic. I certainly enjoyed myself and am glad I saw it.
And you will too, whether you see this film in the movie theater or run across it as you are lying on the couch some rainy Sunday afternoon.
Letter Grade: a solid "B"
7 (out of 10) stars and you can take that to the Bank (of Marquis)
Starring film veterans Michael Caine, Morgan Freeman and Alan Arkin, GOING IN STYLE tells the story of how these three are pressed against the wall, financially, and their last resort is to rob a bank to get the money they need.
And...it's fun...not hilarious...not groundbreaking, but fun. Caine, Freeman and Arkin believably play 3 long time friends who are nearing the end. There is a comfort there with each other and it was pleasant to spend time with them. Joining them was the one and only Ann- Margret and the always fun Christopher Lloyd (in, hands down, the best performance and most interesting character in the film).
Notice, I've used the words comforting, pleasant and pleasing. I did NOT use the words groundbreaking, hilarious or epic. I certainly enjoyed myself and am glad I saw it.
And you will too, whether you see this film in the movie theater or run across it as you are lying on the couch some rainy Sunday afternoon.
Letter Grade: a solid "B"
7 (out of 10) stars and you can take that to the Bank (of Marquis)
Going Back To Traditional Style
rgkarim7 April 2017
The age of comedy has certainly changed over the years, transitioning from the classic slapstick to a simpler, straightforward approach that today's youth loves. Yet, every once in a while, the legends from the past return in an attempt to bring some whit back to the silver screen. Tonight, my friend and I head back into the trenches of the local theater to give some insight into Going in Style starring the legendary trio of Morgan Freeman, Alan Arkin, and Michael Caine. Let's get started!
LIKES: Classic comedy Good chemistry between actors Cute Nicely tied together story
Summary: If the intro didn't spoil it for you, Going in Style is true to its name, as the trio brings the classic comedy back into style. Fans of the slapstick of yore are going to bust a gut at this film as the timeless styles of the leads continue to shine bright. Caine and Freeman have comedic timing and delivery down, with clever lines craftily intertwined in the serious dialogue that put today's writing to shame. Arkin on the other hand is all about the banter and complaining, which for the most part is balanced and well-placed. The trio have great chemistry together, and sell that they are best friends who have faced the challenge called life. They sell the struggles and praise the joys, and do it with such class and minimizing the stupid, mindless banter famous today. And in addition to being funny, the lack of crude comedy also makes this movie cute. Watching older men trying to rob a bank, while also getting their lives in order makes for an adorable adventure as my friend commented. Of course, this reviewer likes a story to his comedy, and Going in Style gets this right too. It's a hardy story for most ages, and one that won't have the older audience members shaking their heads in shame. This may also surprise you, but there were a couple of twists that fooled me, which isn't easy in the comedy genre.
DISLIKES: Predictable Depressing at times Old jokes get a bit stale
Summary: With a simple story as this, it's not surprising that much of the story is predictable. Given the theme of the movie, you should be able to predict most of the ending, and certainly can guess where things are going to go wrong. Therefore, the uniqueness of this movie takes a hit in the story department. And no surprise, the comedy is also predictable and therefore loses the comedy edge they wanted to deliver at least to me. While the trailers do promote the more fun atmosphere of the movie, don't let it fool you that it is all happiness and rainbows (that's the Smurfs!). Going in style emphasizes the end of life generation, highlighting the less than glorious problems of getting older. There are parts that brought me down as they emphasized the sadder qualities of life. Thank goodness for the consistent comedy, because otherwise this could have been a much harder movie to watch. Of all the comedy this movie has in its folds, they certainly stuck with the old theme of this movie. Positives, there are plenty of quips and class to the punches they throw. Bad news, the quips get older than the actors delivering them. How many insults about difficulties getting up can you make, or metaphors for being poor and not having a check. It's good political awareness (nice work there writers), but it would have been nice for a little more variety to work its way into the vaudeville.
The VERDICT:
Going in Style is one of the classier, wittier comedies to end up in the theater this year. Both this reviewer and his friend, enjoyed the trade of simplistic one-liners and innuendos for a less aggressive comedy style that shows the traditional style has not been lost quite yet. Despite the trade up though, the movie is still very predictable and simplistic enough to still be stuck in the mediocre territory. As much fun as I had in the movie, there isn't much to warrant it for a movie theater visit, unless you are a fan of the traditional comedy and looking for a fun group/date movie.
My scores are:
Comedy/Crime: 7.5 Movie Overall: 6.0
LIKES: Classic comedy Good chemistry between actors Cute Nicely tied together story
Summary: If the intro didn't spoil it for you, Going in Style is true to its name, as the trio brings the classic comedy back into style. Fans of the slapstick of yore are going to bust a gut at this film as the timeless styles of the leads continue to shine bright. Caine and Freeman have comedic timing and delivery down, with clever lines craftily intertwined in the serious dialogue that put today's writing to shame. Arkin on the other hand is all about the banter and complaining, which for the most part is balanced and well-placed. The trio have great chemistry together, and sell that they are best friends who have faced the challenge called life. They sell the struggles and praise the joys, and do it with such class and minimizing the stupid, mindless banter famous today. And in addition to being funny, the lack of crude comedy also makes this movie cute. Watching older men trying to rob a bank, while also getting their lives in order makes for an adorable adventure as my friend commented. Of course, this reviewer likes a story to his comedy, and Going in Style gets this right too. It's a hardy story for most ages, and one that won't have the older audience members shaking their heads in shame. This may also surprise you, but there were a couple of twists that fooled me, which isn't easy in the comedy genre.
DISLIKES: Predictable Depressing at times Old jokes get a bit stale
Summary: With a simple story as this, it's not surprising that much of the story is predictable. Given the theme of the movie, you should be able to predict most of the ending, and certainly can guess where things are going to go wrong. Therefore, the uniqueness of this movie takes a hit in the story department. And no surprise, the comedy is also predictable and therefore loses the comedy edge they wanted to deliver at least to me. While the trailers do promote the more fun atmosphere of the movie, don't let it fool you that it is all happiness and rainbows (that's the Smurfs!). Going in style emphasizes the end of life generation, highlighting the less than glorious problems of getting older. There are parts that brought me down as they emphasized the sadder qualities of life. Thank goodness for the consistent comedy, because otherwise this could have been a much harder movie to watch. Of all the comedy this movie has in its folds, they certainly stuck with the old theme of this movie. Positives, there are plenty of quips and class to the punches they throw. Bad news, the quips get older than the actors delivering them. How many insults about difficulties getting up can you make, or metaphors for being poor and not having a check. It's good political awareness (nice work there writers), but it would have been nice for a little more variety to work its way into the vaudeville.
The VERDICT:
Going in Style is one of the classier, wittier comedies to end up in the theater this year. Both this reviewer and his friend, enjoyed the trade of simplistic one-liners and innuendos for a less aggressive comedy style that shows the traditional style has not been lost quite yet. Despite the trade up though, the movie is still very predictable and simplistic enough to still be stuck in the mediocre territory. As much fun as I had in the movie, there isn't much to warrant it for a movie theater visit, unless you are a fan of the traditional comedy and looking for a fun group/date movie.
My scores are:
Comedy/Crime: 7.5 Movie Overall: 6.0
'Going in Style': Review
Lleuq755 April 2017
Joyful, hilarious, touching, exciting. "Going in Style" fits in all these categories, proving how age does not – and should not – deprive actors of comedic spirit. Michael Cane ('Joe'), Morgan Freeman ('Willie'), and Alan Arkin ('Al') give such good performances to the point that moments of lack of subtlety – from both the script and the direction – are minimized instead of forgiven. It is a hell of a good time from beginning to end.
Down on their luck, the three old friends struggle to simply get through the day is becoming more unbearable each day. 'Joe' is under the pressure of bank eviction notices, 'Willie' has to overcome the distance from the family, and 'Al', well, could not care less as long as he is not alone. Alan Arkin, by the way, steals every scene – "Little Miss Sunshine" vibes.
Their situation reaches its breaking point when their pensions are frozen. The three leads decide to rob their mutual bank and this part of the plot is what defines this movie for what it is. On the one hand, it plays up, to the maximum level, all the possible jokes and funny moments applicable to the circumstance – and the payoff includes a supermarket scene that I will not forget so soon. Another way it works is with the sneaky and twisty nature of the bank robbery operation – orchestrated with the help of 'Jesus' (John Ortiz). These do not just make sense, but they are truly clever.
The part where it comes across as not as bright is in its efforts of justifying the leads actions. Of course, situations like this can and do very well happen, and are genuine injustices. Michael Cane sells that emotion with a few dramatic scenes involving his granddaughter in the film 'Brooklyn', played by Joey King. It is, however, in dealing with the circumstances of the robbery and the nature of such a situation that it falls short. Again, this is does not get in the way of it being a good and fully enjoyable film; it only keeps it from having that extra level of much appreciated sophistication.
Ultimately, "Going in Style" does what it came to theaters to do: get constant, big, and loud laughs from the audience. It provides spectators with incredible 90 or so minutes of good fun at the movies. Despite hilarious supporting performances by Christopher Lloyd as 'Milton' and Ann-Margaret as 'Annie', the three Oscar winners leads carry this film with such class and wit that it makes it really hard not to enjoy the trip to the theater.
7.5/10
Down on their luck, the three old friends struggle to simply get through the day is becoming more unbearable each day. 'Joe' is under the pressure of bank eviction notices, 'Willie' has to overcome the distance from the family, and 'Al', well, could not care less as long as he is not alone. Alan Arkin, by the way, steals every scene – "Little Miss Sunshine" vibes.
Their situation reaches its breaking point when their pensions are frozen. The three leads decide to rob their mutual bank and this part of the plot is what defines this movie for what it is. On the one hand, it plays up, to the maximum level, all the possible jokes and funny moments applicable to the circumstance – and the payoff includes a supermarket scene that I will not forget so soon. Another way it works is with the sneaky and twisty nature of the bank robbery operation – orchestrated with the help of 'Jesus' (John Ortiz). These do not just make sense, but they are truly clever.
The part where it comes across as not as bright is in its efforts of justifying the leads actions. Of course, situations like this can and do very well happen, and are genuine injustices. Michael Cane sells that emotion with a few dramatic scenes involving his granddaughter in the film 'Brooklyn', played by Joey King. It is, however, in dealing with the circumstances of the robbery and the nature of such a situation that it falls short. Again, this is does not get in the way of it being a good and fully enjoyable film; it only keeps it from having that extra level of much appreciated sophistication.
Ultimately, "Going in Style" does what it came to theaters to do: get constant, big, and loud laughs from the audience. It provides spectators with incredible 90 or so minutes of good fun at the movies. Despite hilarious supporting performances by Christopher Lloyd as 'Milton' and Ann-Margaret as 'Annie', the three Oscar winners leads carry this film with such class and wit that it makes it really hard not to enjoy the trip to the theater.
7.5/10
Good for what it is, which is good enough (though mostly for the cast)
Quinoa19847 April 2017
So here's the thing: if you told me, out of the blue, with no context whatsoever, that there was a heist flick with Michael Caine, Morgan Freeman, Alan Arkin and Ann-Margaret (or you could have me at just Caine) where they plot to rob the Brooklyn bank that's screwed them over after a royal f***-over from their blue collar job, I'd say 'sign me up!' That it would also be a comedy wouldn't be so bad an enticement either; one might be reminded of something that could've starred these same actors from the 70's (ever seen The Hot Rock?) and spiked with some relevant social issues. Matter of fact, as I only recently learned, this is a *remake* of a movie from the 70's (whether it had the same horrible-bank horrible-company thing I'm sure I don't know).
The problem is it's now 2017 and their age can't be taken out of the text of the film - this is the Grumpy Old Men or even The Bucket List of NYC heist movies - and the director Zach Braff is a hack. Sorry, but... no, I'm not sorry to type that. While I haven't Wish I Was Here, Garden State is not simply in retrospect but what I knew at the time to be an unconvincing and cloying indie that had some decent acting and (not mutually exclusive) some highly self-conscious directorial moves and writing that... well, it didn't date well then much less now.
I don't mean to beat up on Braff's film - good for him for making a movie, it wasn't a crime or anything - except to point to how in his third film out he has moved up to now making an unconvincing and typical and safe middle-brow comedy. It's not that the trailer even showed anything like an edge, but... damn, he could've tried, not to mention some twists and reveals near the end that made me groan so loud I got looks from some of the AARP folks in the theater. Oh, and the social issues are dealt kind of up front and we only sort of see the consequences/ramifications of what this does to people (it's closer to the depth of something like Tower Heist in that way).
And yet I have an admiration for this movie getting to see these faces and, at the least, Braff doesn't get too much in the way of Caine and Freeman and Arkin to do what they can with Melfi's also safe script. They work well together and I found myself laughing more than I expected from if not all of the dialog (though there's one or two clever moments from Melfi) then from how they deliver it. There's lifetimes of experience and knowledge and depths of pathos from these actors, even with Arkin who always seems to be Cranky-Ass Arkin (but this is likely an act, so to simply be this personality so convincingly is impressive), and they play off with as much comedy as they can get from the supporting cast like Christopher Lloyd as a dementia-ish Knights of Columbus fellow and Ann Margaret as Arkin's would-be love interest.
The heist itself is shown in broad strokes and we can buy it because, um, movie. I was fine with most of it, up until it strains credulity though this is largely when the alibis have to come out and all of the loose ends come together (and even here I could believe it, at least in the predictable-safe world its set in). Maybe my critical standards are getting rusty and I should harsher on this, not the least because it features a set-up involving a botched preparatory theft of... ingredients for Chicken Cordon-Bleu from a small super-market that is paid off in a way that makes less sense than it should. I wanted it to do a little more, but what it gave me was fine - I may just be a sucker for this cast and that, for what morsels they're given, they do as much and then some with it. It's an excellent Laundromat Movie: if it came on while I was doing/waiting for my laundry, I'd be highly satisfied.
In a theater.... ehhh... Extra points too for Matt Dillon as a non-plussed cop and a humorous Keenan Thompson as the security hack at the super-market.
The problem is it's now 2017 and their age can't be taken out of the text of the film - this is the Grumpy Old Men or even The Bucket List of NYC heist movies - and the director Zach Braff is a hack. Sorry, but... no, I'm not sorry to type that. While I haven't Wish I Was Here, Garden State is not simply in retrospect but what I knew at the time to be an unconvincing and cloying indie that had some decent acting and (not mutually exclusive) some highly self-conscious directorial moves and writing that... well, it didn't date well then much less now.
I don't mean to beat up on Braff's film - good for him for making a movie, it wasn't a crime or anything - except to point to how in his third film out he has moved up to now making an unconvincing and typical and safe middle-brow comedy. It's not that the trailer even showed anything like an edge, but... damn, he could've tried, not to mention some twists and reveals near the end that made me groan so loud I got looks from some of the AARP folks in the theater. Oh, and the social issues are dealt kind of up front and we only sort of see the consequences/ramifications of what this does to people (it's closer to the depth of something like Tower Heist in that way).
And yet I have an admiration for this movie getting to see these faces and, at the least, Braff doesn't get too much in the way of Caine and Freeman and Arkin to do what they can with Melfi's also safe script. They work well together and I found myself laughing more than I expected from if not all of the dialog (though there's one or two clever moments from Melfi) then from how they deliver it. There's lifetimes of experience and knowledge and depths of pathos from these actors, even with Arkin who always seems to be Cranky-Ass Arkin (but this is likely an act, so to simply be this personality so convincingly is impressive), and they play off with as much comedy as they can get from the supporting cast like Christopher Lloyd as a dementia-ish Knights of Columbus fellow and Ann Margaret as Arkin's would-be love interest.
The heist itself is shown in broad strokes and we can buy it because, um, movie. I was fine with most of it, up until it strains credulity though this is largely when the alibis have to come out and all of the loose ends come together (and even here I could believe it, at least in the predictable-safe world its set in). Maybe my critical standards are getting rusty and I should harsher on this, not the least because it features a set-up involving a botched preparatory theft of... ingredients for Chicken Cordon-Bleu from a small super-market that is paid off in a way that makes less sense than it should. I wanted it to do a little more, but what it gave me was fine - I may just be a sucker for this cast and that, for what morsels they're given, they do as much and then some with it. It's an excellent Laundromat Movie: if it came on while I was doing/waiting for my laundry, I'd be highly satisfied.
In a theater.... ehhh... Extra points too for Matt Dillon as a non-plussed cop and a humorous Keenan Thompson as the security hack at the super-market.
Great Friend Film
shadow_blade-894591 April 2019
"Going in Style (2017) is a professionally produced crime comedy about three lifelong friends who have fallen on hard times through the loss of their pension. Their plan to fix their financial woes comes in the form of a bank robber of their own personal bank that happens to control their pension. This is the second time I have watched this film and I love it every time. It is a reminder that there are good friends in the world that will go through the business with you. It also helps that some of my favorite actors are in the film. This is an overall great film and very sound technically.
For a comedy, the cinematography was surprising at how gripping it was in just the opening scene. The angles of the camera provided a glorious look into the bank that was far from boring. Director Zach Braff must have had the easiest job working with actors Morgan Freeman, Michael Caine, and Alan Arkin, which allowed him to be so creative in his shot selection and editing choices because the acting was so great. I believe the story is very strong, only because it is a comedy. I don't think it would be feasible to make a realistic heist movie with limited mobility elderly. Overall, I think this film is great and would recommend it to all that want to know what real friendship looks like.
For a comedy, the cinematography was surprising at how gripping it was in just the opening scene. The angles of the camera provided a glorious look into the bank that was far from boring. Director Zach Braff must have had the easiest job working with actors Morgan Freeman, Michael Caine, and Alan Arkin, which allowed him to be so creative in his shot selection and editing choices because the acting was so great. I believe the story is very strong, only because it is a comedy. I don't think it would be feasible to make a realistic heist movie with limited mobility elderly. Overall, I think this film is great and would recommend it to all that want to know what real friendship looks like.
A satisfying story
Gordon-119 May 2017
This film tells the story of three hard working pensioners, who have given decades of their lives working for a factory. One day, they are told that their pensions will be stopped, leaving them penniless. They come up with a plan to rob a bank to recuperate their lost pensions.
"Going in Style" seems to be a heist film, but most of the screen time is dedicated to setting the scene, and the planning process. THe actual heist has little screen time, but the story is engaging nonetheless. The desperation and frustration of them losing their pension is palpable, and evoke much sympathy from viewers. I like Alan Larkin's character, as he appears to be unapproachable and yet he is not like that deep down. Michael Caine is great as a man who is desperate as well. I enjoyed the story, and it gives me smiles and satisfaction.
"Going in Style" seems to be a heist film, but most of the screen time is dedicated to setting the scene, and the planning process. THe actual heist has little screen time, but the story is engaging nonetheless. The desperation and frustration of them losing their pension is palpable, and evoke much sympathy from viewers. I like Alan Larkin's character, as he appears to be unapproachable and yet he is not like that deep down. Michael Caine is great as a man who is desperate as well. I enjoyed the story, and it gives me smiles and satisfaction.
You're Never too Old to Get Even
ThomasDrufke6 April 2017
A story about 3 elderly gentleman wanting to rob a bank in retaliation for not receiving their pension funds is something out of a yahoo news article 3 pages down. But as ridiculous as the premise is, there's some unexpected enjoyment to be had here.
Going in Style is directed by Zach Braff of all people. The guy who brought us Garden State? Yep. I imagine this was a situation where he saw an opportunity to work with three of the greatest actors of this generation and took it, instead of this being some sort of passion project on his part. But that really is the selling point of the movie, Michael Caine, Morgan Freeman, and Alan Arkin. Each are legends on their own, but seeing all three of them together is a pleasure for any film fan. These three have taken some heat in the past about appearing in mediocre films and giving mediocre performances, with some even accusing them of "mailing it in". Luckily, there's none of that here. You can tell the three of them had a blast filming together and it clearly shows in the final product. The film won't knock your socks off, but I'll watch anything with these actors.
It's not all giggles, though. There's a deeper message in Going in Style about living your life until the very end, and not sitting back and letting others ruin your life. I'm not sure the film truly succeeded in that sense or I was getting a little sad at potentially watching my favorite actors realize their own mortality. Strangely enough, this is where the film is at its best. Whether its watching these guys tear up at the site of the granddaughters, or just busting each other over the smallest of things, I felt like I was watching them go through real-life issues. It sounds silly, especially considering they're all doing just fine financially in real life, but I felt really bad for these guys.
However, as expected, this movie is just plain ridiculous. The believability is off the charts and the writing is not good, to say the least. I like Theodore Melfi a lot, actually. St. Vincent is one of my favorite films of all time and Hidden Figures is gold, but I can't get behind his work here. I'm not sure whether it was a choice of some of the supporting actors, Braff's call, or in Melfi's script, but there's some really dumb stuff in this film.
As a whole, I had fun with Going in Style. It's far from perfect, and it can even be cringe worthy at times, but the emotions I got from seeing three actors you love truly sink their teeth into real- life problems of mortality was enough for me.
+Actors having a blast
+Well put together goofy heist film
-But sometimes it's a little too goofy
6.8/10
Going in Style is directed by Zach Braff of all people. The guy who brought us Garden State? Yep. I imagine this was a situation where he saw an opportunity to work with three of the greatest actors of this generation and took it, instead of this being some sort of passion project on his part. But that really is the selling point of the movie, Michael Caine, Morgan Freeman, and Alan Arkin. Each are legends on their own, but seeing all three of them together is a pleasure for any film fan. These three have taken some heat in the past about appearing in mediocre films and giving mediocre performances, with some even accusing them of "mailing it in". Luckily, there's none of that here. You can tell the three of them had a blast filming together and it clearly shows in the final product. The film won't knock your socks off, but I'll watch anything with these actors.
It's not all giggles, though. There's a deeper message in Going in Style about living your life until the very end, and not sitting back and letting others ruin your life. I'm not sure the film truly succeeded in that sense or I was getting a little sad at potentially watching my favorite actors realize their own mortality. Strangely enough, this is where the film is at its best. Whether its watching these guys tear up at the site of the granddaughters, or just busting each other over the smallest of things, I felt like I was watching them go through real-life issues. It sounds silly, especially considering they're all doing just fine financially in real life, but I felt really bad for these guys.
However, as expected, this movie is just plain ridiculous. The believability is off the charts and the writing is not good, to say the least. I like Theodore Melfi a lot, actually. St. Vincent is one of my favorite films of all time and Hidden Figures is gold, but I can't get behind his work here. I'm not sure whether it was a choice of some of the supporting actors, Braff's call, or in Melfi's script, but there's some really dumb stuff in this film.
As a whole, I had fun with Going in Style. It's far from perfect, and it can even be cringe worthy at times, but the emotions I got from seeing three actors you love truly sink their teeth into real- life problems of mortality was enough for me.
+Actors having a blast
+Well put together goofy heist film
-But sometimes it's a little too goofy
6.8/10
Going in Style review
JoeytheBrit9 May 2020
Extremely ordinary comedy that relies on the charm and chemistry of its geriatric stars to elevate it beyond the quality of the writing. Any movie that gets no laughs out of Caine and Freeman getting high on weed has to be doing something wrong...
old geezer bank robbers
SnoopyStyle24 December 2017
Joe Harding (Michael Caine) goes to the bank to confront his banker who is threatening to take his home. He has his daughter Rachel and granddaughter Brooklyn (Joey King) living with him. He witnesses a bank robbery and FBI Agent Arlen Hamer (Matt Dillon) dismisses him. He, and his friends Willie Davis (Morgan Freeman) and Albert Garner (Alan Arkin) lose their pension after a merger that moves the plant overseas. Willie needs a kidney and Albert has a fling with Annie Santori (Ann-Margret). As difficulties mount, the guys decide to rob a bank.
This should be better than this. The grocery store robbery is silly. I'd rather they go buy guns and do a straight up robbery movie. They could skip a lot of this. Ann-Margret adds little more than senior babe quotient. The robbery and what happens after lacks reality. Not that reality should be holding this back. I do like some moments like the fake tattoo and finding the bank has taken their pension fund. This needs more. It needs to be funnier and/or more thrilling. The caper needs to be sharper. Zach Braff does a competent job and the movie is generally competent but not more than that.
This should be better than this. The grocery store robbery is silly. I'd rather they go buy guns and do a straight up robbery movie. They could skip a lot of this. Ann-Margret adds little more than senior babe quotient. The robbery and what happens after lacks reality. Not that reality should be holding this back. I do like some moments like the fake tattoo and finding the bank has taken their pension fund. This needs more. It needs to be funnier and/or more thrilling. The caper needs to be sharper. Zach Braff does a competent job and the movie is generally competent but not more than that.
Minimal plot with not many funny moments
SafReviews13 January 2020
I'm a bit disappointed with this movie as I was expecting it too be funny, but there were only like a couple of funny moments. I thought that the plot was very basic, but still a bit intriguing. I was expecting the heist to be a bit thrilling, but It wasn't at all and it felt too easy and unrealistic, especially considering the age of the robbers. Overall, it's not the worst movie, but for me it didn't really excite and thrill me like a heist or even a comedy movie should.
Zach Braff's third film
LeoAlexson6 April 2017
Personally, I really like the works of Zach Braff, I fell in love with him in the series "Scrubs", which, thanks to the actor's play of Braff, delighted the fans for many years. Later I became interested in his first feature film "Garden State", which showed an unusual director's style of Braff. Then, after many years, the second film "Wish i Was Here" appeared, in which the matured director shared with the audience his experiences about the upbringing of children and death. Before watching "Going in Style" i found out that the film is a remake of the same picture released in 1979, this prompted me first to see it. Let's move on to the film itself.
Actors Actors on the main roles, Braff took the first magnitude: Morgan Freeman, Michael Kane, Alan Arkin. Each of the actors is already a professional in their field, so they played at their good level: convincingly and vigorously. This film is the sixth joint work of Morgan Freeman and Michael Kane after the trilogy of Christopher Nolan about Batman and the "Now You See Me" dialog. Not a bad role was the young actress Joey King, who played the granddaughter of the character Michael Caine. I think that the actress will have many good and interesting roles in the future. Also pleased with the appearance of Christopher Lloyd, who was remembered by the majority for the role of Dr. Emmett Brown in the trilogy "Back to the Future".
Story As I wrote earlier, before watching this film, I already looked at the version of 1979. When I went to the film, I assumed that I would see the story one by one, only with the eyes of another director. But, as it turned out, the film's writers foresaw this and pleasantly surprised me by changing the plot in key places. Both films, the 1979 film and the Braff movie are based on the work of Edward Cannon.
Cinematography Separately, I would like to note the excellent and beautiful camera-work of Rodney Charters, which positively influenced the film and created for him a memorable style.
The Result Although the film is not based on the original script of Zach Braff, his style is still very clearly traced in the picture. I believe that under the leadership of Braff, the film turned out to be much more energetic and cheerful compared to the previous interpretation of the work of Edward Cannon. Remained pleasantly surprised and pleased of film. I look forward to the next product of Braff.
9 out of 10
Actors Actors on the main roles, Braff took the first magnitude: Morgan Freeman, Michael Kane, Alan Arkin. Each of the actors is already a professional in their field, so they played at their good level: convincingly and vigorously. This film is the sixth joint work of Morgan Freeman and Michael Kane after the trilogy of Christopher Nolan about Batman and the "Now You See Me" dialog. Not a bad role was the young actress Joey King, who played the granddaughter of the character Michael Caine. I think that the actress will have many good and interesting roles in the future. Also pleased with the appearance of Christopher Lloyd, who was remembered by the majority for the role of Dr. Emmett Brown in the trilogy "Back to the Future".
Story As I wrote earlier, before watching this film, I already looked at the version of 1979. When I went to the film, I assumed that I would see the story one by one, only with the eyes of another director. But, as it turned out, the film's writers foresaw this and pleasantly surprised me by changing the plot in key places. Both films, the 1979 film and the Braff movie are based on the work of Edward Cannon.
Cinematography Separately, I would like to note the excellent and beautiful camera-work of Rodney Charters, which positively influenced the film and created for him a memorable style.
The Result Although the film is not based on the original script of Zach Braff, his style is still very clearly traced in the picture. I believe that under the leadership of Braff, the film turned out to be much more energetic and cheerful compared to the previous interpretation of the work of Edward Cannon. Remained pleasantly surprised and pleased of film. I look forward to the next product of Braff.
9 out of 10
Best comedy in the year
cj27556 April 2017
The movie was the best thing, which could happen to me in sneak preview. I laughed so often, an wonderful story combined with great actors and Zach Braff, who made a great job to transform the old movie into todays background. I'd like to see more movies like this, than the stupid standard comedy from Hollywood. I recommend everyone to see this film and have great two hours. A quick summary: perfect chosen actor,s a bit predictable, but i liked it anyway, jokes,jokes,jokes... GO watch this film !
Clear that the Cast Were Enjoying Themselves
derek-duerden17 October 2021
Not the best heist or buddy movie, or comedy, in anyone's books, I suspect - but perfectly enjoyable fare if you are in the market for an undemanding evening's viewing.
Mostly, it keeps things "plausible enough" - although they all looked too old to still be working in the first place, and the "practice" supermarket robbery was just too silly for me. However, the manager there (and Matt Dillon's cop throughout) added hugely to the sense of fun. Not awful.
Mostly, it keeps things "plausible enough" - although they all looked too old to still be working in the first place, and the "practice" supermarket robbery was just too silly for me. However, the manager there (and Matt Dillon's cop throughout) added hugely to the sense of fun. Not awful.
Lame Cookie-Cutter Comedy
rioplaydrum5 May 2017
Since I'm on the verge of not being much of a youngin' anymore myself, I took a particular interest in this story.
Early on we get a fair idea of what it is to be elderly in a fast moving, youth obsessed society that basically treats it's elderly with condescending and patronizing attitudes at best.
That's as edgy as it gets. After around twenty minutes, the plot becomes quickly deluded with Luke-warm silliness that weighs in about one or two rungs above fart jokes. The humor is contrived and not funny.
Rather than explore the issues of aging more deeply (and yes, I'm well aware it was supposed to be a comedy), what we get is a buffoonish parade of supporting rolls around our central characters, from a bank manager who pees his pants to a variety of other morons not even worth mentioning.
Veteran actors Cain, Freeman, Arkin, Margret and Lloyd are completely diminished by the constant childish antics more befitting of a long forgotten made for TV movie-of-the-week.
If you still sleep with a teddy bear, you might like it.
If not, you'll find it as I did: Infantile and painfully dumb.
Completely forgettable.
Early on we get a fair idea of what it is to be elderly in a fast moving, youth obsessed society that basically treats it's elderly with condescending and patronizing attitudes at best.
That's as edgy as it gets. After around twenty minutes, the plot becomes quickly deluded with Luke-warm silliness that weighs in about one or two rungs above fart jokes. The humor is contrived and not funny.
Rather than explore the issues of aging more deeply (and yes, I'm well aware it was supposed to be a comedy), what we get is a buffoonish parade of supporting rolls around our central characters, from a bank manager who pees his pants to a variety of other morons not even worth mentioning.
Veteran actors Cain, Freeman, Arkin, Margret and Lloyd are completely diminished by the constant childish antics more befitting of a long forgotten made for TV movie-of-the-week.
If you still sleep with a teddy bear, you might like it.
If not, you'll find it as I did: Infantile and painfully dumb.
Completely forgettable.
more than nice
Kirpianuscus4 February 2022
I saw this film especially for Ann Margret. Sure, a sort of nostalgia. And I love it for premise more than for story itself or for humor. A lovely comedy, unrealistic, absurd in many scenes but just lovely. And that fact, like the cast, no doubts, gives to it status of must see it for some fun, some good state, some tention and few smiles.
Fun Movie
bighallee7 April 2017
It is a fun movie for the older crowd. Three very good actors make good movie better. Being 72 I can relate to their dilemmas. A few good laughs. I would recommend it for the older folks. Young people might not feel empathy for the elders. It's nice to see a movie that relates to everyday problems of real people.
"Going in Style" is a fun, although unrealistic, senior citizen adventure and whether it improves on the original film is open for debate.
dave-mcclain8 April 2017
2017's geriatric crime comedy "Going in Style" (PG-13, 1:36) is a remake of the 1979 film of the same name. That one starred legendary comedian George Burns, whose seven-decade career spanned vaudeville, radio, TV and movies, Art Carney, who had even more acting credits than Burns, and who, like Burns, had also moved from mainly TV shows to mainly movies, and legendary theater founder, acting coach and actor in his own right, Lee Strasberg. Oh, and Burns and Carney had each won an Oscar and Strasberg had been nominated, all less than five years prior to appearing together on film. The remake stars Morgan Freeman, Sir Michael Caine and Alan Arkin, three actors with similarly prestigious, lengthy and diverse careers, and all three with Oscars to boot. It's also worth noting that the original was written and directed by Martin Brest, who had only directed a couple other films before "Going in Style", but went on to direct "Beverly Hills Cop", "Midnight Run" and "Scent of a Woman", while the remake's director, Zach Braff, started acting professionally in the late 1980s and directed a handful of films before 2017 (including 2004's cult favorite "Garden State" and 2014's well-received "Wish I Was Here"), all seeming to signal an even brighter future ahead for the auteur who turned 42 years old the day before his movie was released. But does Braff's version of "Going in Style" help further his blossoming career? And is the movie a highlight or a footnote in the careers of its accomplished stars? "Going in Style" features three curmudgeonly septuagenarians who have been friends for decades, having worked together long enough to earn pensions from Wechsler Steel. In retirement, they see each other every day, playing Bocce in the park, hanging out at their local lodge, sharing meals, and watching TV together, to include shows like "The Bachelorette". It helps that Albert (Alan Arkin) and Willie (Morgan Freeman) share a house. Albert is a confirmed bachelor and has no interest in changing his status, in spite of the ongoing flirtations of sweet and sexy grocery store employee Annie (Ann-Margaret). Willie Skypes with his daughter and granddaughter, but can't visit them because, like his friends, he doesn't have much money – and he has a serious kidney problem (which he is keeping from his friends). Joe (Michael Caine) is struggling to pay his mortgage, but is providing a home to his divorced daughter and her tween daughter. Joe is a devoted grandfather to the precocious Brooklyn (Joey King), whose absentee father, Peter (Peter Serafinowicz) has about as much growing-up to do as his little girl.
The money problems of the three best friends become practically insurmountable when their former company announces that it is moving all its operations out of the country – and taking its pension fund with it. Initially very angry at their former employers and very fearful about their financial futures, they decide to do something about their situation. Joe had recently been at his bank talking to a squirrelly and unsympathetic loan officer (Josh Pais) in a futile attempt to fend off foreclosure when the bank is robbed with impressive efficiency by three masked men using automatic weapons. After the pension bombshell, the three old gents find out that Joe's bank is managing Wechsler's finances and Joe suggests robbing that bank to recover their pensions. After some discussion, bickering and persuasion, the guys decide to warm up with a grocery store food heist which goes predictably and comically wrong. The grocery store manager (Keenan Thompson) decides to give them a break and not press charges.
Joe, Willie and Albert decide that they need professional help of the criminal variety. Joe goes to his deadbeat former son-in-law (who manages a shady medical marijuana shop and whom Joe calls a "lowlife character"), hoping that Peter can put them in touch with an even shadier (and smarter) element. Peter links up the wannabe bank robbers with a man named Jesus (John Ortiz) who agrees to teach, train and mentor the guys in exchange for 25% of the take, IF they can avoid tipping their hand to the authorities and actually pull off the robbery. But all this is just the movie's set-up. With a suspicious FBI agent named Hamer (Matt Dillon) seemingly on to the trio, whether they go through with their planned bank robbery (and/or steer clear of law enforcement) is far from the end of this story.
"Going in Style" is a fun, although unrealistic, senior citizen adventure and whether it improves on the original film is open for debate. I found the remake more solid and more enjoyable than the original, but the IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes ratings beg to differ. Director Braff and screenwriter Theodore Melfi ("St. Vincent", "Hidden Figures") successfully update the 1979 version for the 21st century, make it a bit more realistic and give it a more satisfying conclusion, but allow for serious plot holes. The three stars are excellent in their roles, but some overacting from the supporting players (especially Pais) damage the overall effect. The first half of the movie isn't as funny or entertaining as it wants to be, but the latter part of the film mostly makes up for that. The remake doesn't do much for the careers of those in front of or behind the camera, but doesn't hurt them either. The movie is enjoyable, but unremarkable. "B"
The money problems of the three best friends become practically insurmountable when their former company announces that it is moving all its operations out of the country – and taking its pension fund with it. Initially very angry at their former employers and very fearful about their financial futures, they decide to do something about their situation. Joe had recently been at his bank talking to a squirrelly and unsympathetic loan officer (Josh Pais) in a futile attempt to fend off foreclosure when the bank is robbed with impressive efficiency by three masked men using automatic weapons. After the pension bombshell, the three old gents find out that Joe's bank is managing Wechsler's finances and Joe suggests robbing that bank to recover their pensions. After some discussion, bickering and persuasion, the guys decide to warm up with a grocery store food heist which goes predictably and comically wrong. The grocery store manager (Keenan Thompson) decides to give them a break and not press charges.
Joe, Willie and Albert decide that they need professional help of the criminal variety. Joe goes to his deadbeat former son-in-law (who manages a shady medical marijuana shop and whom Joe calls a "lowlife character"), hoping that Peter can put them in touch with an even shadier (and smarter) element. Peter links up the wannabe bank robbers with a man named Jesus (John Ortiz) who agrees to teach, train and mentor the guys in exchange for 25% of the take, IF they can avoid tipping their hand to the authorities and actually pull off the robbery. But all this is just the movie's set-up. With a suspicious FBI agent named Hamer (Matt Dillon) seemingly on to the trio, whether they go through with their planned bank robbery (and/or steer clear of law enforcement) is far from the end of this story.
"Going in Style" is a fun, although unrealistic, senior citizen adventure and whether it improves on the original film is open for debate. I found the remake more solid and more enjoyable than the original, but the IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes ratings beg to differ. Director Braff and screenwriter Theodore Melfi ("St. Vincent", "Hidden Figures") successfully update the 1979 version for the 21st century, make it a bit more realistic and give it a more satisfying conclusion, but allow for serious plot holes. The three stars are excellent in their roles, but some overacting from the supporting players (especially Pais) damage the overall effect. The first half of the movie isn't as funny or entertaining as it wants to be, but the latter part of the film mostly makes up for that. The remake doesn't do much for the careers of those in front of or behind the camera, but doesn't hurt them either. The movie is enjoyable, but unremarkable. "B"
A good solid comedy
mick12035912 October 2019
This is another one of those films that I've been meaning to watch and I've only just got round to it and I have to say, I wish I had watched it sooner.
It's a lovely little film with some good laughs and great characters played by some acting greats.
While this film will never go down as one of the greats of Hollywood, it is none the less a good old fashioned comedy with a good story line.
Some of the critics are trying to poke holes in it, and to be fair there are a few little hiccups and goofs, but it's a comedy, it's not supposed to be that accurate.
Watch it for what it is, A good old school comedy, and you will enjoy it as much as I did.
Funniest Movie We've Seen All Year!
rannynm8 April 2017
Out of all of the movies that I have seen this year, this movie is by far the funniest. Within five minutes, my stomach hurt because I was laughing so much.
I love a comedic plot and Going In Style is exactly that - three older men try to rob a bank to obtain a better life. These lifelong friends, Willie, Al and Joe, are having personal struggles. Willie (Morgan Freeman) desperately needs a new kidney. Joe (Michael Caine) is losing his home. And, Al (Alan Arkin) is just pressured into robbing a bank. Joe thinks of making the idea a reality once their pensions are canceled. Inspired by a robbery the men witnessed, Willie, Joe and Al are optimistic they can steal their deserved pension money, but are going to need help.
Morgan Freeman's portrayal of Willie is incredible. Given that Willie needs a new kidney to better his life, Freeman's despair is heart-wrenching and he connects with the audience in a unique way, because he remains hopeful that he will feel better in the near future. Michael Caine really suits the role of Joe whose fearless personality helps accelerate the success of the robbery. Alan Arkin plays Al who acts innocent at first, but once the robbery becomes a reality, you see his wild side emerge and it is quite hilarious.
The costumes worn by Willie, Joe and Al are extremely entertaining. They wear masks that resemble famous people! In addition to this, the bank they plan to rob is very fancy. Seeing famous people walk into an elegant bank with guns and large bags is humorous to watch. My favorite part is when Joe and Willie are watching television and The Bachelorette comes on. This scene had me laughing the entire time because I am a such a Bachelorette fan. Seeing these older men discuss Kaitlyn Bristowe's final pick was unexpected, but gave me a good laugh.
The message of this film is to chase after your dreams, no matter how old you are. If 70 year old men can rob a bank, then you can too. All humor aside, the film illustrates that nothing is impossible and you can better your life if you want to. Hands down, this film deserves 5 out of 5 stars. There are a multitude of jokes, action scenes and the motivation that these three men possess to reunite with their families and better their lives is so strong. It motivates me to jump over any obstacle in my way and complete any task I need to. I recommend this film to kids ages 13 to 18, because it leaves you with a smile on your face. Even though it is about robbing a bank, kids know to not replicate that, so I'm not concerned about them heading out to rob their neighborhood bank.
There are a few shooting scenes, so please be mindful about who goes to see this film. Adults will love this film as well, because they can relate to the personal issues these men face. It has something for everyone and if you have never seen three older men rob a bank, you definitely should.
By Samantha M., KIDS FIRST! Film Critic.
I love a comedic plot and Going In Style is exactly that - three older men try to rob a bank to obtain a better life. These lifelong friends, Willie, Al and Joe, are having personal struggles. Willie (Morgan Freeman) desperately needs a new kidney. Joe (Michael Caine) is losing his home. And, Al (Alan Arkin) is just pressured into robbing a bank. Joe thinks of making the idea a reality once their pensions are canceled. Inspired by a robbery the men witnessed, Willie, Joe and Al are optimistic they can steal their deserved pension money, but are going to need help.
Morgan Freeman's portrayal of Willie is incredible. Given that Willie needs a new kidney to better his life, Freeman's despair is heart-wrenching and he connects with the audience in a unique way, because he remains hopeful that he will feel better in the near future. Michael Caine really suits the role of Joe whose fearless personality helps accelerate the success of the robbery. Alan Arkin plays Al who acts innocent at first, but once the robbery becomes a reality, you see his wild side emerge and it is quite hilarious.
The costumes worn by Willie, Joe and Al are extremely entertaining. They wear masks that resemble famous people! In addition to this, the bank they plan to rob is very fancy. Seeing famous people walk into an elegant bank with guns and large bags is humorous to watch. My favorite part is when Joe and Willie are watching television and The Bachelorette comes on. This scene had me laughing the entire time because I am a such a Bachelorette fan. Seeing these older men discuss Kaitlyn Bristowe's final pick was unexpected, but gave me a good laugh.
The message of this film is to chase after your dreams, no matter how old you are. If 70 year old men can rob a bank, then you can too. All humor aside, the film illustrates that nothing is impossible and you can better your life if you want to. Hands down, this film deserves 5 out of 5 stars. There are a multitude of jokes, action scenes and the motivation that these three men possess to reunite with their families and better their lives is so strong. It motivates me to jump over any obstacle in my way and complete any task I need to. I recommend this film to kids ages 13 to 18, because it leaves you with a smile on your face. Even though it is about robbing a bank, kids know to not replicate that, so I'm not concerned about them heading out to rob their neighborhood bank.
There are a few shooting scenes, so please be mindful about who goes to see this film. Adults will love this film as well, because they can relate to the personal issues these men face. It has something for everyone and if you have never seen three older men rob a bank, you definitely should.
By Samantha M., KIDS FIRST! Film Critic.
Thoroughly adequate....nothing more.
planktonrules1 September 2018
"Going in Style" was a movie that debuted back in 1979. Now, 38 years later, Hollywood has done a remake of this comedy. I am not particularly a fan of remakes...and this one did nothing to change my opinion.
Three old men have just learned their pension fund has been looted...so they decide to rob a bank (the connection seemed to make little sense to me). The film is about these old geezers (Alan Arkin, Morgan Freeman and Michael Caine) and their robbery....which came off amazingly well considering none of them had committed any crimes before this.
The problem with the film is the 'meh factor'. In other words, after seeing the film, I felt very ambivalent....and I neither liked nor disliked it. A time-passer....nothing more.
Three old men have just learned their pension fund has been looted...so they decide to rob a bank (the connection seemed to make little sense to me). The film is about these old geezers (Alan Arkin, Morgan Freeman and Michael Caine) and their robbery....which came off amazingly well considering none of them had committed any crimes before this.
The problem with the film is the 'meh factor'. In other words, after seeing the film, I felt very ambivalent....and I neither liked nor disliked it. A time-passer....nothing more.
Okay remake
Wizard-88 September 2017
I did see the original 1979 "Going In Style" movie some years ago, and I remember enjoying it, one reason being that while it was officially a comedy, it had a serious edge to it that helped prevent it from becoming too cornball. It wasn't a surprise to me that the serious edge to this story was lessened in this remake - the majority of most modern day movies try to be feel-good exercises from start to end. The strange thing is that when this remake does try to be serious, it comes up with the best scenes in the movie. And the movie at its worse is when it tries to be real jokey and cornball. The movie does remain watchable, however, mainly due to the performances of the three lead actors, who are very likable and appealing. Also, I admit that I was never bored at any moment. All the same, if you have a choice between watching the original movie or this remake, I would suggest you watch the original... though there are definitely a lot of movies that are much worse than this okay remake.
Very Enjoyable
rutzelb3 August 2017
Having lost their pensions and in great need of money Joe (Caine), Willie (Freeman) and Al (Arkin) decide there is only one thing to do: rob their bank.
This is not a strong comedy, but the dialogues and very good chemistry among Joe, Willie and Al insure a very enjoyable movie.
The stealing of produce from a grocery store didn't make any sense to me, but the FBI found the videos of the three helpful later on. Guess that is why those scenes were included. Either that or they needed more time for .well something.
To pull the robbery off they need help and get it from Jesus (John Ortiz) a sort of criminal who helps them with bank layout details, alibis and so on.
The three do rob the bank and Joe, being interviewed by FBI Agent Hamer (Matt Dillon) after the robbery, tells Agent Hamer that he watches the TV show LAW AND ORDER and they solve the crime faster than he (Hamer) does and he should watch it some time.
Do they get caught? The alibis are so solid they cannot be broken. The FBI is pretty sure these 3-guys robbed the bank, but they cannot find enough evidence to charge them. This is all very clever and very enjoyable. Then Agent Hamer wants to do a line-up with that little girl who was in the bank when the three robbed it. So a little tension creeps in. Oh, oh.
There is a twist later on that involves Jesus. Keep an eye when he meets Joe in the diner. This one will surprise everyone.
Notables: Christopher Lloyd as Milton a worker in the soup kitchen; Ann Margret as Annie the love interest to Al.
All in all an enjoyable and delightful movie, with good pacing and some funny lines at times. (7/10)
Violence: No. Sex: No. Nudity: No. Language: One F-bomb was heard. Brief soft stuff otherwise.
This is not a strong comedy, but the dialogues and very good chemistry among Joe, Willie and Al insure a very enjoyable movie.
The stealing of produce from a grocery store didn't make any sense to me, but the FBI found the videos of the three helpful later on. Guess that is why those scenes were included. Either that or they needed more time for .well something.
To pull the robbery off they need help and get it from Jesus (John Ortiz) a sort of criminal who helps them with bank layout details, alibis and so on.
The three do rob the bank and Joe, being interviewed by FBI Agent Hamer (Matt Dillon) after the robbery, tells Agent Hamer that he watches the TV show LAW AND ORDER and they solve the crime faster than he (Hamer) does and he should watch it some time.
Do they get caught? The alibis are so solid they cannot be broken. The FBI is pretty sure these 3-guys robbed the bank, but they cannot find enough evidence to charge them. This is all very clever and very enjoyable. Then Agent Hamer wants to do a line-up with that little girl who was in the bank when the three robbed it. So a little tension creeps in. Oh, oh.
There is a twist later on that involves Jesus. Keep an eye when he meets Joe in the diner. This one will surprise everyone.
Notables: Christopher Lloyd as Milton a worker in the soup kitchen; Ann Margret as Annie the love interest to Al.
All in all an enjoyable and delightful movie, with good pacing and some funny lines at times. (7/10)
Violence: No. Sex: No. Nudity: No. Language: One F-bomb was heard. Brief soft stuff otherwise.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
